![1371640339134[2].png](https://i.imgur.com/1ponCMW.png "1371640339134[2].png")
Would Americans be able to fight off a military coup with their guns?
>>81173888
Why would we want to?
Possibily. I'll make it much harder though.
Well a military coup wouldn't really be a fight against the citizens.
>>81174061
fpbp
Yes. That's every gun nut's wet dream. Now quit asking.
If a coup would ever happen it would probably be supported due to the fact the military is loyal to the Constitution.
>>81173888
/pol/ would support the coup. Only leftists would resist the coup, and they would resort to marching and chanting
We'd definitely make it a hell of a lot harder, but it's not like the military would target civilians
>>81173888
Why would we want to?
Also, if it takes place in cities, we couldn't anyway because cuck gun laws in cities.
Someone have the post listing all the places in the US that control of one would cripple the country? Transportation choke points and energy hubs
a military coup wouldn't really involve the citizens, would it?
>>81174448
This.
Most of the fiercest advocates of the second amendment, and the constitution as a whole, are our military and veterans.
>>81174854
this one? I have a lot of screencaps like this
>>81174291
Gun nuts better get familiar with drone strikes.
they can always shoot off the fire that will burn down their houses
>>81175273
>>81174854
wait I think this is it
Definitely not, but our soldiers would know they'd have to kill Americans who would try, and the military wouldn't be very eager to try.
>>81175069
ahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
>>81173888
US military would never coup in conventional sense.
If they staged a coup it would be to restore democracy and Constitution.
>Military attempts to dethrone king nigger
>Fight them off
For what purpose
who would win
1. The entire US army
2. Bunch of vietcongs
>>81173888
>implying we wouldn't be on the military's side
>>81175726
That looks like it. I've seen other posts about it as well.
>>81175689
Drone pilots better get used to their family's getting killed.
>>81176787
who would win
1. The Austria-Hungarian empire
2. A few thousand Serbs
>>81177080
>killing innocent people
Why are gun nuts such sociopaths?
>>81175689
The problem with an armed populace is you don't know who is a supporter or not, every single one of them can become an insurgent...
>>81173888
The US military is almost 70% Republican. Subtract the cuckservatives and 50% is redpilled as fuck.
>>81174061
this. I trust, love and respect our military, the feds, not so much.
>>81174208
this was my first thought
>>81176787
Who would win
1 the British empire
2 a bunch of colonial upstarts
>>81173888
>implying I wouldn't join it.
>>81177459
>droning innocent people
>>81173888
At this point it would be welcomed
>>81176787
NUKEZzzzzzz
>>81178970
In 1776, the term "British empire" was not in use. Britain was also not a major military power. The Americans, meanwhile, were backed by the strongest military power in Europe (France), the largest empire on the planet (Spain) and the greatest commercial power in Europe (Netherlands).
So, another way of phrasing your question would be this:
Who would win
1. the British who have the smallest army in Europe
2. a bunch of colonial upstarts aided by the three strongest countries on the planet
