[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
How could you support a POTUS candidate who would try to overturn
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 25
Thread images: 2
File: trumpabor[1].png (376 KB, 876x493) Image search: [Google]
trumpabor[1].png
376 KB, 876x493
How could you support a POTUS candidate who would try to overturn Roe V. Wade, drastically accelerating non-White birth rates in America?
>>
I wouldn't. That's why I love Trump.
>>
>>79780013
Incorrect, that's the entire point of my post. Trump has suggested he will nominate a SCOTUS justice who will oppose Roe: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/05/11/trump-scotus-nominee-overturn-roe-v-wade/84223512/
>>
File: images.jpg (10 KB, 274x184) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
10 KB, 274x184
>>79779974
FREE ABORTIONS FOR MINORITIES
>>
>>79780750
100% agree. That's why I'm afraid to cast my vote for Trump, who may open the floodgates for non-White births in the USA.
>>
>>79780270
He never said he would overturn Roe vs Wade
>>
>>79780270
Yeah I'd prefer if Trump didn't get the many Cruz delegates at the convention to throw a riot if Donald admitted he's pro-life
>>
>>79779974
Hey you ever loving faggot, try shutting the fuck up with this retarded horseshit. The image you posted in the OP. Everyone knew it was sensational media trying to distort the full context of his words 4 fucking months ago when it happened.

What makes you think anything is different now?
>>
>>79781364
He has explicitly stated he would appoint pro-life justices to SCOTUS. He can't overturn Roe, no, but appointing pro-life justices is the closest thing to it.
>>
>>79781577
Oh, so you're now saying he can't overturn Roe v Wade. So what the fuck is the point of this thread you imbicile
>>
>>79779974

>interviewer asks if abortions were illegal, should women who get abortions be punished
>trump says if something is illegal, you should be punished for doing it

wtf i hate trump now.
>>
That's the one thing that sucks about Trump, he actually really doesn't seem to be a racist at all, kind of wish he was if he was going to get that label anyway from the media.
>>
>>79781526

haha ass blasted Trump piece of shit.

YOUR MEME CANDIDATE IS JUST THAT, A FUCKING BABY BOOMER MEME
>>
>>79781635
Are you familiar with the Supreme Court? The president appoints justices to the Supreme Court, who serve for life, thereby shaping the political landscape for years to come. While Trump can't overturn Roe V. Wade, appointing several pro-life justices (and yes he may have several appointments) would almost guarantee that it's overturned within a generation. This isn't a big jump to make if you've ever taken middle school-level civics.
>>
>>79782312
You realize what the only other option to this is correct? Hillary loading the Supreme Court with BLM niggers.

I wonder which is worse....

Wow really makes you think huh? Guess I'm with her now...
>>
Because I want to destroy this country, and the more niggers are born the more niggers I get to kill.
>>
>>79780270
He wants a suitable replacement for Scalia to ensure a balanced Supreme Court.
>>
I love how ppl ignore the fact that black ppl never get abortions
>>
>>79782484
Not a Hillary supporter either. But on the upside, she hasn't actually stated an intention to appoint BLM advocates. If anything her appointees would probably be further-right than anyone Obama would appoint, considering she is more right-wing herself. Both options suck, but Trump has made his intentions clear and they worry me.
>>
>>79779974
He drastically cuts welfare for for having more than 2 kids, which dramatically lowers nonwhite birthrates.
>>
>>79783533
It won't actually lower nonwhite birthrates. You and I both know this is not true, unfortunately.
>>
>>79782840
They get half of all abortions you fucking reddiot.

Maybe we can give them $1000 to get an abortion instead.
>>
>>79783779
It will certainly slow it. When Kayeffceeshia realizes she has to raise her 3 niglets on the same welfare she got for her 2 noglet, she will do what she can not to have a 4th. As long as you incentivise having more kids through welfare and not tax deductions, nogs will keep shitting out nappy haired spawn
>>
>>79782866
There's a difference between "should" and "will". Notice how he doesn't say america "should" build a wall? That's deliberate.
>>
>>79779974
What else is he gonna say? He has to say that because of the cuckservatives. I think abortion is immoral but the sooner the right abandons the issue the better.
Thread replies: 25
Thread images: 2

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.