Mods, why the hell are you all so fucking useless? You're spam filtering the "r" site again, but you're still letting shit like "really makes you think" and "how can white boys even compete" through and not removing the abundant porn spam on /pol/? Jesus Christ almighty you're a bunch of insufferable faggots who couldn't run a site to save your cheetos-stained lives.
/pol/ is regarded the way you might regard a messy child. They're throwing their shit around the room and screaming, so the parent just closes the door and lets them live in the squalor. It's not like "the gubmint" is going to come and take this hypothetical child away for the conditions the parents are letting it live in. They have made their bed, and are told to live in it.
You don't like shitposts on /pol/? Complaining won't work, the staff would tell you to stop going there. They don't want you to go there.
>it's yet another an assfractured /pol/ish intellectual pretending his hugbox is anything more than a designated shitting board episode
>>551408
What is your point? /b/ is also a big board. It is also garbage. What did you mean to say?
>>551418
Yeah and something should be done about it.
>>551419
About /b/ or /pol/? Because they're both shit, and trying to fix them would cause people to cry for them to be fixed. The obvious answer, like people asking fir Captcha to be removed all being told to buy a Pass, is to just not go there.
>>551439
Blue boards are by far the worst boards on this site. Period.
You know what happened, historically, when /pol/ gets moderation?
>CENSORSHIP! THIS IS CENSORSHIP!
>JIDF is controlling /pol/!
>moot is a cuck sjw cuck supercuck omegacuck sjw stop deleting my "is ___ white?" threads or I'm going to 8gag
/pol/ wanted a moderation-free memefest and that's what it is today.
>>551448
>Blocking actual spam is bad
>Blocking the word of another website isn't censorship
Stop being an insufferable faggot.
>>551450
Shut up. Anon there has a point. That's all you idiots are going to do when ANY form of moderation is brought upon you. Go suck a fat one.
1. Enable the robot on /pol/
2. Delete /r9k/
>>551467
Robot should be enabled on all boards, especially /tv/
>>551381
I'd just like to see the basic old rules enforced more often than never.
>>551482
Not a bad idea.
>>551483
Those rules aren't even that old. And they've never been adequately enforced.
>>551483
literally safe space: the board
reddit is filtered?
>>551487
They were enforced more often than currently, now it seems like only 1/100 rule-breaking shitpost threads actually get attention by a mod.
>>551489
literally brain-damage; the post
Inb4 I was only pretending
>>551493
Just ignore him, if his post can't even connect with reality then it isn't worth responding to.
>>551494
>things that trigger my are spam
not so different from the SJWs you look for under your bed every night :^)
>>551491
That sucks, but to be expected when a board seeks infamy and public recognition, much to the chagrin of every other board that wants the rest of the world to leave us the fuck alone.
>>551494
>After gaymercancer
True, it was better before, but even by the standards of 2014 /pol/ could be considered to be now in a constant state of being raided. If you lurking '14 or even '12 took one look at the board today, you'd have said it was being raided, now we live with it.
>>551497
Just stop responding to it, all it wants are your (you)s and has nothing to offer but shit.
>>551496
>literal spam is not spam
How is "How can white boys even compete" with an image if interracial porn on a board where such things are literally against the rules not spam? Why should board rules not be enforced? I think it's time to start spamming the everliving shit out of /lit/ with cuck porn. You seem to like it so much.
>>551500
I'm pretty positive the mods are anti-/pol/ and I'm beginning to believe the memes that the administration has always been sjws.
>>551501
You cucks talk about black men more than any other board. How are poignant questions about the intersection of masculinity and race not related to /pol/?
Just admit that you're throwing a tantrum because you can't cope with the fact that white women prefer black men to permavirginal NEETs like you, and you'd rather not have to experience such traumatic thoughts. It's more about your fee fees than the quality of the board.
>>551503
Posting porn on /pol/ is against board rules.
>>551503
>You cucks talk about black men more than any other board
In convinced it's a small group tasked with keeping race-based threads on page 1, none of them are anything approaching productive or even entertaining, serving no purpose other than being untitled generals for shitposting.
>>551505
>In convinced it's a small group tasked with keeping race-based threads on page 1
It always has been. And it's these same jewish cunts who post on /qa/ day and night demanding /pol/ be deleted. And if they can't get it deleted, they're going to shit it up as much as possible.
>>551507
>And if they can't get it deleted, they're going to shit it up as much as possible
It's all one long sustained "REEEEEE", isn't it?
>>551507
>jewish cunts
wew lad
That's no way to talk about your senpai's favourite bulls
>>551511
I don't like Trump. He's a moron. Try again.
>>551521
>>551521
>I don't like
Not an argument
>We need to take proper care of the containment boards!
kek.
>>551527
You're right. We should just delete the blue containment boards instead. They are of no value whatsoever.
only classy scholars can upvote this redpilled artwork
>>551515
>It's literally every other board on this site.
4chan caters to the lowest common demoniator of internet asshole. It has a decent method of encouraging discussion but it's constantly abused by the scumbags. And it will stay like forever because the people who use this site live by board culture and not rules that should be globally enforced. The people hate rules or the concept of a parent scolding them for being bad so instead they self-moderate to protect board culture, not website quality.
>>551668
Things go down the shitter because the moderators are not consistent.
I get banned on a regular basis for reporting rule-breaking content as illegal, simply because the mods and janitors wouldn't give a shit otherwise.
4chan was never particularly great, but the current situation is a new low. Just in the past two months I've seen three threads with child pornography get archived.
It's fucking amazing.
I honestly do not understand the mods.
>>551688
>I honestly do not understand the mods.
What's even worse is that they keeping getting new ones. Either the turnover rate is phenomenal or we have a fuck load of mods not doing shit on a regular basis.
Y'all niggas posting in a concern troll thread. /pol/lacks just report and hide all the bestiality threads. But I guess given Mook's benign support of 'interesting' /pol/ you butt hurt faggots have to change your strategy and masquerade as triggered /pol/lacks since the real deal don't give a shit. We've buried every attempt to take down our board.
>>551688
It is difficult to believe that the mods are warning people who report explicit 3D child pornography instead of deleting it. That's only not only stupid, but could get 4chan shut down and hiro sent to prison.
>>551703
I've never been warned for reporting cp.
Rather, I just report everything as illegal and the mods clear my report queue along with the cp reports.
I encourage everyone to report rule-breaking shit as illegal, because mods SHOULD care.
>>551708
This is like calling 911 on your coffee being cold because it should be hot.
The only thing you're going to do is get your whole ISP banned from reporting things.
>>551708
Well you're no longer allowed to say reddit anymore again, so they obviously care about something. Just not the right thing.
>>551710
I've had this very same conversation before.
Your analogy would work if calling 911 did anything at all.
>>551718
Yeah, I was in it. You were retarded then and you're still retarded now.
>Your analogy would work if calling 911 did anything at all.
It gets you sent to prison when you abuse the law enforcement system for trivial shit.
The illegal report system is not something that is there so that fuckwits like you can cry about sad frogs and ponies. It's essentially an extension of the actual, IRL law enforcement system. You undermined it and got banned; why this would surprise anyone with a functioning brain is beyond me.
>>551720
whatever
I'll stop once the mods get their shit together.
>>551381
>mods rn
>>551728
>gets told on every point
>"whatever"
Incredible.
>>551734
Pretty much.
I don't really care nor do I want to argue.
>It's the largest board on the site.
>It's shit.
Has it ever occurred to you that MAYBE you might just be in the minority opinion?
>>551720
Actually.
Here, point in case.
"Trivial" shit, right?
>>551845
The same swede spams scat, gore, cp, etc...
And his posts stay up for hours or get archived. Abusing the report system is justified.
>>551459
No, he doesn't. It just fits into your worldview so you clap like a retarded seal in approval. Threads with pornographic images in the OP are against the board rules. Mods and janitors should enforce that fucking rule.
>>551381
MAKE /POL/ GREAT AGAIN
>>551398
As much as you seem to ignore it, /pol/ has rules and one of them is
>No pornographic images unrelated to politics
These spammers break the rules
It would literally ruin /pol/, the real question is how we're supposed to live with seeing "reply or x will happen" and then having to choose between x happening and being banned
>>551381
>>mods suck
Really makes you think
>>551845
>>551846
This we also have an Aussie and Kiwi who post Blacked with_
>makes you think
>/pol/ BTFO
>How can White men compete?
How is this shit political.
Also there's a strong chance it's a raid.
>>551448
>ISIS WANTS YOU TO DELETE KEK PORN!
>>551418
/b/ is dead. Nice try /lit/fag
The moderation on 4chan has clearly become infiltrated by plebbit/srs/sjw/tumblr
They are allowing threads that are against board rules on /pol/, as per the sticky, and deleting politically relevant threads.
Hiro, we need some intervention. Our board is nearly unusable.
All we ask is that the rules as per the sticky be enforced. It is becoming obvious that the mods are making /pol/ intentionally shitty because they can't censor us the way they want. It would become too obvious, so they flood us with cancer.
>>551858
They keep deleting threads that call them on their bullshit, but allow inter-racial porn which is against the rules
Mods on /pol/ are absolutely useless.
Fighting spam should be the first priority anywhere anyhow.
Enough is a enough. If something isn't done we will infect every board on this site.
>>551865
Sounds fun, I can shitpost, I quite enjoy feminists fighting for equal pay whilst I out earn them taking a shit anyway.
>>551863
THEY DON'T RESPOND TO REPORTS, BUT THEY DELETE THREADS THAT ARE POLITICAL
THIS IS CENSORSHIP OF /POL/ IN A VERY DIRECT SENSE
THE MODS ARE SJWS
SOMETHING MUST CHANGE
>>551865
THIS
>>551856
I don't really care about /pol/ per se
I just want better, more consistent moderation.
Here's a list of spamthreads on /pol/ right now:
>>>/pol/>>76067831
>>>/pol/>>76065193
>>>/pol/>>76067992
>>>/pol/>>76056356
>>>/pol/>>76067114
>>>/pol/>>76066924
>>>/pol/>>76066651
>>>/pol/>>76068073
And there's even more, I just can't be bothered to list them all.
Fucking hell mods, I report threads like these daily. This is a coordinated effort and can be dealt with as such. Do your fucking job and get them off.
>>551872
>Literally all of them are gone
>>551873
no
he just doesn't know how to link
>>551872
COPY THE URL FROM THE ADDRESS BAR
>>551459
>Shut up
not an argument
>>551873
>>551874
Summarised here:
>>>/pol/76068833
>>551871
This.
don't get rid of a board's culture, but get rid of those who break the rules
>>551879
>they're literally all political topics
I'm not seeing what's wrong here
>>551882
HOLY FUCK A REAL 4CHAN MOD
HOW DID YOU GET YOUR JOB AS A MOD
TELL ME PLS
>>551882
OF COURSE YOU DON'T YOU LEFTIST TUMOR
>>551881
Just curious but
why is /pol/ an orange board?
>>551885
>LEFTIST
So it IS political?
>>551886
Because there's a fair amount of insulting other races on it, and it probably won't look good on a work computer.
>>551404
>>551398
>Thinking we aren't the only uncucked board on the site
>Being content with limitation on your speech
>Posting on boards that are also found on reddit with twice the quality just so you can tell you fellow "over 18 "friends"" how edgy you are for posting on /a/ or /tg/
>Thinking your board is anywhere near as relevant as /pol/
Top lel. If we took our memes elsewhere you'd be nothing. You'd be on another reddit.
>>551862
To be fair my protest thread asked the mods to delete it too. There is way too much porn and we have reported it like mad.
>>551398
There's shitposting and there's blatantly posting porn on non-porn boards.
Maybe just ban Canada and Australia from /pol/, that would pretty much take care of all problems in one go.
>>551398
This isn't about that, you stupid fucking faggot. This is about blatant rules violations being completely ignored. Every fucking day there is interracial cuckold porn spammed on /pol/. The threads are sometimes deleted, very slowly. I never see the posters getting banned despite no pornography being a rule on /pol/.
>>551459
>>551448
Distinct lack of arguments here.
>>551503
We also talk about white nationalism more than any other board. I don't understand how bringing up a topic for discussion that typically isn't sexually based is evidence for anything as for the sexual preferance of the board.
>>551893
This
>>551892
>what are proxies
I bet you also vote for Sanders and think jews are the best, or maybe you even are one yourself?
>>551887
You and I both know what you cancerous outsiders are doing here.
This was the original intent of the cuckening as intended by moot
There is obviously a dedicated group that is spamming cancer and nudity, is 'x' white, etc threads all day long. They post the same thread over and over and over.
The autism is incomprehensible to me.
>>551398
>people not from /pol/ go on /pol/
>cause problems
>blame /pol/ for the problems
nice logic retard
>>551511
Every businessman of any note will need to deal with kikes. That isn't racism, it's a fact. He is against Jewish interests tot eh extreme, so I don't see how this relationship means anyhting.
>>551900
/pol/ isn't reserved solely for right wing politics, even if they are right
Plenty of 'spam and cancer' on /pol/ is simply individuals independently shitposting single topics
>>551900
It is a coordinated effort. They use the same images, same messages, same bumping strategies and same timeframe to do these posts. You can easily tell them apart from random people who just happen to come to /pol/ by chance. Those threads tend to get 0 replies and disappear quickly, while the spam-threads gets lots of fake discussion bumps to them to lure naive people into thinking it has a serious discussion going on, yet these things have been discussed to death already and disproven as lies several times a day for the past few years.
Thread theme.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_4yHhX4SBI
>>551903
>/pol/ isn't reserved solely for right wing politics, even if they are right
Did I ever even imply that?
We are sick of the porn. These are the rules as per the sticky:
>This board is for the discussion of news, world events, political issues, and other related topics.
>Off-topic and /b/-tier threads will be deleted (and possibly earn you a ban, if you persist). Unless they are quality, well thought out, well written posts, the following are examples of off-topic and/or /b/-tier threads:
>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>Are X white?
>Is X degeneracy?
>How come X girls love Y guys so much?
>If X is true, then how come Y? Checkmate Z.
>The variety of threads allowed here are very flexible and we believe in freedom of speech, but we expect a high level of discourse befitting of the board. Attempts to disrupt the board will not be tolerated, nor will calls to disrupt other boards and sites.
Now tell me, where does inter-racial porn fit into that?
>>551668
I disagree. T Here is no middle ground between stromfront and Tumblr anywhere else. I believe that all of the anime related boards appeal to the lowest common denominator, as with most of the others, including, and especially /int/. I do not, however, believe that /pol/ does the same. The only thing /pol/ shares with the rest of 4chan is a URL and a stolen format. /pol/ appeals to people who want real political discussion, natsoc who aren't edgy faggots, classical but not moronic racists, as well as the rest of the riffraff.
>>551907
There are actual rules for /pol/, though.
And one of those rules EXPLICITLY STATES NO PORN.
SO WHY WAS THERE INTERRACIAL KEKOLD PORN ON PAGE 1 THIS MORNING??
As a paying 4chan pass user, I've about had it with this shit.
>>551904
>It is a coordinated effort
That's pretty obvious.
And plebbitors/sjws like this cunt are obviously one of them.
They are enraged that Hiro refuses to delete /pol/ despite their relentless appeals to him to do so.
>>551503
>>551503
>>551503
>>551503
>>551698
desu it would be nice for /pol/ to have it's own moderation.
>>551910
>I've about had it with this shit.
Many us have.
Don't worry, we won't give up until Hiro hears our pleas
>>551913
As if he would give a shit though. I think his happy that our meme power has been cut in half.
On that point though, look at the shear power we have even with this cancer. Imagine if everything thread was a constructive one.
>>551910
Just check this thread now:
>>>/pol/76068833
It's grown from one thread to many. It's someone's JOB to keep at least one racemixing/interracial thread alive on /pol/ at any given time.
>>551911
It's obvious for white, intelligent people. Once you stray away from being white it becomes not as obvious to tell anymore. Hiroshima Nagasaki is a nice pawn for the jews. He's naive and easily manipulated. /pol/ is being kept for subversiveness as it's now being used to try to make white people racemix and not have white children.
>>551913
As long as there are jews it's going to continue. It's a sad fact of life.
>>551915
>As long as there are jews it's going to continue.
Then the solution is obvious. One day... We can dream.
>>551914
> Imagine if everything thread was a constructive one.
Well, by what measure though?
I would be happy with a reduction of the porn threads and even just responses by the mods for reports about threads that are against the rules.
When every thread is forced to be 'constructive' you get echo chambers like crip chan /pol/
A certain amount of freedom and chaos is necessary, but we are being spammed to death with porn and cancer
pic related
>>551917
There is only one solution, and that is us or them. There is no coexistence.
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>MODS DO YOUR JOBS
>>551918
By constructive I mean concentrated memes in threads made by people who care about (or at least genuinely enjoy) /pol/ and it's antics. High octane meme magic not wasted on spam threads which make up a decent chunk of the board. No force or structure needed. In it';s purest form /pol would become unstoppable, using memetics to spread the message far wider than it otherwise could have. It would be fucking glorious.
Queers and other chucklefucks from offsite know our meme magic is too great so they are trying to disrupt discussion as usual a lot of these fags post HERE whining for /pol/ to be deleted because they get triggered so hard from being wrong about everything.
>This thread
>>551381
Can you just make /pol/ an unlisted board
>>551925
>This thread
>>551926
What would that mean/entail?
>>551860
Try to screenshot examples of good threads being deleted
>>551929
I will stay vigilant in the future
This is my new crusade
>>551928
keeps some randoms out
>>551932
If /pol/ is so stupid and dumb why spend so much effort in trying to silence discussion or spend so much effort in trying to get the board deleted or spend so much effort arguing in favour of obvious rule breaking??
These people are truly fucked in the head.
I've noticed a lot more spam and obvious shit posting on /pol/ since the board became an important division for Trump support and influence.
I believe that Correct The Record and-or Soros are behind the attempts to destabilize the board, as a means of weakening the Trump campaign and promoting Hillary.
If there is any consolation, it is the fact that they have been unable (thus far) to buy their way into attaining mod powers.
>>551935
>These people are truly fucked in the head.
It's the arrogance and smuggery of their rhetoric that really makes me rage.
You can just smell their little smirk through the screen.
Also, the doublethink and false equivalences are just outrageous.
I am constantly amazed at the intellectual dishonesty of these people, as if no one will ever notice it.
Lmao so one of the interracial threads was finally deleted but the others are still up?
The fuck is going on?
>>551381
Top kek, I thought /pol/ was a free speech zone where all ideas were welcome?
What's that? You only want mods to censor memes that shatter your delicate world view?
How come I don't see you crying about the "poo in loo" or "pay debnts" memes?
>>551941
Because there aren't 8 new POO IN LOO threads every hour. It shits up the board.
>>551938
It's truly a grinding, maddening injustice. There is no morality in the universe if people so sociopathic and malign are allowed breath.
Hopefully this sense of injustice is what will allow us to fight should it come to it.
>>551941
Those aren't porn.
I wish they would just like remove the flags of countries, it's really just ruined a lot of conversation on /pol/
Like I feel sorry for Indians who genuinely want to have a conversation, instead they just get flooded with "LE POO IN A LOO"
Or my as a British guy, say one thing and you get a whole load of "Le epic muslim joke xD"
I mean its just bizarre why flags were introduced. It was the first nail in the coffin.
>>551941
>How come I don't see you crying about the "poo in loo" or "pay debnts" memes?
WE AREN'T COMPLAINING ABOUT MEMES YOU FUCKING RETARD
WE ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT CONSTANT SLIDING AND SPAM LIKE PIC RELATED
BAN THE FAGGOT SPAMMING THIS SHIT
>>551941
The people that make those threads are the same disruptive assholes that make BBC threads. It's designed to draw attention away from the legitimate political threads in the hopes they slide with little contribution.
>I thought /pol/ was a free speech zone where all ideas were welcome?
It's a free speech zone when it comes to following the board rules.
>>551941
Our worldview isn't delicate, we, especially the natsoc, question ourselves everyday. It isn't fun suppressing your beliefs everywhere you go, it is much more fun to have opinions others can stomach.
Our worldview forces us to absorb all criticism and objection, and yet still we remain. I assure you that if it weren't for the ignorance of leftists, our worldview would be the most steadfast. Not that there is only one worldview.
We have what is essentially a rigid constitution on the front page of the board. If bans are allocated by people who give a damn about the site, and that follow that constitution, it will be fine, and we can go back to healthy and heated discussion with s teaming serving on evasive and all powerful memes.
>>551951
I reported them a while ago.
>>551381
Wow it really makes u think huh..
>>551950
Sorry, but you are collateral damage. A great majority of Indian and British posters are utter shit.
If you get into a more serious thread, however, you will be judged on your pinon.
And if you think you have it tough, guess what my flag is.
>>551960
Opinion*
I would also like to add that the ability to stop Canadian posters is simply to valuable. They are literally never good.
>>551941
Fuck off you degenerate SRS faggot. If someone made an entire thread title poo in loo we would report it.
The fact is no one makes those threads. It is just a small group of Jew/SJW/pro-Clinton shills that are making a concerted effort destabilize /pol/.
>>551951
>sliding
nice meme, there's no real proof of le paid shills paid to "slide threads" like you paranoid /pol/esmokers think
/pol/ is an active board because it attracts redditors from /r/4chan and /r/the_donald, and thus lots of topics are going to be posted per hour.
your so-called "slide threads" are really just your fellow /pol/tards trolling the fuck out of you because the only people who browse /pol/ regularly are NEET losers who get a kick out of collecting (You)s
also, caps lock means you're mad as fuck and triggered. you're a typical /pol/cuck upset that someone called out your inconsistencies.
/pol/cucks are literally crying that the sanctity of their safe space is being violated, top kek.
>>551950
They were added because of the
>I AM A MUSLIM/JEW/X/Y/Z POSTER
>[Relevant shitpost]
Which leads to accusations of being from certain countries.
Funnily I remember seeing one Israeli reminisce about false flagging as a muslim once
>>551960
Inb4 a FUCKING LEAF
>Majority of Indian & British posters are utter shit
I'm British and this is pretty much it. Even in the Brit threads, many are anti-gun, anti-free speech or generally anti-freedom, and though I'm a traditionalist/fascist, that's some real piss opinions.
>>551668
>4chan caters
Post discarded. Lurk more.
>>551963
>It is just a small group of Jew/SJW/pro-Clinton shills that are making a concerted effort destabilize /pol/.
I can claim things with 0 proof as well. Like the fact that the entirety of /pol/ is overrun with Trump campaign interns paid to shill.
>>551958
>>551381
>>551381
>>551381
>>551381
>>>/r/edit
>>>/trash/
>>>/facebook/
Thread theme.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_4yHhX4SBI
>>551964
>Hahhahahha their rules are being violated!
>GOOD!!!!
>LE TROLLED!
>THE WORD REDDIT WAS CENSORED?!
>HAHAHAHA TROLED U
>>551969
>/pol/ is overrun with Trump campaign interns paid to shill.
Except taking one look at the catalog completely dismisses this claim.
Fine let's make these exact bait threads in every other board and see how long those ones stay up for.
>>551964
Look at this retard we know certain leddit groups spend their time shitting up /pol/ that's been established over and over
>my safe space is being attacked!
>i can't ignore things that upset me!
funny how /pol/tards can't take their own advice lmao
/pol/tards always advise people to use the 'hide post' function when they spam other boards with their epic anti-SJW and happymerchant.jpg memes.
Why can't they do it now? Do they really think they're special snowflakes or something?
>>551964
>there's no real proof of le paid shills paid to "slide threads" like you paranoid /pol/esmokers think
DID I EVER SAY THAT THEY WERE PAID SHILLS?
SLIDING IS A FACT OF IMAGEBOARDS, ESPECIALLY 4CHAN WHICH HAS A SMALL CATALOG, COMBINED WITH ONE BUMP PER IP.
WE DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT SAFE SPACES
WE WANT TO DISCUSS POLITICS AND HAVE A THREAD THAT LASTS MORE THAN 3 MINUTES BEFORE IT DISAPPEARS YOU LEFTIST FUCKING ASSHOLE
AND YES I'M FUCKING MAD
>>551971
/pol/ is a containment board buddy, nobody cares if the rules of /pol/ get violated because /pol/ is a cesspool.
>>551975
>WE WANT TO DISCUSS POLITICS AND HAVE A THREAD THAT LASTS MORE THAN 3 MINUTES BEFORE IT DISAPPEARS YOU LEFTIST FUCKING ASSHOLE
TRANSLATION: I want a safe space echo chamber where I can discuss politics with like-minded people and I can call anyone who disagrees with me a paid hillary shill/shitposter/spammer!
>>551967
>Inb4 a FUCKING LEAF
Nah m80
All memes aside, the based brits that start the Brexit threads are nice. Threads like that, if you can push past all of the cancerous $0.02/per post shills, are what a good moderation team will support.
I think you should be able to keep your national flag or pick one of the old ones, like the natsoc or EU one, to stop based brits, poos, leafs, and the Australian masterrace from being shit on.
Well, my thread on /pol/ aimed at discussing the current situation ended up sliding with only one response. I'm calling it quits on that board. I know a common /pol/ saying is "the ride never ends", well for me it has. I'm done with it. I'll find somewhere else to discuss current events and political news.
t. An Aussie Nat Soc.
>INB4 flag
>>551974
Show us examples of multiple thread spamming that is any way near as prevalent as what's happening now... Oh rite u can't
>>551978
You dont really get how containment boards work, do you? Go try to post anything both off-topic and pornographic in /vp/ or /mlp/ and you'll be deleted in less than 10 minutes.
>>551981
>TRANSLATION: I want a safe space echo chamber where I can discuss politics with like-minded people and I can call anyone who disagrees with me a paid hillary shill/shitposter/spammer!
YOU PLEBBIT FUCKING INVADERS ARE CLEARLY INCAPABLE OF READING COMPREHENSION
JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN'T WIN A SINGLE ARGUMENT AGAINST US, DOESN'T MEAN THAT WE WANT A 'ECHO CHAMBER' LIKE EVERY OTHER WEBSITE ON THE INTERNET
IT MEANS WE DON'T WANT CANCER AND SPAMMING YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE
>>551988
Show me examples of le JIDF spamming/forum sliding on /pol/ with definitive proof that it's the JIDF/Hillary campaign/SJW boogeyman and not just some fellow /pol/tard trolling you for kicks.
/pol/tards are probably the dumbest people on this website, they're worse than /v/irgins at this point.
>>551981
Yes. But we already have that, and we just want to not have people making threads about interracial cuckold porn on the same board. Its not that hard to understand.
>>551969
You dumb fuck. This is not a difficult concept to comprehend.
When you have regular and repeated shill threads, posted at similar times by the same flag, on the board that serves as the cultural and memetic cog in the Trump campaign, then there is sufficient evidence to suggest that nefarious actors are at work.
Correct The Record was given millions to pursue an online intiative aimed at supporting Hillary. You don't think they are going to go straight to where Trump's core online support is, and try and destabilise and disrupt it?
Of course you don't because you're the type of faggot that is looking forward to seeing that bitch in charge. Go fuck yourself.
>>551981
No, we specifically want threads in which people from all walks of life and of all political opinions can come and debate. He mentions leftists because
1) they are almost always trolling or "pretending to be retarded"
2) Commies openly reject objectivity and instead use postmodernism.
Even if the left was kicked out, we would still have lolspergtarians, natsoc, Anarcho-Capitalists, anti-trump conservatives, and tones of other different groups.
/pol/ will not ever become an echo chamber. If everyone kicked everyone else out that had different views to them, it would just two-three people left.
Lurk more faggot.
>>551994
Completely missing the point on purpose again, show me an example of spamming like what is happening on /pol/ now.
>>551991
>win a single argument
There's no such thing as real debates and real dicsussion on /pol/, just faggots like you who get really mad at words on the internet and proceed to post carl the cuck or attack the person's flag instead of responding civilly and logically.
Again, getting your echo chamber to agree with you is not "winning an argument".
This entire thread is /pol/ complaining about the sanctity of its safe space instead of using the "hide thread" function like they advise others to do.
/pol/ really is full of bizarro world SJWs, they want to censor any opinion that makes them uncomfortable.
>>551996
>When you have regular and repeated shill threads, posted at similar times by the same flag, on the board that serves as the cultural and memetic cog in the Trump campaign, then there is sufficient evidence to suggest that nefarious actors are at work.
I agree. Ban estis and their devilish toothbrushes.
Who gives a fuck about the flag. If I wanted to spend the time getting a dozen proxies to spam shitthreads on /pol/ I'd probably use a Canadian flag too.
>>551981
>TRANSLATION: I want a safe space echo chamber where I can discuss politics with like-minded people and I can call anyone who disagrees with me a paid hillary shill/shitposter/spammer!
Translation: I am a fucking faggot who can't even read and can't understand why /pol/ doesn't want people breaking the rules when it's a political board
Here's your (you) by the way.
>>551994
>t. /a/ poster
No evidence of that. It's mostly just a meme. Naturally someone using a recycled argument for Hillary raises some eyebrows, especially when they forget IDs and shit like that, but no one is saying with full seriousness that there are paid shills.
We are literally the smartest, actually. We don't just pull Jewish conspiracy out of our ass. We find shit. We are forced to be inquisitive about the world around us.
>>551997
>2) Commies openly reject objectivity and instead use postmodernism.
>calling a literal materialist ideology dating back to 19th century "postmodernist"
This is your brain on /pol/
Consider killing yourself lad
>>551996
>When you have regular and repeated shill threads, posted at similar times by the same flag, on the board that serves as the cultural and memetic cog in the Trump campaign, then there is sufficient evidence to suggest that nefarious actors are at work.
That does not logically follow. It could just be the same troll who gets a laugh out of paranoid fags like you claiming LE JIDF IS MAKING MY SHIT THREADS GET 0 REPLIES :(((((((((
The mods aren't working today. Spam bullshit threads by rolling the alphabet.
>>551981
Not an argument
>>552001
There is some of time you just don't want to admit it for some reason, probably because you're so assblasted that you are wrong about things.
Where is the censorship?? We don't want SPAM AND SLIDE THREADS that are exactly the same every time.
>>552005
>We are literally the smartest, actually.
LOL /pol/ is one of the largest boards, no way it's one of the smartest.
>We are forced to be inquisitive about the world around us.
my fucking sides, you sit all day on the politics section of an anime imageboard, you aren't 'forced' to do anything. cringeworthy neckbeard faggots holy shit
>>552003
Recent. Proving his point.
>>552001
>False equivalencies, misrepresentation
>Muh just as bad as SJWs
>B-BUT THEY HAVE FUN, MAKE JOKES AND BANTER!
Not an argument
>>552001
>/pol/ really is full of bizarro world SJWs, they want to censor any opinion that makes them uncomfortable.
SPAMMING PORN AND IRRELEVANT TOPICS IS NOT A FUCKING 'OPINION' YOU CRETIN IT'S PURE CANCER AND AGAINST THE RULES.
/POL/ HAS NEVER BEEN A ECHO CHAMBER. WE HAVE ALL MANNER OF PHILOSOPHIES, IT'S JUST YOU DELICATE LITTLE SJW TYPES THAT GET YOUR FEELINGS BLOWN OUT BY OUR EDGE.
>>552007
Even the most gargantuan neckbeard could not do this for the amount of hours required 7 days a week.
>shills will literally defend porn being posted when it's against the rules
>>552006
I'm telling you, they call themselves postmodernist and reject objectivity. This is their words, not mine. I'll forgive you for being dumbfounded, but yeah, it happened. A lack of objectivity is the only thing that allows them to justify their beliefs. It is essentially a defense mechanism for communists.
>>552014
Who's to say the "how can whiteboys even compete" posts aren't jokes and banter?
This 'not an argument' shit is fedora as fuck btw senpai. This isn't debate club faggot.
>>552016
You're the guy spamming the cuck porn aren't you?
>>552020
You're calling them postmodernists, and that's because you have no clue what that word even fucking means you retarded little stormfaggot.
>>552015
/pol/ is most definitely an echo chamber these days. The fact that you are so upset and automatically assume I'm a leftist (I'm not at all) because I called you out for your faggotry proves it's an echo chamber.
>>552016
He is assblasted, because like we have been experiencing for months, our opposition is too dumb to come up with a good argument.
>>552011
I bet you are a /lit/ faggot. Angry at the world because your shitty English major gives you fuck all employment options in the real world.
/pol/ is unequivocally the most intelligent of all boards. The reason being that it is the only board that encourages diverse and conflicting opinions.
That doesn't happen when you get faggot shitposters trying to derail the board for their own interests.
>>552021
Everyone with a working brain
>>552022
I wish I was. It's hilarious how much it makes /pol/tards and stormniggers upset.
>>552016
>this faggot is assblasted:
no, I actually just forgot to take off the cruise control
and I'm a little annoyed
>>552024
... They were calling themselves postmodernists. As is customary for anyone that isn't a cunt, I was charitable and assumed they had considered nuance that I hadn't. It's besides the fucking point. We aren't arguing for a safespace, and getting rid of leftists would only increase the level of discourse. Reasonable people are ONLY found int he right wing.
>>552030
cool
>>552027
>/pol/ is unequivocally the most intelligent of all boards.
my fucking sides
It's one of the largest boards, so no way is it the most intelligent. Of course, being a /pol/tard, you don't understand what I mean by that.
Not from /lit/ btw.
>The reason being that it is the only board that encourages diverse and conflicting opinions.
TOP KEK
>>552030
What I we spammed the same shit in every other section of the site
>>552025
You are an idiot. It is anything but an echo chamber. People argue about widely differing views all the time. You are simply wrong.
And you standard of proof is year 7 science tier.
>>552025
>/pol/ is most definitely an echo chamber these days
An echo chamber of BBC, trap and other /b/ tier shit.
>>552032
>We aren't arguing for a safespace, and getting rid of leftists would only increase the level of discourse.
Says the guy calling communism "postmodernist". The level of discourse will always be shit as long as you and your retarded /pol/ friends are present.
>>552035
>I don't understand what a standard distribution is!
>>552031
>rules 39 and 40
>CAPSLOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL
>EVEN WITH CRUISE CONTROL YOU STILL HAVE TO STEER
>>552030
Why even bother being an asshole? Why are you mad at us? Why not engage in proper discourse with us?
>inb4 no lol u goys are not worth my time
Even an attempt at rational discourse is worth more time than whatever it is your are doing. I plea to you, give it another chance.
>>552032
>We aren't arguing for a safespace
>getting rid of leftists would only increase the level of discourse
>Reasonable people are ONLY found int he right wing.
this has to be a false flag to make /pol/ look like retards, lmao.
>>552039
Not an argument
>>552044
>hahaha /pol/ argues in good faith i swear!
Fuck off /pol/esmoker
>>552035
>/pol/ must represent a broad intelligence bellcurve because it has lots of people
By that logic Mensa is full of morons because it is the worlds largest high IQ society.
>>552041
I told you, they called themselves that, and I was being charitable, as anyone looking for a reasonable discussion is. You, however, are not being charitable, and aren't looking to contribute anything to the discussion.
>>552048
And you do?
>>552035
If one board has 1000 academics and the other has 50 /lit/ faggots, is the board less intelligent because it is larger?
No, it isn't you fucking waste of oxygen.
>>552048
Don't see you arguing in good faith either, all yer doing is calling them "/pol/tards" over and over again 2bh
>>552036
Please do, maybe mods will finally do something about the /pol/ problem if you do that. I'm itching for a final solution to you vermin.
>>552045
Not an argument.
>>552048
I am telling you that I argue in good faith. Don't make sweeping generalizations. /pol/ isn't one person and if it was, its constant conflict from different sides is evidence that it is interested in contructive arugment.
Give ME the benefit of the doubt, like anyone interested in discussion HAS to. I am not /pol/, I am a person currently typing with a keyboard, posting on /qa/.
Also, not an argument.
>>552037
>. It is anything but an echo chamber.
The only reason they consistently use this term to incorrectly describe us on /pol/ is because they can't stand the fact that white nationalism and the (((alt-right))) is becoming more and more popular.
They can't STAND it
>>552053
Yes, because /pol/ is definitely comparable to a board full of academics
top kek /pol/cucks really are delusional
>>552063
It was an analogy that is perfectly valid. It was simply mean't to discredit your assertion that quantity decreases quality.
>>552062
>dey make fun of us cuz dey is scared!
lel
We got the asslicking thread deleted.
>>552066
/pol/ is full of neet faggots and losers whose crowning achievement is being "born white", not at all comparable to a board full of accomplished academics
kill yourself bud
>>552069
>/pol/ is full of neet faggots and losers whose crowning achievement is being "born white"
Proof?
>>552045
>this has to be a false flag to make /pol/ look like retards, lmao.
While I would personally love to see every leftist suddenly disappear off the face of the earth, extirpating them from /pol/ is not actually our point here
We simply want porn threads and cancer like '/POL/ BTFO' to be axed.
We get banned for so much as mentioning the scourge of blacks and jews in other boards.
We aren't going to give up. We've been here for almost a decade.
>>552064
One last comment then I'm out.
>>552063
Mocking /pol/ only evinces the breadth of your ignorance. I used to have mutiple tabs open - discussions a range of opinions, from the application of NatSoc to modern society to the influence of Habermas in the formation of the EU. Hell, I've even improved my knowledge of the holocaust in debating those who deny its existence. This sophistication of discussion is unmatched on any board. This is why I am fighting for the mods to do their fucking jobs and ensure that shill and shitposting threads are removed.
You don't understand this because you are not as intellectually attuned and curious as I.
I pity you.
>>552070
I read it on an infograph, that's proof enough on /pol/ that the holocaust didn't happen so it's proof enough here.
>>552069
What about the large amount of countries with a generally non-white populace posting there?
Mods please permaban the cuck posters from Australia, 9/10 times they're actually Australian proxies which should be permabanned anyway.
Furthermore, please respond to reports. /pol/ isn't that bad and you know it, it doesn't deserve the systematic cuckspam from /lgbt/.
>>552057
>I'm itching for a final solution to you vermin.
>final solution
>to the /pol/ problem
We are the board of peace, and I don't appreciate your off-color allusion to the holocaust, which was a horrible time in history, you evil thought-stormtrooper.
>>552073
>You don't understand this because you are not as intellectually attuned and curious as I. I pity you.
>>552068
>>552062
>>552070
>>552071
>>552073
>>552073
BAIL.
This is an obvious troll thread now. If someone is going to see it, then it has already been scene. We need to get the fuck out. It really is sad. I can't fathom the kind of people that sit behind these keyboard. I have etended an invitation to civil discourse, and they have declines., I have showed them their flaws, and they have ignored.
Before you post again, ask yourself; is there anything you can do to change the mind of an imp?
I truely believe your time will be better spent making quality posts on /pol/ with other open minded individuals. You are doing yourselves and our community a disservice by letting this place keep you.
Calling to all /pol/acks, leave this thread.
>>552082
>If someone is going to see it, then it has already been scene
More proof that /pol/tards are illiterate morons. kek
>>552082
See you on /pol/.
Let this thread demonstrate to all those who are lurking which board is committed to civilised and intellectually engaging discussion.
>>552085
Can you dimwitted little pea-brains even make any kind of argument that isn't based on an ad hominem or full of invective?
>>552092
Insulting retards isn't an "ad hominem". Read a book, dumbshit.
>>552082
>Calling to all /pol/acks, leave this thread.
not until I have spoken to Hiro himself
We need a concerted effort to achieve our goals in this matter
>>552092
/pol/tards really need to learn what 'ad hominem' is before bandying the term around like some pretentious middle-schooler.
PRO-TIP: Calling you an illiterate retard because of your confusion of homophones isn't ad hominem
>>552093
:^)
Thank god me using a swatiska and a trip prevented me to face an arguement!
>>552097
Is it ad hominem if I call you a crusty turbovirgin?
>>552100
No, but it's pretty ironic coming from someone who browses /pol/ and defends its honour on a hidden Q&A section of an anime imageboard
>>552100
No. It's an ad hominem if you say.
>You're a crusty turbovirgin and therefore wrong.
It's just an insult if.
>Wow you're wrong, you must be a crusty turbovirgin.
>>552086
/tg/fag lurking, here. I've never been much interested in your board, but holy hell this is a real shitshow.
Hope you guys manage to kick out these idiots.
>>552105
Thank you for encouraging your fellow /pol/tards to stay in their containment zone. You've done a good service here.
>>551398
>it's a contrarian SRS /qa/ redditor whines about /pol/ episode
>>551893
Every day you complete niggers spam every other board with your chest-thumping, Trump-fellating, white supremacist garbage. You reap what you sow, you filthy animal. The reason this website is so categorically shit the last five+ years is blatantly because of /pol/ and the miasmic toxin you shitters brew. Don't talk to anyone else about site rules. You only want them enforced when it's convenient for your polemics.
>>552107
There is no debate here to any other purpose. It's not ad hominem, we're just telling you fuck right off to your containment board. The insults are part of that package.
Of course, /pol/tards are so thick that they think there is a discussion here and their term 'ad hominem' has any weight.
Hang on, let me try.
Reddit.
I need a Hiro, I'm holding out for a Hiro
'Til the end of the night
He's gotta be strong
And he's gotta be fast
And he's gotta be fresh from the fight
>>552110
Well said. I've been here a long time and /pol/ is honestly more cancerous to this site than chanology was.
>>552116
Thread theme? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGcsIdGOuZY
>>552111
>There is no debate here to any other purpose.
>Of course, /pol/tards are so thick that they think there is a discussion here and their term 'ad hominem' has any weight.
Well, it is quite obvious that there can not be any debate when you're outright preventing it by screaming "get back to you Containment Chamber". If only you weren't discussing right in this moment…
>It's not ad hominem, we're just telling you fuck right off to your containment board. The insults are part of that package.
Do you really have no self awareness?
