Hourly reminder Donald rump does not believe in climate change.
>>80416338
Neither climatologists do.
>>80417353
>Neither climatologists do.
Bullshit. 97% do.
I don't much care
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_WHQkPrhjg
>>80417529
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsioIw4bvzI
>>80417733
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/02/the-global-warming-hiatus-is-real-so-why-dont-we-hear-about-it/
>>80416338
Neither do the facts.
>>80417459
Bullshit, there is no evidence of this
>>80416338
He doesn't "believe" in HUMAN MADE one, just like I don't, because I know better.
FFS, learn how to read history and teach yourself instead of being a faggot for believing everything the leeches tell you.
>>80417459
That sounds like a Daily Show "fact".
>be Gore
>point to a line graph
>receive nobel prize
He's smart
Everybody believes the climate is changing because it is. What is questionable is 1) whether human action caused it, rather than natural cycles and 2) whether the West alone should destroy their industry to slow the climate's change, or whether we should adapt to it.
neither do the jews
>>80418495
>That sounds like a Daily Show "fact".
Reality sort of has a liberal bias to it.
>>80419738
Best meme.
>>80416338
does anyone?
you stupid nigger kike
Dear people who don't believe in climate change:
You don't really need to believe, you do only need to make measurements and model the climate, so that you can understand how the climate is changing and how we're affecting it as a species.
We can't just choose to not believe in something that we can measure.
>>80417459
how can those other 3% go on living?
>>80423172
so all 73 IPCC models were wrong, but we should still believe them? see >>80422080
#neverdrumbf
>>80423411
That pic is insane. It shows an accuracy of small fractions of degrees. You cannot measure climate or weather like that. I mean they probably took one bit of data from one weather station and the next from the other so that the results suited their needs.
The pic reeks manipulation. And it's old, from 2011, since the timeline for the observations stops there.
>>80425459
Those temperatures are the mean values of literally thousand of observations. By satellite, the most accurate temperature measurement method. There was actually 19 years of flat-lined temps (pic related) and yet you only need 17 year flat line of temps which climate "scientists" said was long enough to falsify their "science." Of course, upon being falsified, they simply moved the goal-posts because that's what pseudo-scientists do.
As I've pointed out before, Ben Santer said that 17 years was enough time to wait, because then you are outside the 95% confidence interval of the models. (2.5% chance to one side of the interval).
"Our results show that temperature records of at least 17 years in length are required for identifying human effects on global‐mean tropospheric temperature."
Paper: Separating signal and noise in atmospheric temperature changes: The importance of timescale. 2011, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 116, D22105
The NOAA said 15 years is enough:
“Near-zero and even negative trends are common for intervals of a decade or less in the simulations, due to the model’s internal climate variability. The simulations rule out (at the 95% level) zero trends for intervals of 15 yr or more, suggesting that an observed absence of warming of this duration is needed to create a discrepancy with the expected present-day warming rate.”
Paper: http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/bams-sotc/climate-assessment-2008-lo-rez.pdf
15 years is long enough for climate scientist Phil Jones of Hadley Climate Research Unit:
‘Bottom line: the ‘no upward trend’ has to continue for a total of 15 years before we get worried.’
Source: http://di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/4199.txt
Proof of flat-lined temp: McKitrick, R. (2014) HAC-Robust Measurement of the Duration of a Trendless Subsample in a Global Climate Time Series. Open Journal of Statistics, 4, 527-535. doi: 10.4236/ojs.2014.47050
>>80425459
>That pic is insane.
no, people who still believe in disproved predictions are insane
>>80416338
Hourly reminder that climate change is dogma and not science. The "97% scientists agree" figure was completely fabricated. Water vapor is a much better green house gas than CO2, and less than half of the warming is caused by humans. Earth has a higher carrying capacity at warmer temperatures. Florida is the least white state and should be flooded (with water). Greenland has a low population, vast natural reserves, tappable power and rapidly expanding usable land area, you should move there and help with its independence movement.
>>80418180
On noes all that warming, its all your fault. Bad humans tax your carbon so we can better control you and reduce your production.
FACT, capitalism will naturally be deflationary as newer more efficient methods are perpetually produced making the same goods at lower cost. The Jews have convinced us that inflation is good so they print trillions of dollars to give to there cronies in an effort to enrich themselves and devalue our currency. #TheFedIsTreason
>>80428097
water vapor is responsible for 95% of the GHG effect, and humans only contribute 0.001% of it
>>80428736
>>80417459
>9 out of 10 dentist recommend Oral-B
Get fucked.
