match tomorrow
>2nd bundes
fürth - freiburg (20:15 cest)
pls no autosage
hello?
what are your relegation predictions guys?
>>66575001
darmstadt
werder
hannover
>>66575001
I don't know. I really don't know.
Getting some laughs from wsg at the at the moment
>>66575035
>Darmstadt are still only two points above relegation
I feel like they were practically safe at some point. Did I imagine that, or have they just had a massive drop?
>>66575001
Hannover and Hoffenheim hopefully
>>66575035
>>66575085
hoffenheim
bremen
hangover
Someone from here should apply as a janny to stop the autosage plague.
>>66574972
hey
I hope Hannover and Darmstadt go down. The rest of the relegation zone teams I don't have anything against to be honest.
Well not that I have anything against Hannover or Darmstadt. Just that Hannover are obviously doomed and I don't care about Darmstadt.
NUR DER HSV
How the h*ck did Teemu Pukki ever score against Spain. One of the most useless players I've ever seen.
>>66575140
>>66575279
afternoon
>>66575167
look at the last thread... I'm not allowed... to reveal any... more
I would start an ethnic cleansing of bundes if I became a jani
k
>>66575479
ehehe
>>66575566
better star with yourself then anon
>>66575740
wow thats a nasty laughter
>>66575769
im yandere
I live next to a forest so I hear birds right now, that's cool for these kind of evenings.
Also it's raining lightly
Anyone watching stuff about Panama tax constructions right now?
Messi implicated again ehehe
>then
>>66575795
>not chosing ohoho as your signature laughter
>>66575838
>>66575838
ehehe is moe er
>>66575826
im not..
>>66575743
Enjoy never posting in bundes again once they accepted my application
>>66575798
that's beautiful anon
take a pic
>>66575943
uhuh
Dereshishishi
Losing pretty hard in a you laugh you lose thread on worksafegif right now
>>66575952
>>66576156
nice pic anon
>>66576156
is that a ghost dog? :O
>>66576229
No that's a stump
>>66576259
a ghost stump?
>>66576156
2spooky4me
Lost again
Bremen~
hallo
>>66576429
Hello. A couple at the Arsenal match yesterday
>>66576588
They probably don't even do any strapon action
>>66576588
you are really into this couple-matchday-pics couples huh
>>66576588
have you ever seen this sort of thing at Brondby?
>>66576638
Maybe
>>66576673
Yeah
>>66576674
No
Night
>>66574858
will hertha stay at ChL position?
Will Dárdai be a manager legend?
>>66576156
/x/ pls go
>>66577210
No
Maybe
>>66577210
yes
unlikely
~~~~~~~ Hertha will sack Dardai in November 2017
>>66577285
le favre curse
Köln's sporting director Jörg Schmadtke threw chewing gum at Hoffenheim coach Julian Nagelsmann today.
Why didn't /bundes/ talk about this??
Have no sympathies for that horse face.
>>66577599
based
>>66577599
kek wat
>>66577599
10 Spiele Sperre confirmed
>Messi is in the Panama leak
wew laddy
that is some wild shit
>panama leak
can't be arsed to read up on this. is any of it actually illegal or is it just legal tax avoidance schemes?
>There is nothing unlawful about doing this. It is not illegal to be a director, shareholder or beneficial owner – the real owner, even though their name may not appear on the shareholder register – of an offshore company. But the financial advantages these structures provide are not generally available to the ordinary taxpayer.
nvm
>>66578221
why is this allowed?
>>66578243
gaps between laws
>>66578191
>How much data has been leaked?
A lot. The leak is one of the biggest ever – larger than the US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks in 2010, and the secret intelligence documents given to journalists by Edward Snowden in 2013. There are 11.5m documents and 2.6 terabytes of information drawn from Mossack Fonseca’s internal database.
>Are all people who use offshore structures crooks?
No. Using offshore structures is entirely legal. There are many legitimate reasons for doing so. Business people in countries such as Russia and Ukraine typically put their assets offshore to defend them from “raids” by criminals, and to get around hard currency restrictions. Others use offshore for reasons of inheritance and estate planning.
>Are some people who use offshore structures crooks?
Yes. In a speech last year in Singapore, David Cameron said “the corrupt, criminals and money launderers” take advantage of anonymous company structures. The government is trying to do something about this. It wants to set up a central register that will reveal the beneficial owners of offshore companies. From June, UK companies will have to reveal their “significant” owners for the first time.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jul/28/david-cameron-fight-dirty-money-uk-property-market-corruption
>>66578243
There's a really fine line between international buisness operations and tax evasion.
:*knutsch*:
>>66578899
You too
>>66579069
Na, na, na!
good morning losers