>Arguments against Pedophilia
>>77451158
Well time to rape children then
>>77451249
Do you really think Pedos want rape children?
>>77451158
Blood libel
>>77451291
There are no valid arguments against rape
>>77451324
>le jew maymay
Yes Goy, marry a non-degenerated virgin is evil and insane.
Because they can't consent. Pedophiles are rapists and perverts, they should be put down like a diseased animal and dumped in a ditch.
Children shouldn't have sex. And people should be with people of similar age. They also should marry first.
>>77451291
If pedophilia is ever legalized, if the world gets that bad, I'll give up and just hunt every one of you
You faggots are easy to bait too.
>>77451158
argument #1: fuck you, that's why.
>>77451158
Well that depends on what you consider pedophilia. For example, fucking prepubescent girls is clearly pedophilia, but fucking a 16 year old.. I wouldn't really call it that desu.
the morality of a future american :,)
>>77451397
Of course not.
And saying Pedos want to rape children it's just insane.
>>77451431
Where's my proof?
>>77451454
Mate, 'pedophilia' is not ilegal.
Thoughts =/= Actions
>>77451473
Not-an-argument.jpg
>>77451158
It would put divorce lawyers out of business.
>>77451158
It's sickening, it's morally unacceptable, if you defend pedophiles you are one of the reasons why this planet is going to shit.
>>77451533
>muh feels
Literally Tumblr.
>>77451397
women want to be raped
you don't to give women what they want, do you?
if you they them they win
>>77451497
This
What do you mean, OP? Just hebe?
>>77451531
>Thoughts =/= Actions
Keep it that way.
Legalizing pedophilia is probably one of the few ways to get me to finally snap.
I will force-feed you your own testicles.
>>77451531
>And saying Pedos want to rape children it's just insane.
That's why they do it so often ey
>>77451454
>not watching the collapse of western civilisation from across the back of a sweet sweet loli
Either I get to be part of the resurgence of the west or I get to see it all burn while balls deep in a little girl.
Either way, I win.
>>77451569
Litteraly degenerate. Why not go live in a muslim country or convert to a jew if you want to be a pedo.
Or wait you are already in shitico, typical wetback.
>>77451431
>Because they can't consent.
Honestly, if we base the ability to consent on the understanding of consequences, neither can many women.
>>77451645
Well, everybody is a tough boy on the internet.
>>77451678
Nein.
Child molestation is not a medical diagnosis and is not a synonymous with pedophilia.
Not all pedos rape.
Not everyone who rapes a child is a Pedo.
>Only a small part (16,2 %) of sexual offenders against children meet the criteria (DSM-IV-TR) for pedophilia.
http://www.europsy-journal.com/article/S0924-9338(14)77731-4/abstract
If you rape your enemies, they win
-Justin Dudeweed
>>77451777
If I found out my daughter "let" you stick your cock anywhere, I'd let you understand the consequences.
I hope you do find a way to make your pedo-shit legal.
I really do. I almost WANT to go insane at this point. I want to kill people like you.
>>77451777
Trips of truth. Women forever #BTFO.
>>77451797
You don't have to be tough to kill someone who targets children.
>>77451158
>3d
>>77451158
Here's a good one spic.
Touch my kids and I'll shoot you in the face.
>>77452006
keeping them for yourself eh?
>>77451158
>check flag
unsurprised
>>77451431
>children can't consent
>b-but they are sexually aware enough to change sexuality
>>77451926
>>77451983
Man, relax.
We're having a civilized discussion, no reason to get mad.
>>77452006
>Australia
>Guns
kek
>>77451158
Diddling a kid fucks with their brain. Their personalities and outlook are changed forever. It is the act of sacrificing a child's innocence for the fulfillment of a sick desire. It is a fetish that ruins lives. The wall can't come soon enough.
>>77452006
Lol. With what, straya? You mad cunts aren't allowed to own guns.
>>77451533
Thats coming from belgium, topkek.
>>77451158
Does the Bible (God's Word) say anything against Pedophilia?
>>77452092
>Civilized discussion about how you want to fuck kids
Kill yourself, do it now.
>>77451454
It's funny cause in these stupid PC countries 15 years old is considered pedophilia and grouped with the sicko's that are into 7 year olds. At that age you cant even fucking tell if they're underage at all they look the same as 18 year olds.
Such a shit fucking country this is you'd be crucified as a pedophile for trying to even discuss this in any social environment.
>>77451797
>People that molest children are not pedo's because they do not fit this certain definition of pedophile, even though their actions show they want to sexualize kids.
>>77451454
>>77451645
>>77451926
>>77451983
>>77452157
Edgy, simply edgy.
>>77452099
Yes, but the act is not the problem, the problem is the society that stigmatize the child as a 'poor victim' who got in a 'dirty act'.
>>77451158
>Mexican defending pedophilia
They have to go back.
>>77452099
Only because society makes them feel like they were violated
>>77451158
Ruins lives by twisting young innocent minds. They're never the same and can't enjoy life in the same way other kids do after that
>>77452099
>Diddling a kid fucks with their brain.
That has actually been shown to not be the case.
>>77452056
>b-but they are sexually aware enough to change sexuality
What? No they aren't.
This isn't tumblr lad
>>77451926
>getting this mad over shitposted hypotheticals
Sounds like your issues go deeper, just don't shoot up any fag clubs in your frustration.
>>77452223
>Defending pedophilia
>Not being edgy
Pick one.
>>77452212
>What's a situational agressor?
They don't want fuck a child, they just want have control over somebody else, doesn't matter if it's a child, an adult or a granny. They just want feel in power.
>>77451158
>>77452227
The act is the problem because it is filthy and corrupting and they aren't mature enough to make the decision for themselves. Sex isn't for kids you fucking weirdo
>>77452186
That's not what concerns me so much.
I'm talking about people who would target children.
I will kill anyone who touches my kids.
>arguments
>>77452092
>Australia
>Guns
You underestimate how many 'tragic boating accidents' we had in '96
>>77452212
>lets ignore facts because they may make you feel upset at being wrong
And what about people with a primary sexual attraction to children but do not offend?
Are they not pedophiles? You know, according to your feelings I mean...
>>77452157
>muh thought crimes
kys you oversensitive fatso
There's no more rape of children than rape of women as most pedophiles won't ever harm anyone just like most heterosexuals won't randomly rape just because they feel like it.
You're just afraid of change bro, bestiality is currently being legalized, the slippery slope is real and it's gonna come for your children as well. This is what progressive liberals brings to society.
3d is pd
>>77451431
>Because they can't consent. Pedophiles are rapists and perverts, they should be put down like a diseased animal and dumped in a ditch.
Trust Canada to say things without proof.
>>77451158
Feminists don't like it and /pol/ goes statist over the dumbest things.
>>77452260
>Being a pedo
Again, kill yourself
>>77451158
Fuck you OP. My friend's wife was raped by her uncle when she was 6. It left deep lasting scars to her psyche that will probably never heal. If you want to fuck children so badly why don't you go convert to Islam or go to thailand you sick fuck.
>>77452259
>What? No they aren't.
>This isn't tumblr lad
No, but it is through this process that the SJW hordes will be lead into supporting 'pedo-sexual' rights.
What a time to be alive.
>>77452325
This act can lead to Pedophilia
Pedophiles are not defined by their state of mind
But by their actions.
>>77452355
Mate, kids are sexual being.
Ask Freud.
But I'm not defending the sexual intercourse here.
>>77452285
Presenting arguments are now edgy?
Oh well.
>>77452456
incorrect
>>77452404
ITT: Pedo sympathizers.
>>77452099
>Diddling a kid fucks with their brain.
>>77452236
>>77452099
based
>>77452464
>Presenting arguments are now edgy?
Anything that sexualizes children is edgy.
Slit. Your. Wrists.
>>77452456
>Pedophiles are not defined by their state of mind but by their actions.
That's the most retarded shit I heard today.
Please my brother, use wikipedia.
It infringes on the rights of children, you shithead.
>>77451158
There's literally nothing wrong with being attracted to children.
The problem is when attacks & rapes occur.
The same argument can be made up for anything else? Guns? Sure.
Nothing wrong with liking guns, or owning guns (similar to having children). But it's certainly wrong to kill people with them for any reason aside from self defense.
>>77452568
If the world goes to shit. You better hide from people like me.
Enjoy your thread.
>>77452649
>threatening violence to anonymous people on the internet
wew
>>77452099
No fan of pedos but what exactly is
>a child's innocence
? It's spoken of like a vital organ of some sort but I've never seen it defined.
>>77452498
>>77452568
If you define it as a state of mind
You define it as something outside of their control
If you define it by it's actions they will actually be responsible.
But i know i am wrong by official definitions. But they are trying to slowly make pedophilia acceptable. Pretty sure it's the next step on the ladder of cultural decay
>>77452410
what does pd stand for?
>>77452733
It's a blanket term for keeping a child emotionally and mentally stable.
>>77452649
>>77452540
>>77452236
>>77452608
No if they agree.
But again, I'm no talking about the sexual intercourse, just the simple attraction.
>>77452649
kek
Ok.
>>77452649
It should be illegal to be as edgy as this guy.
>>77452503
More like realism. 20 years ago people would react the same to faggots on this board, now they celebrate a homosexual kike.
>>77452816
That works I guess. Uncle's hands won't do that any good.
>>77452752
Saying Pedos has no control of their sexual impulses is retarded as feminist saying Mans are sexual monsters who rape every woman on the street.
>>77452120
>regulated gun ownership =/= can't own
Pretty happy with the situation
>>77452789
Pig disgusting you baka gaijin desu ne
>>77452752
>a term that used to define sexual preference
>somehow part of a nefarious plot
it's like complaining that somebody shouldn't/couldn't be called gay if they haven't had gay sex. Even if they fantasize about it while jacking off.
>>77451158
What's wrong with accepting Pedophiles?
If you reject them they will be more likely to molest. Just accept them and gave them help.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ck3uOCyWB50
>>77453145
>homosexuals
This is the history, going backwards:
Hebrews (Deuteronomy) - Singular Worship male God. Rape of female child (yes read the hebrew) = man keeps her, pays father some money. Man can execute adulterous women. Man owns the woman (he is ba'al (master, owner) of the woman): it says it explicitly if you read the hebrew. No punishment for man who has sex with unmastered(unmarried) women not his wife. Can have asmany women as he pleases (including young girls - female children). All explicit in the hebrew for those who bother to read it.
Assyrians/Northerners - Pantheon, but male god (marduk) has taken the throne and killed the high goddess. Rape of female = father of female can rape your wife or daughter or have you marry the raped female.
Sumer and friends - Pantheon with Female godesses in equal power with man - Man who rapes a girl is executed. Man who has sex with with women not his wife is thrown out of the house without his posessions and exiled from the house. Woman who has sex with men not her husband while husband is at war is accepted back by the husband when he comes back. Matralineal decent
Around Sumer and Previous: women have multiple husbands.
So if you know history, then you know it is not "well yea, they had to keep property.. bla bla bla, wasn't for male domination". Men being able to rape female children and not suffer punishment but instead keep the girl was an _innovation_ ment to bring happiness and power to men. Just as the change from matralineal decent to patralineal decent, and the execution of anyone worshiping the old goddess cults, and the right of the man to execute a woman he _owns_ who has had sex with another.
It was for male domination (it was good).
So how about you shut the fuck up with your minimizing of things which are good for men. Anyone who has studied history of the near east knows that women ran the show once upon a time and then men took over (thanks to ideas from the north) and put women in their place.
Since the 1800s, however, england has dragged us back to the stone age and women again rule:
Today:
A man who has sex with women not the wife is ejected from the house, the woman keeps it etc (just like in sumer).
Women may have multiple partners, no punishment. (just like in sumer)
Men may NOT have female children as brides.
Men may NOT have multiple females.
Men may NOT rape female children.
Men were executed for rape of female children and unmastered women (England, America), though now it is "merely" forever in prison.
Boys do NOT inherit the property, instead whomever the woman marries gets 1/2 etc.
It's all back to near sumer level.
Martrachy.
Will men be granted an invasion from the north and again a strong Male War and Storm God to wash away the cunts and their supporters?
I only pray to He that such may be.
Living with no girl child to own is no living at all.
Slide thread, and an obvious one at that.
>>77453336
>everything is a slide thread
>>77452985
If we legitimatize it as a Sexual preference the same arguments as for Homosexuality can be used for it. And I do not want it to be classified as a Sexual preference it should be a mental illness.
>>77453008
I choose to define it by it's actions
If a straight guy would have a dick up his ass by his will he would be gay in my eyes
Imagine being such a waste of chromosomes your only chance to have sex is using your power position as an adult to trick children into having sex.
People often joke about this, but seriously,
End
Your
Life
>>77453370
Nah just the obvious bait slide threads. You'll learn newfag.
>>77453292
>>77453332
That's a good text.
Where can I find more of this?
>>77453288
The pink triangle was used for both pedophiles and homosexual, you faggot kike. Leave this site at once.
>>77453336
Yea, just because YOU don't fucking like young girls (because you are a pro-woman's rights cunt-brainwashed pieces of shit ("MUH WHITE HERITAGE WE ALWADSY KILLT PEDOOOSS AND RESPKTED WOMYN!!!")) mean's it's a "slide thread"
FUCK YOU
Not too long ago:
>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.
Deuteronomy chapter 22, verse 28-29 in __hebrew__ (not english).
A man who rapes a (virgin, not-yet-given-away) female child (girl; from infancy till adolescence age), keeps her as bride, pays father.
>>77453469
You surely have bested me, what ever shall I do.
Deuteronomy chapter 22, verse 28-29 in __hebrew__ (not english).
A man who rapes a (virgin, not-yet-given-away) female child (girl; from infancy till adolescence age), keeps her as bride, pays father.
>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.
>Also: see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)
>>77451454
call me in to join you then
>>77453441
>Implying they are different
>>77453292
>>77453332
>>77453450
>A Serbian Poster
I don't get it /pol/. Either feminist SJWs are trying to promote pedophilia to advance their pro liberty agenda, or they are trying to force a negative view of pedophilia to cut competition from young girls. Either one or the other. Which one is it?
Since white men kill any white males who go for girls OR young women, someone has to fuck the young women.
The muslims are doing so, since, unlike you low-class hammerskins/aryan-nation/etc pieces of stinking filth, they do NOT kill eachother over having sex with female children and young fertile women.
Instead the recognize that it is to the benifit of the man for him to have young women and young girls, and that they all want this.
The white man (celt, gaul, etc) thinks to himself "ok, well I am OK with settling for the older, fatter woman, so I'll just live with that.... and I'll HATE the '''chomo'''s (hehe, made up a word, I so inteligent -WUZ kangz before ROME 'slaved us (GRRRR, and then AEngland too)), I good boy and REAL Man - The woman says so!".
The Celt/Gaul thinks like a Dog.
The Roman, Arab, Greek, Egyptian, Mediterranean thinks "How do I get what I want the most, with the least expenditure".
The Mediterranian thinks like an intelligent man, or a merchant, or architect:
"I want THIS, how do I get THIS."
The Celt/Gaul (AKA the white, especially the white underclass in England and America) thinks: "I want to avoid punishment, what must I do to get something that I am allowed to have that is somewhat acceptable, without being punished?" IE: "How do I survive". He is not goal orientated, just wants to survive (like a dog).
This is you, "fellow" whites: you are animals. You are dogs. You are slaves to the woman. You always were since 2000 years ago till now.
Sadly someone let you have control of the culture (which you immediately elevated woman with).
You really need to die. You are barbarians controlled by the cunt of your fat old women.
They manipulate you as easily as plucking a hair.
This is why you kill the "chomos".
Hopefully the Arabs will destroy you.
Better that happen than we live under your feminism forever. Life is not living without pleasant things: you slaves have brought us down to your level, like lobsters. Gone are our child brides.
>>77453424
>Small dick
>No selfsteem
Liberal 'argument'.
But no, I see little girls as pure creatures, I will not hurt them in any sense.
>>77453441
>you faggot kike
No, that's Milo.
Honestly why do you think the men at the top bring muslims in?
It's so their culture of marrying QT young girls can be re-asserted.
The Celtic culture is worthless and just low IQ retards worshiping "muh goddess": which they've been doing since neolithic times.
The Mediterraneans and Arabs have the correct view on women and girls and always had. Marry female children: because they are cute and a pet.
>>77453292
>>77453332
>>77453508
>he took the time to write all of this out, saved it, and waited for the right thread to post it
>>77451158
I never thought thoroughly on that matter but i don't like idea of 60yo man having sex with 15yo girl
>>77453414
Bruh, if you only define them as people who have offended, others with the attraction can't get the help they need even if they don't want to offend.
But hey, raped kids is a small price to pay for the sense of satisfaction you get from being right on an anonymous Cambodian shadow puppet board, amirite?
>>77453601
What's wrong with that?
>>77452227
>>77452236
Actually in America the child could never be considered "at fault" in any sense of the word. How could they be? No child is going to be competent enough to fully understand what a sexual relationship is about. Children are, by definition, too immature to handle any aspect of a sexual relationship in any capacity. Physically, emotionally, what have you. They are not ready. They're kids.
>>77452257
>>77452532
The child is never the same after. I'm not talking about the brain physically deforming.
>>77452733
It is the magical time in a persons life when they don't automatically view each new person they meet as some kind of sex object. It is that time where you can make mistakes but it's okay, you didn't know any better. It's a time when the only thing you had to worry about was your grades and the state of your room.
>>77453577
>Tricking a kid into having sex. Something that will severely damage her body/mind
>"I would never hurt a child"
You are delusional, hang yourself
>18 BABIES after impregnating CHILDREN
> impregnating CHILDREN
>impregnating
>CHILDREN
This is not possible, hammersking/Aryan-brotherhood/celtic piece of trash.
What other things do your women force into your infinitely malleable brain, slave race?
Kill all the "Chomo"s right?
Why do we have to live under the culture of woman and retarded celts and gauls?
Once upon a time men could marry female children. Then the celts multiplied and multiplied and multiplied and their slavish devotion to cunts and consensus made it taboo.
>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.
But kill all CHOMOs (made up word by you fucking low IQ retards) right?
You don't contribute one piece of spittle to anything. You just consume drugs and take money from the govt. But your the White Pride, right?
The Romans and AEnglish (when they existed and were in power) were right about you.
Woman says something, suddenly it was YOUR thought, MANNNNS though. Yea KILL ALL CHOMOS!!!!!
Deuteronomy has it right.
>Also: see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)
Ofcourse you hammerskin faggots deleted my thread (you fucking people should be killed) where I posted full explanation and tons of citations. Ooops got to delete the thread then! Cant have this coming out.
I love it when you "chomo" hating white nationalists are killed dead.
I hope that the muslims take over rather than your culture continuing to rule. 140 years of celtic retardation and cunt worship is enough.
Marry Little Girls.
Kill Feminists (including of the White Pride types that have "chomo" in their daily lexicon)
>>77453658
>The child is never the same after. I'm not talking about the brain physically deforming.
nice citation
>>77453671
>Serbs
You need help. Serious help.
DEUTRONOMY DOES NOT REQUIRE CONSENT.
CONSENT IS A WOMAN-S CULTURES DEMAND (aka: "white" cuntture)
Deuteronomy chapter 22, verse 28-29, in __hebrew__ read it.
(Rape of female child, yes it says it in the hebrew)
Whites are retarded slaves of women.
The women are smarter than the gaul/celt men.
Wish I wasn't a part of their race :(
I never really understand why sane people here respond to clearly insane people like OP.
What do you hope to accomplish exactly? Do you think pedophilia and such urges can be cured by anonymous discussion on Djiboutian seashell exchange forum?
Only cure for shit like that is bullet to the back of the head. Unless you can do that, don't waste time.
>>77453669
>All relations has to end in penetrative acts
I'm getting tired of this kind of thinking.
I'm not pro contact.
>>77453754
But anon
That's not an argument
Only way to win is not to play.
You are supposed to marry female children, not grown ass women.
>In the United States, as late as the 1880s most States set the minimum age at 10-12, (in Delaware it was 7 in 1895).[8] Inspired by the "Maiden Tribute" female reformers in the US initiated their own campaign[9] which petitioned legislators to raise the legal minimum age to at least 16, with the ultimate goal to raise the age to 18. The campaign was successful, with almost all states raising the minimum age to 16-18 years by 1920.
>Also: see: Deuteronomy chapter 22 verses 28-29, hebrew allows men to rape girl children and keep them: thus man + girl is obviously fine. Feminists are commanded to be killed as anyone enticing others to follow another ruler/judge/god is to be killed as-per Deuteronomy. It is wonderful when this happens from time to time: celebrate)
Also getting with a grown ass woman is probably adultery as she was probably another man's woman whom she sinfully left (women cannot leave the man) or you took from.
If I were running the place, all these celts, gauls, white nationalists (really white-knight nationalists) who are opposed to men marrying female children would be slaughtered in the cells on by on.
Just as the romans slaughtered them when the gaulish women blocked the men's escape with ox-carts (because the women got to decide this).
These races are always slaves to the woman. It's in the genes. When they hook up with a woman, even a fat one, a switch clicks in their mind and they do whatever she wants and her opinions become their opinion: all the while thinking they're in control still as a Man! I've seen it happen personally. It's a weakness in the organism that is the celt and the gaul.
Imagine being so beta that your mind is telling you the only way to get off and start a family is by taking advantage of a child who won't even realise what a fuck up you are.
Just when you think it's over, this Serb has more! Pedos confirmed for having autism.
>>77453833
So you just want to love a child? So get married and have children...?
The "white nationalist" who's mythology hails back to
the northman and the gaul has always been the friend of woman
and the enemy of man.
During the wars between Rome and the barbarians in Gaul,
it was written that the women in Gaul would block the men
from fleeing battle with their ox carts. The women decided
that the men would fight or die: the men were not to have the
agency to save themselves to live to see another day. The women
decided this. The men obeyed (you're not a MAN if you don't! (not a white man anyway)).
The white man is a golem of the white woman. He follows her directive.
He always has. He was then. He is now.
The same spirit resides within the white nationalists.
They always have been allies of women and enemies of men.
Marry Little Girls.
Kill Feminists.
Little girls are cute and I want to cuddle one.
>>77453918
Look at the state of your life dude.
Hang yourself today
why do people freak out whenever somebody mentions pedophilia
i know some guys where any topic is fair game, but the instant pedophilia is even so much as hinted at, their buttblast-o-meter goes critical and they get stuck in angry bear mode for the rest of the day
it's almost like it's a taboo to even think about
>>77453918 (You)
>>77453848 (You)
>>77453698 (You)
>>77453671 (You)
Didn't Achmeds like you get genocided? How are you still in Serbia?
Children are pure and are desirable to sick fucks like OP.
Appreciating a beautiful child and thinking what a beautiful young woman/man it might be is absolutely normal for a cultivated human being.
"I'd like to spin it on my dick, right now" is savage.
the raid is strong in this thread. pedos should just hang themselves
>inb4 not an argument
>>77451158
Walk the walk hand out your daughter to get gang raped or shut up. Words are easy faggot.
>>77453832
I need arguments against pedophilia.
But all I get are 'muh feels' and 'muh sexual impotence'
>>77453862
>muh sexual frustration
Liberal/10
>>77453903
See:
>>77453952
>>77453975
(Imo) it is the absolute pinnacle of degeneracy.
>>77451158
Would you want your daughter fucking some guy in their 30s or older while they themselves are not even a teenager?
>>77453903
>So you just want to love a child? So get married and have children...?
To the white the man is NEVER 'ba'al' (master, owner). The white man's "solution" is to always cave to the woman.
with a young girl, she's cute before and after and nice.
You, however, like the gauls before you, are just an animal, you follow your urges and are a "real man". You are controlled by cunts.
The cunt wants kids. Your "duty" is to provide her with these kids. You never own anything: you're just a doner. If you ever touch any of the woman's kids you go to prison.
In men's systems, where the men are not cattle like yourself, men take female children as brides. They do alot of touching and enjoyment with the cute female child. They are not just inseminating a sow in the hope of having the "joy" of being allowed to be a father (a woman cuntrolled "joy").
In one system men get cute young girls and have sex with them and rule over them.
In the other system men "get" a sow. Children are born. Men do not have sex with cute young girls, merely the man "gets" to raise them until they too become sows. No man is permitted to enjoy a young girl. Only sows.
You're a fucking animal and should be killed.
I wish I could go balls deep in a 12 y/o
>>77454002
Yes? You can cuddle with your child? To me it looks like you are not a pedo. You want children but are to insecure to find a woman to make those children with.
Legalize lolicon!
THE GOD OF DEUTERONOMY DOES NOT REQUIRE CONSENT.
Deuteronomy 22, 28-29 HEBREW.
(rape female child (unbetrothed), keep her, pay father)
Remeber: under Deuteronomy the man is ba'al : master, owner.
UNLIKE WHITE __CUNT__TURE.
The only people who follow ANY of this are the muslims, which is WHY they should be let in.
All pro-women's CUNT-tures should be destroyed.
Marry little girls.
>>77454089
>sexual frustation
Aren't you getting tired of using this ''argument''?
>>77453714
Let's just say I know from experience, dude. No child is equipped to deal with having sex forced upon them because they're too young, weak, and/or naive to fight back. That type of shit breaks adults. What do you think it does to a kid? It's not worth your rotten nut.
>>77451158
>3d pig disgusting
>There are multitudes of aspects in Islam, Christianity, etc. that are incompatible with western civilization, and they should be mocked mercilessly.
And adherents to both Islam and the Bible (Old Testament) are encouraged to cut people like yourself down inorder to establish the social order espoused in said religions.
"western civilization", aka modern christianity, aka pro-women's rights, anti man+girl pedophillia, pro homosexuality, pro-female empowerment, anti male-overlordship; is just another religion. Just as marxism was.
The old religions must fight if they wish to remove the new woman's religion from ruling forever.
>>16022
>No civilized White country has the death penalty for homosexuality. That's a mud thing.
They used to. Also you could marry female children.
Oh sorry, I was reading history.
In HERstory white men always hated pedos who liked young girls and blablabla since 200000000 y
>>77454021
>Wants to own children as sex slaves and thinks he deserves it.
Yes but I'M the animal here.
Get help.
>>77454002
Argument is the bullet to the back of the head you'll recieve. What makes you think you're entitled to "arguments"?
This world has gone to shit exactly when everything had to be backed with arguments.
But you already got an argument, it's harming to children, and parents don't want it, and they are in charge of children until maturity.
If you don't value that argument, you'll value force that will be used to end you if you transgress on society-established norms.
Act on your urges, and you die. It's very simple m8.
THE GOD OF DEUTERONOMY DOES NOT REQUIRE CONSENT.
Deuteronomy 22, 28-29 HEBREW.
(rape female child (unbetrothed), keep her, pay father)
Remeber: under Deuteronomy the man is ba'al : master, owner.
UNLIKE WHITE __CUNT__TURE.
>that kg3kyOSO edgelord ITT
ayy limão
>>77454228
>This world has gone to shit exactly when everything had to be backed with arguments
That's a stupid logic m8.
Kinda laughable.
>>77454172
Yes go ahead and ignore the rest.
You want to be a father, not a pedo.
>>77454175
>forced
We weren't talking about rape, except in the statutory sense.
Having sex with children is bad.
>>77454021
>all men should fuck 12 year old kids because adult women are whores
Kill yourself, Ivan
>>77454332
Every Pedo has a strong paternal instinct
>>77454350
>because I said so
>>77453658
>The child is never the same after.
>>77454386
>Every Pedo has a strong paternal instinct
LITERALLY LAUGHED OUT LOUD IRL
I just lost 20 Good Boy Points for waking mommy because of you.
>>77454228
>Argument is the bullet to the back of the head you'll recieve. What makes you think you're entitled to "arguments"?
I would gladly torture you to death to fufil the commandment in Deuteronomy to kill anyone who entices one to follow another judge/ruler/god.
Deuteronomy chapter 22, verse 28-29, in _____HEBREW______ allows men to rape female children (read the hebrew) and keep the girl and pay the father.
The war and storm God of Deuteronomy says to kill ANYONE who entices us to follow other things.
YOU need to die. When moslems execute feminists they are following the will of the God of the book of Deuteronomy.
I pray for it, and sometimes it happens.
May it happen to you aswell.
>>77454386
>pedos
>strong paternal instinct
>literally kill childrens after they're done with them.
Why are pedophiles or sex offenders hated a lot more than people like murderers or armed robbers?
>>77454328
Why are you focusing on that in any case?
I already told you. If you act on your urges, you'll die. Self-preservation is a strong argument if your mind has any capacity at all to act like a human.
If not, who cares dude? You're already malfunctioning, thus you don't really need to live. Killing you is kinda merciful.
>>77454386
Yes and they can't achieve become a father because 99% of them are social outcasts. They take that hatred of (adult) women and think of a situation where they can have a child and not a adult women. And that is how they became pedo's.
>>77454386
>Every Pedo has a strong paternal instinct
>>77451158
t. mexican intellectual
one more reason for Trump to build the fucking wall
children should not be allowed to make any of their own decisions about anything until they're 18 tbqh
I don't trust dumb ass kids to make good life decisions. 16-18 is my position for age of consent; not too young to make stupid decisions, not too old to have their hands held forever.
>>77454540
Cause you're taking advantage of a person who physically and mentally can't fight back.
>>77454527
>literally kill childrens after they're done with them
>>77454486
Hey bro, take one of these, you'll feel better.
>https://www.drugs.com/clozaril.html
>>77454343
How is a child going to fend off a creepy adult who won't leave them alone?
How is the child going to understand that this person is mentally unbalanced, can not find someone closer to his own age, and instead surrounds himself with increasingly younger children that he can relate with and abuse more easily?
How is a child going to understand and consent to the full implications and repercussions of a sexual relationship period, much less with a person so much more developed, physically and mentally, than they are?
>>77454527
OP obviously refers to a situation where the girl wants it. You don't need to kill anyone after that, and there's no mental change in the girl if it isn't rape
>>77454540
Childs are the future of the human kind, so it's naturally have a strong protective instinct against them.
>>77454527
Well, I prove you that's not true.
You have a counter arguement?
>>77454562
>Rape somebody
>Get convicted
Nothing wrong with that.
>>77454107
>Not living where lolicon is already legal
I mean its a drawing for fucks sake, what kind of shithole do you live in where a drawing is fucking illegal to view?
>>77454540
Because every sane human realises that fucking a child ruins him/her for the rest of his/her life. That is worse than taking some item that isn't yours or ending a life.
>>77454710
it's actually illegal in a few states
where are you?
>>77454710
>what kind of shithole do you live in where a drawing is fucking illegal to view?
Australia and pretty much every country in Europe.
>>77454649
You had plenty of such cases.
In any case, pedophile is not a normal person. It's not just pedophilia that's the problem. It's always followed with something else.
It's absolutely unnatural to be attracted to sexually undeveloped human beings. You're functioning badly, from biological standpoint.
Same with homosexuals, and other disorders that are today seen as ''normal''. Nothing of that is normal, or good.
Question to all the pedos ITT
What if you marry a 12 year old and you are married for 10 years. She is an adult now. Will you stay with her?
Pedophiles are disgusting people who do the most amazing mental gymnastics to convince themselves that the child wanted anal. Disgusting.
>>77451158
Kids are not sufficiently mature enough to make decisions that will affect their adult life, this is why we try children differently to adults in court.
Paedophiles take advantage of this immaturity, ultimately for self-gratification and to the detriment of the children invoved.
Obviously children mature at different ages, but it would be impossible to legislate for this so an arbitrary age is used.
>tl;dr get fucked you abusive creeps, nonces should have their bollocks crushed by bricks
>>77454704
So what's the issue here?
I clearly said ''if you act on your urges''. Thought crime doesn't exist. You can think of abusing children all you want, your mind is your own realm.
But once you act on it in any way, you transgressed on core social norms and solution is your death, since you obviously can't function in society, and you present a danger.
>>77454687
>previous post specifically mentions this was not about forced sex
>"How is a child going to fend off a creepy adult who won't leave them alone?"
Well, this definitely won't go around in circles
>>77454895
Sorry mate, opinion discarded.
>>77454885
I really have no idea.
I guess it depends on the situation.
>>77454961
>and you present a danger.
Where's my proof?
Little girls have bodies and faces like little boys.
Nobody likes faggots.
>>77454786
In a state where its legal
>>77455027
Don't worry, m8. You won't be posting here after President Trump is elected.
>>77454386
>Every Pedo has a strong paternal instinct
You should consider the rope.
>>77454699
If she wants to have sex then she's not a "little girl" to begin with, which would fall under the category of "ephebophilia", not pedophilia.
>>77454885
That would depend on a lot of things. I would no longer be sexually attracted to her, but I may still be emotionally attached to her. Can emotional attachment alone bind a marriage?
>>77454803
Not surprised, those places hate freedom.
>>77454343
I mean how else could you characterize such a relationship, other than rape? The child is too immature, physically and mentally, to be making decisions about sex. They are predisposed to trust in adults, especially if the adult claims to love and care for them. To take that trust and twist it as an excuse to take advantage of and abuse the child is unacceptable.
>>77455107
fuck off namefag
>>77455053
>long hair
>high voices
>gentle
>acts femenine
Wait, what's makes me a faggot?
>>77455107
>after President Trump is elected
>Implying
:^)
>>77455188
Where's the argument, huehue bro?
You're leaving out important information. Pedophilia is way too vague,
Do you mean a child rapist? Someone banging a 17 year old? There's a lot of scenarios and each very different.
>>77455293
but you mean pedo like you are attracted to children less than 9 or what? ephebophilia is pretty natural
>>77455004
So you can have a single relationship for more than 8ish years?
And that seems normal to you? You seriously think a 12 year old child will start a relationship with anyone over 30? No. So from 20-80 you will only have 1 solid relationship for 8 years. What a sad thing to look forward to.
>>77455293
Where's your argument regarding your statement that pedophiles have a strong paternal instinct? Are you retarded or just outright Mexican?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLObkZTi5TM
>>77455361
>17 years
>Pedophilia
I hate American logic.
>>77455393
>but you mean pedo like you are attracted to children less than 9 or what?
Well, yes. That's what Pedophilia is about.
>>77455398
Can't have.
>>77455009
read
>>77455268
no matter how you slice it, is is a grown adult taking advantage of the trust entrusted to them by a young child, perverting it, and turning them into a fetish sex toy for your own pleasure. The child is simply not equipped to consent to a grown adult's sexual advances.
>>77455027
Since you acted on your urge, it's clear you can't control it, and thus there exists a big chance of you repeating the offense.
Social norm you violated is of such importance that your act warrants automatic death sentence. It's just how it is.
But I don't really need to offer you any arguments or proofs bro. You can rationalize and discuss all you want here (and even get some support considering the lunatics that post here), but in real life you're impotent. Unless our Christian societies crumble, and are replaced by something else, pedophilia will never become socially tolerated.
So you're wasting time. It will never be normal. It's not biologically normal for start, it's not logical. You won't escape what follows.
>>77455361
Pedophilia isn't an act and 17-year-olds are pubescent or post-pubescent, so an attraction to them wouldn't constitute pedophilia.
>>77455558
so then by your definition pedophilia is any child that is prepubescent?
>>77451158
>Mexico
>>77455627
It's like that by medical definition. Only today pedophilia is also extended up to age of consent in colloquial speech.
>>77455393
>but you mean pedo like you are attracted to children less than 9 or what?
age is just a number.
>>77455627
The literal definition of pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children.
>>77455676
>Sweden
I can do this too.
>>77455627
>a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children
>>77455743
>today pedophilia is also extended up to age of consent in colloquial speech
Maybe in your country.
>>77455268
>The child is too immature, physically and mentally, to be making decisions about sex.
What qualifies a person to be capable of making decisions about sex? Do we require women to take some sort of test?
>They are predisposed to trust in adults
According to what?
>especially if the adult claims to love and care for them.
As are most people.
>To take that trust and twist it as an excuse to take advantage of and abuse the child is unacceptable.
circular reasoning and unproven premises. what is even going on in this sentence?
>>77455763
Look at that baby slut
It's totally checking me out and giving nonverbal consent
>>77455361
>implying any of the above are bad
ok americuck
>>77455743
>>77455786
I don't get why it's aged up till 18 in the US then.
>>77455846
>>77455763
The memes are too strong.
Shoo shoo Anti pedos.
>>77455361
>rape is bad
t. cucked male feminist
>>77455878
>>77455924
No, I did not imply anything. You're just projecting that every posts hates you.
>>77455826
I don't know how it works in Mexico, but adult person sexually abusing a minor who's below the age of consent is called ''pedophilia'' in colloquial speech here.
Again, dude, you can discuss until tomorrow here, you can even ''win'' arguments conditionally speaking.
But in real life, that matters, pedophilia will never be accepted. Even in prisons, among scum of human society, they don't tolerate pedophiles. It's a line that can't be crossed.
>>77455627
It's nonsense to define age of consent by chronological age though, so long it isn't about "consensual sex" with 13-year old and below. Some of them are clearly engaging in consensual sex or at the very least getting sexually involved to a degree with someone, and in those cases, they're certainly grown up enough to consent, which is why I believe 14 is fair enough.
It is still widely frowned upon having and older man dating a girl that age, which is perfectly reasonable. But I honestly don't see the problem of an 18-years old lad dating a 15-year old lass.
>>77455880
because laws and language bleed together in weird ways here through the magic of cop and lawyer drama shows.
pedos are wrong because society and morality doesn't accept them, simple. There is not an absolute right or wrong, simply you are not accepted as normal being, but as cancer of society. That's it.
>>77456026
Sorry mang.
Pedophiles =/= Child Molesters
>but adult person sexually abusing a minor who's below the age of consent is called ''pedophilia'' in colloquial speech her
Even If she's 17?
Man, that's absolutely wrong.
>>77451446
>And people should be with people of similar age
Thats stupid. A realitionship is always much more healthy when the young one is the women. Look at our granpas and learn.
I agree with you anyways, kids should be protected, respected and no adult should touch them. Pedos are scum. But a
>>77455952
how is leaving out irrelevant info projecting
When people say they hate pedophiles, are they exclusively referring to child molesters or are they referring to literally anybody who has a sexual attraction to children?
>>77456226
the latter in most normie crowds. and child means under 18 there.
>>77456226
Most people see pedophilia as sterotypical rape van old man snatching kids.
>>77454540
Because most people have a kid, not many own banks.
>>77451158
>Arguments against Pedophilia
>letting ahmed fuck your daughters
wew lad
>>77456040
There's no problem with that but limitations of life force the law-maker to proscribe an age.
>>77456099
How is there no absolute right or wrong?
Absolute right is what causes happiness.
Absolute wrong is what causes suffering.
Social norms exist to create a society of happy people. Of course, historically and now many failed, and I'm talking about society-level morals, not individual morals.
Maybe someone is poor and his life would be better if he just murdered a rich guy and stole his property. But if everyone in society was allowed to do that, that would be a miserable society.
>>77456161
>Even If she's 17?
That's not pedophilia.
>Pedophilia:
An adult who is sexually attracted to young children. Also, especially British, paedophile.
That being said, a pedophile is attracted to young children only, or, is simply British.
>Ephebophilia
A sexual attraction to a teenaged girl or boy who is not at the legal age of consent. Differs from Pedophilia in that said girl or boy has already reached and/or gone through puberty.
>>77454540
Because of cultural conditioning.
>>77456226
Both are considered one in the same to normies due to media brainwashing.
>>77456385
>Absolute right is what causes happiness.
>Absolute wrong is what causes suffering.
be more vague faggot
happiness is always gained at someones expense
>>77456161
>Even If she's 17?
Yes.
>Pedophiles =/= Child Molesters
True in absolute sense but pedophilia presents a risk you will do that. However small that risk is in your mind, for society it's huge.
Right now you're not in the realm of your own mind. You're defending pedophilia, you're making your thoughts known to other people.
You're transgressing against social norms. As I said, what follows is death.
That's just how it is. Imagine if you beat your head against the wall, and I told you ''don't do that, you'll harm yourself'', and you keep repeating ''give me argument''.
Am I to blame for your predicament? Is society to blame?
Of course not. It's your own fault. Pedophilia is the behavioral equivalent of beating your head against the wall.
You have been told, yet you don't want to accept that. It's no one's duty to explain you that.
>>77456385
>Absolute right is what causes happiness.
>Absolute wrong is what causes suffering.
and that is exatvly why it doesn't exist absolute good or bad
for someone something can cause happiness, for another one can cause suffering.
You can't think in term of individuals
>>77454803
Drawings are legal, like, everywhere in Europe.
>>77453614
Just wait until you're 60. That will change.
>>77456478
He knows that. He's making fun of Montenegrin society's stupid use of words.
>>77456385
>Absolute right is what causes happiness
So if I rob you it is morally acceptable because I get happiness in return?
>Inb4 no because someone is getting hurt
Thanks for proving my point that paedophilia is morally not okey.
>>77451158
Your kids.
What a disgusting pedo
Gas him, hans
>>77456507
It's impossible to not be vague when talking about this.
>happiness is always gained at someones expense
True. I actually said it badly, indeed there's no ''absolute'' good. But there is good.
It's maximizing happiness for a society. It's doing it in that way so you don't cause unhappiness for someone else. Of course, it's not possible to be perfect in this. But the less unhappiness you cause, the better.
>>77455827
>What qualifies a person to be capable of making decisions about sex? Do we require women to take some sort of test?
It's about age and maturity, you're playing dumb. There is a physical, mental, and legal transition from "child" to "adult".
>They are predisposed to trust in adults
>According to what?
See, this is what you don't pick up when all you're thinking about in a room full of preschoolers is sex. Children trust adults instinctually. They realize on a primal level that adults have been around longer and are much wiser than they are. They depend on adults to care for them. That makes it all the more despicable when some loser decides to betray that trust and scar the kid for life by introducing sex too early in their development.
>especially if the adult claims to love and care for them.
>As are most people.
A child isn't going to know that the adult is just saying nice things in order to get laid.
>circular reasoning and unproven premises.
What's circular? Children can not consent, because they are too physically and mentally immature to cope with such situations. What's unproven? Adult-on-child rape ruins lives and we know this by observing folks who've had their innocence stolen from them by an adult they trusted.
>what is even going on in this sentence?
Try reading it. Word by word until the light bulb comes on.
what is even going on in this sentence?
>>77456617
But I said already I'm talking on society-level, not personal level.
>>77456698
>So if I rob you it is morally acceptable because I get happiness in return?
Read:
>Maybe someone is poor and his life would be better if he just murdered a rich guy and stole his property. But if everyone in society was allowed to do that, that would be a miserable society.
I'm talking about good or bad on society level, not individual level. Social norms regulate society as whole.
>>77456723
>There is a physical, mental, and legal transition from "child" to "adult".
Define the point of physical and mental transition.
The only defined point of transition that I can find is legal.
>>77456593
Who's being hurt when I say you ''I like little girls''? The ''Society structure'' has no feelings m8.
>>77456703
kek
>>77453658
>It is the magical time in a persons life when they don't automatically view each new person they meet as some kind of sex object.
I have always, for as long as I can remember (age of 2), viewed females as sex objects. In kindergarten, I had a small harem. We played doctor on the little house on the playground at recess.
Years later I tracked down almost all of those girls and fucked them senseless. Except for the two that committed suicide.
>>77456785
>Fucking children an masse won't cause societal problems when those children grow up
Wew
OP.
If you want to be with kids, open a daycare or become a teacher.
>>77456847
>who's being hurt
Social norms. You're defending a behavior that's forbidden by society. You're also hurting society morals.
>>77456831
Are you seriously mentally ill? What about her first period or a dudes first production of live sperm. These things both dont happen to 8 year old children.
I love the amount of butthurt and armchair philosopher psueds these threads bring out.
>>77451158
Remember the days when you were a little nino? Would you enjoy those times while getting your ass rammed?
