Forget the #BLACKLIVESMASSACRE, Congress itself is delivering the final nail in the ClintonCoffin.
>BILL TO REMOVE SECURITY CLEARANCES
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/286803-senate-bill-would-revoke-clintons-security-clearances
>>80167247
>tfw she cannot be Commander in Chief without security clearance ending her run
>>80167247
Email these shithead faggots and tell them to do their fucking jobs. You too, shithead faggot OP.
>>80167247
False flag didn't work
congress is determine to take her down, and no obama false flag is gonna stop em
Sounds like an unconstitutional bill of attainder
>Obama would pass that
kek, hilldawg victory will make his life complete.
>>80167661
They can only revoke her clearance while she isn't President
As soon as she's elected, it won't count anymore
Gowdy confirmed on Megyn Kelly's show today
>>80168795
She won't be elected President if they pass this. Also, Congress would demand oversight over her emails as president and impeach her if she refused.
>>80168194
What frightens me is that you may be right.
What frightens me even more is that they won't stop until their false flags until it works.
ITS THE UNSTOPPABLE FORCE MEETS THE UNMOVABLE OBJECT
AND WE ARE CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE
>this passes
>the Dems put up Biden
>Biden gets elected cause normies hate Trump
>>80169320
This. Trump would just ask how America could elect someone who can't even be trusted with secret intel with national defense?
So many happenings /pol/, this is truly the best summer we've had so far.
"If the FBI won’t recommend action based on its findings, Congress will."
>Truly based.
>>80168624
I really can't comprehend how people can like Hillary, especially if you're a fucking white male.
This is why we call you CTR shills all the time. Even the Berniefags here can't comprehend your retardation.
>>80168795
I know, it was a talking point on Kelly File earlier, thats why I said nothing about being POTUS
>>80167247
http://www.stream2watch.co/live-tv/us/c-span-live-stream
https://www.congress.gov/
It helps if you paste some streams of actual congress hearings and places to watch them.
>>80167247
Bump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8-sj-GdadU&feature=youtu.be
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/3135?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22cory+gardner%22%5D%7D
Here's the bill. Still in progress.
>>80169583
>not wanting the first pedo president
get the fuck out shitlord
>>80170019
Why are you giving us a "live stream" for something that ended hours ago?
>>80170543
That title
top lel
>>80167247
>>80170660
In case you want to watch other proceedings there later, faggot.
Also Congress.gov has recorded proceedings, they just take a while for them to upload.
>>80170005
> thats why I said nothing about being POTUS
you specifically mentioned the phrase "commander in chief"
Who else is commander in chief other than the president??
>>80167247
>John Mclane MCornyn doing something right
what the fuck
Question - if the Republicans pass this in Senate and HoR (they have majorities), will Obama look like a complete shill and veto it? And if so, will Congress override?
How will sanders vote?
>>80171429
no matter what obama does hes fucked because he endorsed hillary.
congress wont be able to override.
>>80171429
It's going to pass congress for sure. Obama will most likely veto it, and that's a good talking point for Trump. Congress can't override; they don't have enough.
>>80171740
>>80172000
So will this be completely partisan then? No fucking liberal will admit that she's reckless and vote across the damn aisle?
>>80168795
>As soon as she's elected, it won't count anymore
You can't just lose a clearance and later get the highest one that exists.
>>80170612
>the first
Get the fuck out summerfag.
>>80168336
>unconstitutional
Good luck talking over the Shitheads™ on this board, they are in full circlejerk mode
>>80172165
>So will this be completely partisan then?
Business as usual.
>>80168336
The bill doesn't have any legal punishment. It just revokes security clearance. Perfectly fine.
>>80168336
>bill of attainder
She's not being convicted of any crime; she's being denied a privilege. There is precedent for this (maybe not with congress though) and it is not unconstitutional.
>>80172258
you can if you're the president
it's almost like you don't know what 'head of state' means
>>80174798
That's not what he meant dumbass
>>80167247
how they gonna get the 67 votes needed to override veto?
>>80167247
Can't Obama essentially just shut such a bill down? I've no doubt he would.
