What went wrong?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /sp/ - Sports
You are currently reading a thread in /sp/ - Sports
What went wrong?
AC are horribly mismanaged and Milan were never that good and they're back where they belong after their 15 minutes of post calciopolli fame
Juventus went right
>>67503512
That kit is pretty sweet.
>>67503512
loving those shorts senpai
>>67503512
Pauloooooo
>>67503509
>Milan
Which one?
>>67503578
Just flip this vertically and try to get dubs next time.
>>67503602
check these
Also serious question : next year is another "juvewinslol" episode or Napoli / Roma have their chances ?
>>67503501
For the last fucking time, Inter is not supposed to be good, the only reason people know them is because they plot with tim and the italian federation to come with illegal recordings of phonecalls so they could relegate juve and "dominate" italian football for half a decade with their "italian" teams that had 2 italians at best, they invested for more than a decade with no return, got upset and had to relegate the big boys, shit club
>>67503651
Juvewinslol
They were simply untouchable once the new signings gelled and Napoli is not going to get another 30+ goal season out of Higuain. Juve will win it by 15+ points
>>67503671
They're historically one of the biggest and most prestigious clubs in global football.
>>67503671
How fucking salty can you be
They were successful throughout the 20th century, not just the modern era
>>67503764
Without Calciopolli they'd have 2 league titles in the last 45 years. That's pathetic
Money in football happened.
Check the payrolls and transfers 10-20 years later.
Football has become shitte.
>>67503793
>le money ruined football xD
The answer is always the same, no matter how many times poeple make this thread: they stopped spending.
>>67503808
Well i gotta pay debts.
>>67503808
He has a point tbf.
It's made it more expensive to watch, either match day or at home. It's rekt historically big clubs like Ajax and others not in the big, heavily promoted Euro leagues. It's created a toxic culture of privilege and arrogance amongst the players where they're primarily motivated by finance rather than success.
There's certainly some good come from money, but to dismiss any contrary argument as "reddit" is fucking pathetic.
>>67503509
>>67503671
great
>>67503942
>gypsy
>juventus was benefitting of shady illegal shit
>them still being able to play and win titles would be legitimate
"If not for calciopoli Inter wouldn't be this"
If not for calciopoli (as in, if it didn't exist) maybe Juve wouldn't have won titles in the first place.
>>67503808
People make fun of the Bundesliga, because Bayern buys off all the good players and wins lol.
But this is also what happens on a continental, or even world level with a handful of teams collecting the best players and winning every year.
This is why people root for underdogs like Leicester that beat the money and the odds, or even like Atletico who despite playing ugly and sometimes dirty still get more sympathy than Real or Barca.
Old football fans will 100% agree that money has made football lesser.
>>>pol
>>67504124
Because this is so much worse than AC Milan getting bought by Berlusconi and spending world record fees on 3 Ballon d'Or contenders in one summer. Or Napoli breaking the transfer record with mafia money to buy Maradona.
Money clubs have always existed. Nostalgiafags are fucking cancer.
>>67504168
>Money clubs have always existed.
It's much much worse now, unless you enjoy seeing the same clubs over and over again, until some rich people decide to pour money into a smaller club and make it big.
>>67504274
>It's much much worse now, unless you enjoy seeing the same clubs over and over again
Not really. If you go back and look at all the old European Champions, you'll notice that the same teams keep cropping up over and over again.
Real Madrid: 13 finals
Milan: 11 finals
Bayern: 10 finals
Barcelona: 8 finals
Liverpool: 7 finals
Imagine how boring the 1970s must have been, when just 4 different clubs won the CL in the entire decade (Ajax, Bayer, Liverpool, Nottingham Forest). Or the 1950s, when Real Madrid won 5 in a row.
mafia
Milan just doesn't have continuity at the coaching position. Mihailovic showed some sign of improvement but he was fired regardless
>>67503501
With Milan, it's a combination of incompetence (awful coaching/scouting) and the fact that Berlusconi is unwilling to put in the same kind of money he used to for a variety of reasons: he's a small fry compared to Abramovich/Qatar/UAE, austerity measures made big spending politically unpopular, he's going senile, etc.
With Inter, I think I remember reading that the main problem is debt, they're something like 500 million euros in the red despite earning less money annually than Everton.
They used to be "competitive" only in an era where they were the only good teams.
>>67505449
the system was different back then and only champions would play in the tournament, makes sense there would be repetition, seeing as the same clubs won their respective championships
also, they won only because they had a generation of good players, a team and were actually good, filled with, if not local players, than at least nationals
that's different than just buying the best players from the other teams and winning
finally, the italians not being at the top any longer has little to do with any of this
sounds like you need a SALARY CAP
It baffles me that, with a mountain of information available at one's fingertips, Yanks still insist on posting ignorant shit like this>>67505449
>>67505466
I remember hearing that it was because berlusconi wanted an attacking team rather than a defensive one
>>67509415
You didn't hear that at all.
