In my history class, the teacher really enjoyed to use Crash Course videos to learn us history. The guy speaks very fast and throws many facts out without sources, often interpreting things wrong. All of the class believe every word he says, and take him as a reliable source, his views are however very biased. My point is that the crashcourse videos are an increasingly trending source of information for bluepilled people. He have many million views on each of his videos.
What do you think of crashcourse and john green I think we should call him and his viewers out on where he is wrong in the comments.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pFCpKtwCkI
>>79149002
He doesn't even write it. It's all written by his Mexican high school teacher. Also pic related is his "wife" who he lusted after in high school, was rejected by, and then quickly snatched up again when she knew he had money.
He even boasts about this to his 'past self' or whatever he calls it in one of his cucked videos.
unfunny kike-puppet
>the idea that Germany was responsible for WW1 has been popular since the 1960s
Pretty certain that's been popular here since 1914 at least.
>>79149634
My point is that he oversimplifies complex historical issues, and transforms them into mere catchphrases of information. It can be wrongly interpreted and misunderstood, by the way he present his information.
>>79149634
You wot m8
It was Austria-Hungary and Russia who dragged everyone else into the mess. Germany, France and GB were just honouring their alliances
>>79149355
i.e. rode the cock carousel, then married the beta provider that still pined for her once she dried up
>>79149002
>to learn us history
>le everything is problematic and the patriarchy is oppressive to women except the mongols were based man
>>79149002
>mfw his books are complete fucking garbage
>mfw people eat them up like its nothing
>mfw he is rich thanks to that
>>79149796
Is there a specific example you can provide?
Also, trying to cover such subjects will inevitably lead to some kind of simplification.
>>79149002
The only CrashCourses worth watching are Chemistry, Physics, and Big History. Hank is a shillary supporter, but he's not as blatantly retarded as John. Also those videos have only unbiased fact(for the most part. I think they use Out of Africa when explaining human origins)
The history is all biased/revised and the economics started strong but is shading into shilling for socialism.
>>79149355
I wonder how many Cheetos she had in her
>>79149002
I don't really see how you can have issue with this episode. He spends half the video talking about historical narratives, how "blame" for something like WW1 can never be certain, the complexities of having multiple sources, and how discourse about history is a good thing.
>>79149002
As far as SJW blue pilled stuff goes, he's not THAT bad, tbqh.
Historian here
He presents good information that I would only recommend students to look at only after you learned a lesson. If you want to learn through it, good luck .
>>79149002
while i hate the format, his voice and his stupid fucking face most of the crash course on history videos are totally fine.
some of them, like the one about the crusades, are absolutely bonkers
>>79149002
He's a Muslim terrorist. Rumor is he blew up the Istanbul airport.
Most of them are okay, and act as good starting points for getting people interested or as good revision (That's why they're made).
He has a clear anti-Europe bias If he's talking about Europeans interacting with non-Europeans
As a stand alone they're not great, but that's not what they were intended for.
I watched some of the world history ones, they weren't too bad, you just have to filter out the autistic John Green stuff. I didn't feel that there was much "sjw cuck" stuff, but it is pretty cringy. They are the most accessible condensed history vids for somebody looking to casually learn those topics
>>79152522
>The only CrashCourses worth watching are none at all.
