i want to have a serious discussion. who is better?
>>68000090
curry and its not even close
The one with a ring that could average more than 20ppg
>>68000098
but why
>>68000090
Curry > Smush Parker > Steve "A Fucking Leaf" Nash
'07 suns vs '14 warrios
who wins?
>>68000090
Fun fact that nobody probably cares about, Steve Nash played college basketball with MLB player Randy Winn at Santa Clara
>>68000111
Better shooter, better handles, better defender, better at the rim, better shot creator, hotter wife. Only thing Nash has is better passing, and Curry is almost there.
>>68000145
>Randy Winn
literally who
>>68000157
>better shooter
>better at the rim
welcome to the 50-40-90 club steph i'm sure you'll have a great career
better shot creator makes me kek.. nash was past-first
>>68000159
He was alright. Made a couple all star teams I think
>>68000090
nash is the better player so far. you dont win championsihps by yourself you do it with a team so curry is a little overrated. just a little.
nash shot better and set his teammates up WAY better. and this dude sayin "curry > nash at the rim" is delusional. nash missed very few at layups
>>68000241
>scoring doesn't matter
>>68000157
>better shooter
Explain the chart in OPs pic
>>68000245
>set his teammates up WAY better
did you miss that part?
>>68000269
wrong guy
meant this guy:
>>68000241
>>68000254
Curry wasn't as good early in his career. Compare Currys last two years to nash mvps years.
>>68000254
Hint: does the chart include volume? If not, why not? It's almost like someone is using a partial view of the stats to make some dumb-ass case.
>>68000254
nash wasn't a volume shooter.
curry's fg% are more impressive considering how many shots he takes from these ranges
>>68000125
Robert Horry.
>>68000172
Nash is better at assist than curry. However John Stockton had so many assist nobody catching that dude. I believe the closest to him is cp3 and I think he's like 2 thousand short or something crazy like that.
>>68000172
Ooh wait, shot creater for himself or teammates? If you mean creating for yourself then curry is better.
If the warriors win this year does nash get a ring?
>>68000145
You're right, nobody cares.
>>68000987
Yeah, I already said that...
Nobody cares about your shithole of a country either lol
>>68000993
Yeah, we don't care that no one care's.
Straya Cunt.
>>68001056
Lol, what a gay self important post
>>68001064
Lol, what a gay American. Go shoot someone burgerface LOL XD
>>68001074
oh boy!! the classic Australian 'banter' XD so witty and original XD le ebin 'shitposting' XD
Lol, suck me bitch XD
>>68001099
No thanks, I'm not a homosexual.
LGTSS
>Amerigays
>>68001113
>Australian
>not a homosexual
lol, good one
>>68001113
you sound childish as fuck my australian friend
the white guy
>>68001122
>legalizes homo marriage
>accuses other countries of being homo
kek
>>68000329
did you just ask if a percentage calculation took into account the total number of shots?
>>68000090
30ppg v 15ppg
>>68000090
Curry is a cuck
>>68000172
He is 28 steph is too old to be a hall of famer
He's old enough to break some records, delly demolished him and made him a weak punk ass bitch in the finals
>>68000796
Man CP3 doesn't even have half as many career assists as Stockton
>>68000090
Steph is better at scoring, 3-point shots and defense.
Nash was better at midrange shots and doing point guard shit (playmaking, handles, and passing).
Nash did the 6'3" skinny guard winning back-to-back MVPs thing first.
For all you kiddies who started watching the NBA in 2012,
Nash scoring:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRHvHp7nJQI
Nash passing:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0kkqt0uvuM
>>68000090
the difference is nash can only make easy shots or he too would be avging 30ppg
curry drills those shots in their faces all day nash takes open shots mostly and thus doesn't get as many points as easy shots are a rarity.
Just for the fun of it, if you want to make a case for Nash being a better player you kind of can.
Comparing head-to-head their best statistical seasons:
Curry(2015-2016): 30.1PPG; 6.7APG
Nash(2006-2007): 18.6PPG; 11.6APG
Estimating that a third of their assists ended up in three point shots (reasonable to conservative estimate) they both ended up generating about the same number of points per game with a difference of decimals (around 45PPG each)
What you can argue makes Nash's 45PPG more valuable is the fact that it comes mostly from assists which have the added unquantifiable value of envlving and engaging the teammates.
Since neither is really an asset in other categories (defence, rebounding, etc) those can almost be ignored.
>>68001074
Lmao
