[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Nazis =/= Far-Right!
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 60
Thread images: 6
File: Hitler we are Socialists.jpg (83 KB, 850x400) Image search: [Google]
Hitler we are Socialists.jpg
83 KB, 850x400
Why are the Nazis considered Far-Right again?

Pic related.
>>
S-SOCIALISM IS RIGHT WING WHEN IT DOESN'T WORK

STALIN W-WAS RIGHT WING
>>
>>79222689
socialism isn't a singular ideology

when people talk shit about socialism, they're talking about marxism-leninism
>>
>>79222689
The NSDAP party was left wing but Hitler wasn't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6k_A40IBbM
>>
Because apparently when you're too far down the right-wing you actually start hating the right-wing. It's complicated, I don't expect a capitalist pig to understand.
>>
>>79222689
first because people are dumb.
second because right wing usually supported this kind of movements.

In any case, Hail Hitler
>>
>>79223001
>Hitler wasn't

Then why did he allow expansion of government programmes when he came to power?
>>
>>79222884
>>79223057
Shut up you uneducated neckbeards.
http://pastebin.com/wV97RYQT
>>
>>79223001
This is wrong.

The strasserists and the like were communists/marxists in disguise.

They literally wanted to abolish all private property and ignite a class war.
>>
>>79223165
You're a retard. NSDAP economic policy was based on Prussian Socialism.
>>
>>79223057
>hail
>not heil
Fucking spic
>>
File: b8.jpg (3 KB, 160x160) Image search: [Google]
b8.jpg
3 KB, 160x160
>>79223159
>>
>>79223259
>>79223165
also

>wikipedia
>>
>>79223260
sorry
>>
capitalism is degenerate and the ultimate cuck ideology.
>>
File: inaduquet.jpg (35 KB, 500x404) Image search: [Google]
inaduquet.jpg
35 KB, 500x404
this lack of egg rolls is inaduquet.
>>
>>79222689
Here is a good explanation of it if you're genuinely interested

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1tUFx_StSo
>>
>>79223202
Hitler was not a strasserist.
>>79223259
Read the link.
>>
>>79223403
>T-the system that produces the most and works the best is a cuck ideology, you guys!
>>
>>79223001
>that whole video

lol
left-wing is not exclusive to "true" socialism. Hitler was a statist who fought against not private property itself, but the freedom to use it individually according to individual needs.
>>
>>79223443
GLR was a good guy, but he wasn't a National Socialist. He tried to fuse National Socialist philosophy with hardcore Americanism. The two aren't very compatible. He doesn't know what he's talking about, ultimately.

>>79223481
>Hitler was not a strasserist
I never said that he was. You said the NSDAP was leftist, Hitler was not. That's not true. To be frank, they were neither right or left wing. They were straddling the middle line, adopting aspects of both.

The strasserists and elements within the SA were traitors, who wanted class-warfare and an abolition of private property. Like I said, faux-NS.

Read Prussiandom and Socialism by Spengler.

If you can't tell the difference between actual reich policy and capitalism, you're retarded. Hitler spoke against Marxism and Capitalism at great length. Even after he took power.
>>
>>79223408
I love the first world. :P
>>
At some point you have to ask - Were the Nazis even Nazis?

Is it just one of many historical Jewish lies? To besmirch the Nazis by accusing them of Nazism?

Either way, I'm now officially a #Hillbilly
>>
Hitler was obviously a socialist, he even labeled his shitty we wuz Romanz roleplay movement "national socialism".
>>
>>79223481
also
>muh misquote

https://youtu.be/pDLyKSYRqXM?t=1m33s

"In these countries, these so-called democracies, the people are by no means the main focus of attention. What really matters is the existence of this group of "democracy makers". That is, the existence of a few hundred giant capitalists who own all of the factories and all of the shares and who, ultimately, lead the people."

There you go, in his own words.
>>
File: Bernie We are Socialists].jpg (40 KB, 474x316) Image search: [Google]
Bernie We are Socialists].jpg
40 KB, 474x316
>>79224848
The one I shared in the OP.
>>
Libertarianism is also usually coded as right or far-right, but it's left af.

I don't get it, OP.
>>
>>79225233
There are two sides of Libertarianism. It can be Leftist or Rightist.
>>
File: ad_161888246.jpg (64 KB, 675x1000) Image search: [Google]
ad_161888246.jpg
64 KB, 675x1000
>>79222689
It's not.

National Socialism is a revolutionary ideology.

National Socialism is a progressive ideology.

And National Socialism is a left-wing ideology.

I like to tell people I'm an "old leftist". Political correctness is a MODERN creation.

See how Proudhon wanted to exterminate the Jews
>>
>>79225436
(sorry, I should say, political correctness is a LATE modern, LATE capitalist creation... leftism has only been so PC since the Jews took it over)
>>
>>79225527
Actually, the term "political correctness" became popularized in the Soviet Union.
>>
>>79225436
Also it's not left-wing, how many times do I have to say it? It's neither right nor left wing.
>>
>>79222689

>So, we are supposed to see that a party in favor of universal education, guaranteed unemployment, increased entitlements for the aged, the expropriation of land without compensation, the nationalization of industry, the abolition of market-based lending - a.k.a. "interest slavery - the expansion of health services, and the abolition of child labor as objectively and obviously right-wing?
>>
>>79226012
>abolition of child labour

Okay, I'm a staunch Capitalist, but even I have to draw the line there. You'd have to be heartless to allow child labour.
>>
>>79224848

Need more of this fat slut
>>
>>79226233
And just generally ignorant of eugenic science. Enjoy your ballooning 80-IQ population once you put people into poverty and turn children into money-makers
>>
>>79226868
>>79226953
Name
>>
>>79227712

Chyna Chase.
>>
File: Metternich.jpg (17 KB, 250x334) Image search: [Google]
Metternich.jpg
17 KB, 250x334
> Conservative Socialism = Metternich
>>
>>79222689
Because the far left writes the books.
>>
>>79223014
It's called horseshoe theory and it works for both sides
>>
>>79222689
>
Because you are a faggot that user right vs left when talking about politics
>>
>>79222689
Because left and right don't necessarily mean socialist and capitalist.

They mean tradition on the right and revolution on the left.
>>
>>79225436
It is revolutionary (left) in the sense that it overturns the new order, it is right wing in that revolution is a move towards the traditional in nature.

This is why it's known as the third position. Neither left or right, but can't call it centre either.
>>
>>79231572
Then Nazi should be far left
>>
>>79232349
No, because far left implies a complete departure from tradition towards a completely new order.

They gain the far right label because many of the values they hold are ancient in origin.
>>
>>79222689
Economics does not determine whether other not a nation or people are left or right. Left or right are defined by hierarchy. Right is the interpretation of hierarchy in the literal sense through class or caste systems and left is the denial of any existence of hierarchy. Economics is utterly meaningless.
>>
>>79223014
>t. Commie Barbossa
>>
>>79222689
Because that was the direction that the globalists wanted to take the world away from
>>
>>79232349
You'd have to be a special kind of stupid not to see that the NSDAP were Conter-revolutionairies.

What they did was reassert germanic values and religion.

This is the opposite of what is understood by revolution in political sense. Revolution is understood as the masonic/judaic anti-traditionalist movement.

This is so fucking elemtairy noone should have to explain it to anyone on /pol/
>>
>>79232528
>No, because far left implies a complete departure from tradition towards a completely new order.
Ergo, nazism
>>
>>79233039
The operative words are completely new m8. As in out with all that went before.

This guy gets it:
>>79232993
>>
>>79232993
>You'd have to be a special kind of stupid not to see that the NSDAP were Conter-revolutionairies.
Counter to what? Democracy?

>What they did was reassert germanic values and religion.
And put the eternal warfare, genocide in the mix
>>
>>79232993
>>79233198
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ANazism%2FRevolutionary_not_Reactionary?oldformat=true

So you are saying nazi weren't revolutionary and they opposed Monarchy in germany?
>>
>>79222689
Gregor Strasser said that.
>>
>>79222689
Nazism and fascism is nothing more but capitalist reaction. Their watchdogs.
>>
>>79222689
Nationalism is considered "far-right" by jewish marxists
>>
>>79222689
Economic philosophy does not always align with cultural philosophy. Being culturally right wing doesn't mean your economically a capitalist. Nor does being a socialist mean you are a cultural leftist.

For example, I would support a mixed economy which is socialist if it had a homogenous society. Where as I do not support that in a society which allows us to be flooded with third worlders and other trash.

At the same time I am a firm believer in the ability to hold your own destiny and control your own affairs. However, in a globalist society capitalism isn't necessarily the best philosophy except when looking outwards. As in - multi nationals do not give a shit about our local communities, where as previously capitalists would have. supported local communities.
>>
>>79222689
Especially weird considering the Right in America wants less government. I think it's because

>Right wing = Racist
>Nazi = Racist
>Right Wing = Nazi
>>
This thread shows gross lack of knowledge in regards to the political spectrum, especially concerning my fellow Americans.

The political spectrum is not one axis, but two. Authoritarian vs Libertarian and Equality vs Hierarchy. National Socialism was an Authoritarian ideology that sat in the middle of Equality and Hierarchy with a slight lean towards Hierarchy.
Thread replies: 60
Thread images: 6

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.