>>76683917
No, it's typical war game posturing.
>>76683961
Maybe not.
let this happening happen
back2urcontainment
>>>/x/
Bump.
I want to see nuclear war
I highly doubt NATO is stupid enough to strike first.
And I highly doubt Russia wants to expand any farther than Lithuania and Ukraine
Nothing will happen, the only thing that would start a war between superpowers is an unanimous public call to arms.
>>76686304
All it takes is a few bad decisions though.
>>76686497
This baka is correct. We have been close to Nuclear war in the past. It only takes the incompetency of the right person in the right situation.
>>76685854
>watched threads last week
>still waiting for nuclear war
let it happen
Everything is fucking crazy. A nuclear war wouldn't be out of place right about now.
>>76686304
Lithuania is part of nato. So if the Russians try to invade, that would require us to respond.
>>76686497
>>76686615
You're right, one idiot or false flag and boom bam you have war.
But in this situation, this is only unannounced Russian posturing to strike frear in NATOs Andoconda drills. A pricing frear because Russia has nearly 90,000 troops on its western flank and NATO can barely scrounge up 15,000.
This is an obvious dick waving contest. The US and Russia shot down each other's fighter jets in the height of the cold war and still nothing came of it.
>>76686932
Respond with what?
Our presence in eastern Europe wouldn't even hold back Ivan for more than 3 days.
>>76685854
>to see nuclear war
Not like if we were going to see a lot...
>>76687215
"Gosh, guess I need to stay on as president then!"
