FetLife discussion thread? I know a Kink Thread exists, it's just everyone copypasta'ing prompts.
Talk FetLife, experiences, uses, profiles, likes/dislikes, etc. you can even copypaste your fetishes list if you want
people post your stuff so I don't feel 2shy by posting alone pls
go go go
wife and i were members for sometime. never met anyone in person, although we were close. people take that shit way too seriously, the bishes are crazy and the guys are old and gross.
Have had an account on fetlife much longer than I have used it.
So far nothing has come of it. The submissive path is a difficult one.
== Results from http://bdsmtest.org/ ==
99% Rope Bunny
99% Submissive
90% Slave
76% Pet
70% Masochist
68% Girl/Boy
66% Primal (Prey)
62% Degradee
59% Experimentalist
55% Brat
40% Exhibitionist
33% Non-monogamist
31% Vanilla
20% Ageplayer
14% Voyeur
8% Switch
6% Rigger
3% Sadist
2% Daddy/Mommy
2% Brat Tamer
2% Owner
2% Dominant
1% Degrader
1% Master/Mistress
1% Primal (Hunter)
>>23793491
Anon, no need to be shy this is 4chan, you're a sub aren't you?
>>23793530
Hmm, well I made this post to ask about meeting-up to be straight honest.. interesting you say that. I asked an girl who attending munches and met many guys off FL and she said they were all creepy. She partnered with an old friend from highschool and not a person from FL
>>23793535
Thanks for reminding me anon, I told myself I was going to re-take this and forgot.
>>23793570
we were close to meeting another couple, however it was a woman and her dude on the side. her husband had no idea she was cheating, let alone looking for even more people to cheat with, with her side dude. she was an emotional wreck we weren't down with the drama. we went to one munch and unless you no somebody you might as well be non-existent.
*know somebody>>23793584
....fuck!
>>23793570
I just took it about an hour ago. Confirmed what I already knew.
I don't have very high expectations for fetlife. I live in a shit state when it comes to anything online
>>23793584
Yeah I've met with a couple from craigslist before and they said a real worry was cheaters, it's really hard to vet people from the internet. I'm not into the idea of munches to be honest, and it's awkward saying it to people because it makes me look like I'm just on FL looking for sex which I'm not. I guess you just have to go to the right munch and be sociable.
>>23793599
I've taken it multiple times and had it change on me as I'm inexperienced and still finding my way. What you said made me realize location is probably key even though some general statements can be made on who browses the site.
My results. I'm not surprised this time as they're very reflective of the girl I've been talking to.
== Results from http://bdsmtest.org/ ==
95% Dominant
81% Brat Tamer
72% Daddy/Mommy
71% Degrader
71% Rigger
69% Vanilla
65% Master/Mistress
63% Sadist
51% Primal (Hunter)
51% Voyeur
50% Experimentalist
48% Ageplayer
44% Non-monogamist
40% Owner
35% Switch
17% Exhibitionist
6% Submissive
4% Girl/Boy
3% Primal (Prey)
3% Masochist
2% Brat
2% Degradee
1% Pet
1% Rope Bunny
0% Slave
>>23793723
Of course one can generalize. In fact I believe generalizing to be necessary even though it's politically incorrect.
I live in Colorado which has an interesting habit of non-participation . You even see it on chan. Colorado threads last long and never have more than a few posters. The same applies to dating sites where 90% of the people you encounter are recent transplants.
>>23793729
Seems pretty average to me. Perhaps more common than average.
Just add me. You can see what I do there lol
Wings87
== Results from http://bdsmtest.org/ ==
99% Exhibitionist
98% Rope Bunny
97% Experimentalist
97% Degradee
96% Submissive
96% Voyeur
96% Masochist
96% Switch
94% Brat
94% Ageplayer
94% Pet
92% Girl/Boy
91% Primal (Prey)
90% Non-monogamist
80% Slave
71% Daddy/Mommy
49% Dominant
49% Sadist
48% Degrader
47% Rigger
42% Master/Mistress
36% Owner
27% Brat Tamer
19% Primal (Hunter)
14% Vanilla
need a hot rich man to be my Daddy
>>23793931
>rich
Hue
>>23793834
>generalize
I think the kink community is full of weirdos and neckbeards, especially the ones who participate on FetLife. I feel like I wouldn't have that much in common with them. I just don't feel the need to be apart of the "community" or connect with others on a platonic level.
Yeah that was a very average result. I've come to terms with appreciating that I'm not that kinky and extreme. Maybe I'll develop more into it. I've gotten a lot of different results, originally I went to FL thinking I was a sub, then a switch, and now an average dom.
>>23793931
Damn those are some high numbers, you must have answered with the extremes. Why do so many young girls like old well-off men?
>>23794281
Meant "a part"*
>>23794281
i know what you mean. essentially as a submissive 'male' fonding functional relationships is a problem. while i dont care about the community there it is a bit of a shortcut in networking to find the diamond in the rough.
I still have a profile there.
Mostly use it to see D/s photos nowadays.
Thinking of buying that subscription for the videos.
As for meeting people there... it's a crapshot really.
45% of the girls are certified lunatics, 45% are "I read 50 shades of shit, I totally love BDSM" types.
The remaning 10% are pretty hard to find or live too far away.
I came for the porn, stayed for the porn.
Occasionally some feminist will toss a rant in my inbox and I get a few hours of conversation going on, but I'm pretty sure it's not really healthy.
>>23794299
>as a submissive 'male' fonding functional relationships is a problem
Explain, anon?
Also what do you mean "a shortcut in networking to find the diamond in the rough?" I've been talking to people through messages for geeze, a year and a half. I've had some great conversations and have learned a lot through them, but only now I think I've found a girl I connect with, and we've only been chatting for a month and a bit, but I feel something different with her.
>>23794339
I hate that you have to subscribe to see more on the front page and videos. I also hate the "culture" of the front page, but that's another topic.
I laughed at your description of the population. Probably still depends on location, I've had some good connections (hopefully they aren't lunatics irl). I think there's definitely a big population of feminists/tumblr types. I never get messages in my inbox, I always have to initiate first. I'm curious what your profile is like anon.
Fetlife has brought me much kinky sex and kinky relationships, but dear lord every girl is busted as fucking possible :/
>>23794506
My profile doesn't really have any kinky shit in it.
I made it a couple of years ago when I thought it was like okcupid but for BDSM.
After a year or so I realized that it wasn't.
It's just for people already in the scene to talk and share things. Yeah, you can meet folks there, but I don't think that happens enough times to actually be a viable way to meet people.
https://fetlife.com/users/2060872
You can take a look. It's not very interesting, but it's like I said. I'm there to see, not to be seen.
I lurk a lot, it's an habit I picked up from here.
>>23794506
submissive guys are common
dominant women are rare
women do tend to like me but very very few would consider a relationship because of now submissive i usually am.
when you network among kinksters the odds of meeting a woman who is actually dominant are a bit better
>>23794540
submissive guys still have that public stygma of "you're a submissive guy, that means you're not man enough".
It's one thing submissive girls don't really have to deal with.
Kinda shitty for them, really. Might be a few hundred years before that changes.
>>23794566
i dont think double standards will ever go away.
hell, half of the feminist BS going around is reinforcing half of it.
its interesting that most dommes will still just hang back and wait for the guys to come to them
>>23793166
I think its alright, I use it to keep in contact with people I met at various events, to talk to like minded people, and to meet new people in the area, if you aren't willing to put yourself out there a bit you will get a lot less out of it though.
>>23794582
I got half-scolded once by a sub because I didn't went to her. Shit was funny.
She was a 6/10 (well, 7/10 when she put an effort) and I simply said I liked one of her pics.
Couple of days later she wondering why I didn't pursue her more. I told her that I thought the guy heavily comenting on her profile must have been close to her, and lost interest.
I got a lengthy message that boiled down to "wow, you're shit, you think women can be taken or be property" and the little interest I still had in her went down the drain with a small laugh.
Like I said, 45% lunatics.
Also found one that was on the site for years, but still got heavily impressed at any new thing she saw. A self-confessed 50 shades of shit reader that saw the movie and just had to try the site. Never had a partner except for a long distance thing.
You know, nothing against those people, but if they didn't made profiles, searching for a partner would actually be a worthwhile endeavour.
>>23794610
sounds a lot like anywhere else, actually. at least by my experience. i think the only way to thin out the lunatics is by making them pay. if you can make a profile for free youre going to get a lot of shit youll have to wade through
>>23794639
Most people on fet adapted.
You'll see tons of profiles in Antartica or that state they're 95 years old.
That's just people holding back their real info and lurking, kinda like I do.
Folks already know about the crazies.
Half the guys on fet are also the "hey bab, u wnt sum fuk?" types, so they also learn to dodge that.
>>23794662
exactly what im saying
im pretty good at weeding through the worst of it. it takes time though and my state is still shit for it
>>23794681
Eh, the country I'm in doesn't really let me have many choices.
Weeding through shit is a skill you pick up on imageboards as a whole. Among the sea of shitposts you can usually fish out a good thread here and there.
But when the sea of shit is a puddle, you get a few small fish and be happy with what you got.
Portugal is a shithole for anything farther than Facebook.
>>23794694
cant say i know much about portugal. everyone seems to be content forgetting all about it.
your neighbor on th other hand...
>>23794699
I feel sorry for Spain. Memes aside, they're a nice country to visit. They have this nice tradition fo staying up late and having dinner at 11PM. Folks go out for coffee at midnight, keeps cities much more alive at night.
But their political landscape is a mess, and there's several places going bankrupt.
Half the country doesn't believe in their government, and the other half are rather hostile about it.
I wait to see what comes out of it.
They are rather obnoxious to strangers though.
>>23794714
it is unfortunate.
my ancestors are from spain so i hope it doesnt go to shit again since i really want to visit some day
I'm a 23yr old mixed(black and white) guy.
I've been to a few events through fetlife but unfortunately there aren't too many women in my age group in the area I live.
My bdsmtest.org test results if anyone is interested
96% Master/Mistress
91% Voyeur
88% Bondage Giver
88% Exhibitionist
84% Dominant
75% Brat Tamer
75% Experimentalist
75% Non-monogamist
74% Sadist
73% Primal (Predator)
66% Daddy/Mommy
64% Switch
56% Primal (Prey)
54% Masochist
52% Pervert
38% Degradation Giver
34% Bondage Receiver
34% Vanilla
31% Brat
21% Girl/Boy
21% Submissive
4% All-Rounder
4% Slave
0% Degradation Receiver
>>23794793
You should try some of the older women.
As long as you don't get tied down with one, they're great fun.
JUST deleted mine. Maybe it's just because I'm a girl but i would get 10+ messages a day (I wasn't that active or popular on there) with guys either only saying "hey what's up" or "Hello m'lady. You may call me Sir Darren. I hope your day is going swell...." etc etc.
A handful of people I talked to on there were people I was actually interested in talking to. I met up with 2 people. I also deleted it because I got herpes from one of them. I'm tainted!
>>23795026
Kek. I never know how to aproach girls online, so I haven't really made many tries lately.
Some of the stuff I wrote a couple years ago is cringe worthy shit too.
I mean, how do you strike a conversation with a girl on a site like that? You know you're doing it to see if you can fug her. She knows that too.
It's just awkward all around.
>>23795026
that doesnt sound like much fun. could still be worse
>>23794662
Yeah this is true, the community has changed. But there will always be people who want to remain local or meet up with people. You can't have your cake and eat it too, you have to choose one or the other. I'd say more than half I've heard of girls literally getting spammed. The male community on FL is pretty shameful.
>>23795026
Yeah this comes up at one point in the conversation with most girls I talk to. Lots of sexually forward messaging, kink talk too soon, just general creepiness, etc. It's a shame so many girls just disappear because of this
>>23795036
It's a crapshoot on FL from my experience. A girl I've talked to on and off for months started with referring to something on her profile, asking about it and then offering to chat generally. The girl I'm talking to now was inactive and I just of just sent that I wish she was still there to chat and she responded eventually. Just be genuine I guess? Because they get a lot of cringe, sexual, or copy pasted messages.
>>23795036
Ha most of the cringeworthy stuff was obviously copy and pasted shit and I didn't respond to that stuff. I would rather hear "Your profile peaked my interest. Your pictures are great. How'd you get into ___?
Also how's it going? How is fetlife treating you? I'm ___ btw"
It IS awkward. I'd reply to some guys because I knew it'd make their day. Would never hook up with them though.
>>23795043
Right? Like hiv? Hehe
>>23795055
Yep. So many straight forward guys. "mmm id ravish that pussy"
What am I supposed to say to creepy messages like that?
>>23795083
yes, HIV
did you ever send the first message to anyone while on FL?
>>23795094
To one girl to get her to accept me. And somebody I knew irl. I lurked guys profiles, but ive never been an initiator.
>>23795100
thats the problem. i think more women would have better luck with online sites if they initiated more often rather than waiting and ultimately being swarmed by creeps.
>>23795083
So uhm, no way to ask this without being blunt. What made you want to meet those two guys and fuck one of them? I think I'm doing things right so far with a qt3.14 but already nervous about asking about meeting, mostly when and how to do it. Was it awkward?
Surprisingly a long time ago my first good conversation with someone led her to ask me for a coffee. She was more experienced than me in the scene and I learned a lot from her, but I chickened out and ghosted. We went to the same campus and she was a band geek type person who went on to study music, so I wasn't really into forming a friendship.
>What am I supposed to say to creepy messages like that?
It's a shame you deleted. Most girls I know just don't respond/block them. It's a hassle compared to someone like me who gets no messages, in the end you probably had to fish for the good ones in your inbox.
>>23795120
I don't like sounding desperate, but that's very true. I guess you could say I'm a little socially awkward, so small talk and starting convos aren't my best qualities.
>>23795121
Ummm... I ended up talking to those two on kik. I warned one guy how shy I am and bad at making first impressions. He assured me and was like "we don't have to have any small talk. I'll make you comfortable" helped that he was good looking and he knew it.
You're asking advice from the wrong person lol. It's rare for me to agree to meeting up with people because it causes anxiety.
You're right. I didn't respond to 60% of them. It wasn't worth the time when they're obviously copying/pasting the same message to 100 other girls.
>>23795154
i think its a misconception. its also biased thinking
i cant speak for everyone, but when a woman sends me the first message i dont even consider they are desperate until a conversation or two. i can only assume most genuine guys would see it similarly.
on th other hand just waiting is certainly going to end up with an inbox flooded with cut and paste which most women will tire of rather quickly and rage-quit eventualy
>>23795181
I never rage quitted. I deleted my profile after I received my test results.
>>23795275
i didnt mean to imply that you rage-quit.
i was just pointing out how common it is for women to give up after dealing with a flood of nonsense and cut-n-paste
>>23795283
I dont know. I figured most girls on there are attention whores to some extent and would enjoy it
>>23795283
Can you really blame them though?
I tried Tinder recently. For girls, I'm sure it's 60% chance that every "like" is a match.
For guys though, the routine is something like:
>open tinder
>swipe right everything
>do this for a week
>you get one or two matches
>one doesn't talk back
>the other talks for a bit, then goes AWOL
>repeat
Diferent mechanism, same result: you end up feeling like shit after a while.
Girls end up feeling like guys only want pussy. And come on, they're sorta right.
Guys end up feeling inadequate or "not good enough".
It's a fucked up world for dating nowadays.
Especially for outcasts with no friends, you're stuck eating shit for years until you get a lucky break.
And for both genders, there's one thing that's absolutely terrible: being average. That's how I was called a few months ago. Average.
And aparently, average doesn't quite cut it nowadays.
My advice? If you ever find someone who likes to have fun on fet and actually likes YOU instead of your genitals, hold on to that person.
Because finding another one is a shot in the dark.
>>23795295
some are. about the same percentage as there are creepy guys. a minority
>>23795302
actually, i can,
both genders are at fault by behaving in a way that only strengthens the cycle
>>23795311
But how do you break that cycle?
Guys that don't go "hey beb wunt sum fuk" are about the same as ultra-bitches with high standards: they're too fucking many compared to people that behave like actual humans.
Consider that everytime you message a girl you find interesting, she's gonna see your message crumpled between 18 other messages from Chads.
And girls, even 4/10s get so much attention from thirsty guys that they have little way of knowing if a guy actually likes them or just the tits.
You can't break the cycle by yourself because the people who perpuate it don't care. It works for them. Ultrabitches get plenty to pick from (and they don't care, they'll just around and stay with a guy for a couple of months) and Chads are persistent enough that copypasting the same corny one-liner eventually works for them.
I've seen some folks on fet sugesting making another site for more "outcast" kind of people, but what would that accomplish? The ultrabitches and Chads would take it over in a month anyway.
The solution is to wander and eternally roam from site to site like some sort of hipters. Anything that exists for more than a month is already tainted and you won't have any luck there.
>>23795348
i often wonder how effective a hetero dating site what specifically requires women to send the first message would be.
lets face it, women do tend to be the picker gender. so maybe if they are the ones sending messages to the guys that peak their interest thing wouldn't be SUCH a clusterfuck
>>23795383
Could work. Especially because it would cut the interest of Chads, since they don't get to copypaste the same message over and over again.
But then again, Tinder is almost like that. They gotta swip you right first. And I dunno about other guys, but my experience was >>23795302
and that doesn't sound like it would lead to a sucessfull site.
>>23795402
i never used tinder.
i think a lot of those chads you speak of are norma guys who quickly realize that sending meaninful messages to the few they find interesting nets zero results
>if you cant hit shit with a sniper rifle, break out the fucking minigun
>>23795418
Hum. You might be right.
I still don't want to think I'd get to a position were I'd try that though. I mean, maybe it works? But the results might tie me down with a chick that shares none of my hobbies/interests and that would be terrible for me and her, even if we were great in bed.
>>23795432
apparently it does work. and i do believe that many guys wont drop to that level and essentially just give up taking a hit to their self-esteem in the process
I've had fet for around a year now. I mostly lurk and don't interact much since I know I'm not in a position right now to really go out and meet people.
But I'm getting real tired of seeing all the "I'm a slightly below average-looking man and I'm looking for a SLUT. Line forms to the left, ladies" threads that I see on my Groups feed.
I'm not good looking myself, but I'm smart enough to know better than to think that a hoard of girls are gonna jump on my dick just because I said I'm available. But everyday there's more of these dumbasses making these threads
my fet name is FatChickFister
made mine because I'm a sadist.
>>23793166
Been on here 3 years. Took time off because its fucking hard to get going. Been back on since around December.
Met 2 girls off here, a masochist and a slave/masochist. The latter was the first girl to eat my ass like she was starving and it was perfect. All i expected it to be. Usually im the one rimming. She was petite, pale skin, b cup tits and a nice round ass that I bruised well. Met her on spring break, made ground rules, couldnt go on her roomies side of dorm, she had to check in w her dom at a certain time, and no perma marks. After that i put her collar on anf hooked a leash on it and walked her around the dorm then to the bathroom where she ate my ass. She u dressed me, kissing my feet and my shoes and worshipped my cock and i tasted every inch of her body. Shes a great kisser. She gagged on my cock so much that she had to safe, i wad herfirst black guy and in her words she eas used to smaller white cocks. That was a huge condifence boost seeing as fl is filled w guys w monster cocks especially black guys lol and it kinda made me insecure a bit. Im 8 inches myself. She loved how rough i was and controlling and physical. Her dom is more caring (i am too i loveafrercare but ) and nurturing and he couldnt treat her like the fuck slut she likes to be so they agreed she could get it from someone else. We talked for months on and off nefore meeting. I was so glad she enjoyed me and i showed her a good time, first meet up and ot was great :)
Thats only part of my fetish list. Right now though im not looking to hook up anymore but find a masochistic sub/pet/slave.
>>23795866
Lol @ unsuccessfully blurring atlanta
The profile sorting, or lack thereof, is absolute garbage. If you're looking for a girl in her early 20s you shouldn't have to spend a half hour scrolling through 50 year old dudes.
>>23795995
>standard FL classified
>>23795026
I deleted mine a while back too for similar reasons, plus the only people I actually connected with in my area were people I went to high school with who apparently didn't recognize my profile pictures. It was a little too surreal I guess.
Also I took this test. I disagree strongly with it saying I have ageplayer/little tendencies, as that whole kink just squicks me out something fierce.
== Results from http://bdsmtest.org/ ==
97% Submissive
91% Rope Bunny
65% Pet
62% Masochist
60% Slave
52% Non-monogamist
46% Primal (Prey)
44% Brat
44% Exhibitionist
43% Degradee
43% Experimentalist
40% Girl/Boy
25% Vanilla
20% Switch
15% Ageplayer
8% Voyeur
4% Sadist
4% Daddy/Mommy
3% Dominant
3% Rigger
3% Primal (Hunter)
2% Master/Mistress
1% Degrader
1% Owner
0% Brat Tamer
See my results online at http://bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=1922854
I am on fet again after a while and i just came back for some friends i found there. Sometimes you can find some good people there but it just takes a lot of going through the shit so to say.
>>== Results from http://bdsmtest.org/ ==
98% Dominant
96% Master/Mistress
96% Rigger
91% Brat Tamer
91% Degrader
83% Daddy/Mommy
82% Owner
71% Sadist
60% Vanilla
56% Primal (Hunter)
51% Ageplayer
45% Non-monogamist
42% Voyeur
33% Experimentalist
25% Exhibitionist
4% Girl/Boy
3% Switch
2% Pet
1% Slave
1% Submissive
1% Brat
1% Degradee
0% Rope Bunny
0% Masochist
0% Primal (Prey)
See my results online at http://bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=1834513
https://fetlife.com/users/6016488
98% Degradee
97% Little
96% Submissive
94% Brat
82% Masochist
79% Pet
76% Exhibitionist
70% Experimentalist
67% Ageplayer
64% Voyeur
53% Slave
52% Rope Bunny
>>23795900
A lot of men use fetlife like a dating site instead of a social network, I think that if there was a search function like that, even more guys would do it. Shit would be worse than OkCupid, unbearable.
>>23793570
>you're a sub aren't you?
ye
>tfw got chased off the site by constant 40-50 year old guys trying to hit on me
I-I just wanted to learn more about the local kink community and maybe get involved...
>>23796300
Unfortunately that is most of fet right there.
>>23796283
Maybe, but there would also be more of a chance to find people you like. 4chan adding the catalog improved things in a similar way.
Also from a fellow metalhead into Dd/lg, nice profile. :)
>>23796343
Gotta agree with her. Folks using the site like a BDSM related okcupid would turn it to shit even more than now.
On Fet, you're suposed to join the groups, open threads, talk to people there and then someone has a reason to message you/you message them.
It's pretty much Facebook. You don't strike random conversations with girls on facebook do you?
21/straight/male my results
== Results from http://bdsmtest.org/ ==
98% Dominant
95% Master/Mistress
95% Degrader
93% Sadist
87% Owner
85% Rigger
80% Primal (Hunter)
78% Experimentalist
72% Brat Tamer
70% Voyeur
59% Daddy/Mommy
58% Non-monogamist
58% Exhibitionist
56% Switch
36% Vanilla
33% Ageplayer
15% Submissive
12% Masochist
9% Brat
8% Girl/Boy
7% Primal (Prey)
6% Degradee
5% Rope Bunny
4% Pet
4% Slave
29/f
== Results from http://bdsmtest.org/ ==
95% Switch
91% Sadist
91% Voyeur
89% Dominant
86% Experimentalist
85% Master/Mistress
84% Rigger
75% Submissive
72% Owner
70% Brat Tamer
68% Primal (Hunter)
65% Rope Bunny
65% Exhibitionist
64% Masochist
60% Primal (Prey)
60% Non-monogamist
56% Brat
43% Slave
42% Daddy/Mommy
39% Degrader
30% Degradee
30% Vanilla
23% Ageplayer
17% Girl/Boy
7% Pet
could do with getting back into fetlife. Been neglecting it and not replying to people for a while now..
arsonistlolita
>>23796343
>Also from a fellow metalhead into Dd/lg
Send me a message or post your profile! I wanna see
>>23796804
best thing about fet is that you get to look at porn and cats at the same time.
I'm a bit confused by the octopus though. You took him home?
>>23796981
I live pretty much on the beach so yep I filled a bucket and took him home briefly
Although in hindsight I'm not sure why I never just took a picture with my phone
>>23795510
>But everyday there's more of these dumbasses making these threads
What, bitch?
Hi /soc/!
I am a submissive 18/f from Europe, I'm in a happy relationship but I'm looking for someone (male or female, dom or sub) to talk about kinks to. Not looking for someone to roleplay or for a sexual thing, just generally exchanging thoughts and talking about kinks. I'm especially interested in discussing the psychological side of it all, especially kinks in relationships and how they've affected yours. If you wanna chat message me on skype at alkoholikerclown.
>>23797980
I already posted my profile here >>23794536
If it's just the psycological side I think I can manage a conversation.
Since we're dealing with the BDSM test :
97% Primal (Hunter)
93% Switch
89% Non-monogamist
89% Dominant
87% Rigger
82% Sadist
78% Primal (Prey)
71% Voyeur
68% Experimentalist
67% Exhibitionist
62% Rope Bunny
62% Master/Mistress
61% Brat Tamer
52% Submissive
46% Masochist
43% Vanilla
42% Brat
31% Owner
16% Pet
14% Daddy/Mommy
10% Girl/Boy
6% Ageplayer
5% Degrader
4% Slave
1% Degradee
More info >>23782916
>>23796283
Don't bother adding me, some faggot saved my videos and it's blackmailing me with them so I'm going to close my account
I can never have anything nice going on, fucking amazing.
>>23798252
creepy fuckers
Ive been on there a few times but never really talked to people. Im a 20F from Europe.
100% - Primal (Hunter)
95% - Dominant
93% - Sadist
86% - Degrader
72% - Brat Tamer
63% - Mistress
60% - Rigger
53% - Vanilla
48% - Experimentalist
44% - Switch
39% - Owner
38% - Non-Monogamist
29% - Brat
27% - Primal (Prey)
17% - Mommy
14% - Masochist
12% - Submissive
10% - Ageplayer
6% - Degradee
6% - Pet
5% - Girl
4% - Rope Bunny
4% - Voyeur
1% - Slave
0% - Exhibitionist
>>23798252
RIP another girl gone from FL, you had a nice profile...
>>23798294
Damn, you're rare, you should talk to the sub guy in here
>>23798252
That usually doesn't work unless the guy knows you or where you live.
And if he does, you usually know him aswell.
Blackmail is a crime btw. Sure, he might put you through some shame, but you'll put him in jail.
Speaking from experience here, I've helped a girl who lived nearby to get a guy arrested for pulling that shit. It's usually some /r9k/ reject that figures blackmail is his only shot at getting laid.
Which does suck, since blackmail is also a fetishe.
>>23798456
Yeah, I'm 99% sure it's one of my irl """friends""" since he speaks my local language and I don't remember giving my contact info to anyone from my country that I met online
And to think that in a few hours I have to get dressed and go to university where I'll see all my male friends. I don't know how I'll deal with it, I hate people so fucking much.
hit me up for some chat i am bored
kik: realfrag
>>23798555
Blackmailers are usually disarmed pretty quickly.
Since you narrowed it down to someone you know, don't worry too much about it.
Just send a message on Fet telling him that it doesn't matter if he does it or not.
He's getting jailtime.
Depends on the country I guess. Some parts of europe, you just get him to pay you money, which isn't all that bad.
It's down to how bad the videos where and how your family/friends would react to it.
Hi c:
100% Submissive
100% Slave
98% Bondage receiver
97% Degradation receiver
88% Experimentalist
86% girl/boy
79% Exhibitionist
77% Non-monogamist
71% Pet
61% Ageplayer
54% Masochist
50% Primal (Prey)
49% Brat
45% Voyeur
32% Vanilla
2% Switch
0% Owner
0% Degradation giver
0% Master/Mistress
0% Brat tamer
0% Sadist
0% Primal (Hunter)
0% Bondage giver
0% Daddy/Mommy
0% Dominant
0% All-Rounder
>>23798555
Which country are you from? Australia?
== Results from http://bdsmtest.org/ ==
99% Dominant
99% Master/Mistress
99% Owner
98% Rigger
92% Sadist
92% Degrader
91% Daddy/Mommy
90% Experimentalist
87% Primal (Hunter)
87% Brat Tamer
78% Ageplayer
75% Non-monogamist
69% Voyeur
34% Exhibitionist
23% Vanilla
20% Switch
9% Girl/Boy
8% Masochist
4% Brat
3% Primal (Prey)
3% Rope Bunny
3% Pet
2% Submissive
1% Slave
1% Degradee
See my results online at http://bdsmtest.org/result.php?id=1927583
kik:lio21345
I help run a college kink club in the bay area. Hmu if your not a creep and want tacos. BrownChemStudent is my user
>>23798570
pic of me
kik: realfrag
>>23796669
>You don't strike random conversations with girls on facebook do you?
I've had numerous men do this to me on FB. I'm not sure how they find me, since we never have any mutuals and I don't think you can just browse by location on there, can you?
>>23793166
anyone else find most fetlifers kind of offputting and pretentious?
>>23798252
just own it. tell him to fuck himself and keep doing your thing. technology is going to force humanity to be painfully open about their personal lives to where this won't even be abnormal anymore. everyone knows that everyone does stuff besides church on sundays.
>>23793530
>oldfool kinkster here
the issue with fetlife is, as already mentioned, they do take it too seriously, and most of them think that THEIR way of lifestyle is the Holy Grail.
as for crazy bitches and old and gross, that's for one in the eye of the beholder and second anywhere in daily life
>>23793931
>need a hot rich man to be my Daddy
hot
rich
pick one
>>23796981
>>23798252
Damn it I was going to message you. :(
>>23800003
Right now I'm feeling like shit. maybe in the future I'll do that but idk
>>23800215
Believe me, she probably had several already and shouldn't have much problems finding another one. When you're good looking like her finding rich hot guys in their 30~40s is rare but far from impossible
>>23800231
Ah, sorry.
>message one who looks free and quite fun
>"Sorry, not looking for anything"
Wouldn't really mind if it wasn't the 4th time this year.
The second one I already knew she wasn't into me, I just gave it a try anyway.
But the other 3 all share the same thing: broke up with a guy 2 months ago, and now they are "not looking for anything" for a few months.
Worst thing about this is that you never know when to message them. Wait too long? Oops some other guy already scooped it up. Wait too little? Nah she's not interested.
Atleast some of them bother updating the "I'm looking for" section.
>>23799797
Cool you're at Berkley, I'm in Canada now but used to live in the area. I could see a ton of kinksters going to school there.
>>23799992
Can you expand anon? I more find them weird than pretentious.
>>23800815
This is a weird thing about FetLife, you can never tell what girls are actually looking for. Because of the amount of creepers, girls put up guards on their profile but may actually be looking, if they put looking for a play partner they are bound to get harassed.
For example, the girl I'm talking to right now got into kink chat and started sending me nudes pretty quickly. Her chat is heavily insinuating that she's looking for something in real life but her profile says she's just looking for friendship, to chat and learn, and not to ask for nudes or to be her play partner...
>>23800917
Kink chat?
I thought they removed that from the site?
>>23801063
Nah man I just meant chat about kink interests, I didn't want to say online roleplay because it's not that, but it's kind of soft imaginary what would you do kind of stuff.
