>73-9
Well, guess it's confirmed they'd beat the 96 Bulls. You literally have no argument against it.
Warriors
>strength of schedule
>30th in the NBA
>beating the bulls
"no"
>>66817900
That's only because they demoralize every team so badly they fall off a cliff
they probably would, but the score would be something ridiculous like 160-150 or something
>>66817932
Don't be silly, the Bulls weren't just good at scoring but they were great at stopping their opponents from scoring.
They'd win in 4.
>Ron Harper trying to contain Currgoat
>>66817900
wew lad
Of course the Dubs would beat the 96 Bulls, Kerr would know exactly what the Bulls are going to do at any given moment.
>>66817900
>strength of schedule
>everyone plays the same teams
>>66818201
>implying it wouldn't be Jordan guarding Curry
>>66818250
underrated post
>>66818250
This man gets it.
>>66817900
You know how diluted the NBA was in 96? There was an expansion draft that made most teams 6 men deep
>>66817915
that wouldn't work against the bulls, they played in an era when basketball players were men, not faggots who play NBA2k when they get home from practice.
If they played in 96 Bulls win in 4
If they played in 2016 GSW wins at 6
Bulls still better
>>66822643
This
>>66822643
i can agree on this
but shitposters will always bring up this topic till the end of time
they barely won multiple games
played 3 superstars in multiple 4th quarters
played multiple overtime games
the bulls never had to do this that season
