>?We fight them over there, so we don't here to fight them here"
What did he mean by this?
The Muslims hated us. They were going to eventually unite on a common hatred for us. So we go there and destabilize the area and reignite tribal conflicts among themselves. Any time someone starts uniting like Libya or Syria we make sure they go back to infighting.
Why do you think we throw guns and money at one faction until they get too strong then do the same for the other one. Or when a strong leader our whole country starts uniting we put a few troops or drone missiles into them right when the others are ready to swoop in and restart the tribal muzzy on muzzy violence.
It's an old tactic as old as the Romans.
For Israel anon.
>>79120629
fk him, he killed my people
>>79124022
Not enough of you Habeeb.
>>79120629
He meant that there were no more attacks after 9/11 when Bush was in charge but Obama has racked up like what... 4 so far? Pretty fucked up when you think about it, for as much shit as we gave Bush he was actually, in the end, keeping us safe.
>>79120629
Just an excuse to fight for kikes.
>>79121516
When you put it that way, I actually support all the war making if it's revealed it's just to keep the assholes from uniting into one faction. I've thought this since 9/11, if they all united into one faction or country they'd actually stand a good chance at getting things accomplished.
>>79124022
At least you got dubs.
>>79121516
This. Except it wasn't fear of them uniting against the USA, it's was to stop them uniting against your greatest ally.
A united middle east is still no match for America, Israel on the other hand.
>>79125475
>A united middle east
Have you ever opened a history book?