[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Does /pol/ believe in evolution?
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 3
File: le monke chart.jpg (41 KB, 620x387) Image search: [Google]
le monke chart.jpg
41 KB, 620x387
Does /pol/ believe in evolution?
>>
>>78705592
Yes.
I believe niggers evolved from apes.
>>
>>78705592
No
>>
File: 1440544194083-1.png (329 KB, 1113x711) Image search: [Google]
1440544194083-1.png
329 KB, 1113x711
>>78705592
yes
>>
>>78706914
Looks like a Turk
>>
>>78707234
>Implying Ashkenazi "jews" aren't turks
>>
>>78705592
It would be the contrarian thing to think. Its jewish hoax to enslave white man.
>>
Nah
>>
>>78705592

Living things change over time. How can anyone refute this?
>>
>>78705592
evolution is a complex topic. no yes or no answer
>>
File: gYK2meM.png (181 KB, 480x437) Image search: [Google]
gYK2meM.png
181 KB, 480x437
>>78705592
Yes
>>
Of course.

>inb4 the devil placed fossils to trick us
>>
>>78706914
Keko
>>
Also, it's not about "believing", it's about understanding. With evidence, you don't have to believe. Whatever you believe, you can't change the evidence/facts.
>>
>>78708196
So you don't believe evolution?
>>
>>78705592
>does /pol/ believe in pseudoscience?

No.
>>
>>78705592

evolution is an extremely ambiguous word, one look at the talk page of wikipedia on the evolution article will pretty much tell you this is true.

small changes over time is something that has been observed, in fact reproduction produces a sort of evolution by creating novelty.

It's the idea of Common Ancestry/Descent that has no real scientific basis, they use phylogeny and comparison to construct a tree of life that is not founded upon scientific methodology but of cum hoc and post hoc fallacies. No matter how objective they claim cladistics is, the fundamental error will always be in the assumption that similarity inherently implies causation or similarity is a cause in and of itself.

if the scientific method was not used, it is not science.
>>
>>78705592
Not without some divine guidance.
>>
>>78708196
this guy gets it
Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 3

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.