Just here
Triggering the /pol/
>>76665618
probably because of Sanders's cucking the other day
>>76665618
>one poll
>2% drop
ok, paco.
misleading graph, almost as bad as that faux news one
>>76665907
4% net drop
It's probably part of a soon-to-be larger trend.
>>76666168
That's speculation
TACOS BTFO
lol see you after the hillary corruption speech
it's close enough that voter turnout will decide this election
keep in mind these polls are based on random samples of the general population, not from random samples of people who have a proven history of actually voting in previous elections which is how the parties do their internal polling used for campaign strategy which is more accurate
>>76670025
Have a (you) for that spicy fresh meme, friendo.
