There isn't a proper board for me to post this rant so I'll just post it here.
Why do women and men alike like any style of pantsu beyond the bikini?
The recent trends towards all the square-like or string-like things (thongs, boyshorts, etc) are totally out of synch with what is aesthetically beautiful, and with what accentuates the curvature of the female form (curves are beauty). When you want to de-sexualise something you tend to make it more square. For example. If you want to make sports clothing for women you make them wear SQUARE like things like spats or short shorts. Not to say that revealing a woman's legs isn't arousing. I'm saying that it is far less arousing than the one a true only perfect form of pantsu, which is the bikini. It has the perfect balance of reveal and conceal. It has the perfect shape. It has mathematical precise calculus that bring out the most arousing and beautiful curves of the female hips. (cont)
>>4484844
Anyone who is into any other form of pantsu over the bikini needs to rethink their entire value system. There is nothing superior. You should notice that 'slutty' girls tend to love thongs and boyshorts and basically things that they think are more 'deviant' or 'sexy' when in fact all they are doing is squaring off the female form and making it less artistic, less erotic. There is a reason that very often a scantily clad woman is more erotic than a naked woman. That reason is that the tiny pieces of cloth 'bring forth' the form and curvature of the body. Thongs don't do this. All they make think of is that there is a string caught in between the woman's ass. Or if it's 'boyshorts' or 'hipster' or any other unaesthetic form, it fails to illuminate the beauty of the female hips by making them more like arithmetic instead of calculus. Here's a wager. College douche 'bros' really love to jerk it to hipster wearing girls while refined gentleman who worship the form and curves of the female always and forever appreciate the bikini. Or the string bikini. Curves = sexual, Square = less sexual.
>>4484844
yes but the square is more worldly, and therefore sexier. the bikini pantsu looks a little like regular underwear, which would make it less erotic. It is also more modest which is fairly fashionable today. If the fabric is skin tight the square can be sexier in that it highlights the shape of the butt.
nice dubs btw
>>4484844
I agree
>>4484851
square is more wordly in the sense that it is less spiritual and more like modern industrial civilisation. Anyways I'm talking pure aesthetics here. Curves are more beautiful when it comes to organic matter. Such as the human organism. What we love about the female form are its curves. That which tries to square off the forms of the female is less pleasing than that which celebrates it. Bikini pantsu > hipster, boyshorts, tangas, thongs... these things are degenerate garbage that only douchebags enjoy with no sense of artistry or beauty.
STOP OBJECTIFYING WOMEN
>>4484856
I am appreciating their forms
>>4484852
finally one person
>>4484844
Bikini is good but boyshorts a best though.
>>4484844
448 4 844
aesthetic mirror dubs confirms
>>4484878
NO, FOR ALL THE FUCKIN REASONS I JUST MENTIONED THEY ARENT YOU DEGENERATE SCUM
>>4484881
Variety is the spice of life! Only liking one kind of undies seems silly to me.
>>4484899
That is the beginning of all kinds of deviancy from truth. Variety can come in other ways. But when it comes to the female form, there is only one true way to highlight its beauty and eroticism. Anything which gives heightened accent to the curvature of the form. All else is unenlightened deviancy.
>>4484844
>Square is not sexual
>everyone who watches miecraft porn disagrees with you
>>4484846
To me square blue strips reminds me of fresh things, like ice cream in the summer and beach. For some reason every other color with strips reminds me of food or snacks, black strips -> chocolate, white strips -> cream, red strips -> cherry and fruits, green strips -> vegetables, yellow strips -> cake.
tbh I want to eat that pussy
