You can (not) stump the Trump
Do people actually get paid to make sh*t like that?
>>4212640
half are them are probably incensed enough to do it for free
dumpass republicuck poaster
>>4213285
>>>/sandersforpresident/
>>4213288
>>>/gooddubsverynice/
le racist senile gramps face
Hilary gon win tbh
1)jewish commie and obvious cuckold
2)commie criminal and woman, also part of the most scandalous family in the history of mankind
3)famous professional businessman who cannot be bought (why would he need money?) and loves america/capitalism
im pretty sure it is obvious that #3 is the correct choice of the current most popular candidates.
>>4214470
trump will win just bc we almost never elect people from the same party 3 times in a row, and when we do the last guy always does something wrong that costs him reelection
if hilary wins she'll automatically be a one termer
i wish ron paul was running, i would vote for him 12 times at once for being a literal hero of the apocalypse
>>4214504
while i'm not really hip on all the memes and stuff (i don't like politics... and i don't vote) won't hillary basically win by default anyway? it's harder for a republican to win cuz they have fewer big states they're guaranteed the votes for. a republican has to carry most swing states to win (like what kind of realistic republican win wouldn't include both florida and ohio?), the democrat can afford to comfortably lose a few and still win, just cuz CA NY NJ IL &c. are so big. so trump is pretty much guaranteed to lose. i'll change my mind if national polls start to show hillary losing, but as far as i know that's not the case.
i also don't really get why 4chan (or is it just /pol/?) likes trump so much, but i don't really care either.
>>4214496
>3)famous professional businessman who cannot be bought (why would he need money?) and loves america/capitalism
The 1% dump on the rest of us, so you trust the man who inherited $200m?
>>4214519
wrong
>>4214496
as you can evidently observe in this fine specimen, ex post facto paultards and other classic imageboard /pol/tards really love gravitating to and deifying every candidate they pick in an election year, and every time it's someone who they'd otherwise brand a pro-israel pro-fed christfag militarist establishment GOP cuckold for one reason or another. also since last year it's been considered vogue and internet coolkid to overuse the word cuck above all other insults to describe anyone they don't like, because it makes them incredibly edgy and original.
whichever man the average /pol/tard makes out to be his king suddenly becomes their ultimate champion of america and free market capitalism and is simultaneously cleansed of all the numerous jewish connections he has. he loves america and capitalism and every other candidate clearly hates both, and that's all that matters. and unless he is the holy and untouchable divinity that is the person of Doctor Professor President Ron Paul, when he loses it's either because of jewish media intervention/vote-rigging or because the guy just wasn't die-hard CONSTITUTIONALIST FREE MARKET CONSERVATIVE LIBERTARIAN enough. but while he has the limelight being even raising an eyebrow at him automatically makes you the definition of everything that is evil and DESTROYING THIS COUNTRY FOREVER, the jewish libtard cuck.
the irony, man
>>4214542
u spent 2 paragraphs failing 2 apprehend that obviously you should support the candidate you want to win
>>4214496
>3)famous professional businessman who cannot be bought (why would he need money?) and loves america/capitalism
To prevent wealthy businessmen from exerting political power through, we will make one of them the president. "3) real life meme" would be more convincing.
>>4214551
why lie to yourself about the candidate you're voting for if they're all literally the same shit?
>>4214555
you realize that literally every dow company (save one) and tons of banks fund hillary
they would have loads more influence under clinton than they ever would under trump, that's the reason so many wealthy people are memeing hard against trump because they dont want to be held accountable by one of their peers
>>4214560
except they're not, and you might be autistic if you can't discern the difference
>>4214555
>>4214567
4 years ago everyone thought trump was a joke but not a real-life meme and now suddenly he's the favorite son of fucking everybody
people are so vulnerable to the media and the opinions of the political beltway that they never stop to realize that the same person usually flip-flops and becomes two or three or even four entirely different candidates who ride popular misconceptions and moment-of-the-now concerns to some vague conclusion every four years, taking everything from statistics to economic models out of context while the public presumes such abridged statements to be objective facts. meanwhile if a fringe website or politician invents a conspiracy theory demonizing some candidate and that candidate is the one you don't want to win, suddenly the conspiracy theory is absolutely true and immune to logical scrutiny just because you like the sound of it. /pol/tards are the most archetypical example of this to be found anywhere that isn't stormfront or some die-hard liberal socialist website.
just one more reason why I don't vote, let alone throw myself behind anyone just because they use such nice sugar-coated language to tell me whatever I want to hear.
you're the autistic one if you think any candidate, no matter what his views are, can ultimately, objectively, change this country for the better or dislodge its corrupt shadowy institutions, simultaneously not do something to massively disappoint the people who voted for him, including you, in the process.
>>4214606
ahaha xd
>>4214555
nice trips to be honest my dude
>>4214609
tee hee <_>
>>4214594
again, /pol/ supports him unquestioningly because as shitty as he is, he's still miles better than the rest, and what small control one has over the future of the country comes down to voting the least shitty candidate into office. /pol/ knows that he has his weaknesses, but you don't fucking win by hand-wringing and saying "oh our guy has problems b-b-but he's the best really guys!" no, you push the good stuff, you pump the positive rhetoric so that your guy wins instead of the other guys who are shit.
everything is a confidence game, you win by inspiring confidence, not by crying in a corner like a little bitch. because the shadowy institutions and the truly evil rely on the same crap to win over votes, which is how a monster like hillary even gets considered for the office despite everything she's done.
no matter what anyone believes, the presidency is not a seat from which one can enact sweeping social change and "save the world" , but that's the rhetoric that wins votes. /pol/ knows that and that's why they laud Trump (and before him, Paul) with ridiculous praise. The difference is that Trump actually has charisma, unlike dear Ron.
if you don't want to vote, if you don't want to fight and would rather resign yourself to helplessness, fine. /pol/ realizes that change is HARD and not instantaneous, but they'd rather put what effort they can into taking baby steps away from the current disastrous road we're on, and elect someone who's not entirely in the pocket of global banks and consortiums
>>4212634
the nazis really admired the authoritarian and jew-hating mechanisms behind the islamic religion and made plans to eventually incorporate ideologically acceptable elements of the religion into the neopagan german aryan-worshipping state religion they hoped to eventually create for the purpose of supplanting the dominance of jew-invented and culturally jewish christianity in europe
so yeah retarded ad hominem-reliant libtard picture OP
>>4214622
>22
>dubs
Your fortune: You will meet a dark handsome stranger
>>4214622
>this is all objective fact and not opinion btw
>if you don't believe this country is in a vastly worse state now than it was in 2008 you're a brainwashed socialist
>if you honestly think we've had presidents worse than the obamunnist then your wife has been sleeping with another man
>>4214632
>who are you le quoting XD I make le post XDDDDD lmaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
- me, 2014
>>4214622
but anon, what if I decide to vote for hillary not because I may or may not support her as a candidate but because I just want to see you get pissed off?
>>4214632
>smugly talking about "objectivity" as if it matters
>pats himself on the back for being so naively confident in his ability to reduce the complex geopolitical issues of the entire planet into a neat list of "objective facts" with which to make his entirely rational and not opinion-based decisions
>reduces himself to meme tier discussion without acknowledging obama's very real failings, namely the absurd ballooning of US debt, the failed stimulus package, and rapidly increasing unemployment rate
>why do any of that when he can just mindlessly make a smug greentext instead
>>4214639
then your mom nerd
>>4214642
>who are you le quoting XD I make le post XDDDDD lmaooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
- me, 2014
>>4214639
I already know that there are thousands of simpletons who's only joy in their meager lives is the tiny one-sided satisfaction they get from being a retard for the sole purpose of being a retard
For a moment I would just feel pity, and then I wouldn't think about it at all
kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew tbh
>>4214642
>my opinion is superior to your opinion/I'm right and you're not
>be on point with the debt problem, but act like it hadn't already been a seemingly impossibly big issue during the 80s and then again from 2001 onward before obama came along and ruined absolutely everything oh lament
>pretend there's actually a consensus among real economists over whether the stimulus package "failed" or not
>look at graphs, make extensive use of rationalization in order to somehow conclude that unemployment has worsened virtually uninterrupted since 2009 and that this has virtually nothing to do with fundamental shifts in economic power due to the inevitabilities of globalization and everything to do with the fact that obama refused to listen to Paul and put absolute faith in the power of the zero-government invisible hand of the free market to produce a 100% guaranteed better result
>the "best" candidate is literally the "best" candidate in totality, not simply the one I like the most or whose (public) positions I agree with the most
>call the other anon smug and naive because there's no way they could have any valid points to make by disagreeing with my flawless rhetoric
>another day, another typical altercation on the internet, where autism is always king
>>4214686
kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew kike cuck nigger jew also who your quoting
>>4214655
by far the most intelligent argument made here
also cool dubs
>>4214688
dubs checked
>>4212634>You can (not) stump the Trump
>>4214686
>implying >>4214632 wasn't a simplistic "i'm right you're not" post with superficial rhetoric
>understands that globalization is the problem but still doesn't want to elect the candidate least in favor of globalization (???)
>doesn't grasp that "best" is still "best" even when it's just shit that's better than the other, smellier shit
>implying it's not smug and naive to point out obvious and defeatist conclusions like some kind of faux "realist" instead of making do with the situation
>>4214704
lol your still isn't say whose he quoted
lol, just lol
chek my dus
>>4214733
NICE dubs!
>>4214704
>believe the other idiot was always trying to frame the argument as a black-white one of "shit vs not-shit"
>even if it's shit it's better than the other shit, how can I be so certain of this, oh right because I'm always right of course
>believe globalization is actually a fucking "policy" instead of an unavoidable (however tragic) natural inevitability that continues to occur regardless of what any given government tries to do to prevent it and thereby be literally north korea in the process of doing so
>"making do with the situation" instead of being a "defeatist"
You've already basically admitted to various flaws in your own rhetoric which make your claims hold no more solid a basis to follow out of either self-interest or for any subjective concept of "the greater good" I may have. You could disagree or "pity" me all you like if I spontaneously decided to veer to the left, but you'd never be able to come up with a strong enough argument to convince any informed but theoretically impartial observer that your position is the better, more logical one, and vice versa. Therefore what you possess is merely an opinion, like all of /pol/ and the mother jones socialist camp, and you're entitled to an opinion, but it's literally nothing more than an opinion and thereby cannot be considered reliable, informed, or even sufficiently "true".
TL;DR you can make do with the situation but you can't logically believe that whatever you go with is "less shitty" than what others go with.
>>4214733
dubs chekd
>>4214745
>but it's literally nothing more than an opinion and thereby cannot be considered reliable, informed, or even sufficiently "true".
good job, now you're ready to participate in politics
>>4214745
>instead of an unavoidable (however tragic) natural inevitability that continues to occur
this sounds like your opinion, not a fact :^)
>>4214787
do u lik huey le wis and le news
dr pavel im cia
>>4214790
yes, did you like my fore?!?!
>>4214795
yes, id like u to post more
