Post your keks.
>>78862336
Ancaps are dumber than sjws
>>78862336
>>78862336
bix nood haha hoo wil maek te rodes, rigte dumm sheeple? haaa
>>78863223
LOL @ this non-sequitur excuse for a meme.
>>78862336
>>78863223
>>78863275
NOT AN ARGUMENT
>>78862336
Monopolies don't long exist
>>78863223
How are these two linked? Free trade and voluntarism is great, big government helping corporations is not
>>78863275
SJWs need to stick to whining online, their memes are cancer
>>78862336
I'm a Propertarian. I hate AnCaps. So many of them are multiculti cucks.
national socialism only acceptable ideology
>>78863533
>Monopolies don't long exist
I sentence structure also statist?
There's nothing wrong with it. It's just not possible. You can't engineer a society in a way that satisfies your autism.
>>78864456
>There's nothing wrong with it
>It's just not possible
How is there nothing wrong with it if it doesn't work.
>guys I can protect my property from an entire army
>>78864726
>>78864805
>>78864935
>>78863275
>/pol/ is a libertarian board
It was only a few years ago. Also, what exactly is wrong with nationalist (closed-borders) libertarianism?
>>78865175
It's dumb. You need strong authoritarian laws domestically as well as internationally.
>>78865091
>>78864935
>cooperation isn't in my self interest
Do you faggots even think?
>>78862336
Hoarding all the water is taking it from other people, thus a violation of the NAP
>>78865313
>You need strong authoritarian laws domestically as well as internationally.
Such as? The U.S. (and much of the West) didn't have "strong authoritarian laws" for most of its history.
>>78865344
Looking at the other posts in this thread, no
>>78865271
Isn't this true though?
>>78865493
that comic is criticizing crony capitalism anon
>>78865313
You need agreements that make sense, not authority. Do you drive on the right side of the road because of authority, or because it makes sense? Do you pay for your food because of authority, or because commerce makes sense? Do you think that your civilization was made because of authority, or because it makes sense?
People are actually pretty clever.
You see why people don't follow the rules sometimes is because for them, it doesn't make sense.
>>78865575
It is. I just like triggering people.
>>78865575
Not really. It is true in some sense, but people already pay for those things through taxes so she's not really making the deep and insightful point she thinks she's making.
>>78865344
Cooperation isn't always in my self interest.
If I can kill an old homeless man and take his stuff. That's in my interest.
>>78865547
>>78865344
>hurr everyone will choose non violence because it is "logical"
this is how you can tell libertarians are all autistic
>>78865313
>Strong authoritarian laws
Fuck off, cuck
>>78865381
Autiste detected.
How do you enforce the NAP.
>>78865918
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb8cErokGFs
>>78865474
They sort of did. What would you consider hanging, witch burning,duels, slavery, indentured servitude.
>>78865828
I would add to this that you need strong families to prevent the kind of degeneracy /pol/ is against, something the state has totally destroyed
>>78865918
Never said that, though the vast majority of people would naturally want to live in a nonviolent society.
>>78865271
fucking Pocahontas
>>78866061
>You need strong authoritarian laws domestically as well as internationally.
None of these are laws retard
>witch burning
puritans aren't all of America or Western history
>hanging
Punishment for a crime? Again, not a law
I was reminded of this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glzXtLvloVo
Sorry wrong one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37CEsB3NK5w
>>78866098
To bad they can't enforce that desire collectively then in some sort of organization called "the government" to ensure everyone abides by those desires.
>>78866216
Meant to quote
>duels, slavery, indentured servitude.
>>78866279
The fact that state societies destroyed non state societies millennia ago is proof that ancaps are retards.
>>78865828
>Do you pay for your food because of authority
Yeah. Me and others would probably steal and shoplift more if we know we aren't going to get arrested
>Do you drive on the right side of the road because of authority
I don't speed and follow most other traffic laws because of authority.
>Do you think that your civilization was made because of authority,
There's a reason most early civs had extremely draconian laws. You need them to keep people in check.
>People are actually pretty clever.
You see why people don't follow the rules sometimes is because for them, it doesn't make sense.
See posted pic
>>78866281
They could under Heathian anarchism, which is basically just private city states. Libertarians are against the monopoly aspect of the state, not its role. Also, what Stirnerite believes in government, th ultimate spook?
>>78866421
>Yeah. Me and others would probably steal and shoplift more if we know we aren't going to get arrested
You would get arrested though. All ancaps and libertarians believe in a police force, just perhaps not a state one
>>78866216
>Punishment for a crime? Again, not a law
This is some of the dumbest shit i've ever read.
>>78866279
Part 1: Introduction: [0-2:30]
Part 2: What is a Public and Private Good: [2:30-5:45]
Part 3: Free Rider Problem of National Defense: [5:45-11:40]
Part 4: Problems With the "Donations Argument": [11:40-18:10]
Part 5: Problems With the "Ostracism Argument": [18:10-29:20]
Part 6: Problems With the "War Insurance Argument": [29:20-34:10]
Part 7: Problems With the "War Bonds Argument": [34:10-37:00]
Part 8: Problems With the "Natural Rights Argument": [37:00-38:15]
Part 9: Problems With the "Wishful Market Thinking Argument": [38:15-40:50]
Part 10: Problems With the "Militia Argument": [40:50-50:45]
Part 11: Problems With the "PDA Argument": [50:45-52:15]
Part 12: Conclusion: [52:15-52:50]
Part 13: My Solution to the Free-Rider Problem in Brief: [52:50-55:57]
>>78866613
We have the death penalty today. That's a form of punishment, not a "law". You really struggle with reading comprehension, don't you?
>>78866430
>private city states
not really anarchy then is it?
More like Feudalism
>Stirnerite believes in government
You don't have to be a Stirnerite to understand that government force is the only thing that ensures law and stability in a geographic region.
The point is that there are people like Stirner who don't give a fuck about your dumb ideals and will just kill you if they felt it profited them.
>>78866098
>I would add to this that you need strong families to prevent the kind of degeneracy /pol/ is against, something the state has totally destroyed
I agree, but you also need a strong state to preserve the family.
>>78863399
was gonna post what this Anon with the dubbawubbadubs posted
have this instead
>>78866579
>All ancaps and libertarians believe in a police force, just perhaps not a state one
I think what you meant to say is roving militias/death squads. If you want to see what private police forces look like go to somalia.
>>78866806
>not really anarchy then is it?
Not in the conventional sense, but it is seen as a form of free-market anarchism as people would ideally have freedom of association.
>You don't have to be a Stirnerite to understand that government force is the only thing that ensures law and stability in a geographic region
Try actually reading Stirner, or try to comprehend what I said.
>>78866735
Do you not understand what a punishment is? Punishments are laws themselves. Punishments are codified, enforced, voted on, and repealed. They are exactly like laws.
>>78866951
England had private police for a very long time and more recently some cities have experimented with it. A private police force protecting a designated area =/= Somalia
>>78867094
Again, reading comprehension really isn't your strong suite. The law is"no raping", not "hanging". Hanging is the punishment for raping. Lots of libertarians are in favor of the death penalty for certain crimes. Amazing that these basic concepts are totally over your head
>>78867020
>Not in the conventional sense
not in any snese
>Try actually reading Stirner,
already did
>>78867284
>being this needlessly pedantic
what a surprise
>>78867284
>Again, reading comprehension really isn't your strong suite. The law is"no raping", not "hanging". Hanging is the punishment for raping. Lots of libertarians are in favor of the death penalty for certain crimes. Amazing that these basic concepts are totally over your head
So why is it that during sentencing a judge doesn't just choose any punishment. I'm pretty sure in every U.S. there is no judge that could sentence someone to hang. You know why? Because hanging is an illegal form of punishment.
