I see your guys' perspective on a lot of things and I understand your beliefs to some extent. Something I will never get over and something that I know loses you guys so much support is the following.
Those of you who are bitter and sexless weirdos that berate anyone who has casual sex loses you so much potential support.
Why is this political? Why does that seep so deeply into your political views? And you're also wrong by the way.
So many of you are making statements of causation based on correlation with confounding variables. You would be marked wrong on your first high school stats exam for mistaking correlation for causation and yet here we are.
So I ask /pol/, why the fuck can't I just fuck around with my friends and other girls who I just met? What is wrong with me having casual sex and why do you hate me for it??
It's about birthrates op. You know, that thing no more Europeans have anymore?
It's about workable, proven traditional values. We need families not hookups, life long partners with kids not cohabitation with pets.
If we do not return to what worked then we will not survive.
>>80533455
>It's about workable, proven traditional values. We need families not hookups,
You can have both. That's like saying you can't eat chicken if you eat salad. It's utter nonsense and this abstract exclusivity to only one type of sexual relationship.
>>80533455
What I'm saying is that people hook up and then they end up settling down later in life. It's actually the norm.
>>80533705
>That's like saying you can't eat chicken if you eat salad.
A good thing doesn't cancel out a bad thing.
Yeah, great, you can do both, but if you're stuffing your face with shit food then you have a shit diet even if you occasionally eat a healthy meal.
>>80535259
Except this analogy doesn't work because casual sex is actually good for you if you take the obvious precautions.
>>80532953
>What is wrong with me having casual sex and why do you hate me for it??
>>80535427
>casual sex is actually good for you
"No"
Even shit leftists notice the trend that more partners means less happiness in marriage
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/08/21/more-sexual-partners-unhappy-marriage_n_5698440.html
>>80532953
Causes more chances for resentment, weakens families, and weakens communities.
Getting off is not important you animal-minded twat.
>>80535677
and by means I mean correlates, so don't be a pedantic faggot
>>80535445
Quite obviously addressed that in my Op. Not surprised that you aren't someone with the ability to get through reading one post.
>>80535677
Already addressed the correlation.
>>80535726
Distinguishing between correlation and causation is not pedantic, it's a fundamental difference. Your argument doesn't make sense in the first place.
>>80532953
Casual sex gets you AIDS dipshit. Its a PSA not a hate crime
>>80535751
>I addressed that I'm not using facts in my argument
>Why are you do stupid that you only use facts to make your point
>>80535427
>casual sex is actually good for you
No, it isn't.
>>80535751
>I don't understand how correlation works
>I submit that the complete opposite of the observable correlation is actually the case
>I I refuse to actually provide a citation for this claim
Yeah, you sure did address it.
>>80535865
Lmao look up the rates for AIDS first, then look up the transition rates for penile/vaginal sex.
>>80535905
I already made an argument against those data, you failed to wrap your head around it.
>>80535959
Sex is good for you, casual or not.
>>80535979
You don't know what correlation is. Also.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20088868
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19817979
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3490558/
>>80535857
Look at it this way. Correlation vs causation aside.
It's still smart for me to want a virgin bride, because all evidence shows I'm more likely to have a good marriage that way.
>>80536292
>Sex is good for you, casual or not.
So then why is rape not okay?
I think some people aren't too serious about it, but some are because they are too insecure to think of girl having been with anyone else.
Ultimately I really hate those actual stormfront types they have zero sense of humor, are completely hostile to minute differences in ideology, and just generally unpleasant. I say this having had an account there when I was like thirteen. You're fucking Namibia shit is never happening you dumbasses, and any attempt to will only decrease the likelihood of an independent Afrikaner Cape
>>80536315
Hows that search going for you of an attractive virgin adult woman?
>>80536292
>I already made an argument against those data
Yeah that's not really how facts work. You can't just make an argument against facts.
>>80532953
That's an American thing. Don't blame Europe.
>>80533705
What a terrible analogy.
If you fill up on salad, you can't eat chicken. If you even eat only a moderate amount of salad, you will not even desire chicken until what salad is in your stomach is all digested, and by that time all of the stores might be closed. (AKA your mid 30's)
>>80532953
It's simple psychology jabroni.
If you have a bunch of casual sex, then sex means less and less to you, making you more likely to cheat.
On the other hand, if you have sex only with your wife, then you associate that activity only with your wife. This creates a more profound attachment between you and your wife.
I could go on with the basic psychology, but that should be enough.
>>80536292
>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20088868
>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19817979
>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19817979
All say sex is good for you, I don't disagree. It makes zero claims about number of sexual partners you disingenuous faggot.
>>80536437
I'm arguing about how you're using those facts.
>>80536404
Consensual is assumed with casual sex. Not talking about rape.
Hey, when your country is morally bankrupt, you can do whatever you want. Abject hedonism, the new American way.
>>80536484
Lmao show me the psychology literature on this anon.
>>80536540
You actually did disagree. You're just moving the goalposts now. Thanks for playing.
>>80535857
>correlation and causation is not pedantic
It's fucking irrelevant you mongoloid.
IF you choose to have casual sex, you will likely have an unhappier marriage, unhappier children, a cheating whore wife, STDs, depression, etc. etc.
Why the fuck would you take the risk? You are basically throwing your life away for 5 minutes of primitive, meaningless pleasure. You are no better than African niggers, you have no concept of deferral of gratification.
>>80536716
Please link the post in which I said sex is bad for you.
Protip: I didn't.
>>80536743
>IF you choose to have casual sex, you will likely have an unhappier marriage, unhappier children, a cheating whore wife, STDs, depression, etc. etc.
That's not how statistics work. This study you're citing also was focusing on women and I'm a male.
>>80536806
Right here buddy. >>80535677
As I said, thanks for playing. Someone like you who can't admit he's wrong on something so basic will never argue genuinely.
>>80532953
>b...but muh dick
-the post
this slut wants to be a whore, but wants to get treated like a lady haha,
this is an age old tale, pick one or the otherbut you cant have both
you are either the slut that every guy wants to fuck
or you are the elegant broad that every man wants to wed and have children with, you choose bitch its a free country assuming youre from america.
>>80537065
>he thinks the success of the 50's was due to public shaming of sexual activity and not the entire rest of the developed world being destroyed 5 years before.
>>80536434
Harder when debauched individuals like yourself keep pushing for everyone to have as much sex as possible.
Also nice way of conceding your entire argument is shit.
>Consensual is assumed with casual sex. Not talking about rape.
BUT YOU SAID ALL SEX IS GOOD FOR YOU!
Now you're backpeddling. Is sex good for you or is sex only good for you in certain conditions?
You also have never cited a single study or fact in any of this. You just make assertions and don't back them up at all.
At least your opponents use data. Scream non-causal all you like, it's better than pure rhetoric.
>>80536937
>That's not how statistics work
Your LIKELIHOOD of these things happening to you increases if you participate in casual sex. That's what correlation means, you dumb nigger. Whether or not its causal is irrelevant.
Yes, there is a chance that it could not happen to you, but why the fuck would you take that risk?
>>80537167
I did cite multiple studies and equating sex with rape to make a point makes you retarded. I'm clearly talking about casual sex. When people are talking about rape, they use the word rape and not sex.
>correlation does not equal causation
I wish reddit core people would actually take a moment to to think about what this actually meant.
Correlation doesn't necessarily mean causation, but it doe provide evidence of some sort of relationship, provided your sample size is large enough. It's possible that relationship is not causal though, it can be that both variables correlate because they are caused by the same thing or
they correlate because of two separate variables that happen to be changing in relative lock step despite having little to no relation, such as the decrease in violent crime and decrease in Brazilian rain forests or something.
However if a strong correlative trend is found and a reasonable causal explanation exists with no equally reasonable explanation for a non causal relationship, it's unreasonable not to accept the causal relationship.
In the case of promiscuity to reduced family stability there is no better explanation for the relationship than "an object in motion tends to stay in motion applies to be a whore" that I know of.
>>80536937
>thanks for playing
>never argue genuinely
Yeah, you've been making such an amazing attempt at honest discourse.
Not all sex is casual sex. To point to the risks specifically associated with casual sex is not to say anything about sex as a whole.
You talked about casual sex, I replied talking about casual sex. You moved to sex overall as it relates to specific physical benefits to which I offer no disagreement, this was met with faggotry.
Genuine arguments indeed.
just get off of 4chan and go suck that guys dick youve been snapping your tits to all day, skank. your children will have a whore for a mother.
>>80537304
Lol you didn't even get to the second sentence of my post before you sperged out and ignored the rest.
>>80537332
There are multiple confounding variables in that same study. I am no longer responding to anyone who refuses to read my post before responding. I addressed this in the Op.
>>80537422
Sex is sex in the context of whether it's healthy for you. The studies are talking about sex in general and casual sex is a type of sex.
>>80537548
>It's a /pol/ can't imagine a man defending casual sex episode
>>80532953
>Those of you who are bitter and sexless weirdos that berate anyone who has casual sex loses you so much potential support.
You sound like a woman, desu
It's pretty simple: Casual sex leads to hypergamy, and hypergamy leads to internal strife and conflict within society as males focus all their energy into competition against each other. Hypergamy was fine when human "society" was tribal and scattered, and having the tallest and most dominating mate had very real advantages in survival.
But we're long past that now.
We created monogamy and marriage as a way of controlling female hypersexuality: This wasn't done to punish women. It was done to control men - to redirect male energy into constructive, rather than destructive, efforts. All it meant was 80% of men could get a wife and procreate, rather than 20%. For women, this is a travesty, as they don't get the best man they possibly could (even if it means sharing him with other women).
Biologically this artificial social construct of monogamy and marriage damages our genetic fitness, but we more than make up for that with the societies and technologies we create through envigorated male effort. Soon enough we'll be able to manipulate our genetics directly, and will no longer have to worry about genetic fitness the same way ever again.
>>80537715
>It's pretty simple: Casual sex leads to hypergamy, and hypergamy leads to internal strife and conflict within society as males focus all their energy into competition against each other. Hypergamy was fine when human "society" was tribal and scattered, and having the tallest and most dominating mate had very real advantages in survival.
Do you have a source for this, or is this just something you made up?
>>80537677
>there's a strong correlation between time spent in the sun and rate of skin cancer
>hurr dur its only a correlation, you can't prove that UV radiation causes skin cancer, im going to spend as much time in the sun as I want
Literally you.
>>80537677
>Sex is sex in the context of whether it's healthy for you. The studies are talking about sex in general and casual sex is a type of sex.
Right, which is why rape should be okay.
Because rape is a type of sex.
>>80537677
>I WILL NOT ACCEPT COUNTER POINTS I ALREADY MADE A PERFECT ARGUMENT AGAINST IT
wew
>>80532953
>I agree generally with what you guys are saying but take exception to you calling out my pet vice (weed, homosexuality, porn, casual sex, trannies, etc)
We are not going to compromise on the truth to get more support. I mean, let's just throw all our beliefs out the window and then everybody will support us, right?
>>80533772
and then they get divorced after 5 years because either the wife or the husband simply cannnot cope with the married life, they have gotten a taste of what's out there after all
and then their single child will see this and become another emotionally detached morally uncommited person to perpetuate the cycle that's destroying the white race
feminism was the beginning of the end and sexual liberation is it's weapon of destruction
It's pretty clear that OP is not going to change his mind on this one, no matter what we say to him.
Enjoy your shitty r-selected lifestyle, OP. Don't come crying to us 5 years later when your marriage is in the shitter and your children resent you.
>>80537677
>Sex is sex in the context of whether it's healthy for you. The studies are talking about sex in general and casual sex is a type of sex.
Yes, and it's referring specifically to physical health, whereas the major objection to casual sex in particular has nothing to do with physical factors.
Formal logical fallacies aren't that common, but you've managed to utilize one, congratulations.
>>80537875
Different levels of proof. Scientists have a lot more evidence for UV from the sun causing skin cancer than you have for your argument.
>>80537937
You just flat out didn't address my point that was right next to that one. It's not just that it's a correlation, it's that there are several confounding variables.
>>80538099
>misusing r/K theory because you saw someone on 4chan do it
Cringe. I wish the people in my lab could see this
>>80538156
It includes mental health, you just didn't read all of it before posting. Not surprising, this is a really poor display anon.
OP is up to 16 posts, and this thread is garbage.
Can we get rid of the ">1 post by this ID" meme now?
Sometimes it's better for OPs to not push their agendas in their own threads.
>So many of you are making statements of causation based on correlation with confounding variables.
Is that your way of going against data?
ITT: People who don't realize that the most important part about being able to *have* casual sex (and most all those who can have it *do* have it) is that you defacto must be socially and physically up to par, which means you have to be, at the bare minimum, a normally functioning human being (which virtually nobody on /pol/ is).
That is why casual sex is a good thing. It turns autists into autists who can actually approach people without sperging out. Hate the general paradigm, not those of us who manage to ride the tiger as it was meant to be done.
>>80532953
Keep fucking broads, OP The inferiority complex of these virgin (by virtue of their virtue, obv) autists will never fail to prevail over what should be the rational approach to the issue.
>>80538373
Yes yes, you're very clever.
Never mind that you've fallaciously thrown in extra terms to try and prove a point; it's other people giving a poor display because they can't keep up with your enlightened sophistry.
>>80538373
Name one possible reasonable confounding variable that would explain the strong correlation.
>implying /pol/ is one person
>>80532953
i know i'm a prude but, sex is sacred and should only be done for the purpose of procreation. the fact that it feels good is merely a happy byproduct, if it didn't we'd be far less inclined to reproduce.
people seem to have this attitude that sex is cheap and children are a burden that should be avoided. hopefully you can see how this has devastating long term consequences.
>>80535751
>>80535857
irrelevant, the cause of someone desiring casual sex is still the same cause for unhappiness later in life.
the cause is you being a degenerate that wants to get his cummies now and doesn't think about how it will effect him later.
>>80538373
>It includes mental health, you just didn't read all of it before posting. Not surprising, this is a really poor display anon.
Your studies boil down to
>We think sex causes people to be more physically healthy, rather than healthy people being able to get laid easier
Literally your own cry of correlation but not causation in full view, just not applied when it suits you.
>We asked 4 doctors what their opinions on sex were.
I bet you I can find 4 doctors that say smoking is healthy.
>People who have sex are more sexually satisfied
What incredible research.
You are displaying confirmation bias 100% and your own arguments are pro-rape. You cant weasel out of it.
>>80538706
I'm not going against the data, I'm arguing your use of the data.
>>80538671
Lol it's not my fault that you faggots have a basic tenet of your hivemind that is blatantly logically flawed.
>>80538725
The abstinence really is charging their anger. I remember how much less of a neurotic mess it made me when I first had sex.
>>80538897
Lol very obviously depression. One of the main symptoms of depression is inability to maintain relationships and growing distant. That same study shows that women on the right of the bell curve are depressed and have trouble staying in relationships. Not to mention the fact that the trend is not anything close to linear, so any causation by number of partners doesn't make sense.
I'm not saying anything with 100% confidence on causation here, but it's obvious that depression is a very likely causal factor for failures in relationships.
>>80538905
>20 out of 22 people agree on the same fringe view with the same shitty pseudo-psychology arguments that they learned from each other
>not a hivemind
>>80536434
better to die trying to raise everyone's standards than to wallow in the filth of mediocrity.
>>80539322
Lmao what do you think happens when women have sex with 7 or more guys? Do you think their soul just gets taken? Did you ever think that maybe the women with very few lifetime partners stay with their husband because they're ugly and no one wants to fuck them?
>>80538897
Oh right, attractiveness could absolutely play a role.
>>80537161
>he thinks the USA was the only nation that achieved great success after the war with traditional family values and culture
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHhuBZEZESU
Pol literally full of fucking idiots.
Oppose casual sex because, save the white race, and morality family values blah blah.
Won't get married because women are evil succubi.
>>80539572
They also were not invaded and made out just about second best after the war.
>Those of you who are bitter and sexless weirdos that berate anyone who has casual sex loses you so much potential support.
because much of the west's problems are due to the decline of the family -- low white birthrates, high divorce, attendant moral degeneration. casual sex culture is the cause of this, because it results in all women only fucking the top 10% of alpha chads and the rest of men are unable to find an acceptable wife.
>>80539495
>Lmao what do you think happens when women have sex with 7 or more guys?
The same thing that happens to people that abuse drugs. It fucks up with the way their brain responds to dopamine, serotonin and oxytocin so they don't respond the same way in the future.
Casual sex is no different than taking drugs.
>>80539495
no i think it makes them whores with daddy issues that rode the cock-carousel into their 30s only to find out that nobody wants an old used up hag.
have you considered that people looking for an actual partner to raise children with are instinctively more attracted to virgins?
>>80539672
Wow, it's almost like /pol/ is not one person you fucking newfag.
>>80539726
Good, we need some form of eugenics. If that means that you socially retarded weridos can't breed, then good.
>>80539759
Lmao source.
>>80539765
Muh feelings :^)
>>80538725
>>80538725
I love how everyone but op addressed the biggest redpill in this thread
Keep on raging, faggots. Me and OP gonna keep getting it in because we're not total losers.
>>80539683
this was london five years prior.
>>80533705
no, you can't have both. with hook up culture, women spend all their lives until mid-30s fucking alpha chads. 90% of men are unable to get a woman who is at all attractive because they're all fucking chad, and won't stop and settle down until they're ugly and past prime child bearing age. no wonder men are less interested in marriage with them at that point.
>>80532953
I've had plenty of casual sex and I still hate kikes, fags and niggers.
OP is a faggot.
>>80539966
>Muh feelings :^)
im sure strawmen will get you everywhere.
>>80539998
Made out a lot better than the rest of Europe.
>>80540117
That's your actual point. It makes you feel insecure because other men have fucked her.
>>80540013
>no, you can't have both.
Yes you can, it's very much the norm. People have sex, then they settle down with someone.
>>80540117
It's really projection.
His main argument is he likes casual sex so it must be good.
He tries to cite some absolutely garbage studies while not realizing that they just illustrate his intellectual bankruptcy.
>>80539966
>Lmao source
Explain how casual sex is different than taking drugs.
>>80535445
>>80536292
Your argument (if you made one) is obviously not well-written enough for the anons posting on this thread to comprehend, myself included. Try again.
On top of that, read the essay, "The Fate of Empires," by Sir John Glubb. Sexual promiscuity contributes to the fall of empires.
http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf
>>80538725
>>80538725
LITERALLY /thread AND THE THREAD KEEPS GOING
BUT WHY
>>80540231
>it's very much the norm
The norm is getting divorced you lowly creature whose only concern is making your dick feel good.
>>80532953
Its not just about birth rates OP. Its about disease and degeneracy. I used to love gaming girls. I didn't realize what I was doing to my body, my psychology and the women I was with. This has a systemic effect and lasts for generations.
Even psychological issues you don't understand aside, there is an argument in regards to disease. You may get some flesh eating shit from Thailand that was brought back stateside by your bang buddies boss (she thinks he's really good looking, he's 37 and divorced), and your bang buddy girl needed to feel excitement and not dead inside so obviously she sucked his dick and he raw dogged her, because why not? Not to mention the herp she got 2 years ago from a black dude. You have that now. But you won't find out you have that for a while. Btw, literally everyone in your sexual circle has at least 1 strand of hpv.
Its ruining viable women, its some r/ selection bullshit. Please find an attractive woman, game her and make sure she wants to lock you down. Then stay with her. Both of you get tested, and you have to tell her about your obviously infected dick btw.
>>80540231
>Yes you can, it's very much the norm. People have sex, then they settle down with someone.
women settle down with a man after they've been used up fucking chads every night, and then eventually divorce him because they can't accept not getting the best anymore after they've spent their life getting it. that isn't sustainable.
the fact is 90% of men have no chance ever having sex with or being in a relationship with an attractive women because they're all fucking the top 10% or even 5% of super alphas. this isn't a good deal for men, so of course men should oppose hook up culture.
>>80532953
this is literally the first i have heard of it. i think ms.whateveryournameis is projecting things from your real life onto /pol/ maybe we remind you of your dad or some guy who wont give you the time of day idlk
point is no man would ever give a shit if some one thought him having sex was bad and your little mental break down is best restricted to /r9k/ or maybe /b/
>>80540231
>People have sex, then they settle down with someone.
And then half of those marriages end up in divorce. Wonder why? Because statistically the longer a chick has been on the cock carousel, the more likely she won't find satisfaction in her marriage and end it.
>>80540321
The levels of NTs you're talking about are hugely different. There is evidence that drug abuse causes brain damage and NT regulation issues. There is nothing to say that sex does the same thing.
>>80532953
Also OP, believe it or not, some people actually still believe that we aren't fucking animals whose only purposed is to act on every impulse. If you believed you had someone to answer to once your time on this earth was done, you would be concerned with having to answer to them when you didn't do what they said.
>>80540574
Or because it's way easier to get a divorce now. >>80540521
Both of you don't seem to be aware that casual sex is on the rise, but marriages that end in divorce has been down for a long time. Not to mention that the top reason for not getting married or having kids today is financial insecurity.
>>80540589
>there is nothing to say that sex does the same thing.
Is there a study saying it doesn't?
Because absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
>>80532953
I never understood why you faggots care about sex so much.
It's just momentary pleasure anyways.
There are greater things in life.
>>80532953
God forbids fornication and adultery, /pol/ is a Christian board. Degenerate.
>>80540788
Lol right but I dropped christianity as a child because like many kids, I decided it was completely illogical nonsense to believe in and base my life around a Roman jew myth.
>>80540231
>Made out a lot better than the rest of Europe.
literally every country that wasn't occupied by communists recovered by 1950 you retard. even west germany was having an economic boom post-war
>That's your actual point. It makes you feel insecure because other men have fucked her.
now you're projecting.
i literally do not care about whores that decide to ruin their own lives. at best i feel bad for them.
but maybe thats because I'm a well adjusted adult that isn't all too interested in sex for the sake of sex. I'm interested in raising a family and that tends to make me unattracted to women who sleep around both sexually and emotionally.
>>80540511
And this af
The norm is degenerate, anti-depressant fueled hell. Do not be a slave to your urges or to absurd, corruptive social standards op. The norm is killing western civilization.
>>80540890
>he wants proof of a negative
No one has done that study because one of our basic functions obviously isn't the same as being a crackhead. I accept your inability to argue as an admission of being wrong.
>>80540835
You're a fucking retard.
I remember the last thread you started on this.
You tried to use this 'data' too and ignored the fact that the number of marriages is down.
Just kill yourself. You show you have absolutely no ability to revise your arguments.
Not a single person was swayed by your last thread, what makes you think this would be any different? If anything the fact you keep trying to shove the same bullshit and expecting different results shows you're an idiot.
>>80540957
Then you are in open rebellion against God. You are a slave to your own sinful impulses, and are powerless to stop. Don't come looking for justification for your actions, you will answer for them alone.
>>80539293
If casual sex is good for you why is it correlated so strongly with depression?
Isn't the reasonable explanation that promiscuity is initially sought as a ineffective solution for a perceived lack of validation that causes an addiction to the fleeting sense of pleasure of "oh he thought well enough of me to fuck me" that results in unstable relationships as the fleeting feeling needs to be sought out again?
Also
>all relationships are linear
Are you retarded.
>>80539495
Unless you're a 3/10 male or a 1/10 woman you can have casual sex. It's not very difficult to do, because the ugos just have casual sex with each other.
>>80541146
>he's on /pol/ enough to recognize a thread made months ago
Yikes
>>80538725
>still hasn't been addressed by any anti-sexers
can you be anymore blatantly avoiding the best argument being posed by this side?
Ideally we should stop being so barbaric with sex
It is destructive to society to indulge in hedonistic pursuits of degeneracy. Having said that, freedom includes degeneracy and it should be allowed, just with mandatory responsibility. The truth fears no investigation. Make all sexual histories available to your partner by law (obtaining the sexual histories WITHOUT overly invading privacy is another SEPERATE discussion)
>>80540957
Also, do you make all your decisions on beliefs and value systems millenia old as a small child? That speaks more to your own naivete then anything else you've posted.
>>80532953
Implying you're not a virgin.
>>80532953
>4chan
>On 4chan complaining about basement dwelling kissless virgin neck beards
You're in the wrong place buddy.
>>80540835
Except for the fact that marriages are still going down regardless of the divorce rate you mongloid.
>>80540957
why am i not surprised
just another atheist looking to get his dick wet consequence free. you are going to die alone wondering where your youth went.
>>80541134
>No one has done that study because one of our basic functions obviously isn't the same as being a crackhead
Yet we have studies about how exercising too much can hurt you.
How overeating can be dangerous.
How oversleeping is bad for you.
Clearly our basic functions when taken to extremes can be harmful.
You're also an idiot if you don't think a study could be done to rule out damage by the NT's released by sex. What is proving the null you scientifically illiterate subhuman?
>>80541300
fuck privacy
if we have INTERNET history available to every potential spouse it would cleanse degeneracy from those who desire it for their family
there's no argument why this shouldn't be the case other than being ashamed of your 4chan and porn habits
>>80532953
You are literally destroying civilization because it's fun. What is the point of fighting for civilization if you're just going to piss it away? Are you angry at me for telling you that that is what you're doing? That's sort of too bad you fucking faggot, and no, it is not a misrepresentation of correlation and causation, the causality is DEFINITELY there.
Women with more partners have failed marriages and fewer kids, and we all know fucking why it remains the same if their partner knows or not. It's because women have instincts. Once a woman has fucked every guy in the tribe, she cannot realistically settle with any of them because he has no reason to assume her loyalty. It is her biological impetus to try and convince multiple men to provide for her, so she WILL chase around.
This is what the evidence bears out. This is what the statistics bear out. This is what all of the data indicates, but you bury your head in the sand and pretend that in an era of accessible birth control and cheap abortions you can build a sustainable population out of a horde of sluts with no loyalty. That is the world YOU are creating sir, and that is not a world for which I stand. I must ask you--why the fuck do you care about ANY of this if all you want is to bang slags? You're literally a degenerate, how dare you claim to understand our beliefs when you are an actual cancer on our civilization? It is quite obvious that you do not understand us or our perspective or what we believe or why we believe it, because you cannot even grasp the importance of cultural familial morality to a civilization, which is the fundamental underpinning of ALL right-wing thought!
>>80541271
>Russian posters
You barely even formed a coherent sentence and then bitched no one responded to it. And even after your shit english is deciphered it's not even an argument. It's just "you have to interact with other humans to do this therefor it is good."
Anyone who jumps from sexual partner to sexual partner or actively pursues one night stands is a dopamine junkie and needs therapy.
>>80541265
>He has a memory capable of recalling things from more than a few days ago.
I pity your narrow time perception.
Maybe that's why you're sex obsessed. Your mind isn't capable of fully contemplating past and future.
>Someone viewing more /pol/ is supposed to make me more capable of remembering a single thread from months ago
>Thinks he understands the human brain at all
Yea, stop trying to spread your flat-earth tier understanding of things to anyone. You're literally doing harm to humanity by spreading idiotic filth.
/pol/ is mostly filled with traditional people. Traditional people naturally think their traditions are the right way to do things, hence why their traditions. But now that they live in a world where their traditions are outdated, rather than adapt, they choose to attack everyone.
>>80537961
nobody wants to be called out on 4chan itself being degenerate, as well as internet addiction.
Seriously , anyone here is consorting with the lowest scum of society and pretending to be moral to feel better.
this site is the real one that everyone here is guilty of and needs to grow out of eventually
>>80532953
Nah, you're right. Although some of /pol/'s beliefs have a rational basis, most of their motivation for racism and nationalism is because they can't get laid
>>80541205
Sex is fun and feels good, it makes sense that depressed women seek it out when they feel bad about themselves. That doesn't make the act bad. In this case, if every partner you have decreases your ability to pairbond, we would see a linear if not an exponential increase in marriage failure. It would not manifest as it does.
>>80541309
I've thought about it since, still holds up. Doesn't take a lot of study to realize that christianity is just another myth.
>>80541366
Missed the second part.
>>80541425
Lol whatever helps you sleep at night.
>>80541467
So what you're saying is that there is no study saying that sex causes the same effects as drug addiction. Good, glad we can agree.
>>80541636
>>80541636
Or you just have a very low sex drive.
>>80541715
Lol I did not make this thread a few days ago. Maybe someone else did.
>>80541722
Some traditions are good, this one is based in an old myth and its time has come and gone.
>>80532953
Why are degenerate cunts on this thread saying you can ether sleep around OR be a kissless supreme gentleman?
If you're not an autistian meme generator, go out and game until you find a decent one. A decent one probably can't suck a golf ball through a garden hose or have a tramp stamp, but blowjob potential aside neither of these are desirable traits in the long run.
Most dudes on /pol should apply themselves more to actually leaving the basement. But OP and that Russian degenerate, you're off base. You are walking cock warts.
You are degenerate.
>>80541722
are you shitting me?
/pol/ is full of degenerate closet liberals who just hate themselves and pretend to be "traditional" to feel like they don't actually have to change their own lives and practice what they preach.
Nobody who frequents 4chan can really call themselves traditional, just by virtue of the filth 4chan is.
>>80540957
Keep living a hedonistic life my friend, no one is stopping you, just don't come here and pretend like your better than some of us because we don't revel in having sex with ugly drunk sluts every other weekend.
>>80539207
I love how OP ignored this post.
Please respond to this OP
>>80539293
>>80532953
>So I ask /pol/, why the fuck can't I just fuck around with my friends and other girls who I just met? What is wrong with me having casual sex and why do you hate me for it??
you can do whatever the fuck you want
just understand that the way society has embraced this since the 60s has been a net negative for everyone
nobody cares anymore and that's the problem
>>80541940
I think he's slightly above average, IQ wise.
Enough to know better, a little more than most people. But too stupid to do anything about it.
>>80541940
Lol I don't bother with ugly sluts, stay jealous.
>>80541954
It's basic medical knowledge that regular sex is good for you.
Here's more though, I'll keep posting them until you guys join reality. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20444178
>>80532953
Sex is about reproduction, making babies, raising families, etc. Why are you so caught up in sex as a purely hedonistic activity? Get your hormones under control.
>>80541636
This is the crux of the issue, casual sex addiction is just another form of cheap happiness pursuit that is ultimately noncontributory and unfulfilling just like over eating, narcotic addiction, video game over use ect.
It's a problem for the same reasons every vice is, it provides placebo happiness that ultimately turns one into a useless depressed piece of shit, lasting happiness is only earned by legitimate accomplishments, such as honing ones self physically, becoming adept at a skill, professional achievements, creating works of art, and the like.
Low IQ people exploiting the over abundance of basic need fulfilling resources accumulated by a successful society are the largest problem humanity will ever have.
>>80542211
Sex is a recreational and bonding activity in social primates, nice try.
>>80541580
>burgshit posters
"u condensed the pro-sex reason in a way that is universally applicable to /pol/ites and that makes me uncomftorable also u speak english better than me an it not evn ur first langooge. being able to talk 2 people and having the capacity to get laid is for NORMANS ROO xD ur a normie haha"
God. American's really do need the oven.
>>80542249
>it provides placebo happiness that ultimately turns one into a useless depressed piece of shit,
Posted several studies refuting that and will keep posting.
>>80542179
Yes I am very jealous of all those std ridden 4/10 sluts you have had sex with/
>>80542179
>Regular sex being good for you
>Still no mention of slutting around which objectively leads to more likelihood of depression, and marriage problems
Cute troll thread though.
>>80541478
Yeah, that could work.
The system wouldn't have to be perfect because all that needs to be enforced is responsibility and honesty. With those 2 things, freedom can be allowed degeneracy and the good will of man will guide our sinners (or not and that is their choice).
>>80541865
Eating food is fun and feels good, do it too much though and you fuck yourself up. Same thing with literally every other basic need.
Having too much sex results in an inability to be satisfied by monogamy and results in unstable romantic relations and a lack of motivation to pursue actual accomplishment.
The very concept of the point you're making is flawed because the two matters at hand (holding /pol/ views and being virgins/relationshipless) are not coincidental but completely connected.
I've only ever had one gf in my life and during the years I was with her, my whole political outlook was more liberal and tolerant. Love does things to you. Being unloved doesn't just sit alongisde extreme views, it CAUSES them.
>>80532953
If you honestly think your lack of respect for yourself is one of the things /pol/ would hate people for you're wrong.
I could care less about other people's fornication habits (sans pedos and puppy fuckers).
>>80532953
Don't listen to the betas. Keep humping
>>80542430
thing is most people here including me and you would be exposed for the shitty people they are if everyone knew our internet histories
not to mention who would record them?
>>80542390
Lol if only you knew what it was like to be normal.
>>80542450
Try something that hasn't been refuted several times in this thread.
>>80542477
>getting laid means I have no respect for myself
I find the literal opposite truth. The sexless people are the most insecure generally.
>>80542457
Speak for yourself. I'm married with two children. Maybe while you're dating you seem more liberal but if anything being a married father caused me to be even more critical of the world.
>>80542355
>depression is extremely high among promiscuous individuals
>b-but I refuted that.
wew lad.
Of course depression is high among people who get no sex, but it's also high among people who over indulge, because just like every need you have to find the happy medium at which the need is fulfilled but you brain doesn't become reliant on the cheap dopamine fix provided by it.
>>80542522
May you slam the pussy my friend.
>>80542318
That's definitely a secondary purpose, not primary. Primary purpose of sex always has been and always will be reproduction.
>>80542430
And would this require total abolition of online anonymity?
Maybe it's actually a GOOD thing to de-anonymize the Internet and have employers and spouses see your every click
it would go both ways and eradicate degeneracy. Would solve the porn problem without even banning porn because people wouldn't be able to get a job if the employer didn't want someone with X internet habit
>>80542664
The constant equating drug use and sex has been refuted in this thread. They are very different effects on the brain in terms of severity, toxicity, damage and neurochemistry in general.
>>80532953
> So I ask /pol/, why the fuck can't I just fuck around with my friends and other girls who I just met? What is wrong with me having casual sex and why do you hate me for it??
Casual sex makes people unhappy ... also you're being a good goy.
>>80535712
If you don't wanna have sex fine. . Don't judge others for wanting to enjoy gods gift
>>80532953
I don't believe it does.
I personally am against casual sex but I'm of no delusions that the majority of /pol/ shares my views.
>>80542670
Great, it's also for fun.
>>80542805
It does not.
>>80542355
You didn't refute anything
You posted studies saying sex is good for you
Which it is. It's quite a physical work out, and it makes people happy. It's a good thing
It's slutting around, and having sex with a bunch of different partners that are the problem.
You have not refuted that AT ALL.
>>80542318
The point of the bonding attribute of sex is to emotionally bond potential parents together and thus increase the likelihood of survival for the offspring by ensuring the fathers stays with the mother to care for it.
>>80532953
I have to agree with OP on this one. Sex is a natural desire, it's healthy, and it's as necessary and as mandatory as eating food, drinking water, breathing, etc. Just because you CAN TECHNICALLY go without sex, that's like breathing the minimum required amount of times to stay alive. Or eating the minimum amount of calories and the blandest food possible, just to stay alive. I see no value in this.
I think people have been forced to accept this idea that sex is bad, because they can't get any. They turn it around and delude themselves into thinking that it's by choice, and they get hostile towards anyone who disagrees with them.
Even from a religious perspective, sex can't be bad. God created sex, and if he didn't want people to ever do it, then he wouldn't have given us the option.
Also, just the biology behind everything. You start developing hormones, boys penises get bigger, and girls breasts develop around age 12-13. That's when you're supposed to start having sex. If you don't have sex at that point, you're some kind of freak whether you want to face it or not. People are so babified by the education system, and by overprotective parents, and by the government, that you're supposed to wait until you're about 30-40 to start having sex. Oh yeah, sounds like a great fucking life. If that's when you were supposed to have sex then that's when your sexual organs / hormones would start developing.
>>80542549
I say a report/reward system would work with mandatory sex licenses at the age of puberty that keep a record of all partners. Sure you could get away with banging on the side and promising to never tell anybody, but we all know how quickly degenerates will sell out their partner for a reward as soon as they're done busting a nut
>>80541865
>Missed the second part
>the top reason for not getting married or having kids today is financial insecurity.
That argument works in my favor. Men are no longer being duped into a legal relationship where they are saddled with the impossible task of making a woman happy. When he fails (and he will) he is financially ruined for at least 2 decades. At the same time it is a universally accepted fact that once married a woman has no responsibility to maintain a relationship that considers what she should do to contribute to his happiness. Men now know they are being played for suckers and fools and have decided not to play the game.
>>80542609
>My opinion is truth, or so I think.
I worded what I did because you think people that would be critical of your lifestyle must be kissless virgins.
Also at the end of my post I said I couldn't give any less of a fuck where you bury your meat whistle.
>>80541574
>Post gets ignored because it's right.
>>80542764
Anonymous internet is completely dependent on a corrupt government. We have a pretty (((corrupt))) government right now
>>80542849
Why do I feel like you have come here to justify your casual sex activities. I think deep down you agree with what we have to say.
>>80542902
I'm talking about porn and Internet habits in general not just sex.
but you know what's funny?
Feminists are ALREADY implementing the beginnings of a "Sex license system", with the college consent laws. maybe it's a GOOD idea to let them go through with it and they'll undo their own sexual revolution
>>80542849
So be free to do it, you just have to be honest about your sexual history for the good of society
>>80542764
Getting rid of anonymity would only hide these problems more. Are you telling me there weren't sexual deviants one hundred years ago? Of course there were. It just wasn't talked about or studied the way it is today.
>>80543115
They are trying to make a rigged one-sided selfish sex license system though. They are right but going about it all wrong for the wrong reasons
>op
>>80543238
There are too many ways to organize hookups in the modern society with no record. These should not be allowed to be hidden from future partners regardless of gender. For the same reason you should be required to share a vehicles accident history before a purchase, an accurate sexual history should be presented before a relationship.
>>80543495
I'm also talking about internet use history too. If you think about it maybe women should also have the right to see your porn and internet habits. That may be too intrusive though.
>>80542861
You have no supported that. I've refuted the support for that argument, hence me refuting that argument.
>>80542885
It's also stress relief. We are very much like bonobos.
>>80542918
Men and women, not just men.
>>80542948
Strawman.
>>80543012
Addressed his points elsewhere.
>>80543109
This is fun for me. I genuinely enjoy arguing with people. I do mean what I say, but I know that I will stir up a hornet's nest if I assert that casual sex is fine on a board full of sexually rejected and repressed loners with tons of hate for the world.
>>80543495
Yeah, let's let some government body further encroach into our personal lives. How about a personality test the government keeps track of for your future partner? Bank records? Online purchases?
I can't believe a fellow /pol/lack would actually be for anything like that.
>>80543109
Some of you faggots are also good competition even though you're so twisted and creepy in the way you see things.
>>80543771
>having sex is healthy
This is the thing your studies prove.
>having too much sex in unhealthy
This is the thing your studies don't disprove.
You're just contradicting every post without arguing because you're salty /pol/ called out your favorite vice.
>>80543771
>Men and women, not just men.
The legal system for divorces is heavily skewed against men. Even prenups don't even work like they used to in many cases. Women know how to abuse marriages in their favor and more and more men have become wary of it. Stop pretending like this has nothing to do with the kike-ridden upbringing of women.
>>80537835
>Asking for sources when you have given none
Really faggot?
Objectively I think it would be a good thing for society if casual sex was shamed.
A lack of strong families have contributed massively to societies problems of low birth rates and bastard children.
But like with most things I'm a massive hypocrite and I think I'm above societal rules. So I fuck and take drugs anyway. In moderation on both counts I don't go crazy.
But still I'm hoping to have enough money, charm and status. To get a nice woman to raise a family with anyway.
>>80544057
>This is the thing your studies don't disprove.
Then you should be able to prove it, but you can't. Your best evidence is a correlation when there are confounding variables with already solid information that they affect relationship success. It's about as shaky of evidence as you can have for your hypothesis.
>>80544202
I've given several, try and keep up.
>>80544177
Yes but I'm telling you that men and women are opting out of marriage and having kids because of financial issues as the number one issue.
>>80532953
I'm glad I'm not making a full fledged argument. Anons here already have. Your mind has been made up already op. I only hope that you look back on having all these emotionally empty encounters while you could have had stronger principles to attract a better woman with regret. Die alone with notches on your bed post anon.
>>80543894
We have our way of seeing things in the world but you have to admit at least we are not willfully ignorant to current events happening in the world unlike the majority of sheep and cattle.
>>80544305
But your just a line in a song
>>80543837
I am not in favor of it, I am just discussing the idea before making it policy in 2018.
The benefits are huge, the moral justification stands strong and the only obstacle is invasion of privacy which could be mitigated similar to the way rape is handled. It's a crime to rape but we don't monitor bedrooms. It can be a crime to lie about your sexual history and people can be punished, be virgin whores on the underground sexual black market.
>mfw writing "Sexual black market" that would inevitably fill with coal burners, sheboons and niggers
>>80538026
/thread.
>>80544307
In some ways definitely, in other ways you are incredibly ignorant. Liberals are right about several things that /pol/ writes off because of genetic fallacies.
>>80532953
literally every man wants to raw dog randoms, those who call it degenerate online are trolling/mgtow cucks
t. white nationalist who knows all women are the same color on the inside
>>80544543
Lol cheers.
>>80532953
>So I ask /pol/, why the fuck can't I just fuck around with my friends and other girls who I just met? What is wrong with me having casual sex and why do you hate me for it??
HPV cancer.
Birds of a Feather, Die Together.
>>80544590
I'm vaccinated as many women are. Also not as cancerous as people often make it out to be.
>>80544361
Do you think it has to extend to internet and porn history as well? Including chat records and "long distance relationships" that don't involve sex yet?
Keep in mind it will be the end of 4chan and all online communities in general if you go this far (as in including all internet history)
>>80544543
Yeah just because I want to doesn't mean I should be encouraged to.
I should be allowed to fuck sluts, but shamed and looked down upon for doing it. As an ex-manwhore I support this 100%
>>80541574
Under rated.
>>80544361
That's another thing that does my head in my.
That my parents were right. My church has a system whereby engaged couples disclose sexual history. And sign a virginity contract with the priest. If either party is not a Virgin the marriage is still allowed but both parties must know about. I also think blood tests are done in this case so the couple knows about potential silent herpes and hpv infections so that marriage is not done under false pretences.
I've thrown away just a beautiful culture to be a degenerate in my 20s
The feels...
>>80544361
>making it policy in 2018
also are you Donald Trump?
>>80538725
You don't have r to be socially up to par or physically up to par to have casual sex. There are plenty of bottom of the barrel on the 1-10 scale that will fuck you if you even show them the slightest amount of attention. Shut there are even some women on the higher end of the scale that will fuck you if you give them enough attention. You could be right if you meant total autists who can even talk to other people at all though. The op is a faggot, but if you want to fuck women casually there is generally nothing wrong with it as a male. As a woman you are just lessening your value though.
>>80544703
Personally I think starting with a simple report/ID card/reward/punishment system would be a good start.
The rest starts to get into unnecessary spying. If you lie to your gf about your porn habits, you're a cuck. Shes either a whore and wont care, or she is a good woman and you should could back on the degeneracy to be a better man for her.
>>80544299
>penial-vaginal sex is positively correlated with health
>Very strong correlation of high promiscuity and unstable marriages.
Please explain how either of these contradict each other
They don't.
The conclusion is
>abstinence from sex is bad for your health but over indulgence leads to instability in relationships and depression.
Saying "muh confounding variables" doesn't work when no confounding variable exists that can explain this. Attractiveness isn't one unless you want to make the argument that attractiveness causes depression, depression itself could be one but the only argument that can be made there is "promiscuous behavior is characteristic of emotional instability, not the cause of it." But the Reasonable conclusion is that it's feedback loop of instability.
You aren't arguing, you're just steadfastly contradicting without actually coherently acknowledging points because ,like your sex life, you are unable to formulate anything meaningful and just need to flimsily provide a placebo for yourself to reassure yourself that your behavior is not negative.
>>80544821
WE HAVE ALL GONE DOWN THIS JEWISH DEGENERACY PATH AND ITS NOT A WAY OF LIFE
ITS JUST SHORT TERM HEDONISM
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH
>>80544975
What happens when a woman tells you that you have to never come back to 4chan?
it will happen. You'll have 4channers exposed for the filth of this place, and maybe it would be good
>>80533772
Our most fertile years are our early 20s
we spend them fucking around, then have 1 kid at 31 because time is running late, and that's it
also, lots of casual sex will make you emotionally numb and unsatisfied. t. been in a relationship for 4 years and comparing with friends
>>80544827
Shhhhh
>>80544975
also I'm talking employers too.
Actually this could work, you'd have the libcuck employers firing "racists" but at the same time conservative employers will refuse to hire all the cucks
>>80544299
>Yes but I'm telling you that men and women are opting out of marriage and having kids because of financial issues as the number one issue.
I never disagreed with that, I don't know why you're pretending like I did. I'm simply saying that the prevalence of feminist/slut culture vastly increases the divorce rates, regardless of whether or not it's the *primary* cause.
>>80545146
TIMESTAMP AND PROOF NOW
>>80545025
Depression is the IV, number of partners and marriage success are DV's. Correlation and inability to maintain relationships itself is a symptom of depression.
>>80545092
Then put that woman in her place and tell her you will only use 4chan responsibly.
If you are ignoring your wife's wishes to browse /b/ or look at wierd shit, then she never should have married you in the first place.
I can attest that casual sex leaves you hollow feeling, but is it ok to have premarital sex with someone you are dating and may some day consider proposing too?
>>80545218
I don't think it's a cause at all. It doesn't lower happiness, it actually makes people happy, depression is an obvious confounding variable and we already know that it has the effect of damaging relationships.
>>80545155
It's a complex system that will be worked out by an uncorrupted government. We are trying to implement full freedom with mandatory honesty and responsibility.
We are going to make our country great again.
>>80545338
I find that casual sex only makes you feel hollow when you're looking for a relationship and don't get one. If you're just fucking around and not looking for a relationship, it's all around pleasant and good.
>>80545494
God man why can't you just be a normal Trump supporter who doesn't exude fedoras? The weirdos on this board really destroy the potential effect you could have.
>>80545494
are you an intern, or the Donald himself?
if you posted proof this would become an "epic bread" as they say
>>80545606
>>80545720
It does not matter who I am.
What matters is what we do.
>>80545338
There is no evidence to suggest that premarital sex is a bad idea, only that over indulgence in promiscuity is. As long as it's a long term stable relationship you're fine.
>>80545312
No shit. Depression causes seeking of cheap fleeting validation of value,promiscuity being one such avenue, promiscuity itself leading to more instability, higher rate of STI contraction, more single mothers, ect. There is no reason to believe it has a more positive effect than a long term stable relationship and there is plenty of reason to believe it has negative effects.
I fill say if you're a man it isn't as big of a deal for you personally, studies show males suffer far less from the negative effects of promiscuity, however it takes two to tango and you fuck up women in the process.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3752789/pdf/nihms499028.pdf
>>80545431
>I don't think it's a cause at all.
Really? Your entire argument throughout this fucking thread has been "I feel like depression has absolutely nothing to do with shifting societal roles in women, muh third variable".
See the link. There are numerous studies on the matter.
>>80546097
>>80532953
if you want to fuck and get fucked do it man why do you want our consent?
>>80540948
>/pol/ is a Christian board
Lol.
>>80546363
>people one generally agrees with and therefor considers reasonable
>disagreement with group zeitgeist
>consider possibility that group is right and you are wrong
>become uncomfortable
>start argument to try and reassure self.
>>80546097
All of your problems are solved by BC, condoms and not fucking a girl with herpes warts. There is no evidence that it is the causal factor, more evidence points toward depression as being the causal factor and just speaking from personal experience, depression really does seem to be the factor that makes girls bad with relationships, fucking a bunch of dudes is just a side effect of sad girls.
>>80546363
>>80546633
Already explained that I do this for fun and this is just a great topic to stir up the weeb hornets nest.
>>80546868
Whatever helps you sleep at night.
If taking advantage of depressed woman is something you enjoy feel free to.
>>80546868
As if sex always goes as planned...
God you are retarded or trolling
>>80547130
Women can make their own decisions, if they want to fuck then I will fuck them. They clearly do it because they enjoy it.
>>80547286
>hur hur ma dik guize
>>80547274
Lmao only on 4chan is there total confusion when we talk about not getting girls pregnant or getting a dick sickness. As if there are no reliable ways to deal with these issues. If you had any experience you'd know that bringing condoms and not being a retard is being 100% prepared for sex.
Go out this weekend.
>>80547425
That's like making fun of people for saying they enjoy eating food.
>>80539293
Use of data is: don't marry a slut, she'll compare you to previous partners in everything she can, even if subconsciously, and will make the both of you miserable little idiots because neither of you can be perfect in everything.
>>80547565
I do that too
>>80547565
>muh dik
Fuck, how do niggers find this board and always act in the same way.
>>>>>>>>>>>/africa/
>>80547739
People overuse this all the time but this is blatant projection. Not a problem in my experience at all. It's very obvious when women fake O's to me and it stopped happening when I got experience. Experience makes sex better and contrary to /r9k/ memes, multiple dicks don't destroy a vagina more than a boyfriend dick and dicks don't ruin pussies at all. I mean you'd have to have a seriously small dick for regular sex stretch to ruin your pussy tightness.
>>80547740
The people who have the most sex tend to look the opposite.
>>80547920
Despite what Americans on /pol/ tell you, casual sex and my views here are the norm.
>>80548152
>causal muh dik ooga booga
Only an ape would be so wholly consumed by sex to make a bread out of it. Truly an embarrassing subspecies.
>>80548152
Where did I mention dick size in that? And just how experienced are you with long term relationships and serious commitment if all you do is fuck casual whores?
Nigger, come on.
>>80548152
Sluts also tend to look disgusting.
>>80547565
except the consumption of food is an actual need
go away hedonist
>>80548272
It's not like your opinion bothers me, if that were the case I wouldn't seek it out. I just like arguing so I go to where a bunch of weebs hang out and say that having sex with girls is fine.
>>80548503
I've been dating and messing around with girls for 10 years at this point. I've had two relationships that lasted two years and a bunch of hook ups. I just started looking for a gf again recently.
>>80548641
Sounds like you need to get laid buddy.
>>80548511
Eh by your guys' definition of slut, it's the vast majority of attractive and normal adult women.
>>80548152
>casual sex and my views here are the norm.
yeah no wonder the western world is in the shitter
>Why is fornication political?
Because that kills civilization. This is the root that leads to the domestication of man. Fuck you and your disgusting Jew-warped mind, reprobate.
>>80548862
Sounds like you're depressed and looking at the world through a dark lens. There's some real problems, but in the shitter is a gross exaggeration.
>>80548951
>he wants to be domesticated like a pet
The epitome of christcuck.
>>80548820
So you basically have zero experience with long term relationships and yet here you are saying that you've never had the issue of comparison in your relationships.
Well no shit, use of data still stands friendo.
>>80548511
fuck me sideways tha middle girl is cute
>>80549123
I've had sex with way more girls than 2, I've just had two long term relationships, some short ones, a few flings, one night stands, fuck buddies, friends with benefits. Plenty of experience with women and sex.
>>80532953
Casual sex sucks once you stop being early 20s.
You've already fucked all there is to fuck if you're remotely good looking, have some money and hang out at shitty nightclubs/beach parties/ski chalet parties/travelling through Europe and all you want is a loyal waifu and chitlens. Once you get them you wonder why you didn't do this in the beginning instead of running around like a nog and throwing away likely some pretty good girls you dated.
tl;dr get a wife and have a family, it will get harder as you get older, real harder.
I think the problem has to do with the perception that women are "used up" or "defective" after having sex with multiple partners. Such an idea is silly, of course, having root more in emotionality than in logic, which is ironic given how emotion based arguments are usually treated here.
>>80532953
It's mostly 2 things:
>/r9k/ spergtards with their MGTOW/Sluthate bitterness
>pseudo-moral stormffags who believe sex is jewish degeneracy designed to destroy the white race
#2 is actually laced with a bit of the truth. They jsut go about presenting their case in the most retarded fashion due to autism.
Society would be a lot better off if families got together, raised kids in a dual-parent home. There is a direct correlation between the sexual revolution and the massive and rapid disintegration of the nuclear family... and all the problems which arise therefrom.
Rather than clearly explaining it like that with appropriate sociological studies and data... they simply scream DEGENERACY!! GAS THEM ALL!! the same way /r9k/fags just RRREEEEeeee SLUT WHORE CHAD STACY!!
Hope that clears it up.
>>80532953
/pol/ has taken a more conservative spin ever since /new/ stopped being a thing.
>What is wrong with casual sex?
Casual sex is really not inline with traditional values of the family. If the family is the building block of any stable and good society, then this should be limited.
You're really arguing against a principle than a factual argument.
>>80538725
Well, you're wrong. You have to be an abnormal and dysfunctional human being to have or enjoy casual sex. It is a deviant and disgusting practice. I'd say it actually proves you are NOT socially or physically up to par. Social and physically fit people attract quality lifelong mates, they don't have disease-ridden dysfunctional sex with strangers.
>>80549286
And? Do you want a cookie or something?
>he thinks 2 years means long term
Considering how quick your average relationship is, I don't blame you for thinking like this.
Yet again the data is still relevant.
>>80549342
I just hit mid 20's and am now looking for a girl, but I accept that if things don't work out with the next one after some time, there's nothing wrong with just finding girls to fuck around with and no strings attached. I'm also not going to hesitate to have fun until that happens.
>>80549397
Good on you for being reasonable.
>There is a direct correlation between the sexual revolution and the massive and rapid disintegration of the nuclear family.
I believe this is much more to do with the change in divorce laws where women had a say instead of casual sex trends. Women before simply weren't allowed to get a divorce or shunned for doing so, so once they were given the option it started becoming normal.
>>80549695
2 years is seen as a long term relationship outside of marriage. Things might be different in the jungle.
>>80549397
>Rather than clearly explaining it like that with appropriate sociological studies and data
This entire thread has been data showing the correlation of promiscuity and it's negative impacts with the op screaming NO REEEEE and yelling at strawmen.
>>80549755
So you're a pathetic socially retarded loser who can't even get a decent wife and you think you can mock people because you can have broken and dysfunctional one night relationships instead. Amusing. It's like a drug addict thinking he's better than people with depression because he thinks he's cured his own depression.
>>80549875
>jungle
XD epic, how's the rest of your argumentation going?
Bah, your kind can never come up with anything against data or history.
>>80548152
>Despite what Americans on /pol/ tell you, casual sex and my views here are the norm.
You and your fellow sexual revolution degenerates do not live up to your predecessors. Your ancestors see you and they hate you. When the modern world rejects something, that usually means it's good.
What has your poison accomplished? Divorce rates of over fifty percent. Single motherism and everything that comes out of that. Everything bad in the world really does come from your worthless worldview. It's been like this for all of history too. There has never been an empire that experienced its rise while their women were sluts.
The reason you hate sexual morality is because you've been programmed to think as benefits the Jews.
>>80550256
I refuted those claims in my Op and people are still making them. You can't attribute causation with the information you have, especially when the confounding variables have more evidence for them being the causal factor.
>>80550369
Lol sex doesn't get rid of depression, that's what exercise, purpose and loved ones are for. Sex is just for fun unless it's with a girlfriend or a wife.
>>80550431
Already refuted your use of those data, just explaining that you have a very different definition of long term relationship than Americans. I called Brazil a jungle because it is a jungle.
>>80550605
Already addressed, you also sound completely insane.
>>80532953
i read you and i agree with you.
it IS what will lead to /pol/'s demise.
which is a good thing, but i come here for lols
>>80550605
Romans were also very promiscuous, had orgies and raunchy sex until Chrstianity came around.
>>80550692
Nice reading comprehension. I didn't day sex cures depression, I said you are a loser on par with a depressed drug addict and you use your dysfunctional sexual encounters as a crutch to convince yourself you have a normal healthy sex life, when in reality a normal healthy sex life is one with a loving partner in an emotional bond. Loser.
>>80550775
If I didn't sound insane to you, THEN I would need to reassess myself.
>>80550934
They also had rampant feminism and sexual liberation before their fall
>what is the bachelor tax
>>80550934
That is actually just Christian propaganda. The Romans were very chaste, especially at their best times. You don't know history, don't appeal to it fool.
>>80532953
>/pol/
>serious business
I'm sorry, you wanted >>>/reddit/. It's down the hall and to the left.
>You degenerate.
>implying our power doesn't come from us just not giving a fuck
>>80550963
>I said you are a loser on par with a depressed drug addict and you use your dysfunctional sexual encounters as a crutch to convince yourself you have a normal healthy sex life
Yeah I know that's what you meant, that's why I explained that it's for fun. Do you do activities you enjoy because you hate yourself anon?
>>80550982
Lol okay chief :^)
>>80551132
That was to force people to marry to raise birth rates. They had rampant sex during their entire rise.
>>80551302
No they had sex with other people before they married, they had bathhouse orgies and the men fucked little boys. Romans were not chaste.
