Why is so much emphasis placed on the distinction between Premier League and First Division?
Saying shit like >Liverpool never won the EPL
How is the EPL any different from the First Division in anything but the name?
Serie A wasn't called Serie A until the 30s and it even had a different format back then, but nobody differentiates between the tournaments won prior to that date and the ones won after.
Nobody says Real Madrid's only won 4 UCLs.
Why make the distinction at all?
>Nobody says Real Madrid's only won 4 UCLs.
rival fans do dismiss all their trophies from the 50s and 60s.
It's called banter.
>>67313990
Different format, different trophy.
>>67313990
what program do you use to screenshot get that filename?
when I use Snipping Tool I always have to make my own filename.
It's just the most recent change, before the PL people would say 'since three points for a win came in'.
>>67313990
Ignore the ABLs lad
This is the trophy that Liverpool won.
This is the trophy that Liverpool haven't won.
ABLs aren't very rational folks m8
>>67314021
>Nobody says Real Madrid's only won 4 UCLs.
yes.. yes they do
It was a different competition, different format before
>>67314143
>>67314153
So Liverpool won that superior looking trophy
>>67313990
Because writers like to do that sort of bullshit to emphasise achievements.
That said, the formation of the Premiership was kind of a watershed moment for English football because it amplified a whole bunch of football business trends by throwing a shitton of TV money into the mix, and it provides a convenient place to indicate where that shift changed.
>>67314143
This is the trophy England hasn't won
>>67314047
He's a phoneposter, friend.
>>67314478
Thanks m8.
>>67314047
Mac OS X
It just werks
>>67314047
It's standard screenshot on a mac friendo.
66 mate
