http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/
>>77643404
Nailed it. Do I get one of them ISIS slaves now?
Red pilled as fuck.
>>77643404
ok i did this test before because it was posted before
>>77644816
>>77643404
>Sexism is committed exclusively against women
This test is engaging in benevolent sexism
That quiz was pretty shit. You could tell the intention behind each question.
>>77645825
To add, I mean that you probably have to answer like a massive cuckold to get low sexism.
>>77643404
>no "no opinion" option
shitty fucking test
>>77645922
Exactly, it's also a pretty shitty article desu.
>>77643404
The test it self is sexist written by a women's studies major. Don't fall for this bullshit.
If you are going to waste your time with that test make sure you list yourself as female
lmao 4.67 means i am a domestic abuser
top kek
>>77643404
kek
>2.5 hostile
>2.33 benevolent
>>77645922
low compared to the average. It's a silly way to displey results.
Id wager the average guy isnt actually all that """sexist"""
>>77643404
we should have never let women learn to read
>>77646476
Letting women vote was the biggest mistake in history.
We should go back to only property-owning white males can vote.
>>77643404
3.5, 3.67
>>77645922
yes
Self-hating woman apparently.
>>77643404
I balance it out a bit.
>>77644865
fucking RARE
Hostile: 5
Benevolent: 1.8
>>77643404
Fuck
>>77645825
Fucking tell me about it. This shit even perceives pointing out women's sexism as you being sexist towards women.
All I answered was that men and women should be equal and I am a sexist
>>77643404
>/pol/ is intentionally going to try to get the high score instead of clicking all the "non-sexist" answers and fucking up their narrative
Stay classy /pol/
>>77643404
Can we define "benelovent sexism" towards men?
>answer generally in all questions that women should be equal to men and not given special treatment
>get hostile sexist result
this triggers me so hard. Fucking liberals.
>>77646927
>>77646985
>>77647017
>>77647017
MAN-SPLAINING CIS HET WHITE MALE SCUM
>>77643404
>agree or disagree
>no "no comment/neutral" option
Some women are shitbags who put men on tight leashes, but not all of them do.
>Hostile sexism describes behavior that overtly threatens, intimidates or abuses women, especially those who defy male-dominated power.
shit fucking test. Sexism apparently just means being critical of women. I guess reality is sexist too
I'm not quite sure what this means.
>>77643404
>answer "disagree strongly" to literally every question
>get perfect score
Wow, great quiz.
>>77643404
What does this question have to do with sexism at all?
Isn't it sexism to imply there's a connection between a persons sex and sexism? That's so terrible illogical.
:^)
>>77647400
It means you believe women should be equal to men and not given special treatment.
these poor womyn
>>77647400
A kindred soul!
>>77647447
It's for data collection. I'm sure they want to see how much more sexist men are than women.
>>77647447
It's to know which category to put your score in.
I selected male and put "disagree strongly" on every answer and still got pic related.
By the way, if you're all going to willingly score high (answering honestly), you should at least mark your gender as female to fuck up the quiz results.
>>77643404
Did I do it right?
>>77647887
Forgot pic
>>77647887
But it will regardless of your choice show men and woman in the end. And where are "other" and "i don't want to tell" collected?
>>77643404
>1. Many women have a quality of purity that few men possess.
already dont know what the sexist response is
>Sexism is only against women
Fucking kek.
I started getting pissed just reading these questions, probably made me answer more strongly. (((Laura Santhanam))) needs a big fucking dose of reality.
>Answer max sexism
>Identify as 30 year old woman from California with a Household income of $70k+ and a Bachelor's+
>Ruin their biased test
>>77643404
I answered for not giving a shit about women, I guess that makes me not-sexist?
>>77643404
hey I passed
>>77647034
Better option is to be golden woman by being female of high income and education while choosing maximum sexism.
Hurts them even more
>>77643404
Hah.
I have a hostile sexism score of 3.8 and benevolent of 1.
Not sure what part of my answers was so abusive to women.
Maybe it's because I said they complain too much.
>>77648426
wait what the shit is Hostile Sexism, I just said that women shouldn't get special treatment and sometimes use sex appeal to get what they want
>>77648574
>>77643404
>Only men can be sexist against women
This test is literally sexist.
>>77648388
This will only make them say "oh look at all this women with harmful opinions because of internalized misogyny!"
Here is what you do:
1. OPEN UP A BROWSER IN PRIVACY/INCOGNITO MODE
2. TAKE THE TEST 10 TIMES
3. ANSWER EVERY QUESTION AS "disagree strongly"
4. SELECT MALE, 18-34
5. Ruin their bullshit narrative
>>77646632
There is nothing women hate more than other women
KEK
>>77643404
Guys, I'm stuck on the first question
>1. Many women have a quality of purity that few men possess.
I don't even know what it means.
Also why is there no neutral option? Wouldn't the only way to be truly nonsexist be to be neutral to everything that pits men and women against each other?
This is fucking retarded.
>>77648699
The best part is the question that asks if you think women cry discrimination when they don't do well.
So apparently if you believe that women blame men for their problems, then you are sexist. That's right, it's sexist to scrutinize accusations of sexism.
That's some salem witch hunt tier shit right there.
>>77643404
Hostile sexism. 4.5 baby.
And they didn't even ask my views on suffrage or discrimination in the workplace...
>>77649304
This is what women's purity looks like :)
Got a 5 and a 0.5. That certainly wasn't written with an agenda...
Apparently strongly disagreeing with Modern feminism and not giving women special treatment over men is equivalent to beating them. What a shit survey.
>>77643404
Geez, I don't consider myself sexist but ok.
This is probably because there is no "neutral" option.
>>77648885
This post is the definition of mansplaining. You see, sexism means prejudice+power. To be truly sexist, one needs to hold prejudiced beliefs against the marginalized class, and the power to enforce their beliefs. It should be obvious that there are no situations in which a woman has power over a man, not in a marriage, social situations, or political offices like secretary of defense. There is literally no way that women can be sexist against men.
>>77646864
HA HA
OMG HE THANKS THATS RARE
HOLY SHIT
YOU FUCKING IDIOT
HAHA
>>77648256
Noticed that myself. A few of the questions seem to be unanswerable in a way that doesn't lump it into either one of the categories of sexism and there's no neutral option. A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
>>77644816
>High Benevolent Sexism
What're you? Some white knight?
>>77647034
It was a shit survey because there is no neutral option. you either are a raging benevolent sexist enforcing gender roles by treating women as precious darling or you are a wife beater. Im going to honestly try to see what answers are required to not be considered a sexist.
How did I do /pol/?
>>77649982
>>77643404
>Disagreeing with feminists makes you more sexist
Christ
>>77643404
>everything is sexsist the test.
I really wonder what "avarage male" they tested... probably all nu beta males.
>>77650525
I thought the neutral was being equal to the """""""""""""average"""""""""""""
>>77643404
Answered everything honestly, and not to be edgy.
By the way, I have to wonder what the "right" answer was to the questions about women having some innate moral superiority to men. If you agree then it's benevolent sexism and if you disagree then it's hostile.
>>77650748
Dissent is terrorism, mate.
>>77650560
apparently we're sexist because we don't think men should back over backwards for a woman.
>>77643404
These college people need to get their head out of their own ass.
Get a job and work in the real world, talk to real people.
It's kinda ironic that a college campus might be the most toxic environment for learning how to be a well adjusted adult
This made me laugh
>>77650748
This. You litterally cannot disagree with feminsm on anything to not be considered sexist. I kinda figured that answering between the two extremes
Would mean you thought men and women are equal. Instead the Strongly Agree and Strongly Dissagree are basically making this survey yes or no towards racking up sexism points. You arent allowed to hold have an oppinion that is not in agreement with feminism according to this. So to not be a sexist you have to be a cuck and freely let women whip you and treat you like dirt.
>>77651427
>apparently we're sexist
>we're
/pol/ is one person!
>>77650560
us /caribs/ sure know how to treat women :-)
Women's sole purpose in life is to get fucked.
>>77651746
We're all getting highly sexist scores m8. The "/pol is one person" meme comes from people assuming there's an inherent contradiction or hypocrisy when one person has a person differing from another's
welp
>>77643404
Hostile: 4.67
Benevolent: 0.0
Fuckin' nailed it.
I was hoping to score higher
Women need structure and discipline.
>>77651981
We would get along.
>>77650903
It was definitely nu male faggots. Most men probably agree at least somewhat with a lot of the statements on the test
PFEW
>>77651746
>/pol/ is one person!
>baiting on pol
we're all getting highly sexist scores on the highly loaded questions if you haven't noticed
Meh.
>>77650525
"Disagree strongly" is the correct answer on every question. Try it.
That alone would tell that this test is bullshit.
>compared to Nazis
>have same views as those fighting the Nazis 70 years ago
>can't even.
outfuckingskilled
if you aren't a cuck your score will resemble this
Hold on, let me pre-empt the next article by our friend Laura Santhanam who wrote the original article.
>PBS ran a sexism-scoring quiz called the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory on June 15th. All PBS.org visitors were free to take the quiz to assess their scores in hostile sexism and benevolent sexism. The results were shocking: men between the ages of 18 and 35 scored far higher in either type of sexism on average than the average sexism scores of an earlier, similarly-aged cohort.
>Hostile sexism is behaviour toward women that is threatening and abusive, especially towards women who defy male dominance. Benevolent sexism is behaviour toward women that treats women more kindly, but on the basis that women are weak.
>"It is not surprising, given today's sexist climate which seems shockingly close to what it was back in the '60s," said Peter Glick, one of the creators of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory after being shown the PBS.org results, "We can attribute the rise in sexism to the rise in Donald Trump's popularity and the mistreatment of [refugee] minorities across the world. The vitriol created from these unfortunate events must have led to today's men becoming more vicious towards women."
>>77643404
This is bullshit.
>>77643404
All my answers were slightly agree or slightly disagree, and I still get this. The only one I agreed strongly on was the one about feminism, and this quiz is a good illustration of why. If you're not a hostile sexist, you're a benevolent sexist. Everyone is a sexist apparently.
kek.
>>77643404
3.33 was shit
Do you think women are superior?
>No
You are sexist
>Yes
You may be a sexist
>>77649982
Wow you obviously have nothing substantive to say, maybe society would be better served by relegating people like you to a supportive nurturing role.
It was difficult to answer appropriately because the parameters of the questions were retarded, and a lot of those statements poised were extremely transparent and used ambiguous qualifiers.
I guess it's 2016 though.
I only picked the slightly options, with one somewhat. Why the fuck isn't there a neutral option?
>>77643404
ayy lmao, triggered
>>77644816
cuck score off the charts
>>77644816
c u c k
u
c
k
>>77643404
Thinking back to my answers, I understand where I got the benevolent sexism score. But I honestly can't imagine how I got a higher than average hostile sexism score.
>>77645825
this. they might as well ask "are you a sexist?"
and hilariously that quiz is the result of 20 years of "research"....you cant make this shit up
>>77650482
>>77655568
>>77655621
it is bad why?
uhm what why
>>77643404
3.67/3
>Answered honestly
>0.5 benevolent sexism
Feels good. Anyone higher than 1 is a cuck.
PERFECT SCORE, NIGGERS!!
>>77644816
rarest cuck
>>77657188
i do not see why you called me that
>>77643404
Answer "Disagree Strongly" on all questions and you literally get 0 sexism. I wonder if this bitch realizes that personality tests are not supposed to have "right" answers.
>>77643404
>What is your gender identity ?
You loose the second you accept to answer that, regardless of your score.
>>77657238
benevolent sexism pretty much means that you bend over to the demands of women and make sacrifices for them because of sexual pressure rather than for moral and rational reasons
>>77643404
do i get a prize
>>77643404
Fucking PBS is such shit.
>>77657673
no that is not what it means read the description
This is the only alpha response. What a load of horseshit.
>>77643404
This is from a government-funded news organization, ffs.
>>77657733
they also closed comments
>>77657911
>non-4chan part of the internet
>expecting free speech
lmao neanderthal
>>77643404
>You can be either hostile or benevolent, but you must be sexist somehow
What a racket!
Yay I won, I did answer trustfully, unlike those scores with 5.
>>77657238
You are being criticized for letting girls push you around.
>>77657791
cuck
>>77658045
>implying i didn't answer truthfully
you underestimate my hatred
>>77658049
that is not what it means though
so what the fuck does this mean?
>think that the family unit is the key to modern western civilization
>this is somehow sexist
POL HAVE MY UNIQUE AND FANTASTICLY GOOD IMAGE
>>77646632
Wait am i reading this right
>Sexism
>Abuses women
Isnt the dictionary definition for BOTH
>>77646645
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Post a pastebin you faggot ass shill.
>>77643404
>PBS
Tax payers money on this shit
>>77658236
Don't worry about it. There's a lot of /r9k/ to /pol/ crossover. The fact is that women have been kept from fighting in wars and other things because of what they call "Benevolent Sexism".In other words they've been protected, not because they're weak and/or stupid, but because they're valuable.
>>77643404
Rate me /pol/
5 on the first one. 0.17 on the second.
>>77658956
Women CAN be valuable. Most women these days have negative value.
3.83 Hostile Sexism
0.83 Benevolent Sexism
>tax dollars helped fund this quiz
Okay so WTF is up with this quiz? There are only two results, either hostile or benevolent sexism? Where's the "not sexist" result?
There wasn't even a "neither agree nor disagree" option. This quiz is shit.
I don't think they're monsters but I sure don't think they're anything special either... what does that make me?
>>77660081
Dont you know its 2016?!!!
>>77660026
they're grading you on two type of sexism at the same time : hostile and benevolent. I mean shit, they even define both, it's not that complicated.
I don't think it's american education, I think it's only you
>>77643404
>Hostile Sexist
Somehow I'm willing to bet that most true men get this result
>>77660361
You're a retard. A non-biased quiz of this type would have a "neither agree nor disagree" option. But you wouldn't know anything about that because you're a fucking retard.
>>77658545
No, -isms are privilege+power, if you're a white male you're the textbook -ism
I'm a sexist and my wife knows it. She understands that gender roles exist for a reason
4.33 hostile
0.83 Benevolent
>>77644816
It's okay Laos, I'm right there with you.
Joke on them, I'm gay. Don't need them for shit.
Hostie - 3.00
Benevolent - 2.00
>>77645985
Thought this as well. A lot of the questions also presented situations that need a shitton of context to answer correctly and just forced you to paint a broad brush one way or the other. Also they all felt loaded as fuck.
>>77646632
The term is internal misogyny u bigot :^)
r8
>>77649047
that's how u know it was created by a woman they can't get anything right
Welp
>>77644816
You a muslim or something? Muslims are the kings of benevolent sexism
>loaded questions: the survey
>>77647400
This means that you view women like you view niggers.
>>77643404
>there's only two types of answer
>both of them make you a sexist
THIS IS FUCKING AWESOME.
Damn. SO close. Don't know where I fucked up getting a perfect score.
>>77643404
Why is there no indifferent/no comment option?
>>77643404
4.17
1.67
did I pass?
>>77669961
haha this
Disagree with every statement but the one that says feminists are in reasonable, get fuck off huge increase in HOSTILE sexism.
What the fuck? Did she write the test program to make the extreme agree/disagree answers 'sexist' and add the questions after the fact? There isn't even a neutral position.
>>77643404
1/2
>>77643404
>my tax money went to this
>>77670965
2/2
>>77645825
Also why is it that if I identify as a Male from a Southern State, my Sexism Points go up signficantly
Loaded question after loaded question. It's funny; I have ridiculous success with women, but apparently I'm also a rampant, misognystic abuser.
What is the author implying? That the way I treat women is abuse, but I should keep doing it anyway because that's what they apparently like?
Keeping women under the boot gets them hot.
Who knew?
Feminism is bad mmkay
Our tax dollars hard at work.
i listed my gender as "other"
5/5 violent sexism
1.65 /5 benevolent sexism
the question i wasn't sure on was "men are incomplete without women". i mean on one level its nice not to hear her bitching all day but on another the intimacy of a good fuck is hard to deny how right it feels.
If you didn't score a 5 on hostile sexism you are a pathetic beta cuck
>>77643404
did I do good /pol/?
I don't even get how you guys are getting such crazy high numbers
>>77672825
You clearly aren't redpilled on the true nature of women at all and must think they are special snowflakes that are morally superior to men.
>>77672941
The morality questions lowers your score for answering disagree I'm pretty sure since women are equally as immoral as men.
>>77653590
underrated post
>>77673082
>equally as immoral
Egalitarian shit head please leave
>>77672825
the correct answers are that women are stupid whores who want to wrap men into marriages so they can control them.
if you don't believe this you've been cucked by the electric jew and just don't have enough real world experience.
>>77673208
Women basically have the same issues as men. I've travelled down the degeneracy path and dated both and it's all the same shit.
Maybe stop treating women like they're aliens and you would actually find a decent one.
>>77673208
This, women have been biologically programmed to be resource extractors, they don't love like men do, they don't have higher ideals or principles. They are leeches and that's how they are programmed.
>>77649982
Hey, Gloria? Quick question...is it allowable under kosher law for a Chosen woman to sup of the issuances of a goyim cock?
>>77673561
Blue pilled as fuck.. Women are biologically different you dummy .. We might have similar issues but we are not the same
>>77673561
i'm not in the market for a relationship. i did fairly well in college considering I never went out and spent all my time doing coursework.
but i've seen how they become broken by going through multiple boyfriends. I've seen the hottest as fuck girls deteriorate, and balloon to hamplanet porportions. i've seen how they are just receptacles for opinions. they have no unique thought they just absorb the opinions of their boyfriend, or the media if they don't have a strong boyfriend figure.
i'm not an expert but i really do think the best way is to get married to a virgin who is age 19. (when you're young)
Here's the score I give the sexist feminist bitch who made this test for operating from the premise that all sexism is perpetrated against women.
I saw a photo from ww2 showing a young woman crying at her husbands belongings after he was shot down over europe. Felt sorry for the guy but not her. Because one thing worse than whores are woman who think they are not whores. A devoted wife who never cheated on her husband is still a fucking whore, she is just in denial, at least a slut is honest with who she is
PBS used to be mr. rogers n shit.
>>77643404
>http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/
>>77643404
I did good
>>77643404
What the fuck is this??????
>>I'm so hostile, apparently
Remember, benevolent sexism is how they say sexism against men, but they twist male disposability and switch it from gynocentrism to patriarchy. Feminists are crafty.
>>77644816
rare cuck
>>77643404
Too kek I get laid more than most people I know.
I doubt any girl I've been with would consider me hostile or sexist
>>77673835
I've seen the exact same situations with guys. I've seen guys breakup with their gf and then go through epic bingers of one night stands, drugs, alcohol, etc.
Plus the idea that all women are just out there to suck the life out of men is ridiculous. In a relationship the other person can only get away with what you let them get away with. Perhaps the problem is not women, moreso your lack of self-esteem and willingness to say no to a situation you disagree with. It's like you people cannot even comprehend basic human interaction.
>>77674339
Better shot f both measures
>>77660694
So women are Hostile as well,
>> REALLY MAKES YOU THINK
>>77644816
Thanks for showing the world what we knew for centuries, laocuck.
>>77643404
Well.
>>77672825
Just strongly agree when it says "feminist ask too much" ==> krypto-mysiginist status obtained.
>>77674639
The majority of the feminists, like probs 90%+ that don't spend their time ranting about meaningless shit on the internet, really aren't asking for that much.
>>77674416
you really don't even understand what i'm saying. when a woman goes through multiple boyfriends, she loses a piece of herself each time. its not the same way with men.
if you date a girl who has had 20 boyfriends, you're basically dating the amalgation of 20 of her boyfriends personaliities.
womens personalities change to mold to their boyfriend. (if they are alpha enough, if not they just retain their teenage personality.
i've had plenty of success with women even when i was not trying, so don't even try to play that card. yes this is the internet but whatever.
>>77660694
>m'lady
>>77674793
Do you know where you are? Tread lightly if you're looking for a reasonable answer from these guys.
>>77674910
>womens personalities change to mold to their boyfriend.
I've seen the same things with guys. I've noticed all of my male friends adopt their gf's common language phrases as their relationship progresses. It's almost like we're all, surprise surprise, human beings.
>>77643404
>I am Le Benevolent Patriarch
>tips hat
Everyone should take the test, score maximum sexism, and then identify as a high-income woman
>>77675127
if they're complete cucks sure. but im not surprised to hear that from a canadian.
it's a two way street but not nearly on the same level.
i've already seen too many of my friends go through divorce rapes, i'm not even 30 yet.
>>77646645
>>77658607
>WHY DOESNT SHE LOVE ME???
>>77675101
Considering this board has repeatedly lambasted the media for their political portrayal in regards to trump the very concept of acknowledging the media's portrayal of feminism on the internet, which is usually absurdly over exaggerated, would be hypocrisy at its finest.
>>77645481
Same
>>77643404
>agreeing that women exaggerate problems at work is "overtly threatening, intimidating or abusive to women"
>>77675264
Uh no, language adoption is actually very subtle and involves group dynamics and psychology.
You've probably done it yourself and not even realized it. It's a subconscious trait that is generally inherent in all humans. Our language always adapts to our social group. You're inviting a new person to your group thus your language shifts whether you like it or not it will happen. You can't fight basic human psychology.
You're on a website with this very concept. We all call eachother faggots, newfags, etc. etc. You'd have to be an autistic sperg to think women influencing your life means you're a cuck. They're a human, they will influence you because you are also a human and that's how humans interact unless you're leaving behind a perpetual trail of spilt spaghetti.
>>77675335
Honestly if they felt so lampooned by liberal media, maybe they should get gud and outsmart shillary. This IS 4chan, /pol/ should get better at their political propaganda instead of sitting in an echo cave. Don't they always say it's liberals complaining about the upper class having an *upper hand* without doing anything for themselves?
If you replaced the rhetoric regarding shillary against corporate takeover it'd be the exact same logic.
I absolutely wouldn't. Will that raise my hostile score, or am I benevolent by being upfront?
>>77675646
believe what you want, but i've not observed any dramatic shifts in the guys who dated. the girls all shifted to meet the guy.
theres a lot more to personality than shared language.
>>77675930
Feminists aren't targeted by media, they actively seek it out, but moderate ones do not. You get a select view of extremists that put their all into seeking an audience hence you get bias.
Remember that girl that shoved a can of spaghettios in her vagina for feminism (it was for some neo-dada feminist revival shit or something)? Do you honestly think every single woman in the west is jumping up for the opportunity to support that performance?
did i pass?
>>77676113
I echo your opinion, check my ID's powerlevel score of 0,0 on that two dimensional test
>>77676113
> Do you honestly think every single woman in the west is jumping up for the opportunity to support that performance?
if they live on the coast, basically yes. the cancer has spread that far.
i've spent too much time with democrats in school but their views have been steadily pushing further left. in 2008 they pretended they didn't want to get rid of the 2nd amendment. in 2016 they're not even hiding it anymore. they want a full weapons ban.
I don't hate women I just think they need to be protected. I'm not a feminist nor do I believe in equality.
>>77653279
Poorly designed and bullshit aren't the same thing.
You could have a multiple choice math test where every correct answer was letter A. Wouldn't make the test bullshit.
2+2=
A. 4
B. 6
C. 8.
D. 10
A isn't a bullshit answer even if every other answer was A.
This quiz is shit.
>>77643404
>Getting 5 in both
>Being able to tell your missus she is an alright cunt but if she doesn't do the dishes you will stove her head in.
You cunts even trying?
>>77643404
>>77677065
casuals, all of you
The questions in this quiz are extremely sexist and offer no sane answer options. Not to mention homophobic.
>>77643404
r8 me
>>77677268
>>77643404
I don't get it. I answered based on facts and they labeld me as a potential domestic abuser
