In all seriousness, will she actually get indicted?
bamp for justice
>>78808877
keep hoping for that, trumpfags, its your only hope
No. She didn't do anything different than other Secretaries of State, the Bush admin literally had entire servers wiped clean before the handover to Obama's administration, and you have people like Patraeus literally divulging top secret info on purpose to his mistress for her book and he got a slap on the wrist.
Nothing will happen.
>>78808877
not under the corrupt obama/lynch justice department
no matter though - just don't vote for this criminal and she'll eventually go away
If not, many many people will see the USA as nothing more then a banana republic.
>>78809326
>>78809426
i would agree with you if it wasnt for Comey leading this, and the 150 FBI staff that have been working on this for so long. I just cant see the FBI letting her off the hook for this one, especially if they found anything remotely close to the rumors of whats on her emails.
Ofc Not Usa people dont have the balls to question there own government
>>78809447
>If not, many many people will see the USA as nothing more then a banana republic.
that's ridiculous. what she did had no impact on anything ever. also, once you reach that level, you simply are not pursued for minor infractions. Imagine if every new administration turned the fbi and justice department loose on the prior administration. it just isn't done, unless you are Richard Nixon, who tried to use the IRS and FBI to silence his opponents.
President Clinton will continue the progressive policies of President Obama, and the world will be grateful.
>>78809823
> what she did had no impact on anything ever
> once you reach that level, you simply are not pursued for minor infractions
> progressive policies of President Obama
can't tell if shill or real
>>78809823
(((Thank you for correcting the record, 50 dollars were deposited in your account)))
No, she's too powerful. She has too many friends in extremely high places. She is above the law.
>>78808877
No, you fucking dolt. The FBI already reported to the Wahington Post that she broke no law. (FBI only investigates, they dont indict.)
Issa remains a lying sack of shit, which of course is not news
>>78809326
This.
Thank you, sir
She will get elected no matter who actually votes for her, the same way she got nominated.
get used to be screwed.
>>78808877
No, the government is too corrupt to touch her.
Especially with Obama to protect her
>>78809262
It's actually bad for trump supporters, because Bernie would be on the ballet.
The FBI works for me now.
>>78809823
>>78809447
Plus, Colin Powell did exactly the same thing as SOS.
You trumpettes are still really grasping at straws with this shit.
>Sad!
>>78810403
This, Bernie might have a good chance of winning.
Anyone with a brain (and not paid off) hates (((Hillary)))
>>78810403
Not if it happens in the weeks leading up to the election. Once all the chips are down and people have picked their candidate, her being indicted would mean a guaranteed Trump landslide.
>>78808877
Is it weird that I want her to sit on my face while she has that expression. She's pretty hot, idk what Bill was doing with Monica.
So what's to stop Russia or WikiLeaks from leaking every single email, including the ones that complete state secrets, to the entire world?
Which would be incredibly damaging to the US's reputation and to the Hillary scandal.
Oh yes, liberals memes of "she's above the law" means this won't happen. Got it.
>>78810651
>>78810742
Same thing that stopped Russia from leaking the truth about the moon landing:
Money.
>>78810758
T H I C C
H
I
C
C
>>78810651
>>78808877
No. The only reason for Obama to allow the Justice Department to indict her would be if the Democrats needed to overturn the primary election results and have someone else as the candidate.
She was in some danger of indictment when she was briefly losing against Trump in the polls while Bernie was winning, but as long as she's in the lead, she is safe.
Let's see what Wikileaks publish next
>>78810742
>from leaking every single email, i
because there is nothing there. she was the secretary of state, not the director of a bunch of spies or hitmen.
remember two weeks ago when Assange was going to destroy her "real soon now". what ever became of that?
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jun/12/wikileaks-to-publish-more-hillary-clinton-emails-julian-assange
>>78808877
If she isn't I'll stop paying taxes, start cooking meth and giving it to elementary kids.
When I'm caught I'll say "what difference does it make?". No one else is held to the letter of the law, why even have laws if people can shit all over them with no consequences?
i dont believe in Wikileaks guy whats he waiting on to publish the email..just do it already
>>78808877
When trump gets elected.
>>78811032
>>78811283
assange forgot how to click the "send" key. be patient. He wouldn't exaggerate or anything.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/jun/12/wikileaks-to-publish-more-hillary-clinton-emails-julian-assange
>>78811283
He claims to be waiting until closer to the election so that it won't just be swept under the rug. But who knows..
>>78808877
No. Even if she went to jail, the cuck President Obongo would pardon her.
>>78811224
This kind of thing is why the FBI is caught in a tough spot.
If they dont recommend indictment, they lose respect.
If they do recommend, they lose influence with government.
>>78810490
Smarter people than you have already weighed in on that bit
>Colin Powell was one of the first SoS to use email
>Hillary violated rules that went into effect during her term as SOS
>HILLARY VIOLATED RULES THAT WENT INTO EFFECT DURING HER TERM AS SECRETARY OF STATE
Typing that out twice so you might actually read it
>>78808877
I think it unlikely.
First, she may have been sufficiently careful to be sleazy as fuck without ding anything for which she could be indicted. Seems unlikely, but possible.
Or, she may have been sufficiently careful in hiding/destroying evidence that an indictment cannot be supported. Also seems unlikely, but more likely than the first.
Third, the fix may be in. This seems reasonably likely.
What becomes interesting is, if she gets indicted, when?
If she is indicted before the convention, Bernster is the nominee. This is not what the elite Dems want, so IF the administration is unable to block the indictment, or is just unwilling to block it, they may at least try to stall past the convention --once delegates go home, the likely reaction to an indictment would be for DNC to meet and decide what to do, in which case look for Biden to get immaculately conceived.
An alternative would be for Obama to pardon her, but this would be as bad as an indictment, politically. Still, there is one scenario where it might happen -- if Obama wants to knock her aside for Biden or somebody, but there is insufficient evidence to indict, he MIGHT be tempted to smash her with an un-needed blanket pardon as "the decent thing to do, to protect an old friend."
There is no love lost between Clinton and Obama that last scenario grows from that and would be the most entertaining.
But given that the political operatives and the administration absolutely do not want Sanders, none of this can happen until after the convention, when he will have gone to the retirement community.
>>78809326
Hiding basically everything from FOIA,
Keeping an easily hackable device outside of Governmental control that you've used to make drone strikes, lying about it, extorting foreign countries for donations to your 'charity' while lying about it, intentionally obstructing justice by deleting everything, $250,000 speeches that last 10 minutes to banking institutions while publically chastising those institutions, possessing the audacity to question others character while lying about basically everything.
Ladies and gentleman, this is the reason why civil war is inevitable. This person is the embodiment of evil, hippocritical, government and my neighbor has a sign in her front yard supporting her.
We are all truly doomdd.
She should be lined up against a wall and executed for treason and sedition
>>78810403
>>78810522
Bernie wouldn't have a chance you absolute faggots. Nobody in America is going to vote for someone who unironically calls themselves a socialist. Hillary, on the other hand, has spent decades building up relations with blacks, hispanics and special interests. She will be very difficult to beat
>>78812034
>If they dont recommend indictment, they lose respect.
>If they do recommend, they lose influence with government.
what's to stop them from doing what they did to Nixon? leak the info to the press. once the proof is public, she is a gonner, just like Nixon.
the problem is that she has already said it was a mistake, and it appears that nothing terrible was done. It's not like she emailed the names of our spies and they got murdered as a result.
it's all political at this point. if there were a smoking gun we would have heard about it by now. there's no reason for Assange to wait for the election if what he has is clear-cut, and if it isn't it will not change votes if he waits till the end of October.
>>78810758
So that's how she's been getting the black vote.
>>78812556
What about a plane Hillary gets on crashing with no survivors under mysterious circumstances?
>>78812946
One can only hope.
>>78808877
As much as I want to see it happen and despite your double dubs, Hillary will never be indicted.
>>78811462
Nixon got a pardon. It didn't make everybody start liking him again, and ruined Ford's reputation.
A pardon would be as bad for her as an indictment, politically.
>>78812621
Building relations with 13% of the population who chronically don't vote.
Also 'relations' in this instance is actually spelled: pandering
>>78808877
If she goes to prison I win $1,000
And have the FBI lose their leverage over her administration? I think not.
>>78809791
Dont you have an EU to beg to be let back into?
>>78810522
Bernie sanders has pretty much been laughed out of the race at this point. I haven't even heard of him from any serious news networks. He's faded into obscurity like Gary Johnson
>>78813222
It'd be worse. People hate OJ more that he got away with murder. It's one thing to go to jail, but to get off, is much worse.
After I saw FBI director Comey himself I decided it wasn't going to happen. Plus, Obama is probably implicated with her.
Maybe they'll cook-up a show trial about simple negligence.
Plus I now wonder if Assange will do it-- I suspect the Swedish delegation that went to him the other day may have been representatives of Washington offering him freedom if he agreed not to release what he has.
>>78810758
kek'd at bills face. You can tell he knows the camera is there and has to put on the happy marriage act again. His face says he is so tired of it and having to touch that bitch
>>78808877
If Trump gets elected and can appoint his own Secretary to the Department of Justice: yes.
If she gets elected and appoints her own Secretary: no.
>>78808877
No, and she shouldn't either.
If the country can't reject her voluntarily at the ballot box it deserves her forever.
>>78815514
>If Trump gets elected and can appoint his own Secretary to the Department of Justice: yes
But that never happens. No administration ever went after the predecessor because of the precedent it would set. Granted she's not in the administration now, but it just doesn't happen.
I could be wrong, though. any counter examples?
>>78816011
>any counter examples?
Yeah, the name "Department of Justice"
>Justice
I don't even know what you're saying. Predecessor to what? She was Secretary of the Department of State. If you can just commit a casual oh, few dozen counts of treason and get off with it because you were somebody who happened to be appointed by the President to be some Secretary to some Department because fuck it, where is the accountability?
>>78816755
>I don't even know what you're saying.
which part of NO ADMINISTRATION EVER WENT AFTER THE PREDECESSOR is hard for you to follow?
Obama did not dig up dirt on retardo bush.
retardo did not dig up dirt on clinton.
clinton did not dig up dirt on elder bush
reagan did not dig up dirt on carter
if you don't know what I said by now, I can't help you.
>>78808877
Hilly and Billy Clinton could decapitate a baby in the middle of Times Square and fuck the neck-hole and the public would excuse it.
>>78817364
>which part of NO ADMINISTRATION EVER WENT AFTER THE PREDECESSOR is hard for you to follow?
The part where you mistook the Executive of the Administration and a Secretary of a Department, Hillary.
>>78816755
You shoulda gone to civics class instead of sniffing your stepsisters undies, Jethro, or at least watch something other than fox news, because you are completely uninformed.
You have no idea what treason means, legally.
Youre an embarrassment and a fool.
Educate yourself
>>78818468
Define treason then.
Obama would never let her actually be indicted. However, the odds the FBI recommends it to create a media shitshow are decently high.
No chance. Obama is inept.
>>78818834
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381
It's pretty clear, she's a traitor.
>>78818468
>You have no idea what treason means, legally.
Aiding and abetting the enemies of the State.
As in, knowingly aiding the ability of enemies of the State to ascertain classified information.
You stupid faggot.
>>78818008
You're*
>>78819584
>>78819469
Treason requires mens rea.
Probably not. She has dirt on everyone.
>>78819469
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381
>If everyone reading this gave $25 right now, our fundraiser would be done in a matter of minutes
is this a wikipedia parody in disguise?
If Trump becomes president she will, the verdict is the kicker
That will show you how deep her roots grow
>>78820130
Aggregating all the laws in the united states isn't cheap.
>>78820367
I'm pretty sure your gov have all the laws aggregated and mexicans already payed for it
>>78809326
Once Russia releases her emails (you know damn well they have them) she'll go down like a lead balloon.
>>78819826
Hillary is mens rea given physical shape.
>>78819584
She signed an NDA
>>78809262
If anything she needs to be indicted to prove the justice system still applies.
>>78811040
>there was nothing there
You do realize that CIA agents are directly attached to embassies and SF operations report back to the embassy of countries they operate in right?
There is a bunch of dirty shit on that server, why do you think they are taking so long with the investigation, and that it is handed by FBI HQ and not some pencil pusher?
They are plugging every leak they can and are preparing mountains of evidence.
From what we know? No.
But if there's something the public doesn't know about what was IN the emails or how/when/why they were deleted then it's possible.
>>78808877
> he stille believes in the system
It's time to leave the denial stage.
>>78812893
The point is that if she broke the law then it doesn't matter if she didn't know it was illegal or not. All of us regular peons would be thrown in jail without hesitation but they have to discuss whether it's a valid option. It's ridiculous.
>>78808877
>>78809122
The numbers point to a yes... under a Trump administration.
Just seeing the shills do the biggest attempt at DAMAGE CONTROL ever seen would be worth it.
>>78821875
>But if there's something the public doesn't know about what was IN the emails
Did you not watch based Trey Gowdy tear this stupid bitch apart?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NaENYYQIAKE
I can't even give you a place to seek to for highlights; he tears her shit apart the entire time.
I fucking love that based mother fucker.
If Trump gets elected, yes.
If not, no.
Chances of Trump getting elected? Low.
Will the elites drag out the investigation and bog it down? Absolutely.
>>78809326
>No. She didn't do anything different than other Secretaries of State, the Bush admin literally had entire servers wiped clean before the handover to Obama's administration, and you have people like Patraeus literally divulging top secret info on purpose to his mistress for her book and he got a slap on the wrist.
You're delusional. Comparing Apples to Treason
>>78822420
I got a little freedom boner seeing Rowdy Gowdy dissecting that pro gun control shill.
>>78810490
>Plus, Colin Powell did exactly the same thing as SOS.
No. He didn't not even remotely did you do anything like Hillary did.
>>78808877
she's the American Putin
she is literally above the law, and flaunts it in our faces. her presidency would look identical to Putin's Russia (oligarchs gets richer, everyone else gets poorer). If she is elected whites in America will disappear, we'll have no fucking borders
>>78808877
I think she might be indicted but it isnt likely. I dont think she will be the dem nominee however.
>>78822765
Dude, my dick is fucking diamonds for that man. He's so God damned based.
N-no homo though, you fucking faggot. I'm not into that dick sucking shit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5m6c8B8DPgA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnMvKM1MSI4
>>78822876
Putin seems to have Russia's best interests in mind. For some reason this ticks off a lot of people in the EU/USA.
Do you think Hillary would do what's best for the USA, or what's best for Hillary?
>>78808877
man that picture of Clinton just makes me mad , really makes me want to punch a wall
Didn't they already state they won't indite her, instead they found many examples of wrongly using emails and therefore they're simply going to retrain their workers?
I thought this was over already.
>>78811040
>not the director of a bunch of spies or hitmen.
Oh, boy. Battle of wits with the unarmed right here.
State is the CIA's landlord, you poor oik. She was literally the director of nearly every spy in the US bull pen. She was required to know the identities of every Chief of Station, because they are always high-ranking embassy employees, diplomats, and often the Ambassador himself.
And she gave away at least 4 true identities and the emails were /marked/ compartmented, human intelligence most sensitive top secret.
Where do they find you people? Aren't you supposed to stick to script?
>>78808877
Yes
>>78808877
no, she will president.
Two scenarios
>Trump wins the election
>Clinton wins the election
>Russia releases the emails and Clinton goes down
Either way we win bros. If I had a house I would bet that Russia releases the emails if Clinton becomes President. They would want nothing more than to BTFO the U.S. if we elect that cunt.
>>78808877
Who is her imagemaker?
>>78819635
I was bothered by that too. You're alright leaf
>>78812621
>a leaf!
About half the country wants her dead. Only about a quarter of the country wants Trump dead
>>78814674
I have two facebook friends who post about Bernie still
I have one facebook friend who posts about Gary Johnson
It use to be 50+ friends posting about Bernie
I've literally only ever seen that one dude post about Gary Johnson. Ever.
So I would have to agree with you.
>>78809326
>treason is okay because crime has been done before
Under the crooked Bush admin. emails between Karl Rove and RNC members were found to be erased. These emails pertained to domestic political strategies.
Hillbitch had her emails and Saudi payslips up until she was required to produce them, when, knowing they incriminated her, she selectively deleted them and paraded around the 55,000 "pages" of emails as if she was so transparent.
Karl Rove resigned.
>>78808877
never ever
>>78812034
>If they do recommend, they lose influence with government.
That's not how power works. If they punish her they gain influence because the political class will be afraid to challenge them. Do yourself a favor and go read about J. Edgar Hoover's career.
>>78809326
>1 post by this ID
