Brexit: is not going to happen, /pol/.
Do you know it, right? It's only for the fun, right?
>>78185900
idiot odds are 99% dependent on what people have already chose. bookies never want to cover bets themselves obviously
Bookies got the last 5 elections correct.
BREMAIN CONFIRMED.
>>78186233
>Bookies got the last 5 elections correct.
>BREMAIN CONFIRMED.
They got the Austrian elections wrong. It was 70% for Hofer, 30% for Van der Cucken.
Betting odds are aligned like this every day thousands of times, yet "upsets" happen all the time. Bookers also constantly fix the odds to get an equal amount of money on both of the sides, so they can make guaranteed profit...
>>78185900
Yea, I made so much money when Rubio won the Republican nomination in the US, SO GLAD I BET ON THE GUY WITH THE BEST ODDS
>>78185900
Doesn't matter what people want anyway, the powers that be will ensure that Britain remains a cucked EUnuch.
Regardless of popularity or what people vote for,, remain will have it by a slightly larger than narrow margin. Mark my words.
>>78185900
ODDS SHORTENING BOYS
>>78186476
They weren't expecting 150% increase in "provisional ballots" (see rigging).
>>78186476
Bookies picked Rubio, Carson, Yeb, Rubio again and then finally Trump when he was only against Kasich.
Last year in about november or so, Trump was paying out like 12-15x for president bets.
>>78186770
CMON
>>78185900
>betting companies see the future
when does this meme die?
>>78186770
I got on the brexit to leave at 4-1 and then bet again the day cox was shot paying 0.75 - 1, before the odds changed because the bookies are slow as fuck on political betting.. and now Im guaranteed to win money or break even.
>>78185900
No, that's not how it works. Here is an article explaining the mechanism.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-22/something-strange-emerges-when-looking-behind-brexit-bookie-odds
