>The cross-party group of MPs is urging the government to make radical changes to the laws on prostitution in England and Wales.
>Brothel-keeping rules should also be modified so that prostitutes can share premises rather than risk working alone, the committee said.
>The Home Office said it would carefully consider the recommendations.
>The MPs also called for previous convictions and cautions for prostitution to be deleted from sex workers' records, saying it created an insurmountable barrier for those wishing to move into "regular" work.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36677693
>mfw making this thread for the second time.
Is prostitution degenerate or a healthy step forward for society?
>>79391719
Sharia doesn't allow this
degenerate
rather one night a paid slag than end up stuck with pic related
>>79391892
FPBP
>>79391719
Isn't prostitution already legal?
Just brothels and advertising are illegal
What sort of country do we live in when filthy sluts can give stds to everyone legally, yet cannabis is hurr durr DEAAADDDLLLYYYY.
>>79391719
>Is prostitution degenerate or a healthy step forward for society?
Hmmmm. Let's see who opposes it.
>Older women with low sexual market value
>Conservacucks with zero interest in the real issues
>pussy-whipped men
I.
FUCKING.
WONDER.
>>79392324
is it really that bad in UK? I mean here laws are pretty strict, I remember I got jailed for 5 days simply for smoking the shit
Can't wait for those sheep brothels
Thanks Brexit
>>79391719
Degenerate.
Doesn't work and it's just going to end up with human trafficking rings. Takes all the power away from the police.
>>79391719
Neat. Though already kinda legal in Scotland. At least I think it is.
t. whoorin for 4 years, never any legal issue
Unless they mean they're bringing back streetwalkers and brothels in which case neat. Bet that cunt Strugeon will have other thoughts on the matter, the authoritarian bitch that she is.
>>79392324
If you're gonna compare street trash hookers to something then compare it to street trash cannabis that's laced with something which can be really fucking deadly.
>>79392619
That's because they wanted to give you free dick along the joint. Pretty much wat smoking pot is: I need cock. In my mouth. Now.
>>79392619
No its not bad at all, unless you're an idiot and get caught with like 10g+ and money. Then you'll potentially get done for intent to supply but i've never had any issues
>>79391719
I'm broadly supportive of this for three reasons:
>It'll piss Muslims off
>It'll piss feminists off
>It'll be one more source of tax receipts
Can we go back to calling them Brasses?
Whilst we're at it can we go back to not serving ladies pints in pubs, or letting them in the tap room?
>>79391719
>implying it wast already legal.
I booked 4 escort so far in London they all advertised openly.
>>79392891
Why would Muslims be annoyed with this, when they are the main traffickers and users of prostitutes?
>>79392973
They will openly freak put about it.
But their men will happily use it on the side.
I wish prostitution was legalized in all fifty states. I would happily part with my money for a few hours a week of pleasure. I'd feel much better fucking women than jerking off to MILF porn.
Healthy step.
Apparently legalised prostitution causes instances of rape and sexual assault to go down.
>>79392973
These will be of legal age, anon.
>>79392179
kill yourself
Whores are legal where I live. All it means is that it will cost you $350 an hour for a rough looking 30+ year old.
Legalize and unstigmatize prostitution.
Once the sexual value of a female is directly equivalent to a monetary value, then the sexual market place will finally either crash or self correct.
A legal/stigma-free prostitute is a feminists worst nightmare.
>>79392324
>filthy sluts can give stds to everyone legally
well regulated prostitution will decrease std transmission. look at places where it is well-regulated including testing, medical care
>>79391719
Wat?
Isn't this the same country that just made facesitting porn illegal?
>>79393250
>A legal/stigma-free prostitute is a feminists worst nightmare.
This. I can go to backpages and get an escort for $200. It's already mostly legal as long as you don't explicitly discuss sex before you pay her. If that becomes widespread, white knights will die out and feminists won't be able to rely on men being willing to hate themselves just to gain female approval.It's also why a lot of feminists have been anti-porn, anti-stripper, etc. And that's why they're trying to take away our video games and ruin our other hobbies. If men can be happy without chasing after women 24/7, women lose their advantage and female privilege goes away.
>>79392973
many British escorts have a 'no asian' thing.
>>79392915
AW?
>>79393730
Mandatory refugee servicing when? As part of the prostitution legalization process of course. Gotta "give back to the community"
>>79393250
>Once the sexual value of a female is directly equivalent to a monetary value, then the sexual market place will finally either crash or self correct.
Excellent point. There are many advantages of regulated and legal prostitution, like this anon (>>79393318) said. If prostitutes are 'professionals' then they will take 'professional' health and safety measures for themselves and their clients. It will also reduce illegal and dangerous (for women, you stupid feminists) human trafficking rings.
Next, it won't encourage more whores, as whores are quite prevalent as it is. They, unfortunately, have the option to do what they want until their 30th birthday, and then marry a beta whom they hate and will subsequently divorce.
It will be great competition to Tinder and other fucked up markets, and betas will be able to rationally analyse the costs of a mouthy bitch that makes them unhappy vs. visiting escorts twice a week (can require as low as £200/week).
Its quite good. It benefits the economy by allowing us to tax an already existing business.
Also the only people who use prostitutes are degenerates and the 1% anyway. If they want to get cock rot nothing of value gets lost.
>>79391719
>Prostitution to be legalised in the UK
Part of the plan to increase jobs in England, and bring in tourist dollars.
Smart move. Your economy is going to take a fucking, so every dollar and euro your whores can bring in will help.
Pro-tip: don't issue licenses to slags. Tends to leave a bad impression with the tourists. Set some standards in the regulations they have to meet to maintain their licenses.
>>79393250
This. The free market fixes everything, including feminism. Even the ugliest, fattest, most useless woman can act like an entitled bitch because somewhere out there is a man willing to put up with it. Mainstream acceptance would drive down the price of pussy and force women to woman up. They'd have to take care of their appearance more, put more effort into being a good wife and wouldn't be able to rely on white knights to champion their place in society. inb4 muh soggy knee. If you don't trust women of being capable of judging if they want to rent out their pussy or not, who's the real misogynist?
>>79394447
>>79394666
Me on the right
>>79394666
Aussie just jealous that they don't get free pizza with the purchase of low-grade ass.
>>79394214
>What is protection?
>>79393780
yes.
>>79391719
It is a necessary evil. And if there are still women in western society that absolutely need more protection prostitues are #1 on the list. Legalising improves visibility.
I'm fine with prostitution as long as they get a monthly check up and they pay taxes.
They're not legalising it, they're legalising soliciting but not actually buying sex.
So men will be punished for buying but not whores for selling :^)
>>79394556
>If you don't trust women of being capable of judging if they want to rent out their pussy or not, who's the real misogynist?
A lot of feminists have gotten around that by saying it should be legal for women to rent out their pussy... but illegal for men to buy it. So we would still arrest the man, but the prostitute would be fine. I think they were trying to get a law like this passed in France or somewhere, and a lot of American feminists want this too.
>>79392750
Gtfo you disgusting slag
/pol/ is for the pure.
>>79391719
It's the best possible way to handle it.
It's going to happen anyway, the Government should just tax it so they at least make some money from it.
>>79395401
Right but unless you fall for a sting (undercover lady police playing the whore) they can't touch you. It's not illegal for example to pay a girl for her company. If she decides after the first 30 seconds that she really likes you then no crime has been committed.
>>79391719
>Is prostitution degenerate
A little.
>or a healthy step forward for society?
No.
It shouldn't be illegal though.
>>79395401
I doubt it the paki gangs were whoring out kids for years, if they arrested the johns too there would have been more then a handful of convictions.
>>79394447
Individuals don't need a licence in Australia. There's just regulations on what they can and can't do (eg. natural services ) and where they can and can't conduct business (no streetwalking, can't have two people working from same room unless it's a brothel).
Brothels can't have more than five people actively working at a time (but can have more than that on call waiting for customers). Workers need health checks, can refuse service for any reason, etc.
>>79395401
>>79396147
But that's the way it is now. You can get an escort in America too as long as you don't explicitly mention sex
>>79395244
This. It's degenerate, but it's a profession that will exist one way or another and usually due to bad circumstances. It's better if those involved have legal protection and regulation.
To make it work, though, a few particular regulations would be a must.
>No STDs
>Must use protection
>Can't be allowed to work under the influence of alcohol or drugs
>Can't work as your own pimp/brothel
>Only can do this line of work if hired by a sanctioned brothel
>Prostitutes and brothels need to be able to pass annual inspections that they are up to code and not breaking laws
Basically treat it like the food industry and keep them up to code. If vetting customers was possible, that would be a plus, too. It would probably hurt business, though, since this is a very impulse-buy market.
>>79396839
Maybe add licences? Qualification?
Institute of Professional Prostitutes giving out CPP (Chartered Professional Prostitute).
What a time to be alive.
>>79391719
I live about 15 mins away from the UKs first 'legal' red light district (Holbeck, Leesd). The areas a shit hole, but it was before the prostitution anyway, if anything the legalization of prostitution just meant the residents could legally work there. The general census appears to be that its an overall positive thing, the main issues I'm aware of is that the police legalized it though simply allowing it in that certain area of Leeds thus allowing the girls to come see them if they need help but the police don't actually patrol the area as often as they could which is unfortunate because I'm pretty sure there's still some girls who are pimped out or it's at least its still a high crime area. I personally don't mind if prostitution is legalized, however if it is I'd like to see it only legal in certain areas of the city if you're street walking (brothels are fine, just keep the exterior classy [no window girls]) then have those areas heavily policed which in turn would help to decrease the stigmatization around prostitution.
>>79394447
>Making restrictive laws
>Being this american
If a tart with a kebab for a fanny wants to spread it for the glory of the empire, i'll allow it.
>>79391719
It is basically legal already.
Authorities usually turn a blind eye to backstreet brothels, as long as they aren't slums, or have been directly linked to criminal activity.
The legalization of these establishments has been pushed for a number of years now. Primarily to provide protection and support for the women involved.
Once an establishment has to conform to standards set by regulatory bodies, it allows greater protection of the prostitutes.
At present many prostitution rings, are linked with gang activity, the drugs trade and human trafficking.
This goes some way to tackling these issues.
Apart from self employed escorts, and those that work through organisations, this change does leave night walking prostitutes in an odd position :^)
Many are heavily reliant on drugs, which are provided by a pimp, who is part of a gang etc.
Sure some regulation will maintain brothels at a standard, however the real underlying issue won't budge much in response.
I guess Prime minister May will start the ever successful war on drugs once again...
>>79397234
What would the exams be?
How to suck a cock as quickly as possible?
How to find the best underpass?
>>79391892
this
I'm all for it. Safer for the women involved, more professional, better regulation, and we can tax it.
I don't see a down side.
>>79397343
Regulated brothers seem more likely than allowing kerb crawling, better security and all that.
>Living in a time in which you can pop down the local brothel for a cheeky pint and shag and be back for tea
>>79391892
It does now you fuck
>>79397835
Mostly hygiene and safety modules.
A first aid module.
A 'legal' module.
Some marketing and microeconomics.
12 week course gives you GradPros (Graduate Prostitute) status.
1 year GradPros experience after that gives you CPros (Chartered Prostitute) status.
For the one year, have a tutor (mostly theory and essay submission) and a mentor (a qualified and experienced prostitute that monitors you and gives you work practice feedback). Have 2 tutor and 2 mentor observations as part of your year.
Also, I'm talking bullshit, but it's funny to imagine this actually happening.
>>79391719
>Is prostitution degenerate or a healthy step forward for society?
Prostitution is degenerate but let me try to sum up what our feminist and political spectrum thought:
>You need to make prostitution legal because it only encourages crime!
>It's a free society and this is just oppression!
>prostitution is made legal
>now all brothels are filled with Eastern Europeans but this time it's legal and even cheaper because of competition
>state makes a lot of money
>still blows money on medical help for prostitutes
>increases it's cost because it wants more control
>meanwhile campaigners of the last decades are basically backpedaling and finally shutting up
>feminists are now splitting themselves because they just can't decide which decision actually empowers women
Outlaw it. Those communities that don't mind won't call the police and so you'll have red-light districts again while the rest can keep their neighborhoods clean. But don't think the state will actually do this once it got its hands on the money.
