>yfw God exists
>>79947688
>mfw atheist arguments can still be used against themselves
>mfw contemporary theist are still """defeated""" by muh evidence
What if I told you that your consciousness was an emergent property of the universe?
>>79947688
>>79947974
>What if I told you that your consciousness was an emergent property of the universe?
This is commonplace opinion right? Atheist or not?
>>79947688
>>79947688
I thought we were done with these threads two years ago.
>>79947974
I'd tell you that literally everything would be an emergent property of the universe with that kind of definition.
>>79948833
That's the point.
>>79948945
Your consciousness is a special case as it's the only thing you can be certain really exists and thus the only thing that resists "muh evidence" arguments.
I think therefore I am, etc.
So if your consciousness really exists, it really emerges from the universe, therefore the universe really has properties that lead to consciousness, why is it wrong to argue the universe itself has consciousness? Exactly where did "it" become consciousness rather than neurons shaped from genetic code?
>>79947688
>mfw
>>79947688
Why would he exist?
