You can only post in this thread if your cunt has three or more aircraft carriers
If they have ramps they don't count
/thread
Why would I want my cunt to waste money on bullshit multi-trillion dollar projects which will never actually be put to use?
>>79236061
>Not put to use
I get that OP is a faggot, but common.
>>79236240
Is that War Thunder?
>>79236061
>Never actually put to use
HA!
Whatever helps you sleep at night kid.
>>79236061
you're an island nation, you arguably have a greater need for aircraft carriers than other countries
>>79236304
Yeah
>>79235863
1 full fleet is designed to take over a continent
#TheMoreYouKnow
>>79236304
Yes, lol/
Whatever you do, don't try and play as Germany.
>>79236304
Yes, hilarity ensues when one puts Russians in charge of historical accuracy.
>>79235863
Carriers probably won't be very cost effective in an actual war.
Are """""""""""""helicopter destroyers"""""""""""""""""""" aka aircraft carriers allowed?
Hyuga class reporting in.
>>79236061
Maybe there is an alien species out there that is just technologically capable enough for us to win with what we have.
... and if we had any less they'd win.
>>79236849
I love how that fucking 'Destroyer' deck is wide enough to accommodate two rows of F35s.
>>79236849
Does it field VTOL fighters?
>>79236999
They call it a destroyer because the US still forbids Japan from having carriers because we don't want them to bomb pearl harbor again so one day they were like "fuck it let's much something that is very obviously a carrier but we'll call it a destroyer."
>>79237200
We forbid them? I thought it was their own constitution and their interpretation of it?
>>79236631
.... god damn dude you are fucking retarded. Shut up.
>>79237200
This is basically how Japan does everything.
>Not allowed a military.
>SDF.
>Not allowed carriers.
>Helicopter destroyers.
>Not allowed high profile banking scams.
>Build more roads.
>>79237285
Get out of here, leaf. Even if Canada had a carrier, Trudeau would demilitarize it to ferry in more shitskins
>>79235863
damn...
>>79237284
It's kind of different now because now the US government is actually doing the opposite and trying to get the Japanese to spend more money on military but back when the ship was originally made the situation was different.
>>79235863
Fridtjof Nansen-class fregate. With the possibility ot carry a helicopter. We got 5 of them, faggot!
>>79236631
One Nimitz fields more planes than most nations have in their entire Air Force
And you think they would not be effective...
Ok lad.
>>79237623
helicopters are rotorcraft, not aircraft.
you lose on a technicality sorry Lars
>>79237623
Everyone has helicopter carriers mate. What OP means is a 50+ fighter carrier.
>>79236496
why not?
>>79237806
Damn, but I'm pretty sure the f35 can land and take off from it too, if it had to.
>>79236061
>>79235863
is this a new word filter
country
>>79237909
War Thunder's Germany is lucky that the planes actually fly at all. The tanks also burst into flames when a Soviet tank sneezes at them.
The BF109's aren't terrible planes but War Thunder's ranking system places early war German planes against jets.
>>79237200
Speaking of pearl harbour, we're back!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EMvq0WdFyw
>>79238229
So USSR or Britain is best right? I never got past low tier but I chose US/Germany and always got killed by some fucker in a Spitfire or Hurricane or maybe a Yak. At least BF110 is pretty good
>>79238757
Waitu piggu go homeeeh!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uC4AUyju7k
>>79236423
>90,000 tons
Fake, anything that heavy would sink
>>79238872
Last time I played it was Britain/USSR for regular fighter combat. Japan if you want to do endless 1v1 dogfights. USA if you want to play a bomber.
>Endless B-17's in the sky.
Is War Thunder fun? I uninstalled World of Tanks since I found it annoying and probably wouldn't play the ground component of WT, but is the flying fun?
I heard they are adding naval shit soon which is what I want.
>tfw world of warships will never come to console
>>79238872
USSR is best for virtually everything because of Gaijin's insane bias towards them lol
Britain is ok but I admit I haven't played them that much
>>79239061
Flat weather right?
>>79236061
that the chinese will swarm with cheap subs and torpedos you men?
Aircraft subs when?
>>79237751
And can be destroyed for less than 1% of its cost.
>>79237623
norwegian navy posters are always my favorite, besides yuropoor crossbow threads, naturally
>>79240698
how exactly do you figure? it seems a lot of people are under the impression the aircraft carriers are just solo powerhouses and not part of a battle group with submarines scouting miles ahead with destroyers in between. don't bring up nukes either because that's a circular discussion
>>79236849
it carriers AIRCRAFT so yes i would count them
>>79240698
Good luck getting close to it
>>79240698
>You can only post in this thread if your cunt has three or more aircraft carriers
Canada, shh.
>>79235863
Ah, the USS Ronald Reagan. She's a beaut.
>>79239229
The flying is super fun, and the ground combat is better then WoT because you have planes in the sky and you can use anti air tanks thats whole job is to blast planes outta the sky
>>79241881
JTF2 is better, more effective and scarier than all of your aircraft carriers.
They literally won Irak by themselves
Checkin in
>>79235863
>if your cunt has three or more aircraft carriers
So you're allowed to post because of your mom's privilege?
>>79236496
>>79238229
Please, I play Germany all the time. In fact, I've been playing Germany for years and still stomp pubbies.
>>79236849
Japan's aircraft carriers are like any other American product. Smaller, cheaper, and have a clock.
Aircraft carriers are a huge waste of money. In the event of a world war everyone's fucked regardless because of nukes. In a conflict with a weaker power you can easily win without them.
We have some
>>79235905
Fpbp
>>79243638
>A FUCKIN' RAMP
>>79243349
how are you going to deploy your nukes?
you gonna wagon them over?
winning a war with a modern day military isn't just pushing a button and praying your enemy has no means to destroy your missiles midflight
I'm sure we have 3
>>79243638
read the OP again retard
>>79236849
Why the imperial Japanese flag?
>>79243638
those are small as hell.
why on earth do they have a ramp?
>what is pitch
>>79244084
Mostly just to piss China off.
>>79236849
that's not even Japan's biggest "destroyer"
>>79244650
read that second one as "huge"
>>79235863
I don't have a cunt. I'm a boy.
>>79244815
top kek
>>79244815
Gtfo
Note that helicopter carriers are now aircraft carriers for a lot of people thanks to Dr. VTOL and Mr. F-35 and that the U.S. is also going to start building a lot more helicopter carriers because of this.
>>79238975
i giggled
>>79244319
>tfw American
How can yurp even compete?
A-are we relevant, usa-senpai? :3
>>79244650
I had to double check that this wasn't a "Don't talk to me or my son ever again" macro.
>>79244084
If I remember correctly, the rising sun is the flag of Japan's navy.
Correct me if I'm wrong tough.
>>79245223
I laughed harder than I should of at this..
>>79243638
That thing on the right is a design abomination. I almost threw up just looking at it, thats how ugly it is. Would be better of as a reef.
>>79236061
This desu.
'Murica should stop wasting money for the war that is not going to happen.Eventhough it happens most the weapons are going to be useless due to nukes.
>>79235863
Carriers? Well you can actually fisk from those, but you can't fisk from planes
Watch out Russia, you ain't getting OUR fisk..
kek fast stealth boat that can go up rivers, we've lacked that ability for some time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeJ-z6lgojU
>>79237623
how's it feel knowing they're only used for search and rescue of lost swedish muslims trying to cross the sea to their new homeland?
Why do you need a carrier anyways? Aren't planes able to lift from ground?
>>79245802
>fucking americans
>america pls help
That's why.
You're just jealous because your navy consists of a chinese mountee and a homosexual stoner taking turns rowing a boat in between bong hits.
>>79246143
like 70% of the Earths surface is water m8
>>79246273
Then make plane that lands on water
>>79246380
>being this dumb
>>79246450
Ok, but for real. Carriers are way too expensive and hard to coordinate logistics to be worth it. A few of them is good, nice base for invasions.
But the huge buttloads that some countries have (specially the US) is plain stupid.
>>79246612
The US projects military power to make sure countries don't get out of line. Any non nuclear country would not be able to touch us militarily.
America will always win in an all out non-nuclear war, and because of this we can project our ideals onto the world.
>>79243837
Probably using the same shit the soviets figured out in the 60's. LEO MIRVs for Fractional orbital bombardment.
>implying the outerspace treaty means anything in total war
