>yfw the greatest most redpilled director of all time was a jew
Should Stanley Kubrick be granted honorary Aryan status?
Yes, I'm a fan of his work
Stanley Kubrick marathon currently on Turner Classic Movies
Yes, although some will say the shining is about
>muh holocoast
His films are so broad and about so many things, I wouldn't even know where to start if someone asked me to explain any of them.
Truly a genius, I heard he had an IQ of 200 and it wouldn't surprise me.
I'm not a conspiracy tard but its pretty spoopy he died right after eyes wide shut came out, and the film was totally shitty compared to Barry Lyndon, 2001, shining, FMJ, strange love, etc
>>79688410
He spent probably thousands of hours Editing each film, Eyes Wide Shut was not completed by him. I think the popular rumar is that Tom Cruise and Steven Speilberg finished it.
Funny that even though he shot every scene of that film you can still just tell that something is off about it.
We will never fucking know what more than half of his movies really truly meant and it pisses me the hell off.
>>79687919
How was "Eyes wide shut" redpilled?
Someone said this in a thread earlier, just watched it really don't see it please explain.
>>79688785
Watch some analyses of it or something, it's about money and power
Also pay attention to the types of paintings in each set, Kubrick obsessively designed every single piece of every set. Nothing is irrelevent, right down to the color of paint on the walls.
>>79688348
>I wouldn't even know where to start if someone asked me to explain any of them.
how about /tv/?
>>79687919
>kubrick
>greatest
>most redpilled
I remember when I was 15...
He made some great movies. He's definitely not the best because his films are not uplifting. They do little to improve our spiritual condition. Even Paths of Glory does not do a good job of that.
It's a stretch to call him 'red-pilled'. He was certainly 'in the know' but did he particularly care about having a positive influence? Probably not. His only goal was to make his movies, even if that meant being complicit.
Remember, if you actually believe in the conspiracies that are suggested in his movies, then you'll concede that plans and truths are always purposefully put out there to avoid negative karma. Maybe he jumped the shark with Eyes Wide Shut.
>>79688785
>>79687919
Yes, just for The Shining.
>>79689110
Name a better director so we can laugh at you.
McKenna is better
>>79689232
Kieslowski
>>79687919
Btw kubrick novice here, whats his most red pilled movie?
>>79687919
Is it not obvious that jews are better?1
>>79688240
Yep. A Clockwork Orange on next. 2001 is almost over.
redpill me on him
>>79689232
Bergman, Tarkovsky, Dreyer, Eisenstein
2001 fucking sucked, I'm just putting that out there
>>79688785
Note that the film takes place during the Christmas season, traditionally a time of celebration of the Nativity of Jesus.
>And, in this transitional period between the end of 20th century and the beginning of the 21th century, Kubrick told the story of a confused man who wanders around, desperately looking for a way to satisfy his primal urges. Kubrick told the story of a society that is completely debased and corrupted by hidden forces, where humanity’s most primal urge–procreation–has been cheapened, fetishized, perverted, and exploited to a point that it has lost all of its beauty. At the top of this world is a secret society that revels in this context, and thrives on it. Kubrick’s outlook on the issue was definitely not idealistic nor very optimistic.
http://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/the-hidden-and-not-so-hidden-messages-in-stanley-kubriks-eyes-wide-shut-pt-i/
>>79689550
Care to give us a reason, or should I just assume you are borderline retarded?
>>79687919
Kubrick thread?
>the sets in Barry Lyndon
hnnnng
>>79689232
I'd do a better job with single movies because most directors have been far more prolific than Kubrick and so have more misses than him. However:
Wim Wender (Paris Texas beats everything in Kubrick's repertoire.)
Orson Welles, even with Kane excluded.
Carl Theodor Dreyer
Cocteau
Kazan
Bunuel
Bresson
the better half of Antonioni's work
the list goes on
>>79689643
>should I just assume you are borderline retarded?
let me hear reasons why you think it doesn't suck
>>79689232
Tarkovsky, Ozu, Bunuel, Bresson
>>79688410
>EWS was shitty
Probably went over your head, pleb
>>79689333
Paths of Glory, Dr. Strangelove or A Clockwork Orange.
Spielburg ruined A. I.
>>79689804
I'll waste my time once you waste yours.
Full Metal Jacket was great
>>79689232
Kubrick's great but I think Orson Wells, Truffaut, Chaplin and Jacques Demy probably top him.
>>79690064
>Orson Welles
>>79689819
>>79689802
>>79689545
>>79689324
Nice tries but none of you even mentioned Lars von Trier so I'm going to assume you have no taste.
>>79689819
>I'm a big fan of Ozu
>You probably never heard of him
>>79688785
It's literally:
>The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.
Before "The Red Pill" became a thing. Not to mention the Jew/Illuminati aspects he exposed in that film.
>>79690248
They invented this thing called autocorrect recently. Also Dogville is great. Wonderful sets.
>>79690248
>Lars von Trier
nice try, but obvious bait is obvious.
though dancer in the dark was decent if way way too melodramatic for my tastes. i liked the music too.
>>79690248
lol wow garbage
>>79689232
Aaron Seltzer & Jason Friedberg
>>79687919
>>yfw the greatest most redpilled director of all time
But that's not Francis Ford Coppola
>>79687919
Kubrick revealed the truth about the Jewish NWO, thats why they killed him for EWS.
>>79689937
outside of the HAL 9000 story it's garbage
the sets and visuals are basically its only value
>>79690553
Kubrick never made a bad movie
Ford has
>>79689662
Barry Lyndon is truly great, my favourite Kubrick movie for sure. Nice taste fellow fucking leaf.
>>79689662
I've gotta watch this now.
>>79690790
Kubrick also made great films in just about every genre.
>>79688348
A genius? I don't know about that, his movies could be pretty sexist and racist, a real creative genius would be Kanye West.
>>79690790
Yep, even Lolita is excellent.
>>79689232
sandler
>>79687919
>(((rZwyCcCN)))
Actually just watched "Eyes Wide Shut" tonight because someone said it was redpilled as fuck...wasn't very impressed. Pretty boring compared to most of his other movies.
>>79690805
1st half was god tier
2nd half bogs down
Overall excellent with some of the greatest cinematography using natural candle light
The score flawless
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7ixGAOwCiQ
>>79691081
I agree but keep in mind that it was edited after his death and upwards of thirty minutes of film was simply removed.
>>79691262
I felt a lot of feels when he duelled Lord Bullingdon since I thought he was just going to murder him.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kF5QqPDjag
Good movie.
>>79689232
I like Fellini and Welles a lot more IMHO
>>79687919
But that isn't Leni Riefenstahl.
>>79689232
Spielberg
>>79690064
Chaplin via Limelight and Monsueir Verdeaux = TOP TIER
>>79687919
he was an over rated faggot
all his movies are oggled over by pretentious retards who think all of his movies are some massive language waiting to be deciphered
in reality he was shit director who made quirky movies
>>79689545
>>79689819
>Tarkovsky
>>79687919
Kubrick is one of the most overrated filmmakers of all time. He has a good eye for visuals, that's it. His films are poorly written with flimsy characters and little plot. Even when he has a quality novel to work with as source material he manages to turn it into a boring pile of shit.
>>79691834
Those are great. I also like Modern Times, the Gold Rush and Shoulder Arms.
>>79691861
yes, some people are incapable of appreciating his films
>>79688348
I haven't watched any of his work since I was a small child. What's so special about his films?
>>79691672
My favorite Kubrick quote and one of the most important and redpilled views on existence I've ever read.
>>79691899
>muh plot
Spotted the idiot who's never read a book or experienced any deeper literature than Game of Thrones.
>>79691672
He is definitely one of the modernist existentialists, Neiztche style, rather than Post-Modern
>>79691899
Except the film version of a A Clockwork Orange is much better than the novel, especially when it comes to the ending
>>79691899
The problem is that a lot of 2001 can't be explained outright, only through visuals.
>>79692212
>muh books
most books are the same way, shit writers, shit writing.
>inb4 hurr durr amerifat too stupid to read
i've only read a few good books and they had a plot not rely on flashy words and descriptions of a piece of hair that could fill a dictionary
>>79691895
Agreed. He turned Red from Roadside Picnic into an annoying, whiny little bitch in Stalker. Pissed me off
>>79691081
>Actually just watched "Eyes Wide Shut" tonight because someone said it was redpilled as fuck...wasn't very impressed.
You can't get it all in one viewing. You also have to know a bit about "Film theory", like:
1. use of color (symbolism, emotions, etc.)
2. camera angles (high-angle/superiority, low-angle/inferiority, etc.)
3. lighting (mood-setting, etc.)
4. themes (good vs evil, etc.)
and so on.
You also need to be familiar with a bit of literature. You also need some knowledge of history and current events. You also need to be familiar with symbolism as it is being used in various media or in various works, including physical structures (masonic symbolism, mythological symbols, occult, etc.).
Or at least willing to question the purpose of the use of such colors/symbols/etc. in the film. Then research it. You don't need to be "learned" or something. You just need to notice why they keep using the same symbols throughout the film, or why they use certain colors when something is about to happen, and then look up what this means.
>>79692397
You are the reason the board hates us
>>79687919
Who gives a shit if he was Jewish? I hate Jew zionists.
>>79687919
>yfw the greatest most redpilled person was a human
>>79692487
you're the reason this board is shit
also nice reply faggot
>>79692095
They blow Anon's mind when he's binging on back alley grass, and thus, Kubrick is a total genius because 420 blazeitfaggot.
>>79692397
Plot's not bad on its own it's just that people mentioning the lack of 'plot' as a detraction when discussing art nearly always showcases just how out of their depth they are. You need to read more burgerbro.
>>79688348
it had elements of the native american genocide about it, it was not about the jewish holocaust
>>79692443
Is Red the Stalker? I didn't think he was an annoying whiny bitch, it seems like Tarkovsky mostly sympathizes with him before Writer and Professor.
>>79688785
it's not redpilled and either is kubrick; the film is based on the book 'dream story' by arthur shnitzler who was a jewish degenerate (this coming from someone who appreciates a good jewish author), but this guy was smut, he kept a journal of his deviancy even keeping record of every orgasm he had. The movie is a resurrection/tribute to this fucking filth which copies of were destroyed in the organised book burnings in germany 1933. Kubrick was fucking obscene and I'm pretty sick of his shit being considered "redpilled"; If you're looking for "arty" redpills read joris-karl huysmans or emile zola for fuck sake - movies are a waste of time
>>79689846
Dude I know right it's just like man this weed is like so dank I'm so high rn nothing goes over my head lol
>>79692740
well it's kinda hard to respect a "plot" when his movies are supposed to be edgy art pieces that really make you think.
movies that try to be art come off as shit that only shit people can watch
>>79689232
Christopher Nolan.
>>79689232
michael bay
Jews aren't all bad - their power as a race just needs to be controlled and directed toward more constructive purposes.
>>79693002
this
ol' chrissy doesn't try to pretend his movies are art with hidden meaning.
he states the meaning of his movies int he movies and makes the plot direct.
this is not b8
>>79688410
>>79688565
10 or mo re minutes where removed after he died
>>79693242
BASED George C Scott
>>79689232
Sofia Coppola
>>79689333
Full Metal Jacket
>>79693127
The strength of Kubrick's films is that he is able to dance between the lines of art film and structured narrative rather well. Both the art house crowd and mainstream audience flock to his films and love them. Also he can take on any genre and be successful. Whether or not you enjoy his stuff personally, that much is pretty much fact.
Also I wouldn't say any of his films really have any "deep meaning". 2001 and Eyes Wide Shut can be disorienting upon the initial view, but there isn't anything particularly convoluted going on that should require an unnecessary amount of thought after viewing like a pure art house film.
>>79693640
>implying the art house crowd or mainstream know what the fuck they're talking about
i like my movies how i like my lap dances that i've never had, entertaining
Him and Carpenter made some of my favorite movies.
>>79693765
FMJ is pretty entertaining.
>>79693765
Nigga are you really gonna sit here and tell me Dr. Strangelove and The Shining aren't entertaining
>>79694095
never watched strange love. shinning seems over rated
>inb4 YOU'VE NEVER SEEN THEM SO YOU CAN'T TALK ABOUT THEM
i know enough about them to know they are boring
>>79692941
I remember being 17.
>>79687919
I actually watched Eyes Wide Shut last night. I always wondered if he was speaking to the audience or the elite overlords more. I am honestly not for sure. He used so many secret messages that you have to analyze every shot to truly understand what he was trying to truly say.
>>79693640
Show 2001 to an average 18-35 year old and 95% would be unable to identify the point of the film
As many have pointed out, there's a lot going on that does require thought
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSo6s_xrj4c
>>79694178
i remember being retarded
>>79694172
>This guy...
ITT: edge fags who think shitty "art" movies are intelligent
And what about the moon landing film he made for the NASA ?
Rly mks u think :/
>>79689602
Saturnalia
>>79694316
I think your statistic is quite far-fetched, but yeah 2001 is a more complicated film. But that's about as complex as Kubrick gets, and really only the ending should come close to what I described, as in requiring continued thought after the movie has ended to comprehend everything. Nothing else in the movie should be THAT confusing, even to a viewer that isn't thinking very hard about what's going on.
>>79692817
Yep, he's the Stalker. What made him seem like a little bitch to me was that in the movie, he treats the zone like some deity and was all "dur the zone must be respected, you got extremely lucky this time but respect the zone, she lives" while in the book, he acknowledges the zone for what it really is: a shitty, terrifying place that has fucked up people's lives.
Also in the movie, the Stalker forces the others to go first in possible trap areas in order to protect his hide, even though he was hired to guide them though it.
In the book, Red was also hired to guide two scientists into the zone, and while he is in it for the money, he does his best to make sure the scientists stay safe, always leading ahead and going so far as to beating up on of the scientists for not listening to him.
The only time Red does make someone go in front him into a trap is at the end of the book, (because he is desperate to get his daughter back to normal) but even then you could tell he is extremely uneasy and guilt ridden (unlike the movie where the whiny stalker doesn't give a fuck)
>>79689662
this all the way
>>79692941
You really are a moron. Allow me to shame you into doing some research so you can actually know what you are talking about instead of just pretending.
>>79691861
Film Theory isn't pretentious. You just don't know anything about it. What you are essentially doing is walking into a room full of people speaking a language you don't and proclaiming that because you don't understand what they are saying it is meaningless and shit.
How enlightened of you.
>>79692397
Shit writing isn't a critique. You are on an anonymous board meaning that you have no clout or body of work you can reference to validate your statement (Notice this is not an opinion, those take work.) Also you show yet again that the usage of symbolism is completely lost on you because you are a cretin.
>not rely on flashy words and descriptions
If i took everything at face value I would come to the same incandescently retarded conclusions you have when it comes to art.
>>79692646
There you go with the one word unqualified description of something you don't like again. You are such a poor communicator.
>>79692941
Films really can make you think. The problem is you think you are smarter than most of them so it closes off your mind to new ideas. Any time you don't understand something I'd imagine you would say it's edgy try hard shit.
>>79693127
It's only hidden to people who don't care to look. Like yourself. It's much easier to claim that a movie is being pretentious than it is to understand the historical significance and use of symbolism. No one is saying everyone or even you should take the time. I'm just saying your retarded.
He did like showing the pyramid capstone (all seeing eye) in his movies.
>>79695808
In the background
>>79695901
Its HAL turn him upside down and watch him fall apart in 2001
>>79687919
>how can Christian directors even compete
kill yourself plebeian
>>79687919
Did you know that in the original A Clockwork Orange the protagonist reformed and joined civil society?
Do you think kikes prefer a version where white society is headed to inevitable decay or do you think it was pure coincidence?
I've only watched full metal jacket, what other Kubrick films should I watch and in what order?
>>79690697
>t. retard
>>79696346
2001 and clockwork orange are the best that I've seen.
What do you all think that CRM 114 meant? I personally always thought that it meant that the following was a false flag.
>>79696346
A Clockwork Orange is god-tier senpai
>>79696233
>Did you know that in the original A Clockwork Orange the protagonist reformed and joined civil society?
either you want to bait illiterate anons or you yourself did not read the book
Could 2001 reference 9/11?
How come Martin Scorsese never gets mentioned?
His movies are fucking based.
>>79695901
John Huston did the same thing. In fact that reminds me, I think he's one of the best directors of ALL TIME
>>79697151
Yeah I forgot him, Bringing out the Dead and the Last Temptation of Christ of two of my favorite movies ever
>>79687919
>American
>Thinking he has the genetics to make somone honorary Aryan
>Probably brown
>>79696443
>2001 was so deep bro you probably didn't get it
yeah fuck everyone who loves 2001
read the books instead
>>79697049
I think there are two versions of the book
>>79697526
>British
>Thinking his country had any worthwhile genetics before the romans came
>Probably a chav
>>79690248
You could've baited harder if you mentioned Béla Tarr but he is too irrelevant to be bait worthy.
>>79687919
he was an antisemitic jew. doesn't get much more based than that.
>>79697526
BEADY
>>79697051
Yeah could be if you want to go full tinfoil
Can also look up the UN meditation room.
