How do Christcucks explain cavemen and Neanderthals? Do they just not believe in them?
How did ur mum explain my big dick in her ass to your dad when he walked in?
>>81409973
Yes, they just do not believe in them. They see cavemen and Neanderthals as secular mythologies.
They also bring up the question as to why there are no in-between species.
>>81409973
>it's a retarded (((atheist))) pretends like all Christians are young earth creationists episode
yawn
>>81410034
REKT
>>81409973
They'll usually start with something like "true science and true scripture always agree" then babble incoherently for a few minutes about how "scientists are always changing their minds"
>>81410067
So Christplebs deny the Neanderthel heritage which separates us from the negroids and abos? And this is considered """white""" culture?
FRIENDLY REMINDER
that Christians only follow the New Testament, the old one is Jewish lies
>>81409973
Each church has a ruling elder. The ruling elder is typically an accomplished older alpha gentleman who is financially secure, and can say anything he wants and get away with it. Anytime Christcucks are bothered by the type of questions that critical thinking generates, they defer to this old dude who can be relied upon to reply "Hogwash!" or "Poppycock!" to any question of legitimacy about the religion they follow.
tl;dr groupthink
>>81409973
>Cave men
>Christians don't believe in humans
K now you've gone full retarded.
>>81409973
They were animals. "Man" was created 6,000 years ago, and we most likely killed off all of the neanderthals, although some attempted to breed with them and thats why we have retards and ugly people today
>>81409973
Most Christians aren't biblical literalists and believe that the story of Genesis is in fact entirely metaphorical
>>81410458
So like atheism and Dawkins?
Actually op, you're cute but not that cute.
Truth is, there is not one single human bone in the fossil record before 200,000 years ago. There is no archeological link between australopithecine and homo sapiens. This is a problem.
Additionally, humans somehow evolved further than primates with LESS chromosomes. That's right, we lost two chromosomes along the way and managed to do better. Wat.
What happened to the extra two chromosomes you might ask? They were fused. Wat. Madness.
Beyond having completely re-engineering our bones and magically fusing out chromosomes we ALSO somehow radically altered our gait and feet completely, as well as the overall length of our arms and our hair patterns.
We completely 100% redesigned our throat and voice box. And we did this all overnight with zero evidence of Darwin's gradual shift.
So you tell me where humans came from because we have zero evidence that it's from evolution. In fact, there is as much evidence of humans evolving from primates as there is evidence of God.
>>81410468
Are you saying there were humans before Adam and Eve?
>>81411269
Your pics are uttered shit btw
>>81411347
Ya,they should look more like this.
>>81409973
>cavemen and Neanderthals
Why do Christians need to explain them? The bible does not contain chronological lists of every life form in existence. Cavemen and Neanderthals are simply pre historic human ancestors.
>>81409973
They believe that they are burning in hell right now. Their ungodly stone age hunter gatherer society should have converted to Christianity
>>81411095
Absence of evidence =/= evidence of absence.
Either someone comes up with a theory that has evidence, or we stick with what's most reasonable until it's proven.
>>81411095
The bible has the world dated at 3,000 years, checkmate
>>81410395
idk if anyones told you... Your savior was a dirty, hippie, communist, jew.
>>81410302
>So Christplebs deny the Neanderthel heritage which separates us from the negroids and abos?
Yes.
>And this is considered """white""" culture?
Christianity is not white-specific, but many Christians these days see themselves as the last upholders of white culture + heritage.
>>81409973
Early Church Fathers wrote that taking a completely literal interpretation of Genesis is retarded, as it would mean that there were days (and thus, the concept of days) before the sun existed. Complete literalism is a relatively new concept and is primarily a protestant notion. Protestants, even if addressed as a single combined group, are a minority within Christianity, and literalism isn't a feature of ALL forms of Protestantism.
>>81409973
Neanderthals probably didn't exists, theres no real evidence for them.
Even f they existed, so then G-d just made them when he created animals and then they all died out somehow.
But there is no evidence they existed.
Evolution is a word trap, they really mean macro-evolution. The holy Talmud which was codified 2000 years ago says in atleast one place that "nature changes" (M'shaneh ha'tevah)
>>81410034
CUT MY LIFE INTO PIECES
>>81411347
>>81411649
There is no evidence that humans evolved from primates.
You have faith and nothing more. Sorry.
Can't they just be really in shaven humans
Just saying they may as well be
human race
>>81412210
Sorry that's a cute image but there is no, I repeat no actual evidence of that transition.
That is a chart of faith created be a religion.
>>81409973
Go bash the koran or the torah. Would be more edgy, you would be so much cooler.
>>81411269
No that's impossible.
>>81412425
False.
God created the beasts of the Earth before he created Man.
>>81409973
>How do Christcucks explain blacks and hispanics? Do they just not believe in them?
>>81412402
There are no actual kikes or slimes on this board, besides JIDF. There are, however, many Kek-denying Christchan spamming deus vult LARPers who must be purged in order to make /po/ great again.
>>81412402
SERIOUSLY
Bashing Judaism is really fucking edgy
>>81412665
"Prove it :^)"
>>81412894
That's easy.
We have fossil records of beasts before 200,000 years ago.
We do not have one single human bone prior to that. Next?
>>81412831
What a shit poster
>>81409973
>cavemen and Neanderthals?
"Cavemen" are neanderthals bro.
The Bible also speaks of other humanoid species.
>>81411095
based anon
>>81409973
How do atheists explain the lack of transitional species which should be literally everywhere?
How do atheists explain the fact that some animals haven't evolved for over 300 million years, while some animals have undergone drastic changes in the last 500,000 years?
How do atheists explain that senses, like eyesight, could not possibly have been randomly developed from something that doesn't have eyesight?
How do atheists believe that the Archaeopteryx was the first bird which evolved from lizards when they had a perfect hollow and pneumatic bone structure, or if it wasn't the first bird?
How can atheists think that a fish flopped out of the ocean and developed lungs?
How can atheists believe that there can be impossible halfway points between absolute changes in animal physiology?
>>81414801
>impossible halfway points
you're assuming something can't be added and then taken away
>>81414801
>How do atheists explain the lack of transitional species which should be literally everywhere?
but they are literally everywhere?
>>81414801
Dinosaurs are not lizards.
You do realize there are lungfish and mudskippers?
>>81409973
This might be the most embarrassing I've seen.
pro-tip: the best hat-tipping argument is the problem of evil and suffering, not science explaining the physical world via human reason
>>81413580
fossil record? Do you know what the use to determine tha age of fossils? Carbon dating, where they determine the age of something by the amount radioactive isotope of Carbon (C-14), which decays to half its existing amount every 5700 years. The average Emperor Penguin lives 20 years, but C-14 dating has determined living penguins to be 8000 years old, meaning there is a window of error of something like over 4000%. How do you know those fossils aren't over 4000% younger?
>>81415574
Go on. First I have looked at carbon dating actually
>>81414965
explain to me then, how anything can develop fully functional lungs from comfortably having gills.
>>81415304
Transitional species like the Coelacanth? Which was thought to be the missing link between fish making their way out of the ocean and onto dry land, only to be discovered still alive in 1938, as a fully aquatic fish having not changed at all over 300 million years?
>>81415574
God forgot to shut down the carbon atoms.
>>81410507
>This is the holy word of god
>Lol no its not completely metaphorical
>>81415941
No, transitional species like frogs. They're basically fish when they're born.
Come on dude, you can be a Christian without denying science
>>81416264
Figurative interpretation goes back to like the 3rd century pal
>>81411095
>there is not one single human bone in the fossil record before 200,000 years ago.
yeah thats becdause modern humasna re about that age
>There is no archeological link between australopithecine and homo sapiens
just google futurama evolution lost link that sums up how retarded you sound
>humans somehow evolved further
thta isnt a thing, you can adapt better, but there is no 'further' comnpared to other species, im pretty sure you couldnt fight hand on hand withy a gorrila
>That's right, we lost two chromosomes along the way and managed to do better. Wat.
they merged, and its called efficiency (smaller computers with more power) it also proves that apes are our ancestors and ts also called a mutation not maddnes
>Beyond having completely re-engineering our bones
the fuck are you ven talking about?
>And we did this all overnight
literally the opposite of what evolution is
>evolving from primates as there is evidence of God.
no
>>81412402
Fedoras are to scared to talk about muslims.
All they can do is bitch about Jesus being talked about in school.
>>81417888
You are suggesting that one mutation was successful enough to bring about all of humanity, out of the blue with no transitional fossils between it's pregenitor and us.
However there just isn't any proof of this.
Our bones are wafer thin compared to our supposed 'ancestors'. Why could I not fight a gorilla? Because of bone density and muscle mass.
We have no fossils, no archeological evidence showing that transition. Thanks for trying but you were fed a big lie.
>>81418307
>You are suggesting that one mutation was successful enough to bring about all of humanity
nope, amutation was succesful enough to give us an edge over other animals, and then with time consequences of that mutation brought other favorable traits over thousands of generations
>out of the blue with no transitional fossils between it's pregenitor and us.
we have hundreds of transitional fossils but you havent found this particular one so im not going to believe anything, the earth is a big place
>Our bones are wafer thin compared to our supposed 'ancestors'
so?
>We have no fossils, no archeological evidence showing that transition
we do
>Thanks for trying but you were fed a big lie.
i guess i didnt pray to my imaginary friend enough
>>81418307
You have such a garbage understanding of evolution and archaeology, it's pathetic.
>>81418997
Give him a better understanding then
>>81418307
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTOla3TyfqQ
this is how retarded you sound btw
>>81418997
That's not an argument
>>81418948
>with time consequences of that mutation brought other favorable traits over thousands of generations
For the LAST time, there is no evidence of that. For the last time. You are operating on faith alone.
Yes, that's a theoretical explanation but it is only theory at this point.
>>81409973
god placed them test your faith
you failed
go directly to hell, do not collect $200
>>81411095
>there are people inhabiting Earth who are this retarded
>>81420627
Still not an argument
>>81410034
6/10 bantz from a fucking leaf
