I care
>>4306608
Why though?
>>4306617
Love with conditions isn't love.
Unconditional Love.
>>4306620
But you said that you care not that you love
Why do you care?
>>4306641
>>4306644
good dubs but you're still not really answering my question, unless you're implying that care == love which I'm going to have to disagree with
>>4306641
Think about it like this, a person continually says they love you without caring for you in any single way... Is that love?? Or deception?
Love is shared. Love is kept.
>>4306649
True but you can care about something without loving it
>>4306652
that isn't care then.
You are associated labor with care now.
>>4306655
Alright, so we can agree that my defintion of "care" doesn't necesarily involve love, and that yours does, but that doesn't mean that either of us are right.
Also, the whole unconditional love thing is a farce. Under that system of beliefs, why would anything matter? God will love you no matter what you do, so technically you could go slaughter a classroom full of kindergarteners and you would deserve as much love as a person who dedicated their entire life to doing good and helping others. What's the point in believing something as ludicrous as that?
>>4306666
>Alright, so we can agree that my defintion of "care" doesn't necesarily involve love
wrong, merriam webster's dictionary say's that it does involve love is you are intelligent enough to figure out words.
Care: regard coming from desire or esteem.
Desire comes from love. Varying levels. and esteem is admiration for the person. LOVE.
>>4306666
WETNESS°D
>>4306682
Nah, you're still just making shit up to fit your story. You just augmented the definition at the end of your post so it makes sense within your context. I'm sorry if your outdated and archaic belief system fails when held up to scrutiny, but that is unfortunately what has happened.
>>4306697
I'm sorry you want to argue to the argue to death!
