This is how the history channel's new show 'Barbarians Rising' portrays Hannibal barcid.
Honestly, it's getting pretty sickening. Never mind that Hannibal was a Phoenician and at best he'd look like a greasy brown Arab but they also neglect the fact that Carthaginian nobility by logic would have been lighter and whiter than the populations it's controlled. IE they did not work the field, in addition they mixed their bloodlines with Celtic and italic peoples. Hannibal's father had many wives one of which was Celto-Iberian from Spain. It's not hard to imagine that Hannibal and other Carthaginian nobility had European blood flowing through their veins.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hfIe9P13X8s
Pic related is "Hannibal" at the alps.
What's /pol/' take on this?
>>76668407
they wuz kangz
>>76668407
I thought it was interesting and informative. Was it probably a shill attempt to get darkies to watch... yeah. But ain't nothing wrong with tricking darkies into to learning something.
>>76668661
Altering history to soothe their complex isn't helping anyone.
He was descended from Phoenicians and was never depicted as looking like a Sub-saharan African. That's all I'm gonna say.
>>76668407
I hate Canada.
>>76668407
reminder that they do this to rewrite history
they will need war and win it as well. humanity will suffer for their retardation
>>76668407
Muh Murican """"""""""""""""""history""""""""""""""""
>>76668862
Neither is dumb nogs watching B.E.T. All I'm saying is if it made one future crip or blood flipping through the channels stop and watch it and maybe take up an interest it history it did good. I'm white I know my history is awesome and that gives me pride and fire to succeed as a person. Throw the nogs a bone once in a while.
>>76668407
>A channel that prides themselves on historical accurateness
>KANGZ MEME
Why are they doing this?
>>76668407
This kind of historical distortion should be penalized or receive some kind of punishment. They are distorting the history of entire peoples and cultures just to make a few niggers feel good about themselves.
>>76669469
Marxism.
WE
>>76669896
what flag is this
>>76669896
what flag is this?using a phone here
>>76669896
what flag is this? mobilefag here
>>76669469
>history channel
>historical accurateness
not for at least the last decade
>>76670070
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
>>76669423
They have their own history to explore. The fact that they're uninterested just goes to show how pitiful their cultures were and still are. The dilution of one history doesn't help the populace of a completely different people, it only aims to harm. They will now be disillusion into believing that they are something that they're not because someone "threw them a bone".
If they want a bone they can go get it themselves.
They are not domesticated dogs, they're jackals.
>>76669896
Rare?
Was ever Moses or King David portrayed by a negro?
>>76669961
Central African Republic, aka
R A R E
A
R
E
>>76669961
>>76670015
>>76670070
Central African Republic. Probably a proxy, since it's pretty fucking rare, but I'm collecting it anyway
>>76669896
WAS
>>76669469
70% of their programation is about ancient aliens and the pawn shop cool guy, totally joke
>>76668407
The fact he doesn't look like a sand nigger is disturbing. We all know carthage was a phoenician outpost that was ruled by semitic moloch worshippers. The romans would talk shit about them practicing child sacrifice.
>>76670081
>doing history masters
>my family buys me books from the history channel
>people ask me on the street "oh you study history? tell me, do you think aliens are real"
fuck my life
>>76668407
>>76670408
Oh also I forgot he did have black african heavy infantry who were trained in using the phalanx who were some of his best. A few made it through his entire occupation of Italy to return to get killed by Scipio.
>>76668407
Are there even legitimate historians out there anymore? What do they think about this?
>>76668407
It's okay, we still have Alexander Siddig as Hannibal.
>>76668407
The comments on the video are absolutely incredible.
>>76670609
Never heard of that. Hannibal's heavy infantry was exclusively Libyan. Libyans were portrayed by ancient Egyptian picture reliefs as pale skinned people.
>>76668407
>all those niggers literally making WE WUZ KINGS comments and being 100% serious about it
>present them facts and evidence proving they're wrong
>HISTORY BE LYIN 2 U NIGGA YO TEACHERS BE LYIN, THEY JUST TRYIN TO KEEP THE BLACK MAN DOWN STAY WOKE
These people are ridiculous.
>>76668407
Drop this shit on any niggers talking stupid on youtube. SPAM IT.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0155046.PDF
>>76668407
>read youtube comments on the video
>Don't know if is /pol/ baits or niggers are that stupid
Here is a marble bust of Hannibal. Easy to google. The niggers who sell this shit think that we are ALL as dumb as niggers.
Yup, sure looks like a nigger....
>>76668625
Reminds me of the famous exchange between Hannibal and Scipio (Roman general who defeated him in North Africa) after Hannibal was exiled:
Scipio: How would you rank the greatest generals in history?
Hannibal: Firstly would be Alexander, King of the Macedonians, because with a small force he routed armies of countless numbers, and because he traversed the remotest lands. Merely to visit such lands transcended human expectation.
Scipio: On that point I heartily agree,
Hannibal: Second I would place Pyrrhus. He was the first to teach the art of laying out a camp. Besides that, no one has ever shown nicer judgement in choosing his ground, or in disposing his forces. He also had the art of winning men to his side; so that the Italian peoples preferred the overlordship of a foreign king to that of the Roman people, who for so long had been the chief power in that country.
Scipio: And third?
Hannibal: Myself, no question.
Scipio: How? I had never lost a battle to you.
Hannibal: CUZ WE WUZ KANGZ N SHEET SENPAI, NAHM SAYIN
>>76668407
>>76668625
>>76668661
>>76668862
>>76668964
>>76669090
>>76671649
>>76671433
>>76671179
>>76671163
LOL I would present facts to you but your all like "we wuz kingz" there were many black vikings Thorhall was described as "swarthy skinned".
>>76668407
I'm wrong, and that's why you're so incredibly angry, huh? Because it's normal for an "adult" to get angry at things that aren't true, right?
Please, you're such a child. Excuses, rationalizations, and a healthy dose of hi-jacking my words to change to your own narrative. If you weren't such a pathetic retard, you might be able to come up with your own argument.
As it is ; it's clear that you're proud of your ignorance and utterly devoid of critical thinking or empathy beyond the typical pretentious tripe that fools like yourself pretend to make you superior to others. So partaking in any "conversation" with you is an utter waste of time. You won't change even when the truth is presented to you because you're operating on the idea that everything is the way you believe it to be and only the way you believe it to be, and thus nothing wrong or bad is occurring in the world, and nothing needs to be changed from the top-down. It's all just the bottom-up for you.
Your delusions fuel your ego and your ego fuels your delusions. Nothing left to be done but let you exist in your futile loop of stupidity and arrogance.
Ta-ta.
>>76671130
GO see south Libya and tell me those aren't black people.
>>76671958
Do you have a single fact to back that up?
>>76671958
>Swarthy
>Black
You mean a fucking slight tan?
>>76672042
Thorhall in the viking saga was described as "dark hair" and "swarthy skinned".
>>76671859
>>76671937
>>76671939
looks like Don Cheadle tbqhf
>>76670133
>The fact that they're uninterested just goes to show how pitiful their cultures were and still are
Don't we shit on them when they take African American study majors though?
>>76672110
Actually no he was as dark as a Southern European which means he had at least some African blood because remember, the reason the Romans/Greeks were so strong and fit (look at their statues) was due to black blood.
>inb4 that was b4 racemixing
Romans race-mixed with Alpine and Germanics making them lighter so they were darker before.
>>76671958
Swarthy does not mean black. Black means black. Swarthy means colored like Mexicans, not Africans. You dumb fuck.
>>76671130
ALso ancient egyptians is like 4000 years of history. WHich ancient egyptians?
>>76672120
Swarthy means weather beaten and darkened by the sun though. Doesn't make him a nigger. Nor does having black hair.
>>76672249
>>76672262
Except vikings went all the way to Southern Spain which they called "swarthy" as well. So he was as dark as a Southern Spainard which means hes part black.
>>76672237
Fuck no, only an idiot shits on someone for being interested in their history. History majors in general get shit but I have a lot of respect for them.
>>76672004
The Libyans of antiquity lived in the northern coast of Libya. South Libya in ancient times was called garamantia, they were not Libyans.
>>76672395
This is shitty bait m8
>>76672415
Based leaf.
>>76671958
>many black vikings
>>76672120
>>76672239
>only keeps mentioning 1 viking
>no sources
>>76672556
You're a shitty troll, enjoy your ban
>>76672249
The ancient Greeks called the Colochians(the ancestors of modern-day Georgians) as black. They meant dark not negroid. Hell, Russians today called Armenians black asses...Armenians are not niggers.
>>76672590
>one viking
Well where the fuck would he come from? It means he had a Swarthy parent, and that guy had a swarthy parent.
>source
MUH SOURCE is the biggest fallacy. Just google it.
>>76672611
>>76668407
Benzo Carson?
>>76672656
Explain why Vikings were described as "swarthy" by their fellow vikings?
>>76672257
The ones that drew this.
>getting mad that a propaganda machine shows propaganda
Don't do this
>>76672690
Or he got a tan from rowing a boat for a long period of time at sea
Huh
>>76672239
The Roman/Greek statues that showed ideal states of the human body? You're shifting the goalpost from this Thorhall guy, he was black > he's as dark as Spaniards > he's part-African
In case you didn't know, it wasn't until the 20th century that North Africa and the sub-Sahara were conflated. Egypt is African, but for all the liberal emphasis on how diverse the continent is they sure are willing to use any example of civilization to justify black Africans as civilized.
>>76672656
Irishmen with dark, curly hair and dark eyes are called "the black Irish". And they are probably the palest, pastiest looking people you can find.
>>76672690
This is the first result I got.
http://stewartsynopsis.com/europe_conquered_by_africans.htm
lmao
>>76669423
The whole reason they are fucked up is because we spoiled them. You're like a shitty mom who gives her obese children treats
>>76672743
Vikings were as others pointed out, can be weather beaten. Some had tanned skinned.
>>76669896
RARE
A
R
E
>>76672848
Sorry we're done here troll
>>76672856
I don't care if he's Sub-Sahara African or North African. We are all Africans and we all view each-there the same. Personally I descend from Senegal. That doesn't mean I don't like North Africans
Now because the Vikings have already seen Southern Spainards it's not like they'ed call a Tan viking "swarthy" because he wasn't as dark as real swarthy people which may I remind you they saw. So we can conclude Vikings were either partly African/Southern Spainish (Southern Spain is more South than parts of Africa) or we can conclude they are Spanish. However it's more likely they were African.
>>76673074
>some had tanned skin
Like how fucking tanned? The Vikings called his skin the same colour they called the Southern Spanish which at the time was Portugal, aka t. Alberto Barboso.
>>76673254
You're being too obvious.
AS A TUNISIAN THIS DRIVES ME MAD
FUCKING NIGGERS REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
WHY THEY STEAL EVERYTHING
>>76673254
>We are all Africans and view each-other the same.
lmao, like all Rwandans viewed each other the same?
>>76673398
You're being too obvious, mods are coming tho
>>76673538
Dude! We are both African. We are the same. Stop falling for the most obvious divide and conquer.
>>76673552
That whole conflict was created by America. They brought people from different cultures and ethnic groups together, what would they expect would happen? Rwanda is rich in natural resources and if you ever saw blood diamond you'd know exactly why the conflict happened.
>>76673586
It's time to stop posting
>>76673723
I'm just waiting for your ban
>>76671859
>>76671937
>>76671939
b-but the Romans were notorious whitewashers
>>76673586
>>76671937
sure bud
>>76673776
>>76673040
The first thing I saw was:
>the vikings were black!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Topix
All I know about Topix is that it's a bunch of deviant middle-aged people, a lot of which are Indian, roleplaying their sexual fetishes, most of it being shit like breastfeeding and incest.
>>76673923
They weren't. Nazis painted many statues white and had their eyes painted blue to prove they were Aryan. The was documented by that Branch of the SS that did archaeology
>>76673930
I wouldn't be surprised if that was CIA set up they did try to frame Malcom X.
>>76673392
Alberto is a meme. Stop being autistic. It's rather sad that negroids claim other people's history. There prides like Great Zimbabwe was created Arab slavers lel
>>76674205
LOL it's sad cumskins try to take credit for the Romans and Vikings and Moors. When vikings were described as "swarthy"
>>76674141
No that's /pol/
>>76674419
Swarthy doesn't mean black, sorry.
>>76674549
Ok then what does it mean? And don't say "tanned" because it's the same word they used to describe North Africans.
>>76668407
Disgrace.
>>76674715
jus google it bro! xD
>>76668407
He gets stomped in the end anyways what do you care.
>>76674832
XD I did it means dark skinned XD
>>76674715
What's 2 + 2? And don't say 4, give me a real answer.
>>76668407
It's not that sickening really for anyone with even a small grasp of history and geography. What's more, whether it is movies, vidya or TV this shit has to sell and producers will always try to appeal to the biggest demographic. It's not a proper retelling of historical events... It's entertainment.
Fuck it, let the poor cunts have it if it makes them feel relevant.
>>76668407
dayum nigga, i'z freezin muh nutz off an sheit
>>76668407
Saw this on monday and was gonna make a thread on /pol/ about it but was too lazy.
>>76675244
So Walt Whitman was African? http://www.bartleby.com/142/50.html
>>76668407
The Romans considered Hannibal barbarians why not portray them as such?
>>76675244
The vikings were a fair skinned people. Someone who was slightly darker than the rest of the group (pic related) would stand out.
Basically, swarthy is a relative term.
>>76675452
Well partly many great people don't know but are part black and black genes are dominant. Tesla was described as swarthy and he was part black but no one at the time considered him black
>>76675679
No actually. The Vikings went all the way down to Southern Spain! They considered Southern Spaniards "swarthy" and used that same term to describe their comrade.
THUMB THIS SHIT THE FUCK DOWN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xeZQkm6my4
>>76671939
>>76668407
Out of interest has there even been a document/historical account that has disappeared from existence which, had it survived, would have showed us some really important stuff?
I mean obviously there has, but are there any we know for sure existed and were cited in other historical accounts, yet is no longer to be found?
Thanks /pol/!
>>76675284
Niggers aren't the demographic for historical entertainment when it's
not about muh Slave ancestors and SHIEET.
This picture is cringe worthy.
>black Hannibal
>white troops
This guy is going full kangz.
>>76675679
Swarthy was never black in British English. Black was black.
I mean we would have called Mediterraneans swarthy. That's what it still means here.
American English did change the interpretation of many words throughout history. Maybe that's where the confusion lies over swarthy.
>>76676128
K so Thorhall had the skin of a Med, which have black blood.
>>76672239
>the reason they were so strong and fit was due to black blood
Name a single "black" empire. The nubians dont count, they took over a collapsing empire, they didnt create it.
>>76675679
Who exactly stands out here? They all look the same more or less skin-tone wise. Better example needed.
Don't you know silly racists? Everyone in history was black, every single human on this earth. It's only since 50 years or so that Yakub created white people.
>>76675820
>Tesla was described as swarthy and he was part black but no one at the time considered him black
>swarthy
He was South-Eastern European. Some are generally darker skinned than, say, North-Western Europeans, or even his peers.
>part black
Just because he carried e-v13, doesn't make him black. learn2genetics
>They considered Southern Spaniards "swarthy" and used that same term to describe their comrade.
I understand, but just because they used the same word doesn't mean they were identical. Did they compare him to the Spaniards, or just use a same word?
It's like when black people call someone light skinned when one of their peers is lighter than them, but they'll still call people light skinned too. Doesn't mean they look the same.
>>76675820
Yeah Whitman and Tesla sure look black to me, those dominant African genes at work m8
>>76676087
He's one of those Yakub believing niggers who believe some fucking black giant headed negro created white people 6,000 years ago.
>>76676339
Some guys to the right look slightly darker. Sorry, it was something I had right away.
>>76676282
Mali Empire, Egypt, Songhai empire, Zulu empire, the Moors.
>>76676265
I've got to admire your blind persistence. Especially when that Egyptian absolutely annihilated your fantasies here, a few days ago.
>>76676423
>but they'll still call people light skinned too
I meant white people.
>>76676265
No, he was likely tanned and had weather beaten skin from being at sea
>>76671958
>>76672249
Did this king have a swarthy complexion and a negroid nose and an afro?
>>76676423
>He was South-Eastern European. Some are generally darker skinned than, say, North-Western Europeans, or even his peers.
Yeah they are swarthy because they were conquered by blacks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3yon2GyoiM
>Just because he carried e-v13, doesn't make him black. learn2genetics
Learn genetics doesn't really mean shit. The amount of ancestors you had 10 generations ago (1024) outweighs the amount of info your DNA can hold about where you came from. He could be black DNA wouldn't know.
>I understand, but just because they used the same word doesn't mean they were identical. Did they compare him to the Spaniards, or just use a same word?
Except why would after being in Spain and calling everyone swarthy would they call their fellow man "swarthy" wouldn't they use another word? It's just it seems this viking was darker than the others like a Southern European/North African
>>76676586
>Egypt
>black
>Zulu """"empire"""""
>>76675911
There are a metric shit ton of histories we only know existed because of their references in later accounts crediting/referencing them. Livy's only surviving work, the History of Rome stretches from the founding of the city to his current day (Augustus) and even there only a quarter of it survived.
That comment section on youtube gave me cancer, evade it at all costs!
I havent seen such mindboggling level of ignorance, anti-white racism and stupidity for years maybe ("blacks evolved first, so hannibal was black" and similar bullshit).
>>76676889
...Where is your reading comprehension?
>>76676843
Actually yeah he had black hair
>>76676657
They never did
>>76676788
Then why weren't his comrades weather beaten?
>>76676916
LOL so its not an empire when black?
>>76668407
Not this shit again. We already went over this shit in previous thread. DNA analysis has revealed what the Phoenicians looked like.....see related pic.
>>76670828
now that I can actually believe that documentary was great they should of just got the rights to that from the BBC
>>76677418
I'm freaking African and he's swarthier than me.
>>76677182
>Arab people are white and racist
kek
>>76677260
>They never did
You got fucking ruined lad. I was embarrassed for you. I suspect that's why you've chosen to argue your insanity when most of us are sleeping.
>>76677556
>I'm freaking African
No you aren't.
>>76677634
I am African.
>>76668407
"History Channel" should be sued and forced to change their name to 'Ancient Alien Astronauts and Other Stupid Shit Channel" or cease transmissions entirely.
>>76677706
Nah.
>>76671939
Fucking kek
>>76677813
I am African, just like how you are Muslim bongman.
>>76677706
Post a picture of yourself w/ timestamp.
>>76670219
>'collecting' small useless gifs of other mens country flag using proxy servers
faces of autism
>>76678055
I don't have a Camera.
>>76678034
The only African thing in your life is the big black dick ravaging your mums fanny mate
>>76678101
omg you are autistic
>>76678101
Especially when this
https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/wiki/flair
has every single small flag out there.
>>76669469
FTFY
>>76678245
Nice weak excuse white boy
>>76678101
>>76670219
How do you save a flag? Do you do copy image or save as?
>>76678491
post picture of yourself to prove you're white? But sure whatever.
>>76668407
HOLY SHIT WHO FUCKING CARES JUST WATCH THE FUCKING THING AND ENJOY THE PORTRAYAL OF HISTORY
>>76678245
Who the fuck doesn't have a camera in this day and age? No smarthphone? No flip phone? No webcam?
>>76678509
what the fuck
Take a screenshot, leaf
>>76678553
Balkanite here.
South-Eastern European. According to your posts, I am black.
>>76678582
Oh my God shut the fuck up read up on Afrocentricism so you can enjoy the fucking movie.
>>76678601
I have a samsung but don't know how to plug it into my computer and all that.
>>76678741
https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/wiki/flair
>>76678741
Oh I clicked on the flag, brought me to a white screen with the flag in the corner and clicked "save as" to my folder. Does that work?
>>76678758
Partly black yes. I'm not trying to insult you I'm saying thats good tho.
>>76678784
>he doesn't know how to put a usb into a usb socket
what
>>76678881
>Partly black yes. I'm not trying to insult you I'm saying thats good tho.
lol
>>76678906
It doesn't work that way. There is no USB there was a plug that came with the phone but I don't know where it is.
>>76678968
Are you mocking me?
>>76668407
"The research team, which was co-led by Professor Lisa Matisoo-Smith of the University of Otago in New Zealand, sequenced the first complete mitochondrial genome of 2,500-year-old Phoenician buried in North Africa. Experts studied a man dubbed the “Young Man of Byrsa” or “Ariche,” whose remains were taken from a sarcophagus in the ancient city of Carthage, just outside Tunis, the Tunisian capital. Carthage was the center of the Phoenician civilization.
Analysis shows that the man belonged to a rare European haplogroup – a genetic group with a common ancestor – indicating that his maternal ancestry is linked to locations on the North Mediterranean coast, probably on the Iberian Peninsula".
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2016/05/27/dna-from-ancient-phoenician-stuns-scientists.html
>>76673254
I don't understand that if vikings were African, there is literally no evidence of historic engravings, wood carvings, paintings that backed up this theory?
Why would that be anon?
>>76679302
b..b..but muh coal paintings!
>>76669415
Easy there Hans you know Ahmed doesn't like it when you get all worked up
>>76679302
He was described as swarthy like a southern Spainaird so he was like a North African and I consider North Africans to be black I don't know why /pol/ says they aren't.
>>76669415
>German
>history
pick one.
>>76679590
North Africans aren't the same skin color as Sub-Saharan Africans. And swarthy doesn't mean tanned like a Spaniard.
>>76679697
>senegal
>history
pic one.
>>76679776
>North Africans aren't the same skin color as Sub-Saharan Africans
Not to mention their skulls are Caucasoid.
>>76679819
Look up Mali Empire idiot
>>76679776
And yes that's what swarthy means. It means Olive skinned.
>>76679697
Uhh Germany has recorded history since the Romans
>>76679925
that's the history of Mali presumably
>>76679925
>muh sandcastle
>>76679925
you disgust me for the last time, leaf.
why do your people do this?
>>76680031
But Mali ruled Senegal and build Mosques.
>>76679916
Oh really? So Moors weren't black huh?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3yon2GyoiM
>>76677182
Jesus there's exploitable caps for years in those comments.
The fucking fervour that some of these blacks go to, as well. They seem to crawl on every obscure site, try and discover every vague image and find quotes from every small-name anthropologist that they can to prove their points.
What gets me about it most of all is the fact that these blacks NEVER talk about their CONFIRMED history. You never see a black person talk about having a great, great grandfather that was a warrior in the Zulu kingdom or some shit, they spend all their time co-opting the history of every race and culture that they can, not just Europeans.
I'd almost go as far to say that it's sickening how so many of them are allowed to get away with this shit.
>>76679925
It doesn't just mean olive skinned retard, it means someone who's tanned or has weather beaten skin, like I've explained 5 times. You really must be an African, you're dense enough.
>>76680112
You're disgusting and disgust me
>>76680072
>muh greek statues
>>76680152
>>76680152
>Moors weren't black huh?
No, they weren't.
>>76680354
THE MOORS WERE NIGGERS
YOU'RE PART EGGPLANT
>>76680213
I've explained so many times stupid how that's wrong.
>>76670408
Moloch is a corrupted kike term for Melqart. And Phoenicians were bros as were Carthagians. They were less Semitic than modern Arabs having been long influenced by Indo-Europeans like Hittites and Hurrians. Hannibal was probably whiter than your average Roman
>>76680178
>implying they can write their history down
>>76675911
Considering the fact that we still don't know what caused the bronze collapse and that the city of Alexandria was destroyed (that's where the great library and the tomb of the kings was) yes there is plenty we don't know
We don't even have Socrates' original works
Only what we got from Aristotle and his other disciples
>>76680152
Poles were ruled by Russia and other domineering powers for centuries, they have their own distinct history and don't claim others' as their own. Senegal has the borders the French and British drew up and any Senegali personhood is a modern fabrication.
Moors are a mix of Arabs and Berbers, both of which were not black.
>>76680252
painstakingly detailed sculptures are not comparable to mud castles.
Stop trying to steal the history of other peoples you fucking leaf
>>76680354
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3yon2GyoiM
>>76680438
Except that you havent, you just went on about nikola tesla being african for some reason you autist
>>76671939
FUCKING KEK MY SIDES ARE GONE
>>76668407
Fucking blackwashing history. We were dear chaps Romans and Hannibal and other things.
>>76680152
The only reason Moors = black meme exists is because blacks think Othello is a moor
that's where it all stems from
They never actually read Othello so they don't know that he's not
>>76675820
>whitman and tesla were black
Goddamn I hate canadians
>>76680552
A giant mosque is better than a fucking rock
>>76680518
Well still our history is more exciting than some boring ass white guys writing documents.
>>76671958
Great bait! You have made your country people proud.
>>76672239
You're in every fucking thread with this bullshit. This is why everyone hates Canadians. This is the same leaf that always posts tranny threads.
>>76672004
>Libyans during Hannibal's time
>Libyans now
Anon was talking about the Libyans before today, burgerstein.
>>76673669
Wait, so multiculturalism didn't work out in Rwanda?
>>76681062
THIS
what do you have to say for yourself, leafs?
>>76681120
Silly goy, nonwhites all deserve their own homogeneous ethnostates, but europe and america are for everyone.
>>76672239
Literally
WE WUZ: The Post
Pick up a book kid
>>76680732
I would also like to add the black Moor's head emblem adding to the mythos as well as the filthy kike Tarantino's "Sicilian" rant in true romance.
Everything and anything belonging to these filthy yid shits needs to be exposed, ridiculed, and exterminated.. Including the kikes themselves
>>76676128
No, lol. I don't think black people could be called swarthy, pic related is swarthy
>>76672239
This shit pisses me off. Tell me this wont become real history some day
>>76681012
Name a single historical figure who identified as Senegali that you find interesting. Here's three easy German picks.
>>76680627
You're autistic
>>76681001
he was part black
they just want to rub as many ugly blacks in our faces as they can. they shove them in all their advertisements and television programs and just bombard us with their ugly fucking mugs.
big thick blowfish lips, broad ass ape noises, shit brow skin and they are fucking EVERYWHERE. IN EVERY SHOW EVERY ADVERTISEMENT.
>>76680732
to be fair, I do remember there being quotes from Othello about him being "big lipped" or whatever.
>>76681331
You do realize books ere written by whites right?
>>76681524
I have no clue who any of those guys are they look ugly. A famous African is Shaka Zulu, Hannibal, Mansu Musa, King Tut, all that shit.
>>76681568
So wheres the explanation cuck?
>>76681568
>Tesla
>partially black
>>76680502
By Plato's own account he only was writing during the days leading up to his execution, and mostly for his own amusement.
It's probably best we don't have that.
>>76680252
Hi, Canada. The nineties called and said they want their horseshit moral compass back, along with their jeans, music, hairstyles, etc.
An inconvenient truth for you: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3611457/Ancient-DNA-study-finds-Phoenician-Carthage-European-ancestry.html
Punic wars <- punic = phoenician
Phoenicians, Berbers, Numidians, Carthaginians = Semitic Mediterraneans =/= niggers
Know how none of them weren't niggers? Whenever the Romans asked about the interior of Africa, they were warned "There's niggers in there."
>>76681755
Well they used the same word to describe Spanish as they did him and they also said he had black hair so he wasn't just "sun beaten"
>>76681786
He had really dark hair, eyes and skin dumbfuck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJ1Mz7kGVf0
This really does not annoy that much compared to Lancelot and Romeo being black. Every person in Africa being linked to sub saharans is stupid but it is not as irritating as literal northern Europeans being black
>>76681813
Who made the study?
>>76668407
Only man alive who deserves/should play Hannibal is Vin Diesel.
>>76681902
>
LOL you think thats us read Himmler read Nordicism and Madison Grant they are trying to be Romans and Greeks and shit.
Nords suffer an inferiority complex.
>>76681922
You are aware vikings spent long periods of time at sea rowing the oars though right? He obviously had a tan. And the word swarthy does have several different meanings.
>>76681922
Please present the original passage where it mentions this "black Viking". In the original language if you please.
>>76681700
>You do realize books ere written by whites right?
So youre saying black kangs and vikangs were illiterate too?
tip top kek
>>76681700
Filename, anon: Otto von Bismarck, Albrecht von Roon, and Helmuth von Moltke. Three of the most powerful men leading Prussia and Germany that saw it become the most powerful state in Europe.
Shaka Zulu, Hannibal, Mansa Musa, King Tut, none of them are figures who identified as Senegali which was what I asked of you. Hannibal and King Tut weren't black either. If it weren't for your dedication to this thread I would have written this off as trolling. You are perhaps the most consistent poster I've seen in spewing out ahistorical garbage.
>History Channel
>Owned by Disney
>Disney C-level executives are nearly all jews.
Jew media will not be satisfied until every last white character is portrayed by a black person. Ten years from now, jew media will be substituting blacks for trannies, alpha men for faggots, and men for women.
>>76682263
Oh my God you're stupid then why was he the only swarthy one right?
>>76682299
Nah they can read and write and do math but they leave that up to whites because we aren't peasants.
>>76682280
http://stewartsynopsis.com/europe_conquered_by_africans.htm
>>76672800
Heinrich von Minutoli? So according to Prussians ah
>>76668407
Too good not to share. Dr Nigga thinks Celts and Vikings were black.... Top fucking Kek!
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/articles/the-ancient-celts-and-vikings-were-black-people-by-dr-clyde-winters/
>>76682430
>Otto von Bismarck, Albrecht von Roon, and Helmuth von Moltke. Three of the most powerful men leading Prussia and Germany that saw it become the most powerful state in Europe.
If they are so powerful why haven't I heard of them. However I have heard of Zulu even ERB made a video about it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOm_2dGzqp0
>Hannibal and King Tut weren't black either.
Yeah they were
>You are perhaps the most consistent poster I've seen in spewing out ahistorical garbage.
You're the one spewing propaganda.
>>76682618
Celts were described as black by the vikings dumbass and many vikings were described as swarthy.
>>76668407
>hannibal is black as fuck
>every other carthaginian is white
>>76668407
We could call this reverse whitewashing "blackboarding". Do it.
>>76682717
Whites always love being ruled by blacks.
>>76682462
He most likely wasn't you dense cunt, danes/swedes that raided or traded were generally tanned, it's what happens when you spend weeks or months rowing oars on a longship.
Phoenician and Hebrew were literally the same language. They were proto-Jews not niggers.
>>76668407
they made atilla the hun white aswell, i dont remember if it was history channel tho
>>76682768
Then why was only one described as swarthy if they were all being tanned?
>>76682628
Canadian primary education failed you? I dunno, Bismarck is one of the most recognized historical figures globally.
>>76682674
>many vikings were described as swarthy
>>76682462
>why was he the only swarthy one
>>76682462
>http://stewartsynopsis.com/europe_conquered_by_africans.htm
"The original “knights” of England were Black! --including the knights of King Arthur’s Round Table! That’s why they were called “knights” after the night or darkness of their skin.
An African king named Gormund ruled Ireland during the Anglo-Saxon period in England reports the medieval historian Geoffrey of Monmouth.
Halfdan the Black was the first Africoid king to unite Norway.
When the British Isles were invaded by the Vikings some of these Norse raiders were Africoid. In fact, different varieties of ‘Viking’ Africans lived in Scandinavia during the middle ages and are frequently mentioned in Viking sagas.
There were Black Huns! The dictionary describes the Huns as “a fierce barbaric race of Asiatic nomads who led by Attila, ravaged Europe I the 4th and 5th centuries A.D.” The Gothic writer Jordannes described their infamous leader, Attila the Hun as having “a flat nose and swarthy complexion.” He describes the types of Huns he had seen as “of dark complexion, almost black... broad shoulder, flat noses and small eyres.”
The African Moors dominated southwest Europe during the Middle Ages for 700 years: 711-1492 A.D. African Moors ruling southwest Europe centuries, darkened whites in this area, especially Portal, which was “the first example of a Negrito (African) republic in Europe?"
Moors ruling Scotland in the 10th century mixed with whites until the black skin color disappeared."
Fucking hell. You actually believe this shit? You really are a dumb nigger. Also please answer my original questions. Provide a source in the original saga's language(iclandic/gaelic/norse/swedish/danish..whatever, not some trumped up bullshit agenda driven english translation...
>>76682843
the word you're looking for is semitic.
>>76682886
Didn't you say there were "many black vikings that were described as swarthy" earlier? :^)
>>76683078
>Canadian primary education failed you? I dunno, Bismarck is one of the most recognized historical figures globally.
Education clearly failed you. We don't talk about Europe in CAnadain education we talk about like Natives and the Underground railroad and shit
>many vikings
>only one
I mean like at a time he was the only swarthy one out of his friends who went on the same journey but other vikings in different times were called swarthy.
>>76682757
Fucking kek.
>>76683122
I'm not giving a fucking pigskin a source. I gave you evidence but you won't accept it so you have no hope. You just want to believe your history is superior
>>76683175
I meant he was the only one out of his comrades, so wouldn't eveyone on the journey be tanned?
>>76670381
KANGZ
How could the Romans have known the trouble they would cause 2000 years later when they destroyed every image of Hannibal?
>>76683466
>>76671939
Actually lold
>>76683466
You idiot! They destroyed him because they KNEW in the future people would figure out he was black!
>>76683410
Where are the details on the skin color of his comrades?
Maybe he was more of a seasoned sailor.
>>76683610
He was as swarthy as a black, ok? Now fuck off. Even Stormfront admits this.
>>76683410
What evidence? You linked a page with very little understanding of historical enquiry. The sourcing is so spurious its laughable. Maybe provide some actual peer reviewed documents to support your case instead of the garbage that you have been.
Don't ever breed mate, least your offspring are as stupid and deluded as you.
>>76683610
What I'm deducing is that they haven't read the original text nor a translated OG source, instead going off of whatever bullshit website he got it from and filling in the rest with whatever rationale suits him. Likely as not he was given a physical description because he was their leader with no indication that the English translation of "swarthy" was unique to him nor accurate in his interpretation of the original Norse.
>>76670177
They should be. A really dark simian looking one that all the jewish girls lust after.
>>76683816
Hahaha, but swarthy means tanned silly! Looks like you've lost out on this one leaf. Sorry.
>>76683122
>we wuz lancelot n sheeit
>>76683942
That guy looks swarthy.
>>76683841
Idiot it doesn't need a source it WAS the source, please don't breed
>>76683916
>>http://stewartsynopsis.com/europe_conquered_by_africans.htm
This is his source.
>>76683916
Sad!
