Is this not valid?
>>77170186
The Founders were all rich assholes who associated religion with the monarchy. Their anti-clerical sentiments were mostly derived from envy and angst, not reason.
>>77170186
Yes, it is invalid, as religion is a symptom of the human condition. If no religion existed, it would mean a humanity with no imagination.
>>77170186
Religion has been a part of humanity forever. There will literally never be a world without religion.
>>77170447
This plus, they had nothing but good things to say about Christianity, when in the contexts of controlling the lower classes and comparing different cultural zones.
>>77170186
*tips fedora*
>>77170186
How the fuck would he know this would be the best of all possible worlds? The alternate reality where we get blowjob robots planted in place of trees sounds a lot better than this one, religion or no.
>>77170447
"not based in reason" but jesus invented the continents lol cucks detected
>>77170186
It is valid. But hypotheticals are really difficult to imagine for theists. You won't convince them of anything.
>>77170447
Says the jealous poor /pol/cuck.
>>77170510
This guy knows. People aretoo stubborn to agree on everything for a vast variety of reasons. Besides without religion people worship the state, plus there's totally a God so there's that.