>52k retweets
Are the liberals waking up?
Liberals hear the word "ban" and can only think of guns.
He got more retweets when he got in a diss fight with Hillary. Because people rather be entertained.
>>77072321
Funny except the shooter was already in the US. The ban on muslims wouldn't do anything.
That's 21k retweets. 52k favorites. God, duh.
>>77072321
hillary got 10x as many retweets with her delete your account tweet
>>77072461
No, he got more retweets because they both used a shit ton of bots in that instance
>>77072578
And then Trumps reply was also his most popular tweet...
Most of his favorites probably weren't bots either
>>77072550
Favorites are better than retweets.You don't need t like something to retweet, but to favorite a tweet means you like it.
>>77072461
He got 270k without the bots
>>77072669
so true
>>77072578
>retweets
>bots
>$1M to correct the record
>>77072426
Pretty much.
>>77072609
trump didnt use any bots, the ratio is generally a dead giveaway. what gave him the boost was fucking news agencies writing articles on hillarys shit tweets so people saw his response
>>77072609
Yeah, that's just your paranoid monkey brain absorbing whispers and rumours. It was clearly organic. It's shit-talking and that is dank. They didn't just both decide to engage bots for one particular tweet. The behaviour we see from bots is a slow, consistent bias applied to every tweet. And a lot of this is not even necessarily bots, but marketing leading people to twitter.
>>77072669
>>77072714
Wut? Who cares if people like it? You want retweets so that more people can see it. Shitty propagandists, you.
>>77072536
except stem the flow
>>77072578
no it doesn't
trump actually has 2 million more followers than her which is pretty funny since twitter is nothing but millenials
