>Tfw he'll start against Slovakia
He was pretty good when he came on desu
>>68530197
Good, wear them down then bring on the pace
Can someone remind me how much this lad cost?
start rashford?
>>68530197
Martin Skrtel will accidentally snap him in half and they won't have to worry about him anymore
>>68530197
He doesn't look like he gives a shit anymore. His confidence is shot.
He hardly fights for the ball, doesn't make runs. His shooting is fucking awful
>>68530252
£50 million
>>68530252
£60M
>le hasn't improved in 3 years man
>>68530252
20p and a blowie from our stella be'ind t' bins luv
KANE IS WORSE
T. UNITED FAN
VARDY AND STUDGE AND/OR RASHFORD PLEASE @@@@@@@@@@@@@@ WOY OUT
>>68530197
well he did score the winner
>>68530322
This kek, massive Suarez babby
>>68530252
600 Million
lellegrini sabotaged this brave englishman desu
Why aren't I manager?
>>68530252
1 Fernando Torres
>>68530197
I want him to start
Fucking nobody else in the team can play on the left, Rashford ran into just as many challenges as he did when he went out on the wing
>>68530436
because you've got sturridge on the wing
>>68530268
Na, he's better as an impact sub to get at tired fullbacks. Start Vardy on the left wing and Sturrshit upfront.
>>68530535
>Vardy on the left wing
Lets just shoehorn anyone in to play out of position.
>>68530597
Better than le runs into defenders and misses sitters man starting
>>68530535
>memeford
>having any kind of positive impact at all
>>68530197
Since when does Kendrick Lamar play soccer
>>68530197
There's no reason for him to start over Vardy, he's shown nothing for Man City or England to suggest that he's a better player.
>>68530597
England's "wingers" play so far inside that they might as well be strikers anyway. Better to have Vardy in that role than Sterling, at least he can score. Same goes for Sturridge over Lallana, even though Lallana was decent today.
Doubt he will. Woy took him off at half time, he's probably not happy with him at all.
I'm more concerned about Alli starting desu.
Time for Wilshere to get his chance.
>>68530816
>american football knowledge
>>68530861
this. kane, sterling and alli out
wilshere, sturridge vardy in
you now remember sturridge - suarez - sterling at liverpool and how goat they were before the slip
do that with vardy in the center ffs
>>68530916
Why not Vardy-Kane-Sturridge?
>>68530861
How about we try Alli on the left and Sterling at CM?
>>68530939
8/8
>>68530947
Or tell Alli to fuck off and put the superior player in Wilshere in.
>>68530947
>Sterling at CM
Has he ever played there before? He was an attacking mid sometimes for Liverpool iirc, but he never did much defensive work
>>68530436
Sturridge isn't a winger
Sturridge has a better scoring rate than Vardy and Kane in the league...
>>68530252
Still don't blame him for leaving.
He was better than Liverpool at the time. Brenny was a fucking fraud. He played him at defensive midfield once for fucks sake. I would want out after that shambles too.
He was good in his early days at City, maybe Pep can bring something out of him.
>>68530869
he's right
our fullbacks are basically wingers
>>68530981
>Wilshere
kek
>>68531025
>Brenny was a fucking fraud
Brenny made Sterling
>>68530197
STOP IGNORING THE POWER OF MEME WOY!!!
>>68530197
will pep keep keep him?
will he even work under his system?
>>68530869
I just looked to me like Sterling and Lallana weren't actually playing as wingers, they were too far inside and England was depending on Walker and Rose to provide width
>>68531049
Wilshere's England form is on another level. He's brilliant for them.
If he's fit he should play, simple as that.
England's best player from a technical standpoint.
>Le Other No End Product Man
these memsters keep thinking they can be Robben but they're not. Sterling is one of the dumbest players ive seen on the pitch.
>le BTFO sevilla man
think salty liverpool fans must have cursed him half way through the season
>>68531202
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7yqEPrPZME
They really don't like him
>>68530197
Rashford needs to start next game, hes too direct. Give him more than a cameo and you will all feel the power
>>68530436
>sturridge on the wing
>la no end product man anywhere
>>68530197
>Sterling
>Kane
>Hart
They are fucking shit, how are they even lauded wtf they suck dick. EPL must be some sort of joke.
>>68530985
if you play 1 game and score 1 goal that's a 100% scoring rate.
>>68531466
>ABE's ARE LITERALLY SEETHING
>>68530981
>Wilshere
not box to box, he's a replacement for rooney
>>68530816
today was different, england were playing against 3 at the back. lallana does drift inside a bit but you want a player who plays wide on the other side.
>>68530270
"accidentally"
>>68531150
>Wilshere's England form is on another level. He's brilliant for them.
rooney played better than him
>>68531700
I'm talking about his overall form for England.
The amount of MOTM performances he picks up is unreal. And they're all 100% deserved MOTM performances where he's the best player on the pitch.
He's okay for Arsenal, but for England he's on another level. Undeniable fact. ABWs need to go.
>tfw your wife says "no butt stuff tonight"
Why even live lads
>>68531516
43 in 68 for liverpool
>>68531848
and practically all in last season
>>68531767
thats what you get for marrying a trap
>>68530465
>1 Fernando Torres
Unironically enough even when he's shit he still delivers something, be it a penalty, an assist, a late goal or whatever
Sterling can't play for fucking shit it's a shame
If only Sturridge wasn't made of glass
>>68531750
yes, but rooney looked better against russia than wilshere did. so i would start rooney and keep dele alli to get forward
>>68530197
He's the black Shaun Wright-Phillips
>>68531767
unless she gives a reason, rape her. you make the decisions, not her.
>>68531957
But Alli's been bad and Rooney's been good and Wilshere is good.
So start Rooney and Wilshere and tell Alli to fuck off.
>>68532010
I keep thinking Alli is a walking red card, he's so easy to wind up, almost Costa level but at least Costa can dish it out too
>>68530252
1 billion
>>68530197
FRAUDE!
>>68531879
>year of our lord and savior Jesus Christ MMXVI
>not rating lady peepees