What's your excuse for not being a Marxist yet, /pol/? Do you just hate the poor that much?
>>79289677
>1 post by this ID
>>79289677
Hate the poor so much that I don't want them to starve to death as Marxism is empirically shown to do?
I guess so.
>>79289677
>What's your excuse for not being a Marxist yet, /pol/?
Basic Economics.
Actually I'm a capitalist, so a true Marxist in a real sense. I believe in increasing the state and eventually creating a communist utopia where work is done by robots and nobody works. except instead of liquidating the rich we would liquidate the poor.
History class, I can't support an ideology that is responsible for the deaths of over 100 million in the last century.
Plus fuck doing shit for others, lazy fuckers should do it themselves
>>79289906
>Marxism has empirically shown to do
Actually, the U.S.S.R. became an industrial superpower under Marxism.
Furthermore, other states are not examples of Marxism because the state, not the workers, owned the means of production.
>>79289677
Didn't work out the first time we tried it.
Reminder that anarchism is the best political philosophy
Its not about race or gender, its all about yourself.
Only weak cucks hate anarchism.
>>79290036
>the U.S.S.R. became an industrial superpower under Marxism.
Keynesian economics, spend a lot get a lot, but that was because they had a war industry and when the war was over, you had the 70's and 80's with the USSR in crisis.
>>79289996
>Plus fuck doing shit for others, lazy fuckers should do it themselves
Selfish bastard. That's the problem with you Capitalists. It just breeds selfish people.
I have good justification to believe Marxism is dysgenic and will cause irreparable damage even if the most idealistic version is applied for long enough.
Meanwhile, capitalism will lead to a physically weak but psychologically fit species if applied for long enough. Feudalism is what creates warriors, it selects the strongest/fastest through warfare and therefore leads to a physically strong but psychologically weak and impressionable people who can be easily led to death.
Choose your path, humans.
>>79290299
Pic related.
>>79290054
It very clearly did.
Leninist Russia was a roaring success in the 1920s.
>>79290559
Only the strongest will survive anon.
Its your own personal problem that you are scared of death.
>>79290346
I'm just a jaded fucker who hates others, Capitalism had no part in it. I used to think like you, then I grew up and realize that a system without money doesn't work. Maybe it does for a few decades but long term it can't.
>>79289677
i believe in marginal utility not the labor theory of value.
>>79289677
>Do you just hate the poor that much?
Yes.
>>79289677
>>79290036
>>79290346
>>79290788
Kike
SAGE
>>79290559
rather ironic that the term zealot originally represented a faction of jews and now almost exclusively is used to describe muslims.
>>79291153
wait I'm actually a jew and you didn't highlight my post :(
>>79291260
>A non communist jew
Nice try
>>79291018
Of course, but if you force people into equality of outcome, the lines between strong and weak necessarily become ambiguous. What's left is literally no means of selection making Marxism necessarily the most dysgenic system.
Likewise, when no system is given most people tend to physical competition as that's what nature typically imposes on humans, ie hunting and gathering. When physical competition is the game, things naturally progress (eventually) into feudalism.
We might as well just accept technocratic capitalism as the goal and breed for intelligence. Because, why not? We might even discover God like this, if a God exists.
>>79291224
Words only have the meaning we agree they have.
>>79289677
stop being a soviet fanboy
>>79291260
The highlight of our lives would be if you ended yours.
>>79291394
You are saying that anarchism will become feudalism.
But thats wrong, because we live in age where nukes are real thing.
anarchism will lead to complete reset of humanity.
And thats what we need.
>>79289677
In order for Marxism/Communism/Socialism to work it requires a strong government that can force it's people to do what it wants.
We already have enough problems with our government interfering with our lives WITHOUT giving them absolute power.
>>79290299
anarchosocialism, to be precise. am i right? because libertarian twats don't count as anarchists.
>>79289677
I'm not retarded.
We need a strong government because that allows people to do whatever they want without ruining civilisation as a whole.
>>79291908
>Its not about race or gender, its all about yourself.
>>79292091
every fucking time
>>79291714
You didn't address a single one of my points, you just said "no, because nukes." Do you have nukes lying around? I don't.
>complete reset
Nice, anarchoprimitism.
Get dropped in the wilderness and see how long you survive.
>>79291908
What an oxymoron.
Nature. Find me one species willing to die for the weakness of another, weaker member of their species.
>>79289677
I'm not a faggot. Saged.
>>79292217
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_nuclear_explosions
You dont have to have one, anarchism will eventually lead to using them.
ISIS have nukes
Russian have nukes
France have nukes
China have nukes
UK have nukes
India have nukes
Pakistan have nukes
North korea have nukes
Israel have nukes
and these manufacturers have them as well.
You can wipe out humanity with biological/chemical weapons as well.
>>79292659
Do common people have nukes? Who are you advocating anarchy for? This is a non sequitur.
>>79289677
What's your excuse for being a Marcist, mick? Are you that much of a failure that you hate the rich?
>>79289677
The human species has evolved over millions of years to the point where even a 2 year old child can know the difference between 'mine' and 'yours'.
>>79292733
Are you retarded ?
IT DOESN'T matter who will launch them if its common people or ISIS effect is same
>>79289909
/thread
>>79290346
No, you are the lazy cunt, potato.
You should rely on yourself and your family, so should everyone else.
You are the selfish one for wanting other people's money, that they worked for, unlike yourself. YOU are the one that takes from others and gives to yourself.
>>79289677
>>79289677
>What's your excuse for not being a Marxist yet, /pol/?
Human beings + communism = not work
>>79290788
Yeah right after they reliberalized the market
>>79289677
The ideology is stupid. Marx ideas are built on the theory that society is steadily progressing through multiple phases to finally reach a communist utopia.
Karl Popper has shown that such a claim is unrealistic and cannot be proven, due to the inherhent complexity of society, economy and human behaviour. Without this development, which cannot be proven and is probably also bullshit, the whole Marxist ideology will not work out.
Its not surprising that any attempt to implement Marxism has turned into an authoritarian shithole except of the promised utopia.
