/int/ is a horrible board, with terrible "humor". Why do we need /int/ 2.0: Edgy Edition?
Remove the flags from /pol/ so the vile /int/ cancer can slither away and we can start having actual discussion on /pol/ again.
/int/ is a good board desu lad
>>334387
Wrong. Your "desu" proves that beyond a shadow of a doubt. Besides, why spread that cancerous "culture" to /pol/? There is no reason to have flags on /pol/, it is disgusting.
>>334397
well the desu was auto filtered from t b h desu desu, but, what cancerous culture is spreading from /int/ to /pol/? /int/ is much less extreme about its racism
Indian spotted.
>>334385
>actual discussion on /pol/
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
TAKE YOUR SHITPOSTING TO THE STREET INDIA
>>334398
Yes, your use of "memes" so cancerous that the site was forced to filter them while defending /int/ is proof of how terrible that board is.
Everything shitty about /pol/ as of now can be traced back to /int/ shitposters who invaded the board when flags were introduced. It divides the board and encourages shitposting and retarded nationalism over real honest discussion.
You may like /int/ but the rest of the site does not. Why the fuck do we need a special board where /int/ can come to be overtly racist? Why can't we have a real politics board with zero flags?
>>334410
you can take the flags off /pol/, I don't really care because I don't use it (:
>>334385
are you really going to try and tell me that this isn't funny
>>334431
jesus christ topkek
>>334410
HI MR HIRO MY NAME IS RAJESH, I POO IN STREET AND FLAG BOARDS KEEP BULLYING ME FOR IT. IF U DO NOT REMOVE FLAG I WILL TAKE THE POO TO YOUR OFFICE
Remove the flags.
>>334385
Pay your debts
>>334948
Remove your shit from the street
>>334948
This
>>334431
Your stale screenshot is meh-tier and should only be uploaded to r/4chan not the actual 4chan. Fucking shitposting /int/shit. Kill yourself.
>>335992
>beign this salty
You must be really fun at parties
P
O
O
I
N
T
H
E
L
O
O
Even if you don't enjoy browsing /pol/, you have to admit the shitposting in this thread is unbearably unfunny and embarrassing. This /int/-tier "humor" is what /pol/ is getting spammed with daily. Remove flags.
>>336174
Calm down Pajeet
>>336186
It's... just not funny.
>>334412
Actually, it takes the admin to accomplish that. Hence why all the threads begging for it to happen are being made.
>>334385
>Why do we need /int/ 2.0: Edgy Edition?
We don't. Remove flags.
Bumping to get this done.
>>336174
>>336569
>>336724
The mods will remove the flags once you can identify the object in this picture.
>actual discussion on /pol/
>>336861
There was plenty prior to flags and ids ruining everything. Check out the /pol/ sticky. That would have curbed the shitposting (along with the gamergate activism ban) and brought about more quality discussion if it had not been for ids and flags making the board unusable for anything but /int/ trash.
>>334385
Tbh OP is right
>>336912
You can't call yourself OP, Rajesh.
> actual discussion
>/pol/
>>336884
>That would have curbed the shitposting
why would they curb the only posts that make any sense on that board?
>>336999
You sound butthurt. Did your fee-fees get BTFO by factual statements you read on /pol/? I am sorry, but we still need to remove flags and IDs.
>>336978
It sucks, right? Fucking id's and flags ruined everything.
>>337015
>/pol/
>factual statements
tip top jej
>I am sorry
pic rel
>>337043
I-I'm not b-buttmad I swear
>j-jej @ u
>muh shitty /int/ meme
That's you btw.
>>334948
Do it. Now.
>>334410
>/pol/
>real honest discussion
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP
>>337028
Not him but I used to go on /pol/ a few years ago and whilst some of the discussion kept me coming back for a while, the shitposting got too much and I left. Been better for it.
/pol/ is not shit just because of flags.
>Indians think that /pol/ - Politically Incorrect is a board for actual, real, honest discussion
YOU
CAN'T
MAKE
THIS
SHIT
UP
BECAUSE ONLY INDIANS CAN
AND THEY MAKE IT IN THE STREET
>>337276
Yes, that is what the sticky, and concurrent mod enforcement, was meant to bring a halt to. However, moot went off the deep end and saddled /pol/ with IDs and flags before results were attained. Now the only posters left there are idiots like the pro-flag posters in this thread.
/pol/ could be great. Enforce the sticky. Ban faggot crusades like "gamergate." Remove flags and IDs. Done.
>>337284
>/pol/ - Politically Incorrect could be great
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Friendly reminder that you moved to a big Indian city FOUR YEARS AGO
>FOUR
>YEARS
>AGO
So how many years did you shit in the street, again?
>>337284
>Enforce the sticky. Ban faggot crusades like "gamergate." Remove flags and IDs.
THIS
>>337361
EVERYBODY knows that you are replying to yourself.
>>334948
THIS imho
>>334385
no
lets not do this
>>337684
Get back to /int/, shitposter. We are removing flags and IDs from /pol/ and you can't stop it.
>>337686
>We are removing flags and IDs from /pol/ and you can't stop it.
Sounds like you're impersonating a moderator, which is against the rules.
>>334410
>Why can't we have a real politics board
>/pol/
>real politics board
>Fucking /pol/
my sides
>>337710
No matter how much you tell him this, Poo-india-lley keeps telling himself that /pol/ is supposed to be a board for actual discussion about politics, even though he completely misses the glaring "Politically Incorrect" in the title of the board.
>>334385
I fully support this idea. People on /pol/ are mocking each other for their flags instead of having proper discussion.
Sure, it was fun at first, all this "pay debnts" and "build wall", but now it is far too spread over like cancerous tumor.
Only "people" from shitskin countries care about this.
>>337825
Everybody who doesn't want stupid /int/ memes and shitposting ruining the board care about it. Not that you would understand, as anything other than shitposting is beyond your comprehension, right /int/shit?
>>337712
>if something is politically correct it cannot be actual discussion
Fucking /int/ faggots. The sticky on /pol/ specifies the topic of the board.
It is made for REAL discussions that get little faggots like you butthurt because it goes against your highschool teacher's narrative.
That is what "politically correct" means, not shitposting about flags because you think it is edgy.
>>338261
>shitposting
>/int/shit
ALL THE SHIT IN YOUR SYSTEM IS HARDWIRED INTO YOUR BRAIN AHAHAHAHAHA
>>338267
Guess what else the sticky says, faggot?
>The variety of threads allowed here are very flexible and we believe in freedom of speech
>freedom of speech
That means if you get called out for shitting in the street, you've got no right to cry about it
>>338459
>Guess what else the sticky says
It says:
>we expect a high level of discourse befitting of the board
BUMP ALL THREADS DEMANDING IDS AND FLAGS ARE REMOVED.
>>338553
this
>>338466
That's clearly not followed though, or its very, very relaxed.
Have you ever even been to pol before?
>>338693
Yes. The flags and IDs have given raise to an environment where only shitposting is possible. Therefore, mods have given up enforcing the sticky and the board has been abandoned by all but the stupidest of r/int spammers.
>>338703
>this fucking newfag thinks he can change /pol/ by spamming /qa/
>this fucking newfag doesn't know that /pol/ was deleted before
>this fucking newfag thinks that if he doesn't like something, it should be changed
Give it up. You spamming threads daily will not change anything. In fact, what you're doing will more likely make flags stay.
Guess what? /pol/ has always, always been shit. You are clearly fucking new because you don't seem to remember pre-flag pre-ID /pol/, it was just as fucking shit. You thinking that removing flags and IDs will magically transform /pol/ into a board of intelligent political discussion may just be the most autisticly retarded idea ever.
You have already been proven wrong with the idea that "everybody agrees with you" from the Strawpoll that YOU made (http://strawpoll.me/5933206/r). You have already been proven wrong because this is a non-flag board and yet you still ended up revealing that you're an Indian who's been shitting in a toilet after you moved to the city four years ago (https://desustorage.org/qa/thread/310640/#310644). You have already been proven wrong because this is a non-flag board and yet you are STILL getting blown the fuck out.
This is fucking 4chan. This is not a place for your content to be judged solely for its post. If you want that experience, go join a political forum or, better yet, go to fucking Reddit. This is a place where we call each other faggots all day and look at porn, dicks and anime. If you can't handle being called out for living in a country which needs to be fucking educated on where to defecate, then you need to leave and stop being a little bitch.
Or, how about this? Move out of India if you can afford it. Then you won't be bullied on the Internet you thin-skinned cunt.
>>338758
tl;dr.
REMOVE FLAGS. REMOVE IDs.
>>338777
Guess you don't want to listen to reason and want to live in an echo chamber filled with your own thoughts.
>>338777
Trips confirms it. Goodbye flags, goodbye ids, goodbye /int/shits. Hello /pol/.
>>338789
Too bad your dreams aren't going to come true, faggot.
I'm following you through every thread, calling you out every time.
>>338818
>he still thinks only one person wants /pol/ to stop being shitted up by /int/ards and pro-id edditors
CAN'T MAKE THIS UP
>>338926
>he still thinks that he's part of the majority
CAN'T
MAKE
THIS
SHIT
UP
>>338926
>he didn't say "can't make this shit up" because he knows he'll be bullied for it
>HE SAYS "SHITTED UP" ANYWAY
EVEN WHEN YOU TRY NOT TO TALK ABOUT SHIT, YOU KEEP DOING IT
AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>334385
>Remove the flags from /pol/
YES
>>338996
>IP count does not go up
Samefagging Indian upset as fuck
I can't believe this issue isn't being addressed.
REMOVE FLAGS
REMOVE IDs
This thread needs to be on the front page until action is taken. Acceptable action: removing flags and id's.
Keep flags.
Expose Punjabbers.
>>340085
>Expose Punjabbers
Why?
It won't help, these racist fucking retards will keep on shitposting everywhere.
>>340137
>So we can remind you that you don't have a loo to poo in
How is that helping facilitate discussion?
>>340169
>4chan
>"discussion"
Get it through your head, retard. Do you ask the KKK to respect black people?
>>340201
What do you mean? You hate the idea of discussion? Why would you visit a themed board, then? Why not just stay on /r9k/ and /b/?
>>340253
I'm sorry, do you think that a board named "Politically Incorrect" is themed?
>>340255
"/pol/ - Politically Incorrect" is 4chan's board for discussing and debating politics and current events.
>>340255
Read the /pol/ sticky.
How much longer must /pol/ suffer the horror of IDs and flags?
>>340533
I'll tell you one thing: /qa/ will suffer from an influx of threads demanding their removal for longer, that's for damn sure.
To page one with you !
>>340642
Damn right.
>>334397
no reason? it deals with international affairs you fuckhead
bring back /pol/ flags instead
>>341350
Go to /int/ if you want to make a topic that requires people to have flags, you fucking dumbass.
>>341356
/pol/ seems well enough suited, I see no reason to go to /inkt/.
>>341356
nah, /pol/ has flags too :-p
>>341371
It won't soon.
Can't wait...
>>334431
It'd be funny if you faggots weren't so completely naive and believe everything that you read.
Remove BOTH IDs AND flags.
>>342704
Nope, IDs are very important on /pol/. Fucking flags, though? Fuck 'em. I wish Hiro would remove them.
>>342922
>IDs are very important on /pol/
But that's wrong. IDs have no place on 4chan. Don't like it? >>>reddit
I'm beginning to see the problem. Take this image for example. Someone makes the claim that there is nothing wrong with MSG and aspartame. Someone from Serbia asks a question. Someone else randomly jumps in to call him a 'Serbn*****'.
>>334410
>Why can't we have a real politics board with zero flags?
We did. Guess what? It was just as shit without flags as it is now, with flags and IDs. Removing flags won't just magically change the shitposting mindset of the userbase like some kind of magical pixie spell shit, everyone will just go back to calling everyone else JIDF like the good ol' days.
Personally I'd like to see a return to the randomised joke flags, they were fun.
>>343184
/pol/ was far better without IDs and flags. If joot had added them in a fit of faggotry, the sticky would have been enforced and the board would be quality. But there was no point enforcing the sticky after mootberg intentionally shitted up the board with IDs and flags.
What makes /int/ unique is it's flags. Without that, it's essentially a SFW /b/.
The only board that should have flags is /int/. /sp/ is an exception I suppose.
>>343184
>It was just as shit without flags as it is now, with flags and IDs.
That's not true actually. It was a fair bit worse without IDs.
>>343163
Why the hell is that nested like that? Who would want to read something in that format?
>>343163
>censoring swearing on 4chan
Holy underage Batman
>>344368
>/pol/ was far better without IDs and flag
Prove it, then. I expect ten pre-flag pre-ID /pol/ threads in 24 hours or your claim is bullshit.
>>344465
Yes, you are underage.
>>344469
I expect you to go to /pol/ and bring back a screenshot showing how IDs add anything at all to the board.
You are the one making the wild assertion that IDs are a good thing, despite being added as a punishment, therefore you should back up your retarded claim.
>>344667
Are you legit fucking stupid?
You made a claim, the burden of proof is on YOU. It's not "make a claim and expect people to prove you wrong" you autistic fucking retard.
>>334410
You sounds like a butthurt Indian
>>344667
>I think that global warming isn't real
>Okay, show me some evidence to back that up.
>No, you show me evidence that global warming is real.
>>344702
>i think that unicorns aren't real
>okay back that up with evidence
>no you show me evidence that they are real
OMG I AM LE RUSTLED R U TEH LEGIT STOOPID BAKA DESU SENPAI
(That's how you sound btw)
>>344706
It's kind of ironic how you cite /pol/'s sticky when referring to quality discussion, when the sticky picture says "Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies"
>>344710
One of which, by the way, is the burden of proof, I forgot to mention.
>>344710
>unicorns are real
>prove they aren't or u r committing le logical fallacy
Wow. Back to reddit, PLEASE.
>>344724
You are now officially dismissing /pol/'s sticky because it's being used against you.
This is comedy fucking gold.
damn flags are cancerous!
I say keep the flags.
I agree, flags are shit. I want to browse /pol/ and /int/ separately, not merged into one board
>>345648
Flags were maliciously added to /pol/ because joot wanted to suppress its ability to expose his jewish activities after he got BTFO during the Mallory episode.
IDs are also grating because /pol/ is the board that requires the least coddling. People with the ability to express politically incorrect viewpoints don't need to be scared of "muh samefag". Only libtards hate a lack of IDs because they can only form opinions based on what is popular, therefore samefagging is dangerous to them.
>there are people coming to 4chan to stamp out bullying
Why are we allowing this to happen
>>345838
>frogposter
>implying you don't get bullied every day in real life
4Chan isn't the place for you to pretend to not be a spergy faggot, kid. Accept your place.
Let's add more flags.
Make this official with state/region and city flags added, so people can have up to 3 flags on their post.
https://github.com/flaghunters/Extra-Flags-for-4chan
>>345854
>Let's add more flags
Nah.
>actual discussion
>/pol/
>>346660
The shit-for-brains actually thinks this way.
And I mean shit-for-brains literally, all his backed up Indian poo is piling up in his skull
>>346699
>Go read the /pol/ sticky
Nope. No. Nuh-uh. You can't use that excuse anymore. You dismissed the /pol/ sticky when I used it against you.
>>346699
By the way, guess what board we're on?
Not /pol/, that's for sure.
>>346727
What the fuck are you talking about? Your image makes no sense at all. When people tell you to read the /pol/ sticky, they are referring to the part that requests a high level of discourse not.... whatever the fuck your image is about.
>>346743
Here's your discourse
>When people tell you to read the /pol/ sticky
Nope. No. Nuh-uh. You can't use that excuse anymore. Nada. Uh-uh. No dice. Nup.
>>346754
I'm sorry, you're not being specific, could you provide a high level of discourse from the /pol/ sticky? Oh, wait, you can't do that. Sorry. Nope. Game over. You lose. Out you go. See ya. Better luck next time. There was an attempt. Try again. Trial and error. Improve next time. Learn from your mistakes.
>>346760
But... we're not on /pol/. The reason people bring up the /pol/ sticky is you pop up in every thread saying:
>pol
>serious discussion
Or blathering on about how flag-based shitposting is somehow acceptable on /pol/, so people point you towards the /pol/ sticky to prove you wrong.
I'm sorry, but I think you may actually be retarded. I mean in the literal sense of having something wrong mentally that makes you too stupid to function. Have you ever had an IQ test?
>>346769
I'm sorry, but the intelligence quotient of a user is irrelevant to this discussion. Can you be more specific about your intentions? The /pol/ sticky specifically states that you need to provide a high level of discourse in your posts. Could you please utilize an increase in discourse next time?
Oh, sorry, I forgot, you can't use that excuse anymore. Nope. Nuh-uh. Buh-baw. Swing and a miss. Shame. Press 1 to contact technical support. Poo belongs in the loo. Uh-uh. Nup. Can't do that.
>>346778
>the intelligence quotient of a user is irrelevant to this discussion
I dunno. If your IQ is a single digit, then it is pointless trying to explain to you that this isn't /pol/ and the sticky applies to discussion on /pol/.
>>346794
Yeah, could you back up your claim about the effect of a single digit IQ on a person's ability to comprehend and state their contention in an argument? You do know that the /pol/ sticky encourages the use of a high level of discourse to...
Oh, pardon my error, I seem to have forgotten that you can't use the /pol/ sticky in your arguments anymore. Yeah, I'm sorry, your argument doesn't carry weight. It doesn't. No point. Not going anywhere. Lack of evidence. 2/10 would not even bother grading.
>>346804
You sound seriously butthurt... Don't tell me your IQ is literally a single digit? I guess I'd be buttmad too if I was attempting to be clever but getting BTFO due to having a sub-10 IQ. I'm sorry, bro.
>>346824
I can see that you are making a few accusations. Care to corroborate on this? Read the /pol/ sticky, I hear that discussion is encouraged by a high level of discourse and...
Ohhhhh, riiiiight, you can't use that. Sorry, the /pol/ sticky requires total and full support of all of its ideas. Nope. Nuh-uh. Buh-baw. Nada. Zilch. Zip. Love. Goose egg. Zero. Four minus four. Black holes generated when used as a denominator.
>>346838
/pol/ sticky doesn't apply here. Why are you so buttmad, though?
>>346845
Oh, you seem to think I'm angered in the anus. However, you don't appear to be using any relevant data to authenticate this idea. If you read the /pol/ sticky which you seem to worship, you'd know that the key to good discussion is a high level of discourse. This can be helped by citing evidence.
But wait, hang on! Oh my goodness, I totally forgot. You CAN'T use the /pol/ sticky, it's out of bounds for use in your arguments! Yeah. Bad luck. Shocker. Nuts. Ouch. Who'd a thunk it. Wow. Crazy.
>>346850
>you seem to think I'm angered in the anus
Uh, it's pretty OBVIOUS you are........?
>>346887
I'd just like to object to the structure of your post. An extended ellipsis is not a good thing to use when composing a question. You see, /pol/'s sticky encourages a high level of discourse and, well, as an advocate for the sticky, I expected better.
Wait, no, I forgot, you dismissed the /pol/ sticky. No wonder you're lacking proper structure, because you can't use the sticky to support your claims. Nope. Nuh-uh. True story. Fact. Look it up. I'm not afraid. To take a stand. Everybody. Nothing. Zilch.
>>346894
>muh sticky
Seriously, d00d?
>>346903
The usage of numbers as a substitute for letters in a word, especially when the word itself is misused, is not good 4chan ethic, my friend. Do you read the sticky on /pol/? It says that a high level of discourse is required for posting.
But what a shame, you can't do that because you have lost the privilege of utilizing that in your arguments. Dang. Damn. Darn. Ouch. Ow. Oh. Aw. Nope.
>>334385
Why will we never get the old /pol/ flags back? Those were great, and I miss the JIDF fun with them.
>>349315
Never say never.
