Part 71 >>16820894
Where do you guys usually get full sets like these? I'm not sure where to find them. Contributing what little I have
These threads remind me of a time when every thread on /s/ used to be about great professional shots like these. Nowadays most thread are photos of amateur hags taken with their phones.
why are these hi res threads always filled with these skinny boy body slav skanks?
>>16824569
Hello gorgeous
>>16824430
Agreed, i don't share their taste of women to
>>16824430
If ya don't like it you can always waddle your ass back to the countless swampdonkey threads that infest this board. It's as simple as hiding the thread and moving on without crying about it. We get ONE thread like this per day max and you're still bitching?
More redheads!
>>16824430
Because they're sexy unlike the girls in all of thr dumb threads that are on /s/ OHIO GIRLS and FACEBOOK HOTTIES.
>>16824883
Sorry brosef, I'm obviously with the "skinny boy body slav skanks" department. Somebody else is gonna have to step in for that request - not a lot of reds where I'm from.
ok, last one from me for a while. enjoy...
>>16824385
To be fair, this was probably inevitable, what with the proliferation of cheap and affordable camera phones within the last half a decade or so.
>>16823684
Try Planet Suzy or urlgalleries
Part 73: >>16827390
>>16824430
Most of the "fine art" nude sites are based in eastern Europe. Met-art, femjoy, Domai etc.
These companies area not pushing SJW fat acceptance agendas.
>>16824720
It would seem that you don't agree with the English language.
