What's his market value?
>>67366114
probably more than he's actually worth now because he's english
£60m
If he was of any other nationality ~60-70m.
Taking into account that he's English - god knows but it's definitely not a sane amount
>>67366114
based on sterlings "value" 100m
>>67366114
If we're talking about what Spurs would realistically accept in order to sell him, probably £70 million to a foreign club, £100+ million to an English club.
>>67366180
Not fair to base it on Sterling as City were bent over a barrel on that deal.
>>67366180
Based on sterlings value my dead nan is worth £100 million
>What's his value
About £30m
>What would he actually go for
About £70m
>>67366234
>20+ goal a season striker in the current market
>worth 30m
ok
>>67366234
>£30 million for the best striker in the epl who is 22 years old
>inb4 aguero 0 (zero) shots on target in 5 (five ) games in the CL
>>67366234
>22 year old striker who scored close to 50 league goals in 2 seasons
>£30m
lmao
>>67366234
>assblasted arselel fan
>rates Giroud
>>67366234
>30 mil
>>67366234
>(you)
>>67366253
>>67366264
>>67366287
>>67366292
>Oy, vey, he doesn't overinflate just because the market is retarded
>>67366234
Sometimes I wonder if people actually genuinely believe half the retarded shit that they flood this board with
>>67366114
As a spurs fan, priceless
I love him, don't ever leave me Harry. You are my everything
>Actually worth
£25M
>What he'll actually go for
£80M
You people can't seriously suggest a club should spend more than £30m on him, right?
>>67366313
>le market is retarded xD
No, the market is fine, clubs are making more money than ever so they're spending more money than ever because they know they'll get it back in results, new fans, increased marketability etc. It's you who is retarded.
>>67366313
>he doesn't go off market value and instead decides to assign his own arbitrary number he
pulled out of his ass instead
Aguero>>>''''fit'''' Sturridge>>>>Vardy>>Kane
>>67366329
Mate, if you want a (you) so badly hy don't you just ask for it instead of this pisspoor le eblin troll attempt
>Actually worth
£4 million
>What he'll actually go for
£15 million
>>67366313
google "supply and demand"
Players like Kane are in high demand and short supply. And potential buyers are rich as fuck.
>>67366349
>>67366350
Extra 35 mill for being english and an extra 20 mill because of playing for a jewish club
Remember when he was only 71 rated?
Honestly I see his value as 50-60 million but I don't see Tottenham selling for less than 70. The real question is how much is Dele Alli worth? Express (lol) says Madrid wants him, which sounds unbelievable.
>>67366338
>the market is fine
kek
>Actually worth
50 quid and a packet of Doritos (grab bag not family size)
>What he'll actually go for
£80 million
>>67366382
>One good season
>English
>Young
>Midfielders
>Plays for spuds
He wont go for anything less than 60 mill
>>67366379
That kit was so bad, holy shit
>>67366383
It is you literal retard. The clubs nowadays generate 5 times more revenue than they did 15 years ago. Do you expect them to keep paying the same prices for players that they did 15 years ago?
>>67366382
Alli isn't worth anything close to what Kane is worth. If you'd take all the players and rank them based on their worth, Kane would be top 5.
>>67366382
I fucking hope he doesn't go to madrid. That would be career suicide.
He should go to barca or bayern
>>67366413
>the market is fine
>>67366413
>50 million for sternig
>80 million for Memtial
>80 million for hamez rodriguez
The market is a joke
>>67366413
The market flew in price the last 3 years la. How much would Neymar (as good as he was during the transfer) be worth now? Way more. I blame the English clubs like United and Liverpool buying literally who's for what the price plus another 10 million you could have bought Ozil 3 years ago for.
>>67366434
Alright, explain to me why is it not fine.
inb4 bcuz 50m for a player is lots of monies lmao xD XD xD
>>67366462
>the market is fine
>>67366460
This.
I have no qualms with teams spending £70M + on players like suarez and Bale, but when you spend £50 million on a pacy black winger and apacy black striker and £80 million on a guy who played well in the WC then there is a serious problem
>>67366460
>I believe I alone can objectively determine value of an asset better than a free market of competing parties
>>67366461
Ozil was in the final year of his contract. If you were older than 15 you'd understand that there are a million factors other than ability that determine value
>>67366473
good argument
>>67366512
Even 80 million for Bale is ridiculous. Hes worth 45 tops.
>>67366528
>I believe I alone can objectively determine value of an asset better than a free market of competing parties
>>67366528
He wasnt worth more than suarez but he is amazing
>>67366537
>spurs being jews and bale being ''''homegrown'''' is the free market
You're a mouthbreather
>>67366541
Once again, value doesn't equal ability.
Bale is younger with a higher sell on value and Suarez had a release clause in his contract that capped his value on the market
>>67366523
>the
>market
>is
>fine
>>67366554
It literally is. Spurs thought it was worth selling for 100m, Madrid thought it was worth buying for 100m.
Doesn't get any more free than that. I'd even argue that Real got the better end of the deal.
You'd all have a point if clubs were taking on huge debt to sign those players and risk becoming bankrupt in the coming years. But they're all making that money back and the business is growing which is a sign of good financial decisions.
126 mil in uk
50 mil outisde of uk
