Is america becoming the king of bantz because of trump?
>>79526937
No.
nah m8 nah, just nah ey
>>79527118
>>79527201
Put a wooly sock in it
>>79526937
No but we are becoming the king of dank memes. And if you control the memes you control the world.
lol no
>>79526937
No, but we are becoming the land of the trolls. Bantz are supposed to be clever, and that's not the American focus. Instead the Trump style is about getting under people's skin and into their heads.
>>79528779
Basically, become one with the Jew
>>79528880
No, the Jew thinks he can score points with clever rhetorical arguments (look up "hermeneutics"). This is irritating to real Westerners, because rhetorical arguments aren't considered legitimate in the Western Tradition. Irritation is not the purpose of it, rather it's function is to assert a crude form of intellectual dominance.
The Trump/American style is about becoming one with the "Cracker". The anti-white epithet "Cracker" is a short form of "wise-cracker" and it relates to the tradition in white American society of deliberately trying to irritate others and make them "lose their cool". This is also a dominance ploy but it's about social rather than intellectual dominance. It's about proving you can control your opponent's mental and emotional state, not about proving you are cleverer than them.
too much banter can be annoying as shit though, and it can get so aggravating that it starts to blur the line between banter and straight up insults. dealing with that at my current work and it gets tiring after a while. and gay jokes. gay jokes all the fucking time up there. I think they're all fags tbqhfam
>>79530509
>The anti-white epithet "Cracker" is a short form of "wise-cracker"
No, it's a short form of "whip cracker"
>>79530509
>>79528880
some what related:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjNXQ3DTMIY
>>79531064
No, that explanation was invented by left-wing academics in the 1960s to justify black racism as part of grievance over slavery.
>>79530509
Well said. Busting chops is an American right of passage. If you can get people to go on tilt, you win.
>>79532520
>Busting chops is an American right of passage.
Exactly, and getting your own chops busted is part of it.
>If you can get people to go on tilt, you win.
More importantly, if people can't tilt you then you win. The whole thing is a social exercise in teaching restraint and shaming people for losing control.
>>79527118
Y E S
E
S
>>79526937
Not at all, we weren't raised in a system that supported bantz. We were taught that everything that wasn't entirely nice was mean, and if you're mean then you're a bully, and if you're a bully you're evil.
So any kind of bantz we might have picked up on as a kid were crushed and if you even tried you'd be labeled as a bully and molded into an asshole (still incapable of bantz).
It's only with friends that we bust each others chops and that's because we know how to egg them on.
>>79526937
No, America is the king of bantz because America is the only country where bantz are still legal
>>79528648
lol pic-related is you faggots
