1. Clemson
2. Alabama
3. Ohio State
4. Notre Dame
5. Iowa
6. Oklahoma State
7. Oklahoma
8. Florida
9. Michigan State
10. Baylor
11.Stanford
12. Michigan
13. Utah
14. FSU
15. LSU
16. Navy
17. UNC
18. TCU
19. Houston
20. Northwestern
21. Memphis
22. Ole Miss
23. Oregon
24. USC
25. Wisconsin
>>63645051
Navy and USC are memes and so is Stanford
2nd for /top4/
>staymad
>>63645051
>USC below ole miss
gay as fuck desu
tOSU
2. Bama
3. Oklahoma
4. Clempson
5. BootyBlasters
6. Iowa
7. Houston
8. Northwest Missouri St.
9. OK St.
10. Jacksonville State Gamecocks
ND will lose to BC this week
cap this
>>63645077
ND isnt dropping anywhere if the committee is actually putting them at 4 for the second straight week over undefeated Iowa or even Okie State
>>63645113
who is this semon demon?
>>63645051
>UNC will not make top 4 even if they run the table
Fuck the selection committee. They'd put Notre Dame or the Pac 12 champ in just with 2 loses before a 1 loss UNC Conference champ
Iowa and Okie Lite don't need to be butthurt. Iowa gets to play a Top-10 B10 team in the championship, and OKST presumably gets two Top-10 B12 teams (assuming Oklahoma doesn't choke). Both of those will look better than Notre Dame in the end.
Also, why the fuck are Memephis, Oregon, and USC ranked while Wash State isn't?
Committee will put Alabama #1 when its all said and done
1. Alabama
2. Clemson
3. Ohio State
4. Oklahoma or Bootyblasters (hopefully not though)
>>63645082
did someone on tv say that?
>>63645091
>everyone who isn't sec is a meme
>sec is so good
ya, that's why the sec got fucking btfo last year in rivalry week, playoffs and bowl games. sec is overrated
>>63645077
Wait a sec..you mean to tell me Clemson almost Clemson'd?
>>63645154
The entire SEC E is a meme.
It's even better because they act like they're legit like the West.
>>63645129
Alabama's Running game and their Run-Stop Defense are definitely the best in the league though
>>63645129
>claim that FCS opponents hurt your playoff standings
>Alabama plays three FCS teams
ALABAMA HAS ZERO QUALITY WINS
>muh eye test
LSU looked like number two and then they end up losing to Bulemia and the Boys. You cannot make a claim that one loss Alabama is any better than the rest of the one loss teams.
>>63645168
implying the West didn't embarrass the conference during bowl season
>>63645160
yes?
also:
5 conference champs + 1 group of 5 team
1 + 2 byes
3 vs 6
4 vs 5
reseed for semis
force ND to join a conference
everyone wins
>>63645154
This has nothing to do with the SEC and everything to do with USC losing three games and Navy being in the AAC
Official REAL CFB Top 4 Rankings:
1. Alabama
2. Clemson
3. Ohio State
4. OSU
>>63645179
The East embarrasses the conference by sending Missouri to championship games.
>>63645146
Only real explanation is the committee is trying to artificially increase ratings. Can't believe we're stuck with a group of people who decide shit like this.
>>63645168
>West
>Not a meme
Every team is shit aside Bama
>>63645196
>OSU so good you list them twice
Thanks anon, nice
>>63645051
>Ole Miss, USC, Oregon, and FSU having any business whatsoever being ranked
>>63645176
Wisconsin will become one again if they win out.
Also it will make Iowa look good too.
>>63645212
OSU is Oklahoma State, idiot.
Alabama is winning out and going to the playoffs.
Cry me a fucking river you bitching little babies. WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
>>63645231
>>63645212
It's agreed upon that they're OK St.
>>63645231
The only idiot I see is you
>>63645176
And Bama got curbstomped by a team that lost to fucking Memephis who couldnt even beat a military school its bias like fucking crazy.
>>63645243
Ohio State=tOSU
Oklahoma State=OSU
Oklahoma State barely beat Texas and ISU. They don't deserve top 4 right now. ND beat Texas 38-3.
>>63645218
That would also discredit the claim that early-season Alabama was worse and could lose to Ole Miss. If you consider Wisconsin a quality win, which it could very well be, Ole Miss is not a fluke loss.
>>63645243
Okie Lite, bae
Can this season just be over already?
>>63645194
regarding usc, you have to be a little ignorant if you don't realize they had a coaching change after week 4/5...they are not the same team now (a head coaching change will do that). also, 3 wins, riding a 4 game winning streak isn't really that farfetched for top-25. shit, by the end of the year, probably half of the top-25 will be 2-4 loss teams.
>>63645251
Suck my dick faggot. Maybe if you cry hard enough things will change.
reminder that bama getting exposed by ohio state will be a yearly occurrence and theres nothing you can do about it
>muh henry Heisman even though elliott is better
>losing to ole piss
Alabama schedule
NOT ONE
NOT TWO
BUT THREE FCS SCHOOLS
THEY'RE BEST WIN IS AGAINST LSU BUT LSU JUST LOST TO SHIT ARKANSAS
NOT TO MENTION THEY HAVE A LOSE
NOT TO MENTION THEY LOSE TO OLE MISS
THE SAME OLE MISS THAT GOT BLOWN OUT AGAINST ARKANSAS.
>>63645051
i like this map
>>63645258
>>63645243
BUT WHAT ABOUT OREGON STATE?
why is navy ranked higher than Houston?
>>63645258
tOSU = Ohio State
OK St. = Oklahomo State
OSU = Beavers
>>63645289
They only play one FCS team
What is this.. some kinda meme?
>>63645251
"Curbstomped" isn't exactly what happened. Alabama played their worst game of the last 5-6 years and was still within a TD when the game ended. Ole Miss literally had to have a miracle play happen to let them win.
The loss should count against Bama but it's not like Ole Miss dominated the game. Bama shot itself in the foot time after time and they haven't looked like that since then.
>>63645289
Ohio State lost to Va Tech last year and then won it all.
I know its hard to not be Alabama, but take the Alabama dick out of your mouth.
LSU will lose to Ole Miss this weekend
>>63645305
"Quality Loss"
We have reached the point where losing is actually better than winning
Daily reminder that Ohio State in the CFB Playoffs this year will be just like FSU last year.
1. Both teams won the previous year's championship.
2. Both teams will enter the playoffs undefeated.
3. Both teams have QBs who had legal, off the field issues.
4. Both teams had easy, weak schedules.
5. Both teams blown the fuck out in the 2 vs 3 seed game.
>>63645051
>Florida not top 5
shit ranking tbqhwysd (to be quite honest with you sempai desu)
Orst or wOrst, which ever you prefer
>Stanford
Post yfw BootyBlasters choke against BC
ITT: A bunch of teams that will never make the playoffs complaining about Alabama dominating college football for the last decade.
dubs4repeat
>>63645321
They might as well have 3 FCS schools with fucking 1-9 Louisana-Monroe and Middle Tennessee on the schedule.
>>63645289
ARKANSAS LOST TO HOLY TOLEDO
WHO LOST TO NORTHERN ILLINOIS
WHO LOST TO CENTRAL MICHIGAN
WHO LOST TO WESTERN MICHIGAN
ALABAMA IS WORSE THAN A 6-4 MAC SCHOOL
>>63645275
USC is at least a week out of the top 25 still. Yes Sarkisian was a huge distraction but that doesn't change their resume from being their resume. Wazzou deserves in over them
>>63645289
i've said it before and i'll say it again:
if you count wins against fcs (div 2) schools on your schedule, you should not be eligible for the fbs (div 1) championship. simple as that.
if you want to play them as a scrimmage or whatever, fine, but they absolutely should not count towards your stats nor your record in fbs (div 1) football. it's complete bullshit and the sec should be ashamed of it.
>>63645366
Or at the very least they should be forced to play the top FCS teams if they insist on it.
These trips say Alabama is dropping a game before the end of the season
Alabama's best win will be when they dominate UF 41-3 in the SEC Championship game.
reminder that bama will lose to auburn, UF will lose to FSU, and the SEC will be left out of the playoffs
>>63645352
how is not getting past the first round of the playoffs "dominating?" how is not even being in the championship discussion the year before "dominating?"
serious inquiry. i'm genuinely curious as to how your southern espn-addled brain will somehow justify your previous statements.
>>63645366
First you have to prove the best FCS and D2 aren't better than average p5 teams.
Which the FBS doesn't want to allow.
>>63645366
FCS is Div-1... But it is still Div-1AA
So it's really D1-Lite, all the poor schools go here.
>>63645366
The top FCS teams are at least as good as or better than the shittiest CUSA and Sunbelt teams though.
>>63645417
Alabama could play 2015 Kenny Stabler at QB and not lose to Aubie.
1. Ohio State
2. Notre Dame
3. North Carolina
4. Navy
Search your feelings, you know it to be true.
>>63645421
You are a moron.
>>63645387
nah, they should simply have to play a full 12-game regular season schedule of div 1 teams, and if they want to tee off on fcs teams for a paycheck, tack it on to their normal schedule, but it's bullshit to play 3-4 less "real" games to rest starters while the rest of the country has to fight it out against div 1 competition
>>63645417
>Bama losing to Auburgers
>>63645417
Alabama would beat Auburn this year with their 2nd team
>>63645425
>>63645431
>>63645422
but then why the fuck even have division designations in the first place? there are 130 fbs schools. there is not reason to be scheduling in a lower division if you want to be taken seriously as a championship contender. look, if you are a bottom-dweller in a major conf, i guess you can schedule fcs schools all you want, because you're not worried about potentially getting into the playoff, but if you want into the playoff, yo should be required to play fbs competition all year long. it's only fair.
Well I predicted the top 10 right. After that lel.
>>63645482
>>63645470
>>63645445
>muh eye test
It's a trap game, have fun with zero legitimate championships in the entire history of your program.
>>63645454
so that's how you'll do it? be completely ignoring my post altogether and posting the same fake meme image about an entire conference.
i was replying to a post about bama. only bama. not the sec. not any other team. just bama. do you understand that? how is your image relevant to bama? they have not been "dominating" and i proved it. you proved nothing by posting some image about conf head-to-head matchups.
>>63645456
>>63645495
This is leftover shit from BCS era.
And games are scheduled so far out teams can't catch up now.
They need 2 more years and some schools need 4 years to start scheduling properly.
>Playing real games and risk losing your conference seeds in the first 3 weeks
>>63645524
Don't they have 3 National titles in the last 10 years?
>>63645534
Alabama is playing Charleston Southern this week.
>>63645524
Alabama has dominated college football for the last decade. If you think otherwise it's because your team sucks dicks and you're mad as fuck.
Alabama is going to win another national championship this year, and no amount tears from your teenage eyes will change it. Boo fucking hoo.
Alabama will win the championship this year giving Saban 5 Nat'l Title wins.
This is 100% going to happen.
>>63645559
>>63645569
Alabama will get btfo by Ohio State just like last year.
>>63645327
>Alabama played their worst game of the last 5-6 years
I thought that was the Ohio State game? Wait, no, wasn't it the Oklahoma game?
>>63645547
That was most likely scheduled two years ago.
What do you want them to do? Give Charleston free money to please Condi? And then play no one because no one is available?
>>63645130
because unc is a joke with a shit loss to a high school team and two OOC games against JV middle school
>>63645581
Alabama will be the #1 seed. Ohio State will be #3. Ohio State will lose to the #2 seed and not face Alabama.
>>63645581
>implying Ohio State doesn't drop one to State or Michigan
K.
>Clempshit
>Still #1
I fucking give up
These useless morons on the committee are fucking morons
The real rankings:
1) Clemson
2) Alabama
3) Iowa
4) Notre Dame
5) Oklahoma State
6) Ohio State
>>63645590
It was scheduled long ago, but it's not even fulfilling the early season role. It's pathetic no matter the championship system.
>>63645593
Stay bootyblasted f.a.m
>>63645559
>not even making it to the championship game
>"dominating"
enjoy your fake bcs trophies, bubba. sec is a meme conference and last year proved it
>>63645130
if the right combination of teams lose UNC could make it
>>63645600
Relax. There is a 50% chance they will lose to UNC.
>>63645619
Why?
Who cares when they play their cupcake teams?
>>63645547
Who is pretty good as far as FCS schools go desu
>>63645596
>State
they've been exposed as a meme team
>Michigan
they're literally incapable of beating Ohio State
>>63645634
yeah, all of them. the tar holes suck ass and so do their fans, kentucky would booty blast those chumps, just like in basketball
>>63645632
>we beat the worst Alabama team of the last decade
>Alabama was exposed
You are fucking retarded.
I'm done with these threads. A bunch of college aged kids who don't know dick about football.
>>63645335
I don't think so m8, last years Florida State teams always went into halftime losing to shit teams before barely escaping in the 2nd. Ohio State hasn't done that to the extent FSU did. I'm not saying a 20-17 win over Northern Illinois is acceptable but it they haven't been in the situations FSU was last year.
>>63645643
Yeah because Ohio State has beaten so any ranked teams this year.
>they haven't even played a ranked team
>>63645651
You're going to be eating those words out of your ass when UNC booty blasts UGA to start next season.
>>63645651
>impersonating me with an elementary tier trolling attempt
pathetic
>>63645634
Florida, Iowa, Michigan State, Michigan, Utah, Stanford, Oklahoma and Oklahoma State all have a chance to get in even if people do fall the right way. I do think they would get in over Notre Dame because of the head-to-head, though.
>>63645667
UGA will beat your little basketball school into the ground, screencap it. if I'm wrong I'll switch my name to BITCH TO ACC for a year
The Cleveland Browns would bootyblast all of these teams
>except Alabama
>>63645670
Are you having a stroke right now?
Calm down. Daily reminder that Alabama will beat Auburn: 52-0
>>63645099
As an Iowa fan I have no problem with Notre Dame being in the top four. They are more deserving than anyone else from the Big XII and if they win out should be in against anyone from that conference.
Of course TCU and Baylor can both win this weekend, fuck over the state of Oklahoma and the Big XII much like the Pac-12 becomes irrelevant in the football playoff discussion
>>63645655
>gets rekt by facts
>ragequits
pretty much as expected from braindead southerners
>>63645637
>Losing to the Gamecocks
Yeah right
>>63645683
bullshit. You promised to switch to BITCH TO B1G this year after Ohio State beat Bama.
Harvard, Jacksonville st, Charleston is fucking 9-1
I have a hard time believing they wouldn't bootyblast most of the SECE
As a Stanford fan I'm amazed that they are ranked still in the Top 15.
As a Stanford fan I also can't wait to watch the hurt they put on kal this weekend and next when they face the Overrated Bootyblasters
>still caring about this pleb armegg non-sport
better star watching you real sports fucking Murrilards
>>63645699
If you don't think Alabama has been the best team in the last decade, you're the mentally deficient hick.
What team has won more championships in the last decade?
None.
>>63645662
Just like last year too
>>63645714
I didn't promise you queers shit, learn to count how many teams you have in your conference.
>ib4 muh b1g education
>>63645731
but FSU has sent more players to the NFL than any other school the last decade
>>63645670
>>63645683
Whichever one is real I expect you to change the name in 10 months
>>63645662
The have also not lost any games.
>>63645727
As an Oregon fan at the game last Saturday, I'm a believer that Cal can win. Your secondary is looking like ours from the beginning of the year.
>>63645687
kek I'm a Browns fan and even I know they would probably lose to a mid-tier MAC school. They're terrible this year
>>63645746
Alabama has sent a ton of great players to the NFL, and they have won the most championships in the last decade.
>>63645746
he said best team, not the best players
kek
>>63645681
UNC would jump the 2 loss Pac 12 teams if they beat Clemson
So if Stanford beats ND it very well could be a final 4 of 1 loss ACC champ, 1 loss SEC champ, 1 loss Big 12, and 0 or 1 loss Big 10 champ
they moved up 6 spots this week which is one of the biggest jumps ever for the committee
>>63645730
Build Wall
>>63645757
SO they are right up there with Harvard and Iowa
If UNC beats Clemson, do they make the playoff game?
Will the Big12 champion jump Notre Dame?
>caring about cfb rankings before the end of the season
>>63645746
Alabama still swung its dick all over top OOC opponents in the past decade. Dabo has a job because of Alabama ffs.
>>63645610
I would put Iowa at four as an Iowa fan but your top four is what it should be. Ohio State finally has to play someone tougher than a piece of paper or the blind school
>>63645770
Harvard got bootyblasted by Penn
See >>63645113
>>63645495
I agree with you. They shouldn't have these FCS schools as opponents, especially in the middle of their season.
Looking on Bama's schedule, I'm seeing their next opponent is FCS CHARLESTON SOUTHERN. ALABAMA vs LITERALLY WHO from WHAT CONFERENCE? I can understand that the FCS schools does this to make money. But really it's only a means of just padding their win column, as well as getting an HBCU band to play entertainer for 8 minutes of the half. And even then, you don't schedule something like this TOWARDS THE END OF THE YEAR.
But here's the kicker: the funny thing is that FCS schools actually have a legit championship playoff, much like high schools do with divisionals, regionals, state, and nationals. Even ten-team conferences have championships to decide their one-true champ.
In a nutshell, FBS:
SEC, ACC, Big Ten, [insert power five here]
Two teams outside looking in, no consolation prize.
Just 4 teams picked by a biased committee who can be bought off.
Only one comes out.
FCS:
24 schools get in
No committee buyouts
No bowls
No Power conferences to hog the talent pool
No bullshit
One comes out a champ
>>63645776
Not with that schedule.
these are the rankings that I had
1 Clemson
2 Alabama
3 Ohio State
4 Notre Dame
5 Iowa
6 Oklahoma State
7 Oklahoma
8 Florida
9 Michigan State
10 Baylor
11 Michigan
12 North Carolina
13 TCU
14 Navy
15 Houston
16 Florida State
17 Stanford
18 LSU
19 Northwestern
20 Utah
21 Wisconsin
22 Oregon
23 USC
24 Washington State
25 Mississippi
>>63645757
Iowa here at 10-0 and having actually played people. Ohio State is nothing but name brand and an overactive coach and nothing on the field.
Also Ohio State Iowa has the superior quarterback this season. Know why? Well mine doesn't have to play musical fucking chairs on a week to week basis
>>63645776
need ND to lose and it is possible because last year they put Ohio State in out of nowhere in the very last poll
>>63645308
I'd like to see her beaver
Colleges that have sent the most players to the NFL in the last decade:
1) FSU
2) Miami FL
3) USC
4) Alabama
5) LSU
6) Florida
7) Georgia
8) Ohio State
>>63645776
UNC won't make the playoffs even if they beat Clemson.
The Big 12 winner will jump over ND in the very last rankings, and then the Catholics will bitch and moan like Art Briles did last year.
Iowa fan here, what do you guys think of Colin Cowherd shitting on the fact that Iowa is ranked #5?
Personally, I think he has some points when it comes to strength of schedule, but regardless Iowa is still unbeaten. The only way I see them getting into the top 4 is winning the B1G championship
>>63645495
It's so the FCS schools can get money.
>>63645776
The refs literally will not let them win that game.
The last week of college football is the most refball of any sport, at any level, in any part of the year
>>63645767
I'm not convinced they'd make it over a 2-loss Stanford with a win over ND.
Stanford needs to lose to Cal and beat ND and Utah needs to lose to UCLA or Colorado for UNC to make it in over ND and the Pac 12 champ.
>>63645759
Sure, but Goff hasn't looked great lately, and I think the secondary just had an off night. I never like the prospect of them facing a pass heavy team (see: Wazzu) but I think that they're solid and explosive enough on offense to make up for it. Given that Oregon put up 700+ yards on kal, I'm not convinced that McCaffrey and friends won't do similarly.
>>63645776
No, but I hope they win because the ACC has no place in the cfp
I still cannot figure how people have Ohio State ranked higher than Iowa.
Same record
Iowa has played two ranked opponents
Ohio State has played none.
>>63645830
He is a moron Pac 12 homer. Nobody cares what he thinks. He just trolls people and makes them rage and gets paid for it.
He's the Howard Stern of sports. No talent idiot.
>>63645724
Jacksonville St lost only to Auburn, who they could've beaten if it wasn't for a bad coaching call.
>>63645827
the Big 12 could jump ND and that would still leave a spot for the ACC champ since Clemson would be out too
>>63645870
The SEC wouldn't need an "apologist" if the BCS wasn't a complete fraud all those years.
>>63645776
Stanford, Utah, and ND need to drop at least one more game for UNC to make the playoffs (assuming they run the table).
Even in this situation I can honestly see the committee putting in OU/OSU or Iowa just to fuck UNC over.
>>63645870
I just think it's funny how he says he doesn't give a shit about Iowa, but keeps returning to the subject every single god damn day
>>63645519
>implying I cheer for bummer
>>63645861
there is no way Utah is making it
Stanford might need another loss which could occur in the Pac 12 championship game
>>63645867
muh eye test
This committee shit is awful; they should have scraped the top 4 off of the BCS ranking system. Pathetic how the AP and coaches poll waited for permission from the committee to drop OSU.
>>63645891
I have a feeling that the Pac 12 and ACC are fighting to see who can be this year's Big 12 in being left out of the playoffs.
Pac 12 already out. If Clemson loses, so is ACC. And rightly so.
>>63645902
>Stanford
>Utah
>Just got dropped this past week.
I can see your argument for Notre Lame, but Pac12 have not a fucking prayer to even reach the top 10
reminder that UNC will have the best win of the season if they beat #1 Clemson and there is nothing any of you all can do about it
>Pac 12 not already totally eliminated
>>63645926
>Pathetic how the AP and coaches poll waited for permission from the committee to drop OSU.
This
>>63645898
I'm an apologist because the BCS committed an absolute travesty in 2004 when they put USC and Oklahoma over an undefeated superior Auburn team.
Colley has compiled the "BCS Rankings" based on the formula they used:
1) Clemson
2) Ohio State
3) Alabama
4) Oklahoma State
5) Notre Dame
6) Iowa
7) Oklahoma
8) Florida
>>63645916
If UNC beats Clemson and Stanford and Utah both win out, with Utah winning the Pac, I can definitely see Utah getting the #4
Granted that's very unlikely but I can't see the committee putting a 1-loss UNC, 1-loss Iowa, or 2-loss ND in over a 2-loss Pac 12 champ Utah. Not a Utah homer by any means.
>make /sp/ explode
>bc beats nd
>msu beats ohio state
>nd loses to stanford
>msu beats iowa in the b1g champions hip
>north carolina beats clemson
>stanford, msu and unc make the playoff
>>63645962
USC and Oklahoma were undefeated and the SEC hadn't won shit since Tennessee in 1998
Auburn barely beat Virginia Tech in a bowl that year USC would have destroyed them
>>63645830
They chose consistency over Oklahoma State's win over TCU
>>63645949
>there is nothing you can do about this hypothetical situation with an astronomically low possibility of happening
>>63645987
Auburn was undefeated.
Auburn had a much harder schedule than both teams.
USC cheated and got their title vacated anyway.
>>63645949
Yet, a Big 12 team would get in before UNC. Enjoy your big victory against an overrated opponent.
>>63645975
No fucking way Clempson jumps tOSU in a BCS style
>>63645926
I should clarify since this is contradictory how it's written. It should use the BCS formula, with poll voters ranking with strength of schedule in mind. The computers were a positive force for comparing teams that don't have a lot of schedule connections, much better than human retards. And not ESPN's FPI garbage.
>>63645946
My point is that UNC's chance is so far out that for them to even be considered we'd have to reach the point where the playoff teams have blown up so much that the Pac 12 is considered viable again.
>>63645864
I imagine it will be similar to the game you guys played against Wazzou. Both teams will score a bunch of points and it'll come down to the wire. And as much as I think McCaffrey is a great player, he's been slowing down lately along with Hogan. I think teams have finally figured them out.
>>63645987
The NCAA Title game happened in Jan 2005. In Jan 2004, the very year before, LSU, an SEC team, literally won the title.
Read a book.
>>63646007
SEC was ass in the early 2000s especially 2004
when Urban Meyer got to Florida and Saban got to Bama is when the SEC got better but they are still overrated as fuck every preseason
>>63646018
The ranking uses the polls. The AP would have kept OSU one without bending over for the committee's philosophy, but he has to use what the AP ranks.
>>63646035
2003-04 LSU would like a word with you.
>>63645985
I'd like to see these teams make it but that's also probably the worst outcome. Seeing Stanford and UNC in the playoff would feel wrong.
>>63645051
>oklahoma lost to texas
>Bama lost to a team that lost to MEMEphis
>Clemson is in the shittiest conference
>Iowa and OSU has beaten literally noone
>OK state beat overrated B XII teams
>Florida almost lost to Vandy. VANDY
this year has no front runners, and it makes no sense
i love it
>>63645949
I bet this game will end up like the Clemson/FSU game from 2013.
>we're putting up the same stats as clemson
>we're scoring 50+ points in many games like clemson
>our schedule is just as difficult as clemson's
>clemson 56 UNC 14
>9 t-times out of 10, we would have b-beaten clemson
>>63646030
not until you have sex
2003 LSU was the worst BCS champion ever aside from Tennessee without Peyton and 2 loss LSU in 2007
>>63646007
Nope
Before the bowls, Auburns best win was #8 Georgia
USC beat # 6 Cal
Oklahoma beat #4 Texas
USC and Auburn both had 4 Top-25 wins and Oklahoma had 5.
Auburn was third best any way you look at it unless you are simply a homer.
>>63646065
You underestimate the power of Clemsoning.
>>63646063
Alabama is the clear front runner.
>>63646030
>>63646048
>this repetition
>the state of public trips
>>63646018
>complaining about shitty rankings
*cough*
>>63646018
the ranking uses the polls and the computer average, just as the BCS used to do.
>>63646063
It will get a frontrunner once tOSU gets their chance to destroy good competition.
>>63646077
Auburn literally had a better SOS than both teams.
>>63646079
>Clemsoning
>>63646112
Would have been solved with a 4 team playoff anyways.
>>63646131
If Clemson loses, it won't be a close game.
>>63646134
Yeah, which Auburn would win.
Jason Campbell + Ronald Brown + Cad Williams=CFB success, but not NFL success.
>>63646112
god, that is pathetic. I have the schedule right in front of me.
once again. Auburn and USC beat 4 top-25 teams and Oklahoma beat 5 top25 teams.
USC and Oklahoma both beat higher ranked teams than USC.
Can you not even read?
>>63646139
sure
>>63646134
>barely beat Va Tech in a bowl
>think you would have beat 2004 USC
reminder that when a national title is vacated the runner up doesn't get the title
>>63646150
You sound upset. SEC > Rest.
>>63646079
\o/\o/\o/\o/
>>63645091
A meme that's gonna booty blast Notre Dame
>>63646175
so you're a troll, and not an apologist at all. It's okay, the KING OF SEC is still the better troll.
>>63646175
>rooting for a conference
>being this salty over getting keked in the Civil War
>>63646175
Rest > FCS > Division II > Division III > 6A High School > 5A > 4A > 3A > 2A > 1A > AA > JV Football > Middle School > Pee Wee league > Adam Sandler > SEC
>>63646221
they don't even root for a conference, just half of a conference.
hurr our division of our conference is the best
>>63645746
>still relying on fake bcs mnc's
>living this hard in the past
which conference has never been to the playoff finals? hint: it's not the pac-12, and it's not the b1g
>tfw 2013 florida state team is the greatest team in cfb history in terms of nfl talent.
>>63646244
The SEC East should just be sent to the ACC fuck them holding the conference down
>>63646244
They don't even root for the good half. They root for the overrated half, and then treat the East like some 3rd world stepchild.
But they wanna claim them when they do good in post-season after the side they've been praising goes to the shits.
>>63646276
when else has a team have every starter about to play in the nfl?
>>63645819
jesus christ...but i thought bama was "dominating" cfb. oh wait, the only thing they "dominated" was the bcs beauty contest. once you had to play your way in to the championship game, guess who was nowhere to be seen?
>>63646293
> and then treat the East like some 3rd world stepchild.
That's the entire FBS
>>63645819
being a good nfl player doesn't mean you are a good cfb player
bama produces a lot of top tier guys who don't fit in to the nfl because they are too physical for the nfl's pussy ass new playstyle, trent richardson if he was allowed to play in college today would run for over 200 a game for sure and yet he can't even get a job in the nfl
>>63645843
i understand that, but how does that change any of the points made? that is a complete non sequitur. all of the reasons listed here:
>>63645495
>>63645366
are still valid.
if you schedule a lower division, you should not be eligible for a higher division's championship. how does anyone else not see this?
>>63646305
Ohio State is the first true cfb champion. The playoff totally exposed the BCS bullshit.
SEC fans and FSU fans are still in denial.
>>63646371
one fucking games doesn't mean anyone is exposed, ohio state got lucky if anything
>>63645147
I think 3 of those teams will lose before then.
And Oklahoma isn't one of them.
>>63646392
There is a big difference between 1 game than 2 games.
And Urban took it to everyone with his QB there was no film on.
>>63646392
this is how these threads always end. the SEC fags just admit they were trolling the whole time and say "look at all these butthurt responses" to show they were successful.
Every cfb thread is like this.
>>63645147
if bama wins out I don't see how they aren't #1
>>63646007
usc never cheated. look into the case. you obviously have no idea what you're talking about. reggie's parents were given rent-free place to live to entice reggie to LEAVE USC EARLY AND GO PRO. how is this "usc cheated?" serious inquiry. im genuinely curious to see what kind of mental gymnastics your tv-raddled brain is still capable of.
>>63646416
because they lost to a crappy team.
>>63646417
reggie lost his heisman and usc lost a bunch of wins and scholarships
sounds like cheating to me
>>63646276
>>63646298
>most of then will never reach a pro bowl
you can't come close to Miami's 2002 class, nobody ever will
>>63646007
get fucked bitch
http://www.winsipedia.com/usc/vs/auburn
should've won in 02 and 03. lost your right to talk shit after getting positively btfo by based usc
>>63646421
ole miss could booty bast clemson nd and anyone else in the top 4 that's not bama
>>63646007
http://deadspin.com/5975168/the-definitive-list-of-actual-no-bullshit-college-football-national-champions-or-why-alabama-is-a-liar
suck it
>>63646446
Ole Miss got bootyblasted by Memphis and Arkansas.
and they beat Alabama.
>>63646446
Ole Miss already bootyblasted the supposed #2 team in the country. Your post doesn't make sense.
>>63646030
see:
>>63646449
neither lsu nor auburn have any claim to 03 or 04. both are usc's and they didn't cheat to get them (unlike auburn admittedly paying cam newton to attend auburn)
>>63646426
sounds like a witch hunt to me. again, you obviously have absolutely no knowledge of the case itself. you just parrot what espn tells you to think.
http://www.ncaainjustice.com/
there are a lot of hard words in there, but i think you can manage to read it
>>63646449
>lose bowl game
>claim national title
SEC fags.
![Big-12-new[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/iQl56CF.jpg "Big-12-new[1].jpg")
JUST
>>63646532
meh
>WSU not ranked
Fucking BOOOOOOOOO
wisconsin had a bye week remained 25th..ole miss also had bye week unranked last week jumped all the way to number 20...would love to hear the committees reasoning for that
McNeese State would bootyblast every SEC team
>>63646581
they should be where ole miss is, desu senpai
>>63646063
>TCU barely beat Kansas
Is college football just a stale meme?
>>63646694
college football is everything.
Also Mount Union had more national titles in one decade than Alabama has had in 100 years
>>63646581
>lose to FCS team
>complain about being unranked
>>63646740
LSU is worse. They canceled a scheduled game against an FCS team rather than face humiliation.
>muh SEC
>>63646532
ADD HOUSTON
>>63646730
NCAA Championships are not National Titles.
If Ohio State and Notre Dame win this week, Alabama should drop to 4 or 5 based on who they play this week. Get Iowa or Oklahoma State in the 4 spot.
>>63646772
BCS "titles" are not real Championships
>>63646608
Ole Miss beat Bama, gotta keep them high ;)
>>63646756
I'm sure they're regretting it now that their 40 year old RB will be missing stats while genericAlabamaRB #41241 will racking up 400 yards on that middle school team they're playing this week
>>63646756
>cancel a game
>get an extra home game
meme team supreme
>>63646608
Ole Miss has three quality losses:
>Memphis
>Arkansas
A quality loss to an unranked team counts as a win in the SEC
>>63646608
ole miss booty blasted the #1 team in the nation aka bama imo they deserve at least a top 20 ranking
>>63646773
Top ESPN
>>63646608
It only took like 2 weeks last year for the world to learn that ESPN is paying at least 1/4 of the committee to try to force the SEC whenever they can
WIth another 1/4 of the committee being people that don't even watch football and just go by whoever ESPN talks the most
