If the US were to ban guns, not only would violence slow to a trickle the US, it would decrease in Mexico as well.
http://www.insightcrime.org/news-analysis/2000-illegal-weapons-cross-us-mexico-border-every-day
Yes, it is absolutely clear that white nations are responsible for everything bad in the world. It has nothing to do with the fact that mexico is populated by illiterate shitskins. Nope, America is the problem.
hmm this really makes me sage
>>79079640
The problems is brown people
>>79079640
Our firearm rights aren't subject to other people violating those firearm rights.
That is, disarming law abiding people will not stop criminals from breaking the law.
>>79080315
>The problems is brown people
>>79079640
((((Bloomberg))))
>>79080353
LOL. The gun flow is from the US to Mexico, not the other way around, Einstein.
No guns = very low gun crime.
Armed citizens prevent virtually no crimes, so tha whole "gun free zone" argument is completely irrelevant. Virtually all large public spaces where people work, travel or consume alcohol are gun free zones. If they weren't, there would be gun violence on a regular basis.
>>79080990
>LOL. The gun flow is from the US to Mexico, not the other way around, Einstein.
Thanks to the US government selling firearms and criminals buying and transferring firearms.
Regardless, my rights aren't subject to what people do in violating those rights.
>No guns = very low gun crime.
It wouldn't matter if a million people were killed every year with firearms. My rights are not subject to crime statistics.
>>79079640
>Bloomberg
hmm really makes think.
>>79081578
It's been proven time and time again that banning firearms greatly reduces violent crime. It's happened in every other western nation that banned them.
There is no reason for anybody to own a firearm. They don't serve any useful purpose other than to kill or maim. Therefore, they should be eliminated, especially since their elimination will definitely, 100%, greatly reduce violence and violent accidents.
>>79081735
>What is Switzerland
>>79081735
>It's been proven time and time again that banning firearms greatly reduces violent crime. It's happened in every other western nation that banned them.
I don't care. My rights are not subject to crime statistics.
It would be like banning cars for everyone because a small percentage of car owners break the speed limit.
>There is no reason for anybody to own a firearm.
It's my right. That's reason enough.
> They don't serve any useful purpose other than to kill or maim.
So what?
>Therefore, they should be eliminated, especially since their elimination will definitely, 100%, greatly reduce violence and violent accidents.
Again, my rights are not subject to what someone else illegally does.
>>79081735
You're not getting his point.
>>79082084
>>79082316
>>79082002
>>79080582
>>79080315
It is impossible to make the statement that banning guns won't lower violent crime.
All we have to do is look at the violent crime rates of other western nations to know this.
Merely banning handguns would dramatically lower gun deaths and injuries.
Once the criminal-on-criminal and family-on-family and friend-on-friend and accidental gunshots at home are factored out, only a tiny, miniscule fraction of handgun discharges are a law abiding citizen defending himself or his home.
>>79082776
>It is impossible to make the statement that banning guns won't lower violent crime.
>>79082776
>It is impossible to make the statement that banning guns won't lower violent crime.
I don't care.
My rights are not subject to violent crime statistics.
>Merely banning handguns would dramatically lower gun deaths and injuries.
But then you'd be in violation of the second amendment to the constitution.
On top of which, disarming law abiding people for what criminals do is wrong. It solves nothing.
For example: How would you feel if the government banned your computer because someone else posted CP on /pol/?
>Once the criminal-on-criminal and family-on-family and friend-on-friend and accidental gunshots at home are factored out, only a tiny, miniscule fraction of handgun discharges are a law abiding citizen defending himself or his home.
My firearm rights aren't subject to firearm accidents.
>>79083233
>My firearm rights aren't subject to firearm accidents.
>muh rights
Sorry but you have no rights. Your rights are all a mirage. You can only do what you're told
>>79082776
By your argument then ban anything that can be dangerous.
>>79082776
Odd. In the last twenty years we've doubled the number of guns in the US, while loosening gun laws, and watched as the murder rate was cut in half and violent crime fell to record lows.
It's almost like you have no idea what you're talking about.
>>79082776
>>79083040
This- supporting gun control is pro-rape
>>79081735
>It's been proven time and time again that banning firearms greatly reduces violent crime.
... except that's a fucking lie, proven by the actual crime statistics in every single country that has banned guns.
Why do liberals care nothing about the victims, but instead only the weapon used? Knife killings mean nothing to a liberal. Nothing at all. All you care about is firearm deaths, while those raped and beaten to death with bare hands don't get a mention. In fact, liberals actively ignore those deaths.
Are they simply not politically valuable to your agenda? Kind of like why liberals never talk gun control until white people die, while ignoring thousands of dead black kids murdered each year? Libs are silent then... no mention of getting handguns out of their hands. Only when there are some white victims does it become a problem for liberals.
Libs are just terrible people. You care nothing about who lives or dies... just about advancing your own political agendas.
>>79079640
Let's ban niggers instead
>>79083399
>Sorry but you have no rights
Yes I do. Only freedom hating gungrabbing faggots like you think otherwise.
That's why having firearms is so important. Because if you say "you have no rights" and try to take my rights from me, I can shoot you dead.
If I don't have a firearm and you say "you have no rights" then there is little I can do to stop you from taking all of my rights from me.
>You can only do what you're told
Then tell me to my face to give up my firearms, you gungrabbing faggot. Watch what happens.
But hey, if no one has any rights then you must literally believe there was nothing wrong with the holocaust. Right?
Since those Jews didn't have a right to life, killing six million of them in gas chambers was perfectly acceptable. Correct?
>>79079640
>the NRA is some big ebil controlling group
>paid for by the citizens they represent, to represent them
>the literally hundreds of liberal groups aren't bad
>>79083801
Whatever you say inbred redneck
>>79083782
>White (Hispanic)
>White (Black)
>>79083932
>Whatever you say inbred redneck
Still doesn't justify disarming me.
My rights trump your feelings (and your pathetic insults)
But you know what? I'd have the right to keep and bear firearms even if you managed to revoke the second amendment.
You know why?
Because they're called constitutionally protected rights and not constitutionally granted rights.
>>79079640
>If the US were to ban guns, not only would violence slow to a trickle the US, it would decrease in Mexico as well.
banning Obama would have had the same effect
>>79079640
Kinda off topic, but last night I was watching at the Simpsons episode where Homer bought a gun and was irresponsible with it, leading his family to leave him and his horrified NRA friends (whom Marge called gun nuts) to kick him out
>>79084187
Getting rid of firearms will have a huge effect on criminals using guns, because they would no longer have as many of them to use.
But, again, criminals with guns attacking law-abiding citizens constitutes only a small fraction of non-hunting, non-target practice gun discharges in the US.
The idea that there are these hordes of armed criminals attacking law abiding citizens with them is a total myth.
There is no legitimate need for anybody other than law enforcement to own a gun.
>>79081735
>be Vermont
>only state in the union with constitutional carry - you can own and carry a firearm without any permit to do so because your right to own and carry is in the constitution
>also be 98% white people
>have one of the lowest rates of violent crime in the entire country
Your response?
>>79084652
>legitimate need
Who gives a shit about legitimate needs? It's my right to own a gun, not my need.
>>79080097
Wait, is it really that low for us?
>>79084652
The 2013 CDC study on gun violence disagrees with your post.
They found that people defend themselves using guns at several orders of magnitude higher than the number of murders in the country.
>>79084652
What about armed occupation by a foreign country?
>>79082776
Sorry for the time between posts. I was busy fapping. I literally had something better to do.
>>79079640
>The autist who posts those shitty Horsey cartoons got loose from the tard wranglers again
>Flat the thread
>>79083040
>2001
>1979
>2001
You should get updated sources, those are kinda old
>>79079640
>If the US were to ban guns, not only would violence slow to a trickle the US
Because criminals will just turn in their firearms right?
>>79084717
>be Chicago
>one of the strictest on gun control
>the population is 32% black
>most gun violence is black related
I too want a response
>>79084652
>Getting rid of firearms will have a huge effect on criminals using guns, because they would no longer have as many of them to use.
Then why are you trying to disarm those who aren't criminals as well as the criminals?
>But, again, criminals with guns attacking law-abiding citizens constitutes only a small fraction of non-hunting, non-target practice gun discharges in the US.
Then why are you so worried about it if it's such a small fraction?
>The idea that there are these hordes of armed criminals attacking law abiding citizens with them is a total myth.
Then why are you trying to disarm every single firearm owner in the country?
>There is no legitimate need for anybody other than law enforcement to own a gun.
The document is called the bill of rights. The document is not called the bill of needs.
It's my right to buy, own and carry firearms.
I don't have to justify my need to you, the government or anyone.
>>79081735
Chicago wants a word with you.
Heyjackass.com
>>79079640
You do realize we can buy tanks, right? Aren't tanks more dangerous than guns?
http://m.exarmyvehicles.com/offer/tracked-vehicles/tanks
Sage
Most politicians wanting to ban fire-arms or restrict sales do so because it allows them to re-direct the money into thier own coffers rather then for better background checks or helping agencies who job already is to make sure fire-arms don't go into the wrong hands.
>>79084717
>>79085108
Chicago is far more populated than Vermont. Are you this dumb? Chicago is the 3rd most populous city in the country.. No comparison
>It's another "Banning guns will magically make all 300+ million of them in the US disappear" episode
OP is a faggot.
GUN CONTROL WORKS
see brazil: safest country on earth
>>79084652
>He's still trying to make a valid point, but still havent grasped the concept of shall not be infringed
>>79084652
>There is no legitimate need for anybody other than law enforcement to own a gun.
>>79080097
I like what this image is trying to say, but I find it really unlikely that the Middle East and northern Africa have similar homicide rates to Europe, Canada, and the US. I guess if nobody keeps track of it, it doesn't exist.
>>79085615
Populated by who? Chicago has a huge ______ population? Fill in the blanks.
>>79085615
>t-thats not the obscure specific form of gun control i was talking a-about. Y-youre wrong!
>>79086087
He wont say it
Stop pushing your agenda soros and kill yourself.
>>79084717
Actually more states have Constitutional Carry now. I think like 5-7 total. Off the top of my head, Alaska and Idaho also have it.
>>79079640
liberal cuck
>>79086372
>>79079640
These dead Mexicans disagree with you OP.
>>79085976
That's because the Middle East's crime-related punishments are worse than the West's.
>>79086508
Those people in the image are actually related to cartels and not normal citizens, even some of the messages in the images say that they were working for a rival cartel.
>>79085615
>Chicago is far more populated than Vermont. Are you this dumb? Chicago is the 3rd most populous city in the country.. No comparison
If gun control works then how come Chicago with all its gun control is one of the most violent places in America?
>>79085976
I can believe it. You get executed for that shit in the middle east; they don't play around.
>>79085615
Here OP. It's right there. You just gotta acknowledge the problem.
>>79086087
populated by corrupt and racist police? Yes
>>79086710
Thanks for clearing that up. I honestly didn't have a clue what those posters said.
>>79079640
>It's fairliy clear that the US is the problem, not Mexico when it comes to guns
The gun crime is way higher in Mexico, they have strict gun control and yet criminals still obtain guns, but no lets just ignore all this and blame those evil white people. Fuck you, move to Mexico since it's so much better you piece of shit.
>>79086846
>populated by corrupt and racist police? Yes
There's more niggers than police officers and the niggers are the ones doing all the crimes.
Oh and there's monumental levels of gun control there yet it's still one of the most criminal cities in the country.
So prove with facts logic and statistics that the problems of Chicago are not due to niggers and gun control.
>>79086846
Nooooo....come on, it's right above your post. You can do it. You just gotta say it. Facts aren't racist and no one will think differently of you.
>>79086846
Kek fucking weak. I bet you called the orlando attack a hate crime
>illegal
Gunshow sales are illegal now?
>>79084912
The CDC study is wrong. As usual, you've got nothing to base your lies on.
And just again today, yet another tragedy that could have been prevented by gun restrictions.
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/news/ex-colts-rb-zurlon-tipton-dead-from-own-accidental-gun-shot-201836763.html
>>79084088
Most people who choose to own guns are bad people.
When they are all made illegal and the are forced to turn them over, the subsequent cleansing will be a great thing for America. If all members of the NRA wire lined up and executed tomorrow (crossing my fingers) our country would be a much better, much more intelligent and much safer place.
>>79087187
I think that towns and municipalities and states should be able to enact whatever gun control legislation that they want. The 2nd Amendment is not an individual right, but was only meant to allow for a militia to exist in lieu of a standing army.
Personally, I support a federal law that would completely ban the ownership and manufacture of any firearms and ammunition except for bolt-action rifles.
>>79086846
why are any of you even still posting in this bait thread
>>79087333
wew lad
>>79087249
>The CDC study is wrong.
Prove it.
>As usual, you've got nothing to base your lies on.
Prove it.
>And just again today, yet another tragedy that could have been prevented by gun restrictions.
So how will disarming me have stopped that one accident? (Which my rights are not subject to)
>>79087104
The Klan is a Christian religious organization.
Most muslims don't believe the literal interpretation of the Koran. Those who choose to come to America certainly don't.
The foreign born muslims who hate America already don't live in America - it's that simple.
As far as people who conspire to commit crimes - we have law enforcement in place to root them out, whether they be mafia, mexican drug lords, or people of middle-eastern extraction. Law enforcement generally does an excellent job at this.
Random acts of violence that are not coordinated and have nothing to do with larger cells of organized crime will always be incredibly difficult to stop, whether they be supermarket shooters, or people like Omar Mateen, who are mentally unstable and self-loathing homosexuals.
>>79084182
based shirt
>>79087333
>Most people who choose to own guns are bad people.
Prove it.
Oh and define what a "bad person" is.
>When they are all made illegal
How are you going to make them illegal?
>and the are forced to turn them over,
How are you going to force us to turn them over?
>the subsequent cleansing will be a great thing for America.
Says who?
> If all members of the NRA wire lined up and executed tomorrow (crossing my fingers) our country would be a much better, much more intelligent and much safer place.
So how would all the NRA members be executed?
>>79080097
what about double green countries though?
>>79087436
>I think that towns and municipalities and states should be able to enact whatever gun control legislation that they want.
Even if they violate the constitution?
>The 2nd Amendment is not an individual right,
Prove it.
>but was only meant to allow for a militia to exist in lieu of a standing army.
Prove it.
>Personally, I support a federal law that would completely ban the ownership and manufacture of any firearms and ammunition except for bolt-action rifles.
Justify your restriction of our rights.
>an actual leftist retard sperging out about guns
jesus, I didn't think you fucks actually existed.
The hallmark of a civilized society is one where everyone has access to weapons of mass destruction, yet no one uses them, out of respect.
>but but muh violence
Declare a war of extermination against the cartels. Kill every last one.
Also applies to gang members.
>but but muh mass shootings
Symtom of a much greater psychological problem caused by the cultural and social values associated with a pseudo-Keynesian economy.
Banning guns would solve nothing whatsover, people would still go on mass murderous rampages. And kill themselves.
>but but some other problem related to mental illness
Mental illness with always be a thing, and it is retardedly easy to kill a bunch of people if you want to.
Best solution to mental illness related problems is mandatory eugenics.
>>79087436
>>I think that towns and municipalities and states should be able to enact whatever gun control legislation that they want
But not none?
>>79087569
>The Klan is a Christian religious organization.
Prove it. Also, cite passages in the bible that justify the klan's actions.
>Most muslims don't believe the literal interpretation of the Koran.
Prove it.
>Those who choose to come to America certainly don't.
Prove it.
>The foreign born muslims who hate America already don't live in America - it's that simple.
Prove it.
>As far as people who conspire to commit crimes - we have law enforcement in place to root them out, whether they be mafia, mexican drug lords, or people of middle-eastern extraction. Law enforcement generally does an excellent job at this.
Then why are there still crimes?
>Random acts of violence that are not coordinated and have nothing to do with larger cells of organized crime will always be incredibly difficult to stop, whether they be supermarket shooters, or people like Omar Mateen, who are mentally unstable
Even though he was radicalized by ISIS?
>and self-loathing homosexuals.
You're not up-to-date on the news. The FBI confirmed that he wasn't a sodomite.
>>79087929
He has to be trolling. The answer to gun violence is right in front of his face but refuses to acknowledge it.
>>79087799
Asians aren't violent. The Middle East is ruled with several iron fists that will execute you if you step out of line.
>>79088129
What about where I live? Guns are banned and nearly unobtainable, 5x lower homicide rate.
>>79088638
Because you are mostly white obviously.
>>79087569
Was already proven that had zero gay lovers .
Also
>what is infiltration
>what is lone wolf tactics
>those that hate america dont live there
Wew lad fucking jesus
>uncoodinated attacks are difficult to stop, thats why terror cells wont do it.
Fucking b8 all around
>>79079640
>If the US were to ban guns, not only would violence slow to a trickle the US
Why do retards believe this bullshit?
>>79088638
A solution that doesn't work 100% or allows for situations to arise that invalidate the entire purpose of that solution is not a solution.
>>79088638
Weed and majority white.
>>79088638
Your country isn't 40% non-whites.
>>79079640
>why can't we just let this lone billionaire dictate bullshit tyrannical policy to millions of americans?
>>79082776
http://crimeresearch.org/2013/12/murder-and-homicide-rates-before-and-after-gun-bans/
read pls
>>79079640
Horsey is so fucking dumb.
>>79087333
KEK what if some nigger breaks into your house and is beating your family to death and raping your wife wouldn't you wish you had some means to defend yourself
>>79085615
>rates aren't normalized for population size.
>>79086623
>>79086773
I guess terrorism or Islam related slaughters don't count as homicide? If that's the case, then gang and inner city-black murders shouldn't count toward our statistics.
>>79082776
Works here in Australia :^)
>>79090752
It depends on the country. Dictators like Hussein kept terrorists in line and they didn't blow up people. There's no doubt it's a fucking mess in Syria though.
>>79080315
Based Ben
>>79090752
Furthermore, just because something is not illegal nor unconstitutional, does not mean that it's a good idea. A national policy of discriminating against muslims for entry to the US would be an enormous affront to the muslim nations of the world, and would damage US relations for many years to come. Such a strategy would need to have a very compelling reason to be enacted. Trump, however, has provided no such compelling reason. In fact, the *only* reason he has provided is the ambiguous "until we can figure out what is going on." In other words, he has no reason to ban muslims from entering the US except to provide his xenophobic supporters fuel for their ignorant hatred.
And, furthermore, waiting until Trump figures out what most learned people already know would take several lifetimes.
>>79091584
>US would be an enormous affront to the muslim nations
Who, incidentally, have nothing of value to offer the united states.
On the other hand, Islam in general provides a constant threat to the safety of the citizens of it's nations, as well as those who interact with it.
Interestingly enough though, Persian muslims do not have nearly as many problems with violence as Arabic muslims do.
I wouldn't be surprised if there were some genetic component to their rate of radicalization.
>>79079640
Do you think that if the US made a law making it illegal for Mexicans to shoot each other the Mexicans would obey it? Is the US now responsible for policing Mexico?
>>79079640
>Ban assault pharmaceutical companies
>Ban assault banks
>Ban assault agriculture companies
>Ban assault bigbox retail
>>79091584
Do you think the Muslim countries like us NOW? And why should we care? You would not be able to figure out what educated people know in a thousand lifetimes, because you do not have the intellectual ability to ever do so. Enjoy your extra chromosome, fag.
>He thinks the cartels would be in any way affected by US law
You know they're CARTELS right? Insanely rich organized syndicates that assert dominance in their territories through jihadist-level brutality?
>>79079640
Pretty sure the cartel gets shipment crates full of weapons from some slavshit countries.
>>79079640
>implying based 'Davidolf' Horsey doesn't ardently support the 2nd Amendment
>how else would he murder niggers?
this thread again
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
>>79087333
>most of the people who choose to own guns are bad people
>I can't wait to line them up and execute them with my gun
Looks like OP is #MentallyHill
>>79092392
The more he spews out the uglier it gets fucking kek
>>79080990
>Armed citizens prevent virtually no crimes
>>79092765
I would say that if David Horsey depicted blacks and Jews the same way he depicts Southerners, he would be elbow deep in Shit Creek.
But, in actual fact, he DOES make virulent depictions of niggers and kikes. He is a truly brave muckraker, who never goes for easy targets.
>>79079640
>If the US were to ban guns, not only would violence slow to a trickle
The lie detector has determined that was a lie.
>>79091584
>A national policy of discriminating against muslims for entry to the US would be an enormous affront to the muslim nations of the world, and would damage US relations for many years to come
source?
>>79093600
He just need a gentle guidance from the board of peace
>>79087333
>I want to slaughter five million people
>gee how come they won't give up their guns?
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
>>79079640
I love the message of that cartoon. "The representatives elected by me and my supporters through the free elections of our nation, in order that they might represent my views in congress, are in my pocket!" Yeah, no shit Sherlock. Congress people are largely beholden to represent the views of their constituents. Their constituents want gun rights, therefore they vote for gun rights. How do you make that controversial?
>>79080097
It's nice to see Somalia is a beacon of peace and a gun free zone of Africa.
>>79091584
So, bombing and shooting them for the past 15 years straight is cool but denying their entry to our country crosses the line?
>>79087799
That graph might as well be titled, "If the United States was your home instead of the Netherlands, and you were black, you would..."
>>79079640
people with gun knowledge would just make their own guns. How wold the average citizen protect themselves?
>>79080315
ISIS must feel legitimately ignored because of all the crazy White people committing hate crimes dwarfs their efforts at being terrorists.
>>79079640
Sad that I as a German have to explatin to you how it works, so listen boy:
You send people to get the guns.
Those people die.
You are chased down.
You are hanged in public.
Everybody will go back to their shooting ranges and have lots of fun while being safe.
>>79079640
Not really, no.
Gang membership and poverty are better indicators of gun crime than (legally) owning a gun. .004%- roughly- of all firearms are used annually to commit homicide.
>>79082776
Nigger, look at Honduras! Banned guns, murder capital of the world!
Pull your head out of your ass, Che.
>>79083399
The Bill of Rights says otherwise, faggot.
>>79091936
Our muslim allies like us very much.
White male Trump supporters are a far greater threat to the preservation of our nation and our values than any muslims.
I can't wait until the president gives the orders and you and your family are slaughtered in the street or brought to internment camps.
>>79083932
Not an argument
>>79097825
>>Our muslim allies like us very much.
And they have nothing to offer us, so there would literally be nothing wrong with just straight up nuking them.
>White male Trump supporters are a far greater threat to the preservation of our nation and our values than any muslims.
>I can't wait until the president gives the orders and you and your family are slaughtered in the street or brought to internment camps.
You are very very stupid if you think this could ever practically work.
Not to mention all the other reasons why this is a really retarded idea.
>>79079640
Remeber fast and furious?
Yeah me too.
>>79087436
>The 2nd Amendment is not an individual right
The Supreme Court would like to disagree.
>>79092392
Why is Henry Kissinger selling Horsey guns?
We should jus ban niggers, gun crime would drop by most of what it is now, but I doubt you'd support that, the whole point of the 2nd amendment is to protect against tyranny, you wouldn't mug someone who you knew was packing, that's the concept
You're a fucking whit male!
>>79087436
You are wrong.
"The great object is that every man be armed [...] Every one who is able may have a gun. But have we not learned by experience that, necessary as it is to have arms; [...] it is still far from being the case?"
- Patrick Henry
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined."
- Patrick Henry
You see? The founding fathers want you to buy more guns and to never give them up. You are disrespecting them.
I am nearly twice as likely to be a victim of a stabbing than an American is to be a shooting victim.
This is despite the fact having a blade in public is an offence that lands you prison time.
Banning things clearly works and makes everybody safer.
>>79100211
Are swiss knives okay ?
>>79084183
>White (Fucking Leaf)
>>79079640
Why does Horsey hate white people so much?
>>79100865
So niggers will vote Dem.
>>79082776
Performing total genocide of the human race would reduce the crime rate to 0, so let's do that.
>>79097825
>We're peaceful, loving and tolerant
>I can't wait until the president gives the orders and you and your family are slaughtered in the street or brought to internment camps
Liberalism at its finest
>>79088638
You guys don't have a nigger and spic problem.
>>79079640
Another burger ban guns thread. Enjoy your butter knives hoplophobes.
Common Sense: These things usually follow through a more logical route. If the u.s citizens blame guns for deaths. And not the psychological...then they are technically telling the govts around the world that they will begin discarding their WMDs since they are the only sick nonsensical country that has used them on foreign civilians. Therefore Americans shouldnt be allowed to have them nor be protected by them because bombs kill people don't.
Just like the situation withcubans landing on offshore lighthouses because they us has treated chinese offshore light houses and manmade islands as part of the mainland.
>>79086829
I did those pie charts, but where's the source?
Also, captcha, what the fuck.
Taurus and Kalishnikov aren't American manufacturers
>>79081735
>It's been proven time and time again that banning firearms greatly reduces violent crime
LOL, lying faggot.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/116483/hosb0212.pdf
Get that shit bait out of here.
