FUCK ALABAMA
Bama. (11-1)
2. Oklahoma (11-1)
3. Iowa (12-0)
4. Clempson (Very insecure about their school and their ranking btw) (12-0)
5. Northwest Missouri St. (12-0)
6. Jacksonville State Gamecocks (10-1)
7. Harvard (9-1)
8. Slippery Rock (12-1)
9. Houston (11-1)
10. aOSU (11-1)
the top 4 will remain unchanged. cap it
1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. OU
4. Iowa
Clemson with one loss still gets in over tOSU:
1 more win
2 wins vs top 10
tOSU:
1 win vs 19
???
>>63939674
neither will get in if Clemson loses
>>63939705
im just pointing out its absurd that tOSU fans saying they just need clemson to lose when clemson would still be ahead of them if that occurred
>>63939717
>tOSU
senpai I believe you mean aOSU
>>63939717
I've seen more people saying that they'd be in with an Alabama loss rather than a Clemson loss which they would have a better argument for but they still wouldn't get in
reminder that the fightin k's will run the table next year
>>63939674
UNC gets in at #4 if they beat Clemson desu, with Alabama at #1 if they win dominantly or Iowa at #1 if Alabama isn't convincing and Iowa plays really well in a win over MSU
>>63939827
hahahahaha no they won't
>>63939784
Cant believe they didn't make it in the top 25.
>>63939827
clemson might even get in over UNC with a loss. you have to look at entire resumes, not just one game, even if it is the most recent
>>63939928
yeah that looks much better than ohio state's lineup ::leshiggybatman::
>>63939784
>he thinks the K's have a chance against the G's
G just got that JUCO QB commit that's going to take them to the top
>>63939928
>two FCS teams
why is this allowed?
>>63939960
which is why even with clemson losing, if you were to rank the 3 teams, itd still be
1. Clemson (1 loss to a top 10 team, 2 top 10 wins, 12 total wins)
2. tOSU (1 top 20 win, only loss to another palyoff team)
3. UNC (1 top 10 win, 2 >FCS wins, terrible loss)
![1323642424001[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/7cOnP3i.jpg "1323642424001[1].jpg")
>>63939928
good lord i knew that their schedule was poor but i had never bothered to actually look it up
>>63939979
>implying SC is actually better
Stop with this SEC > FCS meme
What are the chances oregon could get aOSU in the fiesta bowl?
>>63940111
Oregon is too shit. We'll get tOSU vs Bootyblasters in the Fiesta bowl
Michigan State will make the playoffs
>>63940155
tOSU vs Stanford in Fiesta
Booty Blasters will play Houston like the G5 team they are.
>>63940155
this
and Stanford will play Northwestern in the Who Gives a Shit Bowl
>These ACC shills on ESPN trying to argue that UNC should get in if they beat Clemson
>>63940185
Im still convinced clemson is in no matter what at this point
>>63940198
No way Clemson gets in if they lose to UNC. That makes literally zero sense.
>>63940198
No way. A loss to UNC so late in the season would kill them. If you're going to lose, you have to do it early in the season.
>>63940214
how? NW is behind stanford with identical records
>this lame ass hype shit before each ranking
Who cares
>>63940226
>head-to-head loss
>no conference championship
How mad are you faggots going to be when Michigan State is #4
>>63940233
these use audio clips of those lame ass espn talking head analysts like its so hype and they matter so much very important
>>63940233
we should have hype shit
our rankings are better anyways
Galloway creams about UNC every week too. UNC is fucking shit
UT 25
fuck off bama shills
>LSU
espn stream?
>ole piss 13
LMFAO
>Vols made it back to their preseason position
>UNC
BTFO
NORTH CAROLINA BTFO
b-b-b-b-but UNC would get in over clemson and tOSU with a win!
tard heels btfo
>Still behind FSU
I fucking told y'all UNC had no shot
>THE CITY OF NORTH CAROLINA
>>63940245
Not one bit
AHAHAHAHAHA ACC AND PAC BTFO
EAT SHIT SHITTERS
Aight. So UNC still gets in if Stanford loses.
Jumping from 10 to 4 is going to happen
CFP committee tryna ruin our poll
>Committee values quality wins
>Alabama 2nd
Iowa meme needs to die
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>63940399
Delusional Kuck confirmed
1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. OU
4. Iowa
5. Michigan State
6. Ohio State
7. Stanford
8. Notre Dame
9. FSU
10. UNC
11. TCU
12. Baylor
13. Ole Miss
14. Northwestern
15. Michigan
16. Oregon
17. OK State
18. Florida
19. Houston
20. USC
21. LSU
22. Temple
23. Navy
24. Utah
25. Tennessee
1. Clemson
2. Alabama
3. Oklahoma
4. Iowa
5. MSU
6. OSU
7. Stanford
8. Notre Dame
9. FSU
10. UNC
11. TCU
12. Baylor
13. Ole Miss
14. Northwestern
15. Michigan
16. Oregon
17. Oklahoma State
18. Florida
19. Houston
20. USC
21. LSU
22. Temple
23. Navy
24.Utah
25. Tennessee
BASED HAWKEYES
>>63940452
>UNC
>#10 with 1 loss
>NoD and Stanford #7 and #8 with 2 losses
WHAT THE FUCK
>3 of the top 6 are B1G teams
WHERE IS YOUR SEC/BIG 12 GOD NOW
How the fuck Iowa good?
Wow.....It's official....if Alabama loses this weekend, there will be no SEC Team in the playoff. The other sec teams are too far out of the top four.
WOW THAT DID SUCK ASS
>>63940468
>FSU lost a team UNC beat
>>63940457
This
>>63940449
>>63940384
Git gud
>see you Saturday
No.1 Clemson and No.4 Iowa for Orange
No.2 Alabama and No.3 Oklahoma for Cotton
>>63940477
Big ten west is less competitive than B1G East....that's why Illinois isn't a bad job.
>>63940490
Don't get shook lil nigga when you're BTFO by half
>>63940482
>mfw
>>63940500
Nobody would watch Clemson/Iowa
UNC still being disrespected tbqhwaoyf
>>63940516
>>63940500
iowa would move to 3 with a win over MSU
>>63940517
Nice schedule dumbass
>OSU has a chance of getting in without even playing in its CCG
This is everything wrong with this playoff and just college football in general
>yfw Iowa is going to get anally annihilated this saturday
>yfw Clemson Alabama Stanford lose
>>63940500
Iowa/MSU winner will go up to #3
>>63940536
NEBRASKA TIRE BCS BULLSHIT
>>63940502
I guess the B1G East suck ass. Can Stanford get in the playoffs? What do you guys think about Ohio State vs. USC in the Rose Bowl?
>>63940468
>UNC loss was to 3-9 SCAR
>Stanford lost to 14 and 16
>Notre Dame lost to number 1 and number 7
>Both Stanford and ND have played much better schedules
Not that surprsing desu
>>63940507
>Implying the game will be a blowout
This is the B1GCC were talking about... my money is on a close game
>>63940482
>Bama
>losing
Pick 1. If Florida had an offense, then it would be possible but they don't
>X beats Y, therefore X is better then Y
Why do people use this argument so much (i.e Hokies 2014 national champions)
If Clemson and Bama win it will be.
1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. Iowa/MSU winner
4. Oklahoma
>YOU CAN'T WIN THE NATTY IF YOU CAN'T EVEN WIN YOUR CONFERENCE
>HURR WE NEED 8 TEAMS IN THE PLAYOFF
pick 1 and only 1
>>63940536
if Ohio State somehow sneaked in to the playoff and won it all would it be more tainted than Alabama's 2011 natty?
Current Playoff Matchups (projected Vegas spreads)
#1 Clemson -8 over #4 Iowa
#2 Alabama -3 over #3 Oklahoma
>>63940536
they have no chance. 2 spots are already clinched. alabama wont lose and a clemson loss means either UNC or stanford
>>63940568
Should have kept Grier out of trouble. Roll Tide!
>>63940575
We need some meme teams like memphis and houston in it for fun
>>63940568
it seems every year we get one puzzling conference championship game loss.....
perhaps mcelwain has some trick plays lined up.
>>63940536
Yes well with the BCS we'd have Alabama vs Clemson Natty and with 8 teams tOSU is in this is perfect.
>>63940577
Even more so than Iowa winning it all
>>63940563
>This is the B1GCC were talking about... my money is on a close game
>Literally a blowout last year
>>63940582
Believe in holy croc
>>63940557
If Stanford gets in the playoffs then Oregon would go to the Rose Bowl because they are 7-2 in conference while USC is 6-3.
>>63940536
Ohio State's only chance is if Clemson wins, Iowa wins, Alabama loses, and Stanford loses which won't happen
>LSU
>Lol Miss
>UNC
>>63940608
How is a team going 15-0 tainted after winning games against 3 tops 5 teams in a row?
What happens if:
>Clemson (#1) loses to UNC (#10)
>Bama (#2) loses to Florida (#18)
and
>Iowa (#3) loses to MSU (#5)
???
>>63940624
Oh, I forgot about that.
>>63940582
that's simply not a guarantee......
the human element is going to come into play with the committee, who has to look at strength of schedule.
they will pick apart the ACC's overall strength vs. the big ten's this season......
>>63940644
1. Oklahoma
2. MSU
3. Stanford
4. UNC
>>63940644
1. MSU
2. Oklahoma
3. OSU
4. Temple or Houston
>>63940644
All don't make the playoff
>>63940644
Probably
1. MSU
2. Oklahoma
3. Stanford
4. UNC
Friendly reminder that a school can only be good in either basketball or football. No in betweens
>>63940658
i disagree. OSU would absolutely make the top 4 in that situation.
>UNC fans acting surprised
you lost to a 3-9 team and played 2 FCS teams, you're not fucking getting in
>>63940578
Interesting. I think OU matches up with Bama the best, and I might favor them by 1.5
>>63940650
Yeah most did, I'm just an Oregon fan grasping for an unlikely outcome.
>>63940658
If they have UNC at 10 right now and Ohio State at 6, as much as it kills me to say it, I can't see why Ohio State wouldn't get in over UNC in that situation.
>>63940644
1. Choklahoma
2. MSU
3. UNC
4. Stanford
>>63940668
I hate the Gators, but they proved your argument is invalid.
>15
>one spot behind 38-0 northwestern
>B1G east is suffering when you're not elite yet
>>63940641
I'm just shitposting m8. In all reality i'm a UofI Student trying not to let his hopes get to high
UNC is clearly not getting in, if they win Ohio State is in (and deserve to be)
>>63940644
OU is #1
MSU moves up #2
UNC moves up to #3 if Stanford loses #4 if they win
tOSU would be #4 by default if Stanford loses which would be bullshit
>>63940668
>what is 2006 Florida
wow he literally said H2H and conference championships are only tiebreakers
>>63940701
Stanford
>the city of ohio state
>>63940701
Clemson would get in over tOSU still, and Stanford would get in over both
Go Clemson tbhfam
Not trying to play an Ohio school again
>>63940668
Iowa and MSU can tie and we (OSU) get in, right?
>Florida can only score 2 (points) at home
>"people" expect them to beat Bama
aOSU is only going down. they DONT play this weekend. They literally can't go up.
Why are people acting like Ohio State's SoS is way better than UNC's? They had UNC at 63rd and OSU at 58th
I'm conflicted about the current seeding of Alabama and Oklahoma.
On the one hand, I don't want this year's playoff to go by without Stoops and Saban meeting up again just so one of them can make the other extremely butthurt. So in that respect it would be good to be certain that they meet up by seeding them #2 and #3.
On the other hand, this removes the possibility of them meeting in the championship game, and I would love to see them against each other for all the marbles. So maybe somebody else should face them in the semifinals.
>>63940754
>>"people" expect them to beat Bama
They're 17.5 point underdogs, retard
>yfw USC wins and they get into the playoff with 4 loses because muh ratings and history
>>63940668
>>63940765
srsly this. everyone from 6-9 is just a few pips above UNC which is reasonable since UNC hasn't played Clemson yet.
>>63940754
>FSU scored the 2 points for Florida because they felt bad
SEC SEC SEC SEC
>>63940765
this week is UNC's first game against a ranked team and they played 2 FCS teams
>>63940754
>aOSU fans
FIFY
So what happens if Florida and UNC pull the upsets? Ohio State, Iowa, Oklahoma, and who's last? Does UNC get the right to jump all the other teams in waiting?
>>63940793
Clemson is in over tOSU
>>63940793
>iowa
>I think Iowa will beat MSU
>>63940819
Just have them keep doubting. Only fuels them more.
You're all retarded if you think UNC doesn't make it in with a win over #1 Clemson
Everyone is going in about teams not jumping each other next week as if that's how the CFP rankings work.
>>63940833
>10
>>63939649
Damn son
>>63940791
Second*
Pitt was ranked when UNC played them.
>>63940451
Man, the committee really fucked up here.
this is going to be the easiest natty bama has ever won, except for 2012 notre dame.
>>63940819
I don't get why this is so far fetched fucking MSU hasn't been the pillar of greatness this year and I think both are mediocre teams.
>>63940444
You need to die
>>63940760
were you 4 in 2007 or something?
>>63940854
What they have accomplished with the injuries and a shitty secondary is pretty good bro.
>>63940696
>>63940709
NCAAF: W 41-14 vs #1 Ohio State
NCAAB: W 84-75 vs #1 Ohio State
holy shit, they really are the kekeyes
>>63940836
They're 10 without beating a ranked team or having a conf trophy. Winning your 12th straight game against #1 the last game of the season to win a conference on prime time tv is literally the highest value win possible in this system. It doesn't get any better.
how old were you when you grew out of arguing about CF rankings?
>>63940875
we were 2nd nationally in soccer that year too ;__;
>>63940901
>play a heap of shit all season
>play one good team
>get in
Would be a disaster
>>63940901
long literally said championships are only a tiebreaker after resumes are otherwise found to be equal
>>63940906
>being a mature, calm, and well-informed poster on 4chan
>>63940906
15
we don't argue here we post meme images next to bad opinions
Why do people forget that the reason why UNC had 2 FCS schools is because OSU ducked them? One of those was supposed to be UNC vs OSU, but OSU backed out, probably because they wouldn't get the ratings they thought they would.
>>63940922
>TCU and Ohio State last year
If UNC somehow blew Clemson out they're 4.
>>63940922
Righto, you don't think beating consensus #1 makes UNC at least tied with 6-9? Then conference ship leaves only stanford to beat. Will probably come down to how those two teams look in their wins.
>>63940906
How old were you when you lost your passion?
And let's be honest here: every team besides bama is a meme this year.
>>63940854
They're winning in big games this year. Deal with it
>>63940958
that series was for 2017 and 2018 breh
If UNC somehow gets in, they will lose by at least 28 in the playoff. What a joke
>>63940958
because it doesn't change the fact that they played 2 FCS schools. actually it works against them as it's obvious they would have another loss if they played aOSU
>>63940993
they would play bama probably, imagine the carnage
Chicken tender sub incoming.
>NORTHERNERS BTFO
>>63940973
UNC with 2 ranked wins (PITT was ranked when they played) and only one loss, albeit to SC, should get in over any 2 loss team.
>>63941007
It depends if they were playing OSU when they decided to be shit earlier in the year.
>>63941013
>southerners don't know how to take a photo
>>63941016
no one counts rankings when they got the win
Is the Committee worse than BCS?
>>63941025
Nah. OSU would probably beat them regardless.
>>63941029
works for Bama
>>63941030
yea
>>63940958
Ohio State backed out because the B1G is making all it's teams schedule another conference game instead I think is what they said
How long would Richt turn Virginia around?
>>63941039
You have nothing to base this off of besides "lel acc"
>>63941062
>richt
>good
>>63941030
not even close and last year proved that
>>63941030
what if they just instituted the playoff into the BCS rankings?
>>63940973
This. If Stanford loses to USC (my sleeper pick for an upset) and UNC somehow beats Clemson (especially if they did it convincingly) then UNC would make it into the playoffs at #4. UNC would have a win over the former #1 and Ohio State would have a win over #15. UNC would be a conference champion. Just don't think you can justify anOSU in that instance.
>>63940958
"Supposedly" the fear was that anOSU would have to play 9 conference games so they dropped UNC over powerhouse programs like Western Michigan, Hawaii, and Northern Illinois.
UNC has had games canceled by Tennessee, Minnesota, and anOSU in the past decade. I'm not so sure it is their fault that the schedule didn't pan out the way they wanted it to.
If MSU blows out Iowa should they move up past #4?
>>63941063
and an aOSU natty champ last year and everyone returned and a weak UNC schedule with a weak loss but yeah what do i know lel acc
>>63941099
The UNC series was for 2017-18
people can't read apparently
>>63941069
>ACC schedule
He'd at least upgrade the recruiting and would have 2-3 teams at most to worry about.
>>63941028
Sorry I'm usually the one in front of the camera. ;)
>>63941030
Yes which I find to be fucking hilarious
>>63941062
He can't even win getting some of the best recruits in the nation and you think he's going to do it in Virginia of all places?
>>63940993
If they played Bama or OU, the two best teams remaining if Clemson lost, then yeah. They'd have a good shot against Iowa or MSU but there's little chance that game would happen.
>>63940958
>>63941099
Who cares?
>>63941105
Look at it this way. tOSU has looked ineffective in a number of games. On the other hand, UNC has blown out most teams they've played. Your average B1G and ACC coastal team are about on par.
IF UNC wins the ACC championship, there is no way 2 loss FSU and ND get in over the ACC champ who knocked off the number 1 team, is there? What about Stanford?
>>63941110
It got pushed back originally m8
>>63941118
He could easily steal some of VT's players now that Beamer is gone and its the ACC.
I'm only talking about making them a ranked team every year, possible ACC threat, not a natty.
>>63941141
TOSU gets in over them. UNC would have to hope for Alabama loss.
>>63941141
Stanford probably would because they'd be PAC12 champs (which honestly looks better than ACC champ) with an 18 ranked SOS compared to UNC's shitty schedule. Also Stanford lost to two teams in the teens while UNC lost to some shitter.
>>63941125
Iowa and MSU would both bootyblast them.
>>63941172
>tOSU gets in over them
I cannot see why that could possibly be the case.
>>63941141
If UNC beats the team that beat ND and FSU then the committee should rank them above all three. Iowa/MSU will also lose at least one game, and if the loser is MSU then that would be good cause for UNC to jump OSU too.
That's 5 guaranteed spots UNC would move up. They still probably need Stanford to lose to USC if they want to get into the playoffs but it isn't outside the realm of possibility.
>people unironically putting the 't' in front of OSU
>>63940644
Low television ratings
god I hope none of these scenarios happens
I don't want to see another shitty ACC team that doesn't deserve to be in get blown the fuck out in the semifinal
UNC getting in would be a guaranteed blowout for whoever plays them
Oklahoma wins the natty. Cap this. Bet on it. It's happening.
>>63940628
This is true.
Stanford is only ranked as high as they are because 1.) Notre Dame sells and is overrated because of this and 2.) the committee needs a west coast representative if they can force one in so they don't lose a ton of that market.
Is the muh SEC bias meme finally kill?
>>63941135
>Your average B1G and ACC coastal team are about on par
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ok
Help me out here. I'm trying to find UNC's best win. I literally don't even know which one it is. Looks like it's 8-4 Miami who lost to Cincinatti, beat nebraska in OT, beat duke by 3 points.
>>63941271
>UNC getting in would be a guaranteed blowout for whoever plays them
Same with the Iowa literal whos
OSU would booty blast UNC
>>63941321
Pittsburgh, which is only an okay win. Them getting in would be an absolute joke.
Long: Using committee's metrics, Ohio State & UNC's strength of schedule numbers "not close." Ohio State's "clearly superior."
>>63941299
no because LSU is ranked and lol miss is #13
>>63941344
yeah, UNC would bootyblast all of those teams
>>63941321
The Pitt, VTech, and NC State wins shouldn't be overlooked. All road games, Pitt was ranked, Beamer's last home game, and NC State is always hard to beat on the road, especially in this rivalry. The Gtech game also proved UNC can be clutch.
UNC also beat Illinois by more than anOSU beat Illinois tbqh familia
>>63941299
People on twitter are already bitching about LSU and Tennessee were put back in the poll to justify Bama's ranking
Domino's is the GOAT pizza chain. Prove me wrong
>you can't
>tfw the defending national champion is automatically out of the playoff picture because of one loss to what will be a top 3 team by a field goal simply because everyone is rooting against them and is tired of their success
Meanwhile shit Bama who got throttled by the same team less than a year ago gets a free ride because ESPN needs a team in the playoffs
Iowa/UNC natty
CAP IT
>>63941361
src please. the graphic they showed during the selection show said they were very similar.
>>63941361
UNC still played one more game :^)
Big reason why TCU and Baylor didn't get in last year, not just because they were "co-champions".
>>63941387
>UNC also beat Illinois by more
never ever compare blowouts to make an argument. OSU also dominated VT on the road in a game that was hyped for a year
GT and NC State are pure trash
>>63941394
How can anyone be this wrong?
>>63941411
thats the ESPN graphic using their meme ratings, Long is the head of the committee
Facts:
>With a Clemson/Alabama loss, the fourth slot will go to (in order of liklehood): Stanford, UNC, Ohio State
Stanford and UNC would be conference champions, and i'm not sure how you say that UNC has a better resume than Stanford despite the second loss. UNC would need a Stanford loss to get in. Ohio State sleepwalked through most of this season and would not have even played for their conference championship. Ohio State would need losses by both Clemson and Bama to get in.
>Clemson is not getting in if they lose
Not even sure how you autists justify this. Not winning the weakest power five conference and losing in the last week is a recipe for getting left out.
>>63941401
>tfw confirmed MSU/Oklahoma natty game
my body is ready pham
>>63941387
>>63941401
This. Alabama could lose to a bunch of girls playing and still be in. Not even an OSU fan desu
>>63941433
Clemson still has a better resume than Ohio State with a loss
>>63941390
>implying they are wrong
>>63941401
the difference is Bama will be a conference champion while Ohio State won't even be a conference runner up and Bama lost early on and had time to rise back up the rankings and Ohio State didn't
>>63941433
Agree, but I think UNC gets in over Stanford if they look dominant in their win and Stanford just squeaks by.
>>63941433
They shouldn't get in with a win
>>63941433
>Not even sure how you autists justify this. Not winning the weakest power five conference and losing in the last week is a recipe for getting left out.
>weakest power five conference
But anon, Clemson doesn't play in the PAC12
>>63941435
as an tOSU fan I hope you guys do win. B1G has three teams in the top 6 and still gets no respect. Meanwhile, the shit SEC gets propped up by horrible rankings and these nobody conferences are trying to make a case for a 2 loss team to get in if they beat a shit 4 loss side. Maybe maybe a second straight. national title will wake their asses up
>>63941433
>weakest power 5 conference
Clemson moved to the Big XII?
>>63941487
It's too little though
If Clemson loses:
1. Bama
2. Iowa/MSU
3. OU
4. Stanford
If Clemson AND Bama lose
1. Iowa/MSU
2. OU
3. Stanford
4. Clemson or UNC
>>63941459
If they were trying to rig things for the Tide don't you think they'd put in a 9-3 Georgia team who's won 5 of their last 6?
>>63941387
>The Gtech game also proved UNC can be clutch.
No it fucking doesn't, all it does is that they struggled against a shit team.
>>63941506
>an tOSU
>an the ohio state university
>an the
>>63941450
Maybe with an MSU loss that makes tOSU's loss look worse. I just don't see any ACC team other than the champion getting in.
>>63941497
Who are you referring to?
>>63941499
PAC12 and ACC don't even compare in terms of depth. PAC12 might not have a top four team at the top but top to bottom they don't even compare.
>>63941517
Big 12 is probably 1b in terms of weakness. The ACC just has no depth to it whatsoever.
>stanford loses to 2 mediocre ass teams that are now ranked because they play in horrible divisions
>gets to play a crappy team they already dominated for the conference title
>people saying they should jump 1 loss teams to get in
now THIS is some retarded shit right here
>>63941433
>weakest power five conference
I know this is bait but, there's only 2(two) conferences with 3(three) teams in the top 10. I'll wait....
>>63941528
BEST outcome:
If Clemson AND Bama AND Stanford lose:
1. Iowa/MSU
2. OU
3. UNC
4. Clemson
>>63941485
No, the difference is that Bama rode through a soft conference where they were able to sneak into a championship game against an awful team where Ohio State is playing in a conference where their competition is ranked 4 and 5 and their only loss was to one of them by 3 points. Bama lost to Ole Piss
>>63941552
Clemson still has 2 better wins than OSU and one more overall win
>>63941552
Clemson
Winning in a group of six team means shit
>>63941487
Fuck Stanford. They are so fucking overrated.
>getting btfo by Northwestern
>getting btfo by Oregon
I don't care what happens this weekend. They don't belong in the playoff.
>>63941420
nice proof idiot
what's the real GOAT chain?
>still domino's
>>63941564
>UNC Clemson rematch for the natty
kek
>>63941564
I want this doomsday scenario and then a UNC/Clemson rematch in the final.
