http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/are-you-sexist-take-this-quiz/
Well, /pol/, are you?
Take the quiz, post results.
>>77494447
I got a 3 on hostile sexism. I'm guessing cause I strongly disagreed men should provided for women? Idk.
>>77494447
You tell me (((Faggot)))
>>77494905
I think that would be filed under benevolent sexism but this shit is nonsense so who knows
>>77495086
I got a 0 on benevolent sexism.
>>77494447
Do I win?
>>77495906
The "women are only good for sex" patrician class
>>77494447
holy shit. the real quiz on the actual site has entirely different waaaaaaay less loaded questions.
I got 3.5 hostile and 1.5 benevolent is that good?
Well.
While answering on purpose I managed to get beautiful zero on both of those.
And I tell you.
Requirements for that are bullshit
Not my fault most women are whores who can't be trusted.
Hostile Sexism --- 5
Benevolent Sexism --- 1.83
shit im a cuck
Guess I'm a horrible pig that hates women according to this.
>>77496142
>>77494447
1.5 hostile
0.5 benevolent
Am I a total loser?
Is it good /pol/?
>pbs
I'm sure this will be an fair and objective look at sexism.
Taking to find out.
>>77496955
Yes. You give slavs a bad name.
>>77494447
Why would I need to take a quiz to find out if I'm sexist? Of course I fucking am; what sort of idiot isn't?
lol?
>>77494447
7. Once a woman gets a man to commit to her, she usually tries to put him on a tight leash.
9. Many women get a kick out of teasing men by seeming sexually available and then refusing male advances.
IT USED TO BE CALLED THE TRUTH NOW IT'S SEXISM?!?
Hostile - 3.8
Benevolent - 4.1
>>77496955
Lower hostile = bigger cuck
Higher benevolent = bigger cuck
Benevolent is about you thinking men should fall over and praise the shit out of women.
Hostile means you think women are corrupt.
True patrician score is above 4 in hostile, below 1 in benevolent. I haven't quite reached that point yet.
>>77497423
Being hostile and low benevolence just means you can't get a wife.
Hostile:4
Benevolent:3
>>77497512
Goats don't count as wives, paki.
5 on hostile, 0 on benevolent
Try and out-misogyny me faggots, I fucking dare you
so does saying that men should protect women add to your sexism power level?
I'm the complete opposite of ashamed.
>>77494447
Got a 2 on benevolent sexism
>>77497622
>Being this upset
>>77497638
No, the complete opposite. A true sexist does not believe in being a white knight.
>>77497667
>>77495510
>Bending over this much for your goat
Your life must be miserable, you hate women yet you are their slave.
>>77494447
>Take the quiz, post results.
Nah I'm good bro, you have fun with that
>>77496048
There's another """(((class)))"2" ?
>>77497079
I'm definitely sexist to feminist standards. But I'm right now trying to figure out who isn't a sexist...
I can't think of anyone... I think everyone treats men and women differently. Which they should, because they are different.
Huh.
I got 4.5 on Hostile Sexism and 1.67 on Benevolent Sexism.
>>77497648
Nice Geralt background.
>>77497072
and...
Hostile: 3.5
Benevolent: 2
Looks like I'm a sexist [spoiler]grill[/spoiler].
>>77497822
I don't hate women at all. I'm just not stupid about understanding what women are.
>>77494447
Hostile - 3.5
Benevolent -2.5
>>77497215
If you think any behavior that is bad is done more so by women than men, you'll be labeled as a bigot by a lot of people these days.
>>77497931
Yes, because benevolent sexism refers to how much you believe men should help women.
A lower score is better. A higher score puts you in nu male white knight territory.
>>77497962
Shit I didn't mean to screen cap both monitors... Kinda wish it was something funny instead. Imagine if it was loli kek
>>77494447
GENDER WAR NOW
Hostile 4.2, Benevolent 2. Reality is what it is.
I guess I can leave the cuckshed now.
>>77494447
I couldn't give a shit about the opposite sex tbqh
>>77494447
within 2 answers i figured out the answer key. still took the bait on one
Looks like I am angry sexist fuckin white male
>be faggot
>get 4.2 on hostile sexism and 0 on benevolent sexism
so either way im sexist?
Better a violent one than a cuck
>actually taking this quiz
Have fun being in a shitty infographic used by feminists and cucks for years to come, faggots
>>77498772
HOW? Tell us what they think a perfect person is lol
>>77498888
Faggot's Quad for kek's God
wtf is this bullshit, I would never abuse women
shit test
>>77499109
picking disagree strongly with every question gets you a perfect score.
i know these shills game. laziest survey type.
boi
How'd I do, /pol/ ?
FWIW I actually do tie my wife up, spank her when she's bad, and I make her get on all fours so I may inspect her every Friday night.
I also have a daughter who gets straight As, was lead in school play, is school president, Trump supporter.
Not even joking, that really is what's going in ova here.
>>77499020
Oh no... Their infographics will be too powerful!!
>>77498888
>not 5 like me
>feminazi detected
>>77497855
Ty for the bump, faggot
>>77496225
Winrar
>>77494447
This quiz is made by a feminist, go fuck yourself.
>>77497099
that win was meat for you
4.67 Hostile shitlord.
0.5 on the benevolent scale.
>>77494447
Women genocide when?
>Mfw I got the top score for ''abusive hostile sexism'' or whatever the fuck it was...
Those questions though, fucking hell.
I answered truthfully, basing every answer on logic.
Going by logic makes you a hostile abusive sexist, apparently.
Who knew?
>>77499287
So of a bitch.
>>77499296
>being this insecure about your wife
>benevolent sexism
So, certain kinds of sexism are good?
>>77494447
Not really surprised.
5H 0B master race anyone else?
>>77496978
No.
The second one should be 0 you fucking white knight.
>>77497970
yeah same I was surprised myself, thought I'd score lower on sexist as a woman.
I bet it's internalized mysogyny.
>>77494447
Scored just over a "3" on hostile. Test is complete BS because there are no 'middle ground' answers. I found I would've liked to select an option like "I think they should be treated equally" the majority of the time, but this test is clearly DESIGNED to make people appear more sexist than they really are.
>>77499589
As soon as we get artificial wombs my friend.
But first we need to keep pushing this pro-choice narrative so women do the job of removing embryos special protections.
>>77499648
Because something is sexist it doesn't mean it's wrong, reality is sexist.
>>77494447
>homo
>5 hostile
>0 benevolent
>can't fucking stand women or effeminate men
sexist male pig reporting in
Explain this bs to me please
>>77499648
I know man. I answered legit serious and in reality I always see each woman as her own. I will make estimations about their behavior, but I'll give them a chance to show off their personality before I conclude anything about them.
The fact that women generally behave a certain way is a fact that modern feminists despise. They think every woman is a blank slate and should never be considered as part of a group (unless it's for a quota)
>>77499968
lel why would we do that?
it all seems like a waste of time and effort
just wait for the modernity to inevitably fail so they come back on their knees like henry IV in canossa
The idea behind it is this: sexism is “multidimensional” and more nuanced than many people realize.
Here's how we will give you an accurate score based on a few questions!
Western women are awful. They couldn't be worse if they tried.
Did I do good /pol/?
Remember, in the questions that ask about education, income, etc. make sure to put that you're very well-educated and make a lot of money!
>>77494447
I think saying 'slightly agree' to feminism being unreasonable must boost it massively.
>>77500176
Because I dream about the day where I can start an army of super humans all by myself, that won't happen until the embryos special protections end and we start making more lab tests with human embryos.
She should of fucking listened the first time.
>>77494447
>sacrifice your self to financially provide.
The fuck manner of a question is this?
>>77499589
how?
>>77500413
Is that thing you drew...a nose???
> Not even a "neutral" option.
Who makes these? My only options are to be a cuck or a bigot then?
>>77500443
nice utopianism
shoo shoo lefty pol
>>77500443
como tá a quarta série amiguinho ?
>>77494447
The only thing this is missing is the ability to tell the writer to go fuck herself after finishing the test.
Rate my privilege senpai.
I'm going to do the test multiple times and make a score sheet for how much agreeing with any question strongly adds to your scores.
>>77500514
The first is actually hating women and the second is only for white knights.
Basically if you get high score on both of them then you're the typical 1920's strawman sexist/nice guy.
If only for the first then you're an actual women hater.
>>77494447
I got 4 WTF. I intentionally answered the questions like feminists. Are feminists sexists?
>>77497423
>Higher benevolent = bigger cuck
Benevolent sexism according to this quiz is treating a woman like men did in days long gone. Basically the good old days. Perhaps today it makes you somewhat of a cuck because women are shit, but we can dream can't we?
who /5+0/ here
>>77500813
Need you ask?
>>77494447
I was musing about feminism earlier while driving, and it occurs to me that the root of the increase in homosexuality is in feminism. Men's masculinity, especially during puberty, is primarily validated by women. With the increase in women of narcissism, consumerism, and feminism and the increasing barriers of empathy between the sexes men are turning increasingly inward while being emasculated.
Feminism is doing irreparable harm to generations, ruining young men and women in the process.
And for what? So women can tend to their paranoia and neuroses? So they can receive a few dollars more on a paycheck? The selfishness of the fairer sex and their lack of understanding of society is killing us.
>>77500552
>lefty pol
wat
Also you wouldn't be implying that depending on women for the continuation or advancement of the human species is a good idea right?
Don't give them an inch
>>77500503
Should only sacrifice yourself for your kids
If this isn't your result, you're a massive faggot
Well, shit, those questions were loaded.
>>77500945
Women's role in maternity and motherhood supercedes any other use.
>>77499704
Clearly you've never had role-playing sex, or any other kind for that matter, before...
>>77500472
Tbh, when doing this, I attempted to answer by treating them the same as a man.
Of course, I beat the shit out of men
I'm okay with this
>>77500945
>depending on
well I also don't like depending on water and oxygen - that doesn't mean imma gonna walk around with a canister tied down to my lungs all day long
work with what you have nigg4
>>77494447
I got a 4.6 on hostile sexism.
Fuck bitches.
>>77494447
3.17 hostile
1.17 benevolent
And yet I'm a betacuck that wants to be completely dominated by a woman.
>>77501036
mate
>the average woman is less sexist than the average men
Bullshit
>>77501036
nice
>>77500405
just a little bit
>>77499718
almost there
>>77498667
needs a + 1.5
>>77498888
also nice
Everyone else is a cuck
>>77501076
Not if they aren't needed anymore.
>>77501164
>work with what you get
Because surpassing those limitations isn't what the human species has been doing since forever?
/pol/ complains about the white race dwindling, if we already had a technological solution for not depending on women for reproduction that wouldn't be the case.
Anyone under 4 should just end themselves
>>77494447
Odd. I answered this quiz from a purely egalitarian perspective, where the answer to each question is "they are the same", and apparently I am so hostile to women that they flee at the sight of me.
I think this might be a bad test.
I put "Strongly Disagree" for literally every answer. God this quiz is so fucking flawed
>>77501661
Men are a minority for fucks sake
OH MY GOD SHE PISSES ME OFF
>>77501554
>surpassing limitations
fck u I love limitations, they are best
Hostile 2.6 benevolent 2.8
>>77501819
cuck
>>77494447
My answers were based on realism.
>>77501053
They were also vague as well. Purity doesn't mean anything without a subject, it could mean anything.
>>77494447
Yes. Sex exists. I guess I'm sexist.
>>77501036
He's right, I'm a Fag and this is what i've got
Okay.
>>77494447
>>77501990
Why it seems like all faggots on the thread have a low benevolent score?
>>77502241
Your lack of attraction to women lessens your willingness to act as meatshields for them in order to get puss
It evens out in the end, so I'm officially not a sexist.
what does this even mean
>>77502473
You're a cuck
>>77502336
This, they have no use.
>>77499287
so if I put agree strongly with everything, do I become satan?
>>77494447
Basically no matter what you get you are sexist. My GF just took the test and she scored 4.5 and 0.6
>>77499831
wait is is better to have a higher score on the top one?
4 hostile
0 benevolent
Fuck cows
>>77502241
>>77502149
What's up with dirty brown spics in poverty-tier South America repeatedly scoring high on benevolence?
Do you guys really eat that shit that women are "pure" or more "innocent" than men?
Just lol at your collective low IQ poverty existence. Enjoy being used by women.
>>77494447
I'm white?
>>77502752
Yes.
The top should be 5 and the bottom 0,
>>77502742
my gf got the same score as me 0.5 / 0
>>77502616
yes
>>77494447
pls r8
btw im str8
>>77502833
Women here are huge bitches and men are desperate for sex 24/7
That being said I got 0 on benevolence cause I don't give a fuck about women.
>>77502752
To be truly redpilled on women, you need a 5 top score and 0 bottom score.
Basically, you should think of women as lying cheating whores that you either kill on site for being too ugly or rape, if they're attractive, then kill afterwards.
Anything less than that and you're not a man. You're a pussy who will be cheated on for not understanding women are dangerous awful pieces of shit that exist solely for your biological function to ejaculate.
(This is hyperbole, but kind of true at the same time)
What do I win?
>>77494447
Apparently, I'm a hostile sexist.
Trips get
>>77502833
>america calling anyone a dirty brown spic
>>77502875
>that flag
>that benevolent score
Looool
>>77500725
>>77494447
Every single question has the same value, except it either adds points to benevolent sexism or hostile sexism. Lol they don't even have the intelligence to weigh the answers differently. At least they didn't give you gender or earnings an effect (I tested that)
If you agree completely to the following (this is the values for the questions)
>1. Many women have a quality of purity that few men possess.
0.83 Benevolent Sexist Points if you completely agree
>2. Women should be cherished and protected by men.
0.83 Benevolent Sexist Points if you completely agree
>3. Women seek to gain power by getting control over men.
0.83 Hostile if you completely agree
>4. Every man should have a woman whom he adores
0.83 Benevolent
>5. Men are incomplete without women.
0.83 Benevolent
>6. Women exaggerate problems they have at work.
0.83 Hostile
>7. Once a woman gets a man to commit to her, she usually tries to put him on a tight leash.
0.83 Hostile
>8. When women lose to men in a fair competition, they typically complain about being discriminated against.
0.83 Hostile
>9. Many women get a kick out of teasing men by seeming sexually available and then refusing male advances.
0.83 Hostile
>10. Women, compared to men, tend to have a superior moral sensibility.
0.83 Benevolent
>11. Men should be willing to sacrifice their own well being in order to provide financially for the women in their lives.
0.83 Benevolent
>12. Feminists are making unreasonable demands of men.
0.83 Hostile
>>77503234
>Hungary
DIRTY
>>77502833
>Brown
I'm uruguayan, i'm white
>Do you guys really eat that shit that women are "pure" or more "innocent" than men?
No, i don't but good women must be pure
what a heap of sexist pigs
kill yourselves
I got 4/5 for both. Do I pass?
First score is nonsense - I do think that women are self-interested, but I also think that about men.
Some questions are bs desu
>>77494447
Yup, I'll make sure to put women on a pedestal to avoid future sexism.
What.
>>77497077
Estonians aren't fucking slavs
>hostile sexism
>4.33
Actually I fall in the middle around here. You americans are cucks.
>>77503358
>>77497077
Estonia isn't slavic you fuck.
>>77503294
6, 8 and 10 are stupid questions to determine sexism
>>77503584
>>77503557
and greeks aren't turks :^)
What this mean?
Did I just get called a wife beater by PBS?
>>77494447
this was the most poorly worded piece of crap ive ever taken
this quiz just oozes SJW bullshit
Welp
>maxed out
what do i win?
how?
I got 3.33 on both. I'm sure all of the women in my life, many of whom are feminsts, would be shocked to hear that. Mostly because it's horseshit.
>>77501601
The test is really a test of how much you presume. It's a test about prejudice. If you believe that common sense generally works, then you will be a sexist.
>>77494447
Great, another poll reinforcing the belief that I am a hostile sexist.
>>77501902
Pure cunts.
>>77494447
>>77503901
Nothing.
The bottom one is supposed to be 0.
>>77494880
I guess me and OP think alike
>>77502928
0.5 hostile, 0 benevolent?
TRUE FEMINIST NUMALE ANTI-GENERALIZATION TWAT
>>77495906
>1.67
step up senpai
>>77503901
1(one) refugee to be fed and housed as you see fit
>>77504241
HAHAHA
>>77494447
>mfw Hostile as a motherfucking shitlord
4.7
Did anybody share there results on jewbook?
Is something that will be mandatory when Hillary becomes the CiC on November?
>>77494447
Not surprising, I hate women.
didnt expect to be this much of a cuck
>>77503697
Most of them are. Just because you see patterns of behavior within a group and are willing to make general statements about said group does not mean you will unfairly treat individuals of that group.
>>77498011
judging from the amount of underage male on male rapes in your shithole country, I'd wager that you don't actually have a decent understanding of what women are
begone with ye, mohammedan
What does this even mean
fuck women apparently
>>77501661
How has this thing ever had a man in her life?
What would love a thing that inherently hates them?
>>77504320
can i hang it off a lamp post?
>>77504320
I'll feed him with his own shit, and house him in my fucking oven.
Lmao no shit? You don't say...
what do i win?
>>77504820
now, now don't be greedy like a kike
it's the German's refugee
hands off
Hostile - 2.33
Benevolent - 2.33
I have achieved perfect balance, and become a Zen Sexist master.
>>77494447
I know I am sexist, I don't need a clickbait exam to prove that.
>>77494447
Seems to me like they define anything other than complete and total submission to the feminist ideology as sexism. I'm most certainly hostile to feminism.
>>77505082
The wet T-shirt contest motherfucker
>Hostile sexism describes behavior that overtly threatens, intimidates or abuses women, especially those who defy male-dominated power
>your score: 4.5
>>77505087
I need my refugees too, Cosmin.
>Many women have a quality of purity that few men possess
Disagree somewhat, I can see greater purity in some for cultural reasons but it's hardly innate.
>Women should be cherished and protected by men.
I'm interpreting this as relative to other people (other men), so disagree somewhat ("strongly" might imply Elliot Rodger or something).
>Women seek to gain power by getting control over men.
Lobbying and bribery are well-established means of power, and women are hardly exempt. Women probably do it more just because men are more physically useful, though. Agree somewhat.
>Every man ought to have a woman whom he adores.
What about gays? It would be nice for every straight guy to have a qt tau/2, so I guess slightly agree because the sentiment is nice.
>Men are incomplete without women.
Metaphysical nonsense, disagree strongly.
>Women exaggerate problems they have at work.
Everyone does, slightly agree.
>Once a woman gets a man to commit to her, she usually tries to put him on a tight leash.
Game theory would suggest she would try to, with no sex-specific motivation, leverage the commitment. Somewhat agree.
>When women lose to men in a fair competition, they typically complain about being discriminated against.
In everyday life I don't think it's really a problem, but I'd put slightly agree because of the cultural climate.
>Many women get a kick out of teasing men by seeming sexually available and then refusing male advances.
Nigga I don't even blame them, shit sounds fun, somewhat agree since I don't think it's a huge thing.
>Women, compared to men, tend to have a superior moral sensibility.
We are all self-interested creatures, there is no angelic sex. Strongly disagree.
>Men should be willing to sacrifice their own well being in order to provide financially for the women in their lives.
Nope, but kids are another matter. I'll allow for cases where she's disabled or something, benevolence isn't inherently bad, so somewhat disagree.
To be continued.
I must be a woman...
>>77503907
You're a white knight cuckold.
>>77505342
you need to prove your cuckness to the local imam, George
>>77505478
c u c k
u
c
k
>>77494447
This thing is pretty retarded. The answer to a lot of those that get classified as "sexist" are obviously in denial that SOME women do the things described there. So when they make a sexist statement without the SOME qualifier you have to pick some variant of somewhat disagree instead of the answer they want you to pick.
>>77505284
Yes you are a hostile sexist because you chose not to put woman on a pedestal while emptying your pockets to support her. Congratulations!
I'll be expecting the rape charges any day now from the local sheriff
Not sure I understand these results.
I've been called a self-hating sexist ~8 times over the course of my life. I hate Toronto.
>>77505087
i already told i'm gonna hang it. maybe blood eagle it.
Seeing as a lady made this, I'll go ahead and assume I'm a sexist pig to save myself some time.
>>77494447
this was hysterical
>quiz only asks about what men should do for women
>nothing about what a woman's role is for a man
this is the official passing score, now
1.17 hostile
0.5 benevolent
Get at me
>>77505444
>Feminists are making unreasonable demands of men.
The /pol/ answer is strongly agree, but I want to point out that "feminist" can mean a pretty much anything from "snip the men, sex war now" to "not a radical islamist." I presume it means a fairly modern third-wave context so I'll say slightly agree because man-spreading, but leave room for not trying to impose legal patriarchy.
>What is your gender identity?
Male, I know exactly how my score will be affected.
>Please identify your age range:
18-34, filthy millennial here.
>Do you live in the United States?
Fight for what's right, fight for your life! Also SC.
>What is the highest level of education you have attained?
Some college, finished 3 years, but I'm gonna need an extra semester.
>Please identify your household income:
30-75k, middle class.
Let's see the results, folks!
>>77503988
Oh wait forgot to post bottom half, apparently I am a hostile yet benevolent sexist, the hell....
>>77497072
>public broadcasting
so she's receiving tax money to do this?
>>77494447
This is bullshit!
>>77506208
Literally Hitler
>>77506146
Looks like I misplaced my fedora today.
>>77506305
Apparently, Kinda feel proud to be honest with you, that is some impressive shitlordness!
This is the perfect score.
Just mean enough to be manipulative and keep them dancing to your tune without them realizing you're treating them like dog shit.
Just seemingly nice enough for them to feel like you really care about them.
In short learn to hide your power levels.
Not quite sure what this is supposed to mean.
>>77506208
you are both toxically masculine and patronizing at the same time. add the gratuitous use of 'cunt' in australian vernacular and you are the feminist anti-christ
>>77494447
>First Question is Gender
>Select Male
>Result: Sexist
>Select Female
>Result: Not sexist.
>>77506512
R8 my score wise man
>>77506296
/pol/ seems to be low on benevolent sexism. Women really are wonderful, but weak and stupid.
>>77500027
Kill yourself no one cares
>>77506714
cuck
