ITT we remember the sheer balls it took to stand against the British crown at the height of its Empire
Really makes ya think....
Would you have done the same?
>>79698023
>rebel against corrupt, injust rulers
>actually win because it's economically inefficient to try to rule any sizeable population resisting you especially back then
>turn around and create what has turned into one of the most corrupt, injust, unrepresentative ruled pieces of land in the world instead of just keeping rid of the rulers
wew lad fucking NWO
Congrats you beat us on home soil while we were fighting france, spain and the netherlands and also half of india
>>79698023
Indian resistance was psychological, if Ghandi didn't know the British self image as righteous and morally good he wouldn't have thought to exploit it
as a loyalist, hell nah. you guys ruined the dream of a united Anglo north america.
>>79699072
>Gets into wars they can't win
Why do you people do this?
Wan't really the height of the Empire desu famalam. Still though, good on you chaps.
>>79699072
chill out there, butthurt. are you saying the french were so powerful they stopped your """"legendary""" ships half a world away? I thought brittania ruled the seas? lmao
are you saying the spanish and french didn't have any other conflicts outside the little skirmishers they contributed alongside the americans' war against your """"glorious"""" empire? lol
>>79699072
hmmmm so your saying you were enemies with everyone at the time?
like some kind of evil empire
really makes u think
>Britain
>lost the war due to their constant homo fag sex
>constant ass fucking faggotry while mumbling in their incoherent inbred languages
>constant dehydration due to tea
>severe tooth and jaw issues from inbreeding
Britain, the biggest faggots?
>>79699072
>WOOOOW IT TOOK FIVE OF YOU TO KILL ME
Its only okay to have allies when Britain uses them
http://vintagephoto.tumblr.com/
>>79699387
Lol
This
>>79699356
Are you saying the other europeans didn't tie down a large portion of the british military? Are you seriously taught it was just US vs GB?
>>79699387
No it was just simple power play. GB was getting too powerful, same thing happened to spain, france and germany
>>79698023
Get over yourself yank. you're there because we put you there. you are our vassal state, your the retarded cousin we like to get out as a battering ram. Your country was never great. Nice to see you can still speak english.
Britains war strategy was to line up in red coats with Royal dildos that the queen personally inserted into every British fag solider's anus, and then take turns shooting the opponents.
They actually looked forward to getting shot because they're anuses would clench and grasp the royal dildos in their unclean ass holes, causing immense sexual pleasure. Because the Brits function on an animalistic level, the red color on their red coats arrouses them as it would a Spanish bull. The color red represents aggression, and their demented inbred brains find this stimulating while their ass holes are clenching the Royal dildos the queen inserted into their faggot asses. This is why their strategy was to line up to get shot
>>79699765
Half of the British combat forces in North America surrendered or were driven out of the north before France and others even joined.
Actually, at the beginning of the revolution, it was America vs Britain, British loyalists within America, and several German princedoms.
>>79698023
>Be across the fucking atlantic
>consider yourself brave
Wouldnt work today, fuck off
>>79699921
they also bribed native tribes to help them fight
>>79700039
That too. British essentially paid savages to raid and scalp its own subjects.
>>79699765
>Are you saying the other europeans didn't tie down a large portion of the british military? Are you seriously taught it was just US vs GB?
I'm saying it's fair game when every colonial powers' forces were also tied down in other conflicts at the time you got your entire history, heritage and culture cucked for the rest of the world's existence
the world doesn't revolve around you, nor did it 3 centuries ago.
>>79700039
>bribe the natives
>reward them with small pox blankets
LOL FAGGOTS
It's ok folks, we're all Anglos here. Let's all just calm down and have a cup of tea.
Where's the tea...?
What do you meAN THEY THREW IT OFF THE HARBOUR?!?!
BLOODY SAVAGES!!
>>79700184
I throw my tea into the ocean every chance I get
>>79700298
That would explain why you're always so fucking salty m8
>>79700039
>>79700084
Bribe? One of the major causes of war was agitation over the limits of settlement - Americans wanted to go west and exterminate, while the British made allies out of those tribes during the French and Indian War and didn't want to upset the applecart - Indian furs helped mitigate the EXORBITANT cost of protecting the colonies.
>>79700094
Except the French literally killed themselves doing it. They had their chance during the War of 1812 to reconquer the territory but they didn't do it - you know why? Because they found out they could just trade with us instead of pissing away money on us.
>18th century
>The British crown at the height of its empire
LMAOing at your education
>>79699765
Actually yes
We literally only hear about France and UK
https://youtu.be/rZMmPWTwTHc
>2016
>not listening to schoolhouse rock
I don't even want to see your face
https://youtu.be/PBBTF0Wg7dY
>>79698023
Yeah "height of its Empire" fuck off mate the British Empire was at its height in 1922 you uneducated Americuck
Besides the British Empire sent its worst, most poorly trained troops to try and "seize" its least profitable colonies.
Get over yourself, if the Brits really cared about America they could have taken it and no upstart farmers and their shitty militias could have stopped them. Britain just decided to cut its losses because the true prize became India which was far more valuable.
>>79701443
>Get over yourself, if the Brits really cared about America they could have taken it and no upstart farmers and their shitty militias could have stopped them
It's like Americans forget what happened when they tried to take Canada some years later
>>79698023
Remember the sheer balls it took to go across the entire world to fight a war on foreign clay, while your grand-grand-grand-grand-grandpas merely took muskets from cellar and dug in their lawn.
>>79701659
DELETE THIS
>>79698023
You didn't win in the end did you? Now the jews have you. What would have happened if you stayed? Glorious white Utopia.
>>79699253
when did america last win a war?
>>79703184
War has changed. WWII shocked the world with how gruesome and barbaric it got. Since then we try to fight politicized wars that try to minimize civilian casualties. "Winning" now requires that you stick around and rebuild the enemy country's infrastructure and government, while sticking around long enough to ensure it doesn't devolve into civil war.
These types of wars cannot be won. It's impossible. Having said that, we "won" in Vietnam and Iraq we just left and let it go to shit.
>>79703184
When did Britain last win?
>>79704211
The only thing "new" about WWII was the speed, scale, and efficiency of slaughter. It wasn't the first time occupying nations slaughtered villages and tried to exterminate a people.
I think part of it too was the fact that they did it to other Western Europeans instead of just Slavs, Arabs, Jews, etc.
>>79704672
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conflicts_involving_the_United_Kingdom#United_Kingdom_of_Great_Britain_and_Northern_Ireland_.281922.E2.80.93present.29
Britain last won a war in 2011.
Excluding the Cod Wars (not real wars desu...) and stalemates, Britain last lost a war in 1967 in Yemen. Before that it was 1920, Russia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States#21st_century_wars
Last time the US lost a war was 1975 (Vietnam). Before that the last time the US lost a war was 1961, The Bay of Pigs Invasion. Before that it was 1920, Russia also.
>>79698023
Height of empire? What, the late nineteenth century - you're referring to India?
>>79699858
Armies round the world used that 'strategy', mate - French, German - and the good ol' USA - look at the Civil War.
>>79705253
How are you doing in the Middle East?
>>79709135
Historians are generally agreed that there were 4 British Empires throughout the last 300 years.
>>79709243
The Brits experimented a lot during the 17th century and came to the conclusion that closed ranks of muskets using volley fire was the most effective use of force and produced the least casualties.
