>>77229997
I hope so. We need kebab removal so fast your head will spin.
Considering it's unconstitutional, no.
>>77230153
Lol
Sure
>>77229997
i hope so .
>>77229997
Kebab seem to want it just as badly as Trump. They literally cannot stop killing people
>>77229997
Doesn't need to. It's against someone we're at war with so he can pull an executive order
>>77229997
It doesn't have to pass anything. The president has the authority to dictate restrictions like that.
>>77229997
Of course it will. Do you think we're stopping with Trump? We'll meme Pepe-tweeting alt-right candidates into Congress too. We're going full speed ahead on this. State and federal level.
>>77229997
Won't work. Trump doesn't have a plan.
>>77229997
Obama did it and no one even reported on it. Yes it will.
It's already passed.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1182
(f) Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline.
>>77229997
Pass? It's a presidents executive order dude. 8 usc section 1182 law.cornell.edu a president has the right to suspend immigration from groups or nations he deems unfit for American interests. This doesn't need Congress.
>>77230380
Robert Morrow for Senate!
>>77229997
With the attack on faggot club the other night, it just may. Not to mention the fact that he has enough evidence of it failing all over Europe.
>>77229997
He doesn't need one, obama did a temporary ban in 2014 using an executive order.
>>77230153
where in the constitution does it say we have to let people immigrate?
>>77230153
>unconstitutional
>>77230460
BUILD
>>77230153
Where in the constitution? Point it out.
>>77229997
He doesn't need to pass anything. Congress passed a statue in 1891 that made people inadmissible if they practice polygamy. It was aimed at the Mormons and no court since has ruled it unconstitutional
>>77230217
The constitution clearly states freedom of religion dumb cunt
>>77230877
THE
>>77230153
How could Jimmy Carter do it then?
Sort of surprised that it isnt a big thing in the US that it already has happened before.
>>77231277
> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Doesn't sound like we're obligated to accept them into our collective assholes.
>>77229997
If he keeps pushing it, with no facts on how to implement it, it will cost him the election.
Base voters (middle aged or retired) want safety. They see his plans as half baked. Go look up what he says.
> Mr trump how will you implement this ban?
Well we will have the customs agents ask them if they are Muslim, and if they say yes, we won't let them in.
That's the planning of a child.
/pol/ May love trump, but he's scaring the normies. Most will go middle of the road because they are afraid of pissing off Islam and being attacked on native soil.
IRONICALLY ITS HILLARY'S WAR IN SYRIA THAT STARTED ALL OF THIS. But everyone forgets this so quickly. It's actually in her declassified emails, that she wanted to unsettle Syria because, "that's what's best for Israel", but most people won't/can't read that far.
>>77229997
Yes. This is nothing new for our republic. We ban those who wish to murder us. PERIOD.
It doesn't need to pass it's an executive power
>>77231277
Yeah, he said Muslims, not people who follow Islam. He means literally all kebabs, even those who follow other faiths.
>>77231520
>because they are afraid of pissing off Islam and being attacked on native soil.
>What is WWI and WWII
When a white guy shoots up a black church in Charleston, you don't call for a ban on white guys. What's the difference here?
>>77231402
Obama has already done it as well.
>>77231520
Denying them access to our country isn't the same as prohibiting the free exercise of their religion.
Besides, that clause in the constitution is going to end our society if a lot of them get in, and establish citizenship. Classical liberalism, despite being the system I'd most like to live under, is helpless against Islam.
>>77231645
Digging that hole deeper and deeper lmao
>>77230153
>>77231277
He is going to walk it down to a ban on immigration from "high risk" countries.
>>77229997
American law supports the president's ability to do so. It's been done before, it needs to be done again.
>>77231520
>Well we will have the customs agents ask them if they are Muslim, and if they say yes, we won't let them in.
So you didn't listen to his speech yesterday and you know absolutely nothing about his policies but still feel the need to spout your ignorant bullshit?
>>77230153
its been done before
>>77231277
Freedom of religion for citizens of our country you dumb cunt. Rapefugees are not citizens protected by the Constitution and Amendments.
>>77231520
Just ban immigration from the middle east you idiot.
>>77229997
>banning all Muslims
You forgot to add deport all Mexicans
The subtle hillshill spreading lies with a touch of truth.
Trump wants to halt middle eastern entry into the US until there is a process to see who they are.
Europe just let in anyone.
Trump wants to deport illegal aliens whether they are from Mexico or not.
Why is it ok for Mexico to have more stringent immigration laws then the US?
No, it will be neogtiated down to banning people from regions where ISIS is active.
If Trump had proposed that, no one would have cared.
Rand Paul proposed that exact plan and everyone ignored him.
Trump said this to get everyone's attention.
Haven't you even read The Art Of The Deal?
>>77230153
I don't think your constitution was intended to protect every shitskin on Earth. Just the ones who already live in America.
>>77230153
The constitution doesn't apply to non-citizens.
>>77232039
The constitution doesn't only apply to citizens
>>77232328
It only applies within US borders. If they're not here they're not protected by our constitution.
Trump said in his latest speech that the president has the power to ban immigiration from a certain class of people, a "class of people" being determined by the president.
Here's the quote:
"The immigration laws of the United States give the president powers to suspend entry into the country of any class of persons. Now, any class — it really is determined and to be determined by the president for the interests of the United States. And it’s as he or she deems appropriate. Hopefully it’s he in this case."
btfo
>>77232244
The thing with the constitution is that most of its language is ambiguous. The idea was to make it adaptable to changing circumstance, but that also means people can prop up ridiculous stuff while pretending the constitution explicitly supports them.
One thing going on in america is liberals claiming that the constitution says stuff it doesn't. The Second amendment never covered automatic firearms, the bill of rights extends to foreign nationals etc.
>>77230153
>border restrictions are unconstitutional, goyim
>>77232328
>>77232321
This faggot
>>77232575
But that doesn't trump the 1st amendment that clearly states that you can't legislate against a religion. Then again, the constitution doesn't apply near borders.
Please make it so
>>77230460
What the fuck did you say Pico? The wall is a start, you can look at it from your side and wish every day you were on the other side.
>>77230153
>>77232328
Ya, it does.
>>77233254
Banning non-citizens from entering the country doesn't disrupt them from practicing their religion. It only does if you accept jihading as a part of the Religion of Peace
Never
>what is political capital?
>>77232812
It's funny because the Second Amendment is quite possibly the most plainly worded part of the entire constitution. It literally exists so that the people could have a means to overthrow the government in case they became too tyrannical, or interpreted the other parts of the constitution in such a way so as to allow for greater tyranny. The direct intent was for the citizenry to be able to match the military capabilities of the army directly.
Hilariously, this means that the founding fathers would probably have been in favor of private ownership of ballistic missiles, jet fighters, tanks, and so on if they had seen their development occur.
>>77234121
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_71q5lVEjc
>>77233254
>that clearly states that you can't legislate against a religion.
And he's not.
He's legislating against people coming from countries with high terrorist links
ala Libya, Afghanistan, Syria
He's not banning Muslims. Just immigration from countries related to ISIS or terror organisations.
>>77234121
Back when they wrote the 2nd A ordinary citizens were allowed to own literally every single weapon the military did including cannons and warships.
>>77229997
>ban all kebabs
It's a ban on immigration, you advanced reader
I'd also ban foreign imams and monitor wjat they are preaching to their death cultist flocks
>>77229997
>>77230153
The president has the power to ban any group for any reason.
>>77230655
That guy turned out to be a total fucking retard though. He hates Trump for whatever vague reason, he spends his time calling him childish insults on twitter now.
>>77234511
Precisely, the founding fathers would probably be pushing to undo pretty much all gun legislation and allow for even machine guns to be regularly purchased. I think they'd support background checks to some degree, but in terms of actual weaponry I highly doubt that they'd want any real restrictions.
Except maybe nukes. I think if you explained that one to them they'd see that might not be the best idea.
>>77229997
We just need a couple more mass shootings and the god emperor is a as good as potus.
Go go allah ackbar
>>77234342
But he literally says ban muslims. Yesterday he just expanded that ban to anyone from a country with a history of terrorism against the US
>>77230153
/pol/acks only know about the 2nd amendment.
>>77229997
It's not a "proposal", that's just what he says to chill out the retards. He doesn't need Congress to ban a class of people for any length of time, its within the purview of the Office.
>>77235613
The president can ban ANY group of people from coming in for ANY reason. The constitution doesn't apply to foreign nationals outside of US borders.
>>77235613
>He doesn't at least have the bill of rights memorized
>>77235298
We always knew he was gonna have to do it regionally as opposed to a religion test, because Taqiyya.
>>77229997
Doesnt have to "PASS"
He can do the temporary ban if he wants to.
However, what might be more difficult is actually weeding out "muslims"
>>77230153
What Constitution are you talking about?
The South African one?
>>77232328
>The constitution doesn't only apply to citizens
>>77230153
>Unconstitutional
Funny Jimmy Carter fucking did it
>hurr durr you can't ban people from coming to your country.
Are you just pretending or are you really retarded?
>>77236099
It's irritating when people don't realize immigration is a fucking privilege. Nobody has a God given right to come here as they please.
>>77235746
They're already in. Many are citizens and they are allowed to have guns. You can't do anything based on them being muslims, which is precisely the group they belong to.
>>77235881
I hope he follows ((Savage's)) advice and just puts a ban on all immigration for his entire two terms or at least until we get all these unemployed AMERICANS into the job market.
>>77236343
>hurr durr
It's about preventing future threats genius.
>>77236343
Trump is halting new Muslim immigration. He's not deporting the Muslims that are already here legally.
>>77236035
It doesn't, unless they're in country. He would need a declaration of war against ISIS to start detaining and deporting Muslims in country though. That declaration would pass easily, because everyone who doesn't vote yes won't be re-elected.
>>77231277
Yeah, the Constitution doesn't apply to people who don't live here. If we want to drop a blanket ban on aloha snackbar immigration, we can. We just can't remove the kebab already here.
>>77229997
No, just like how there will be no wall
>>77229997
Not a chance. If he is elected his VP will finish the term because he is a fucking idiot and will be forced to step down.
>>77236751
>>77236790
>libshit delusion
>>77236751
>>77236790
>Thank you for correcting the record!
>>77229997
No, because he never actually made one.
>>77230153
Like...banning guns?
He's not going to ban muslims.
He simply raised the issue, because no one is speaking about it. What he will do is make it harder for people from third world shitholes to come into America, because that's where the muslims come from.
>>77236790
>t. I have no idea how hard impeachment is
They couldn't fucking impeach Obama after he committed dozens of crimes and violated the Constitution several times, how would they impeach a guy that won't abuse the power of the office? You can't impeach someone just because you disagree with them.
>>77237391
RARE
A
R
E
>>77236929
>>77237026
>pre pubescent Trumpcuck anger
Feels good to know I'm on the right side of history
