>formation only has 3 defenders
>he thinks formation matters
>formation only has 1 striker
>formation has two strikers
>>69123608
>7-1
>>69123572
>It's an Italy episode
>>69123785
BOO!
>only 3
Dumbfuck. A back of 3 is much more defensive than a back of 4.
>>69123654
This
>>69123891
good post.
>his formation has 3 strikers
I run a 5 2 1 2 on fifa
Am i a meme
>His team doesnt play patrician 3-5-2
>>69124110
PART
>>69125187
TIME
>>69124981
>he doesn't play 4-1-4-1
>>69124869
was gonna say yes but this has me on the fence:
http://forum.ea.com/uk/posts/list/2951510.page
3-5-2 is the true GOAT
>>69125231
MANAGER
>FOUR
>FOUR
>FUCKING
>TWO
>>69124057
Unless of course your full backs can defend rather than being deep lying wingers which I know is a foreign concept to your lot
>>69125517
Using actual defenders on a back 4 is idiotic. Rather have 3 CBs. The most important notion on that aspect is positioning, which can be learned more easily than tackling or marking. No use to have 4 '''real''' defenders.
e.g. see how Belgium is shit.
>>69126922
By "that aspect" I mean "being a full back" if it isn't clear
