Is globalism inevitable?
>>79158472
It is and the thought of it alone is depressing.
No.
>>79158472
As long as there remains separate cultures it is not.
>>79158472
that bottom left white dude hittin the dab!
>>79158472
in a way, yes. global trade is probably going to happen no matter what
does that mean you can't use some protectionism so your country doesn't lose half of it's manufacturing? no
does it mean you have to flood your country with displacement levels of migration? no
just because we're heading into a "globalized world" doesn't mean we have to destroy our countries
Get ready for a LOT more Istanbulls, Bruxelles, Paris, Anraka's and Orlando's.
>>79158617
Why? Why is it bad to come together as one? Borders are irrelevant now, more people are moving everywhere now that planes have made far away travel cheap in an increasingly economically intertwined world. Don't be a troglodyte. I'm sure tribesmen were scared of villages. And village folk scared of citing states. City states scared of the rise of nation states. This is just the next step in human progress, I'm just glad I'll get to witness it.
>>79159116
There are not 2 people who share the exact same opinion.
>War
>>79159116
Diversity + proximity = war
>>79158472
Globalism is the inevitable result of Capitalism struggling to acquire more labour-power and profits.
Yes, faster it comes faster we can get on with this shit and start doing something good.
>>79159359
>>79159231
People don't wage wars, governments and leaders do.
>>79159403
You do know that Globalism will cause the end of the world, right?
There is literally no way globalism works in practice.
Not if I can help it.
>>79159452
>What is Civil war?
>What are violent protests?
>>79159452
Actually, that's pretty true, but in its current form globalism is mostly a government program seeing as how most immigrants wouldn't come to any european or american country if it weren't for welfare benefits.
So globalism is pretty synonymous with big governments.
>>79159502
Nah m8, when there are no opposing forces big enough to destroy eachother and the world with it we're good. Globalism will do that.
>>79159540
That's true. Those don't destroy the planet though.
>>79159361
Isn't globalism the goal of communism?
>>79158472
I have no problem with everyone working together, but Globalism makes the culture of indervidual nations ilelevent. If A contrey is going to the dogs let it, it'll either die or rise such is the way of the world. The strong nations should take what they pleace from where they please. Nations are just like animals, the strong crush the weak and that's right. Sure its not pleasant, sure millions could die but that is fine, its evolution of both man and culture.
Globalism is trying to subvert the system bringing the weak among the strong and as such pulling us all down with them as the old saying does "your only as strong as your weakest link" and today's Globalism is breeding weakness and division.
The only thing like Globalism I'd accept is a number of nations working for a common goal but no more. Globalism only benefits two groups the Bankers of the world and the ruling elite.
The question is how do we stop it and remove the weakness that has been bred?
>>79158472
Only death is inevitable.
There are literally no reasons for ethnic nation states anymore. It's based on prehistoric notions of blood ties and clans.
>muh kinfolk
>muh scary outsiders
You're proud to be from your France .Your children will be proud to be from your Europe. Your children's children will be proud to be individuals
>>79158472
No. Resist.
No, because it already happened. Like 50 years ago.
>>79158472
Nope it can never work, try as they might they cannot defeat nature.
>>79160211
That hilariously incorrect topography.
Yanks...
>>79158472
Only after the purge.
>>79159093
This. Globalization is not the same thing as globalism. The first concerns only the size of the market, the second is about stripping nation states from their powers.
>>79160211
>Your children's children will be proud to be individuals
While they're getting taxed for almost all their income, going to designated schools, designated colleges, and earning a designated income to pay for designated healthcare.
Socialism is the opposite of individualism
>>79158472
No we the people will rise and more people are staring to become politically aware than ever before , the elites are scared and they know we are coming. It might be an uphill battle but I think we'll win. After all It's better to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
>>79158472
Political globalism certainly isn't as there is no sound argument for it. People only tolerate it because they're living so comfortably. And as they start living less comfortably they'll start questioning it. Which is why Euroscepticism is steadily increasing as violent crime is going up and the economy is going to shit.
That's why they need to replace/mix the population with 3rd world niggers who've never known better. They consider a smelly studio apartment and extra 200e/month as living in luxury. So they'll never bite the hand that feeds them.
>>79161000
This guy gets it. When people are pushed far enough they will all stand up , I'm ready and wait for the day everyone stands up I'll be up front with a baseball bat in one hand and a flag in the other.
>>79158472
No.
We'll never ever have globalism as long as Africa and the middle east are backwards Islamic economically destitute shitholes.
This globalism meme is only pushed on white countries and is actually codeword for "import a tonne of cheap labour". There is no globalisation untill we see millions of Europeans migrating to Africa- so never.
>>79159116
Because the people supporting Globalism imagine themselves as the leaders.
>>79159093
>does that mean you can't use some protectionism so your country doesn't lose half of it's manufacturing?
More jobs have been created than lost because we, as a NATIONAL economy we have profited off cost-cutting through international means. That means more jobs in service, more jobs in development, more jobs that exist just to be jobs. If idiots would just move out of failing cities like Detroit they would realize why the vast majority of Americans say they are happy with their economic prospects and why a slightly smaller majority say they are increasingly better off.
The displaced refugee problem in Europe is a serious problem, the Mexican problem is a minor problem. The off-shoring problem is a non-problem. It's just hippie anti-corporate hand-wringing.
>>79160488
Is this real?
>>79161623
>letting china devalue their currency with no repercussions is hippie
>having more part time jobs is better than more full time jobs
even our founders talked about the importance of protectionism to keep a strong American middle class and workforce, do you consider them hippies? the mexican problem isn't a minor problem, if you're worried about anti-corporate hand-wringing then you should look at how they vote.
your free market principles aren't going to be upheld in a majority mexican nation, it's just delusional to think otherwise
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnAT7FZpmg0
>>79159116
Are you serious have you had a look at the effects of what globalism has done to the world. They try'd to usher globalism in under the guise of it being progress and telling everyone it's supposed to be a good thing but those were all lies look at whats happening to Europe it's absolute madness and all in the so called name of multiculturalism it's utter madness.
>>79161595
When are you Sweeds gonna return to those Viking roots and take back your country ?
>>79158472
Yes, it is inevitable, unless we find a way to stop problems from spreading on a global level so quickly, which would involve throwing us back into the dark ages technologically.
>>79161623
>>79162073
also tell me how massive migration from people with an average IQ in the 80s-low 90s max is going to be good for a service and development based economy?
you really don't see the left taking advantage of this? they even do it now, they're constantly reading off statistics about how much better white people are doing financially as if there's some racist conspiracy(cultural marxism). causing minorities to vote for welfare/socialist policies
if you want to import and live in a country with populations who differ in IQ drastically, the best thing you can have is a large manufacturing base or any kind of manual labor. this way there won't be an underclass who all happen to be minorities and are easily manipulated by lefty politicians
>>79158472
God, I hope so!
>>79162432
Sometimes although it may not be an easy thing and also very extreme sometimes the only way to do things is by force it's not nice but it might be the only way.
>>79162472
Thank you for making your second post so I can safely ignore your first post without actually reading it. Stay marginal, /pol/.
>>79158472
Yes
>>79159359
At its roots, war is usually about the control of land. Other resources are now a stand-in for land, but the =result is the same.
>>79159746
You think different things cannot have the same goal or end?
>>79159838
Globalism does not do that. Look at Oz - we have a very multi-cultural society in our large cities and neither the individual migrant cultures nor Aussie culture are made irrelevant.
"Strong crush weak"? You sound like a fascist. We have always done better through co-operation than the alternatives.
>>79162591
>cuckservative can't make an argument
yes you totally won this round. i'm now a #cruzmissle
>>79159632
>rebels get nukes
>not the end of the world
Nice try shitbia
>>79162877
>we have a very multi-cultural society in our large cities
Yeah it's real multicultural
>>79160488
I doubt the Yank selected the Euro-pic for "best topography", same as you didn't select your pic for "best resolution": you chose it for effect.
>>79158472
Yes but it must not be forced down people throats like some do now
>>79161258
Make sure you keep your mouth open for both feet, though.
It will never work because it's putting all your eggs in one basket, not diversifying your bonds nigga.
>>79163030
It's not? Where do you come from?
>>79163141
I think you should go take a trip to Afghanistan oops I ment Germany
>>79163222
All over the country are you blind go anywhere there's Indians , Africans , Afghanis everywhere it's not as bad as Europe but in 30 years it'l get bad.
In all the big cities it's like this.
>>79158472
It's already here. Past tense.
The only thing that will end globalism (at least, temporarily) is if we have massive die-off of humanity, like reduce the population to under 3 billion or so. Then areas of the world can be isolated enough to not be entirely connected to the rest of the world.
We probably need something like a once-in-500-years solar flare hitting the Earth directly to fry out 99.9% of our tech so we're reduced to using candles for a decade before we can start rebuilding ... hopefully slower and smarter. It would be a miracle second chance if we were so lucky.
>>79159116
Humanity's economic progress has outpaced its cultural progress. Mixing 7th century Muslims with 21st century secular westerners is going to (and has) resulted in disaster. We're not ready for it.
>>79159116
(you)
>>79159093
Good post burger bro
>>79162591
>I literally don't have any arguments
>therefore I've won
pick one, mad cuck
>>79158472
First of all, most of you don't even know that theres actually three different globalisms movements on the rise.
The establishment, controlled by the likes of George Soros, Bilderbeg and Rothschild bank. Who control the western economy and its pushing the leftist agenda in almost every American and European country.
The Nomenklatura, controlled by the Russian and Chinese government, plus their secret services. Who are trying to push the communism/soviet government using their military power.
The Umma, controlled by the islamic leaders, who are trying to spread their religion beliefs through the entire world by simple invading the western countries and multiplying themselves until they can take control.
Each of these groups control one of the basic requirements for a functional society: economy, politic-military and religion. Each have their own story, strategies and have even cooperated with each other during some time in story. If you don't know about any of this stuff, then you can't even begin to talk about globalism.
>>79158472
As long as people will buy the cheapest goods no matter what, then yes. If people were willing to say things like, "yea, Walmart has the best deals in town, but I value my race and culture more than the money I would save there..." then perhaps not.
>>79159116
>Why? Why is it bad to come together as one?
Because shitskins and whites are different, shitskins have thirdworld countries and whites don't. White countries quickly become thirdworld shitskins ghettos when shitskins are allowed in.
>>79159502
Ok tell me how it litterally doesnt work? And how it will cause the end of the world, please tell me.
>>79158472
It should be opossed in any form.
>>79158472
It already happened. What do you think is going on now?
It will only get worse. The world has only gotten smaller since the civilisation began advancing.
