"Yeah we're taking over the South China Sea, what are you gonna do about it white boy?"
>>76345166
Project force, something you chinks can't do.
>inb4 muh Russian anti-ship missiles
>>76345166
Id be terrified to see what a fully war mobilized china could do,
They could put an aircraft carrier to sea ever 36 hours probably.
Why does America give a single flying fuck about the South China Sea?
What is there thats worth fighting over?
President Monroe is rolling in his grave
>>76345877
the gold
>>76345166
Japan beat them senpai. they are cucked
give me a reason not to genuinely worry about WW3 now.
>>76345877
1/3 of global trade passes through it
How do the chinks manage to get the other chinks to work together? Asians in general suck shit at teamwork? How do asian militaries even operate?
>>76345166
Bring over some Japs and South Koreans to have fun with your mothers, wives and sisters.
Nanking was a test run, Yang.
>>76345860
>They could put an aircraft carrier to sea ever 36 hours probably.
>implying
People really underestimate the power of the US Navy. We are untouchable. Even if they sank every one of our carriers, we'd still be BY FAR the world's most powerful navy. No one can fuck with us, not even the Chinese. Hell, Russia, the EU, and China combined couldn't defeat us at sea.
>>76345877
Cargo ships go through there. Therefore we must retain military superiority over it.
Just check out the show of force when Iran threatened to close of the Suez Canal.
>>76345166
Put the keys to your toys on the top shelf...
>>76346221
They would do the same thing we did in the last war
make tanks and ships faster than we can sink them and blow them up.
>>76345166
What is China's official justification for their absurd claim of most of the South China Sea? It doesn't make any sense if you look at the boundary they want to draw for themselves.
>>76345166
Nothing sir,,, uhh please have our electronics tech field jobs. NO NO.. dont worry about us... we are working on becoming day laborers and other manual labor once we solve our "immigrant" problem.
Uhh one more thing.. sir wong sir.. what size would u like me to sew your nikes for you?
This is a radicalization thread. Gooks are a threat though.
Still, shit thread.
>>76346180
that's the perception the media creates. I've never seen a single news report about either china OR japan that wasn't just shitting all over the country
we're trying to destroy their sovereignty. even japan's
>>76346147
yes, wel, 1/3 of global tradable goods are created in china, so it makes sense that they'd control it.
>>76346390
That's incredibly unlikely, bro. This isn't 1944. We have stealth bombers that can take off from Missouri and hit anything in the world, anytime, in a very short period.
>>76346390
We're not dealing with a pre-space age war here, anon. You don't simply outproduce against icbm's.
>>76346390
How hard would it be without factories though?
>>76346406
It's justified by the fact no one can stop them
>>76346390
>>76346221
>>76345860
Although, you cucks realize that in WWII Submarines destroyed 85% of the enemy fleet right?
>>76346221
Joke I once heard between a Brit and a burger
>American: how's having the second largest navy in the world?
>Brit: how's having the second best?
But in all honesty naval warfare is useless nowadays. Take out the aircraft carriers and the rest become sitting ducks compared to aircraft and missiles. Yes it's sad but the glory days of ocean naval ship to ship battle is over
>>76345166
im ok with this
soon i will only need to learn chinese to travel asia
>>76346633
>icbms
Because global thermonuclear war is totally worth a shit ass place like the South China Sea
>>76346713
>Take out the aircraft carriers and the rest become sitting ducks compared to aircraft and missiles. Yes it's sad but the glory days of ocean naval ship to ship battle is over
last time we fought, we fucked them up. I woudnt worry about them.
>>76346713
>>76346633
>>76346145
>>76345860
>>76345166
>>76345330
>>76345699
>Forgetting about Submarines
>>76346654
This.
China would be dead in a month.
People on here unless they are in the know have no idea what the U.S military is capable of.
How about weather warfare as well as pic related.
>>76345166
Why is that always US wants to eliminate China and Russia and always the US see them as major threats? Start shits gets hit
>>76346937
>>76346862
>submarines
Who do you think is firing the missiles?
My ancestors are smiling upon me Whitebois. The century of humilation is over First the south china sea then mongolia then raze europe to the ground.
>>76347056
RODS FROM GOD, BABY!
>>76345166
>obongo
>white boy
he's the one who let this happen
>>76346917
>>76346937
Submarines are a different issue altogether however they won't be doing much besides attacking ships
or launching nukes which is to be avoided at all costs
Unless there is a sub that can land men or carry planes that I'm not aware of
I'm just going to let you indulge in the unclassified info of our glorious Submarines.
>>76347056
>multi billion dollar target orbiting in space
ICBMs get the job done just fine, there's no need for that impractical thing.
>>76347204
>subs that carry planes and land marines
You're like 60 years behind the times. We have subs that can do both and have been used in the past. But that's not the job of the sub anyway. Persistant threat of offshore missile launches cannot be underestimated.
>>76346713
navies are essential to deploying ground forces. the us has the best army because the navy is necessary to secure and deploy our ground forces.
no one else can play offense. china coudn't invade soth america or the ME to weild influence in the "peaceful" decisions that their governments make which are "totally no coerced"
they need the navy for that. it's not that naval warfare is obsolete. naval forces are the backbone of US "diplomacy." that's why we expand the navy, to the complaints of the generals. as is russia and china and france. we don't expect to use them to win wars. we use em to threaten foreign countries to do the things we want.
it's ALSO why china expanded its territory in the shoals, so that we CAN'T do that to them
China would still be fucked in a traditional war. Even with or without nukes. The nukes are the only deterrent, though. No one wants to be hit by 200 nukes. America might have 10x that amount, but even if we use them, unless they were retaliatory nukes, we'd be seen as the bad guys.
Even more than we already are.
>>76345166
Not give a shit because that's your playground not ours.
Also since when do Chinese soldiers use the QBZ-03, I thought the QBZ-95 was supposed to be their standard issue rifle?
>>76347204
Look up Boomers, GN's, and Fast Attacks.
>>76347358
>nuke damage without EMPs or nuclear fallout
sound bretty gud to me
>>76347204
>Unless there is a sub that can land men or carry planes that I'm not aware of
Oh, they can land SEALs, but zerging their eastern seaboard with Tomahawks can put shipbuilding, ship deployment, and any sort of maritime force projection out of the question.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio-class_submarine#SSBN.2FSSGN_conversions
>>76346713
>Brits think that their history of being the most powerful navy somehow magically makes them the current best
The U.S armed forces are better than their counterparts in EVERY way.
Except we have women, that part is gay as fuck
We'll just move all our sweatshops to India and watch as your economy collapses
>>76347204
>nuclear subs wont be doing much besides attacking ships
time to stop posting leaf
>>76345166
>think its a magic eye puzzle
>cross eyes
>arr rook same
Holy shit, I'm too drunk for this magic eye chink shit.
>>76347629
Waiting for the module to come around to a target on the other side of the world doesn't sound like a lot of fun, nor does the prospect of having to undertake a space mission to reload.
>>76347629
what's wrong with EMPs?
>>76347539
we can't beat china in a land war. as mentioned earlier, global naval forces would all simultaneously eliminate each other at the outbreak of a conventional war by attacking from land-based platforms.
which means that we'd have to land in china with our air force and ground force. which we cannot do.
america's military is a diplomatic tool.
>>76347834
>leaf flag
>chinese dicksucker
like poetry
>>76347695
>not scheduling an hour with your designated slip n slide 4 months into the deployment
pfft
>>76347834
Oh look, it's this argument again.
>What is total war?
>>76346713
This to an extent. Surface ships will go the way of the big Battleships. With the power available to modern aircraft and the unprecedented strike range and accuracy of anti-ship missiles, surface ships would be very vulnerable. Just like the Battleships were to carriers.
>>76347695
You also allow fags in not just your navy but all your armed forces
>>76347918
EMP's disable friendly forces as well
no EMP = swarm the destroyed area right after
>>76347910
if we were even considering using the device it would be in geosynchronous orbit over the general area far in advance
also, you think there's only one?
>>76347936
Navy implements a blockade in the straits of Malacca.
China starves to death.
Reminder that: Europeans only managed to get one shitty port city from china and ended up making it great for us Haha you cucks literally raised another man's kid
>>76347936
Holy shit you are so misinformed its hilarious
You are seriously overestimating China's military and technological ability.
We're at least 15 years ahead of them, technologically speaking.
>>76347918
They're indiscriminate and could cause problems for your own forces and hamper securing a zone because all found gear is inert or unreliable.
Imagine a commerce complex being occupied but everything of value to get the area running again is on the fritz.
You want to eliminate resistance if possible without damaging infrastructure anymore than intended.
>>76348069
For the time being
>>76347834
3 b8 5 m3
>pic related
>>76347834
T.Hongcouver
I'd love to see China get with a kinetic bombardment.
>>76345166
yeah fo real, show 'em white bois. Disrupt U.S trade, dem wall street mo fuggas
* dies of lack of welfare and no sympathy from China*
>>76348151
Life is so plentiful and cheap in China it would take them a long time to starve to death. Yod be doing them a favour anyway lowering their population
>>76348180
To say that they are anywhere near the levels we were in 2001 is insulting. They are at Best a 1980s American military without the 600 ship navy and massive air force.
>>76347834
Few hundreds, dude you should put in like 5 millions. Not including civilian.
>>76348418
True, every Chinese jet, ship etc are just copies of ours from the 80s/90s
>>76347695
they allowed women into the military because they decided that military effectiveness was not a strategic priority.
you get that? the DECIDED our military didn't need to function to fulfill strategic goals.
the idea that women are capable of functining on a carrier under attack any better than they can run or do pushups in a nonstressful training environment, is dumb.
our navy is ineffective at fighting anyone other than camelfuckers.
>>76348400
Hey did you know that China actually gets most of their rice from California?
Pretty neat huh
>>76345166
/yawn
who gives a shit
expand west next
Israel is on ancient Chinese land.
They also said you look like slit eyed mutants, and plan to rape your children and use them in their goofy blood rituals.
>>76348294
hit with*
>>76348507
I'd like to see someone try based on the expert analysis of based neet on /pol/. The world needs to be reminded every now and then.
>>76348400
Food isnt the only thing getting blockaded.
No oil, steel, exports, or grain. 2 weeks and China enters Civil War with the CCP collapsing.
Nothing hopefully. I understand the simple fact that China needs to secure food sources for their 1.4 billion shit eating gook citizens.
After the end of the Cold War, plans called for Ohio to be retired in 2002, followed by three of her sister boats. However, Ohio, Michigan, Florida, and Georgia instead were slated for modification, to remain in service carrying conventionally armed guided missiles, and were redesignated as SSGNs.
The conversion modified 22 of the 24 88-inch (2.2 m) diameter Trident missile tubes to contain large vertical launch systems (VLS), one configuration of which may be a cluster of seven Tomahawk cruise missiles. In this configuration, the number of cruise missiles carried could be a maximum of 154, the equivalent of what is typically deployed in a surface battle group.
>mfw at-sea replenishment
>>76348507
It was really because women are unthinking conformists and the military was consistently the most redpilled part of society.
>>76348507
No they allowed women in the military because of overwhelming political pressure from the second and third waves of feminism.
If our government allowed women into the military, then I assure you they did so knowing that even with women being retarded we would still be a more than capable military force
>>76347834
>>76348499
Here is what actually happened.
>>76348151
that would shut down their economy, but it wouldn't starve them
further, to enforce a blockade they have to have an open and identifiable position. we'd attack their ships with land based platforms and they wouldn't be able to defend themselves to maintain teh blockade.
further niggers and women and spics make up some 40% of our military. say goodbye to effectiveness and force projection.
>>76348180
being 15 years ahead doesn't allow us to avoid mutual damage. both of our forces still end up destroyed.
>>76345860
KEK Chinese, like all asians, are genetically incapable of innovating. They'd fold like a Frenchman as soon as we cut off their supply of illegally obtained technical information. There's a reason they haven't invented anything important since the age of Rome.
>>76347347
>an airlock
>has been in sci fi since before the space race
>is now cutting edge for subs
Seriously?
Please do. No seriously, do it.
I wish a sane government would dominate everything so it would force sanity back into this one at the end of a gun.
>>76348418
Tech means f all with numbers. The Nazis basically fought with the weapons of the 1950s and the allies (sadly) won by throwing bodies at them
You may be able to beat them everywhere else but if you invaded China they could arm even just half their population with bolt actions and still have more soldiers than you have citizens
>inb4 nukes
Thinking you could nuke them and not get likewise fucked up or possibly drag the whole world to nuclear war is stupid. No nukes its unrealistic and we would both lose anyway
>>76347936
That's stupid. China's military wasn't even unified until God Emperor Xi took control of it. They're poorly trained, even more poorly equipped, and they have no combat experience.
China lost to recently unified Vietnam after America took out 3 million of them. They couldn't even invade Vietnam. Even without any of the restrictions the American army had, like "don't shoot until they shoot at you".
Chinese military is insultingly bad. Even Russia could beat them in a ground war, and look how much they struggled in fucking GEORGIA
>>76349057
>the Nazis basically fought with tech of the 1950's
How to show you know nothing in one easy sentence
>>76345699
is that the african chinese hybrid they've been developing
>>76349057
We could certainly nuke them and then shoot down their shitty 60's era missles. They're not even close to Russia tier.
>>76348944
So you were defeated on the home front
Serves you right for defeating hitler and setting us back 100 years
>>76349238
No argument there, leaf. :(
>>76345877
>>76346666
Yes we all saw how infallible submarine warfare obviously is....
WAIT WHAT THE FUCK IS THE AT-LAN-TIC?
For real bro Nazis used submarines which were heavily butt fucked by destroyers and literally basic efforts to stop them.
Once Britain stopped being stupid and wanted to protect its cargo ships, the wolf packs were done for. They lost over 90% of crews during the war.
I'm so scared of submarines bro
>>76348944
True this, South VN would actually win the war, if libtards not holding American down. And we will have second South Korea
>>76346862
>icbms
>global thermonuclear war
He doesn't know what Long range tomahawks are.
He doesn't know about the Thor program.
Three gorges goes down in 15 minutes of China declaring war, 11 minutes later we receive China's unconditional surrender.
I knew a few Chinese kids...
They said that Chinese soldiers are scared as fuck to fight because they know their families will only get a message "ching chong lee was lost, but he isn't dead, we just don't know where he is."
>>76348689
can't decode this sentence
>>76348835
anti-racism has infiltrated every pore of our government except the military. china remains our strategic enemy because the pentagon decided this was a non-negotiable aspect of american security.
they didn't bend to anti-racist pressure. they didn't bend to feminist pressure. tehy decided that the military literally DOES NOT MATTER.
>>76349057
>zerg rush matters in 21st century warfare
this is how you know leafs/chinkaboos don't know what the fuck they're talking about
>>76349016
lurk moar.
>>76349168
>tech
No just weapons
Assault rifles
Better tanks
Jet planes
>>76349348
>comparing WW2 diesel torpedo subs to modern nuclear missile subs
Man I love Canadians
>>76349238
We played our part in that to you self righteous prick.
Go play outside little boy.
>>76345166
Wgaf?
Call me when they get to the South American Sea.
China can have the
>South
>CHINA
>Sea
>>76346406
>Muh historical waters
Fuckin chinks, why cant they share it with all of us
>ALL THEIR GEAR IS MADE IN CHINA
>>76347358
That's a way harder to stop "missile", though. Modern anti-missiles rely on deforming the missiles so they become ineffective. The rod would still crash down with insane power, maybe it'd miss the main target by a bit, but it would at least still hit.
Also, the rod itself has not much tech to it. It's just a tungstanium rod, with not much else to it
>>76349471
>assault rifles
Insignificant
>better tanks
Incorrect
>Jet planes
Horribly engineered jet engines, barely operational planes. Even then the ME 262 was only months ahead of the British jet fighter the Meteor.
>>76349514
Unlike America we were basically forced to by our alliance with Britain
The Americans had the opportunity to sign a deal with hitler but noo "muh poor joos being oppressed"
>>76349746
>chink
>share
They are going to kill you for your last shekel senpai
Anyone else want to see nuclear depth charges like the W-44 in action? I wonder how close a sub could get and still survive. Bet thats all heavily classified tho
>>76348961
No, they would literally starve.
China cant do jack. Straits of Malacca is well out of their reach, and this isnt even facotring the Indian Ocean region where Cbina would be anally devasted with their littoral navy. Long-Range attacks would just reveal their position and have incredibly low chance of hitting.
Meanwhile a secondary force would be sent to liberate Tibet and Xijang, further straining supply lines.
This isnt even including allies, of which China has exactly none. Russia would just quadruple the price of oil and gas going to China while laughing themselves all the way to the bank.
>>76349057
They have a million man army and so do we.
The difference is ours is not conscripted and is well trained. They also do not have the logistical ability to fight a long term non nuclear war even in their own country.
Thinking they could supply their 500m military age population with even simple bolt rifle is fool hardy. They couldn't even do it with 50m
>>76349348
A FUCKING LEAF
>>76349820
German declared war on us you fucking moron.
THIS IS A BAIT THREAD
IGNORE THE CANADIAN POSTERS
NO EDUCATED ARGUMENTS ARE HAPPENING HERE
I was just experimenting
And now have proof
One gets more (you)s by shitposting instead of being logical
>>76349490
Thanks bro I like you too!
I wonder if destroyers are 1950's tech too, and if THEY FUCKING DESTROY shit like submarines still.
I bet they dont, the name is misleading
>>76349490
>Man I love Canadians
I don't, 90% of the posters are either braindead underageb& or JIDF proxyfagging to further divide the white race.
>>76349471
Funny how Nazi Germany apparently had the "tanks of the fifties" but Shermans saw use well into the 60s.
>>76350099
They aren't even real Canadians, every leaf in this thread is a Chink from Vancouver.
>>76350079
They'd just form body walls then
You do not realize how really cheap and meaningless life is in China
>>76345166
>That one guy on the left
bet he's high as fuck
>>76350143
The other 10% are Asian or Paki like this guy
You also have to consider that China is basically continuously teetering on the verge of collapse . Their economy is based entirely on simple manufacturing that is rapidly automating. They've managed to supress dissent so far with stuff like the great firewall, but add a war to that and it would implode like Tsarist Russia
STOP RESPONDING TO THIS THREAD
Sage in all fields, niggers
>>76349126
the chinese wouldn't be fighting an offensive war, dolt
we would clearly be attempting to invade them, from our current pattern of >destabilize region >accuse of human rights abuses >invade
china has ground forces without experience because they don't have 40 years of using sand niggers as target practice like we do. but their tech is just astep behind ours. troops with guns aren't going to destroy carriers. land to sea missiles will destroy carriers.
we've never fought a symmetric war since ww2. pray tell how our forces of 80 iq niggers and women are going to fight a land war in china with their supply chain destroyed
>>76350309
No, the other 10% would be people who actually have knowledge on the topic they are posting about. You'll know who's the ten percent when you don't have several replies pointing out the nationality.
But hey, keep sliding these threads, chicom.
>>76350221
>chink from Vancouver
>not realizing that cuckgary has more chinks than Vancouver
"Let me educate you on how Canada works"
-every burger ever
>>76346937
the noisiest subs on the planet
no one is forgetting
>>76350251
Yeah that's probably what they would do.
But we most likely have different opinions on the effectiveness of that.
>>76350143
The other 10% are Asian or Paki like this guy >>76350487
you think you are on some kind of crusade against your own nation, when in reality you are just even more autistic than they are
Played yourself
The chinese claim is fucking insane.
>>76350130
KYS M8. G'DAY CUNT
>>76350099
Nope japs declared war on you
You never had to fight hitler in fact that was the right time to offer him friendship
But nope it's always "hurr durr muh freedom muh rights muh no oppression"
>>76350463
We don't even need to accuse China of human rights violations. The Chinese military isn't the "Chinese" military, it's the "CCP" military, which we have already accused of violating human rights several times, especially in 1989.
It wouldn't be hard. We would throatfuck anyone holding a gun. The Chinese populace can't even wield rakes without getting shat on by the secret police, so it's not a hard distinction to make. It would be a quick as fuck war, ending with us getting nuked as the CCP collapses.
>>76350863
You're even starting to suck at being a troll.
Kill yourself, preferably after killin Trudeau.
>>76350463
Why fight a land war?
Just destroy the navy, blocade the country and shell every city and port and send a few tomahawks at every major infastructure, airport, and power plant. No lights, no food, no communication.
Send small special forces units to liberate Tibet and Ughyristan.
>>76350725
Do you really have the capability of killing 1.2 billion without nuclear retaliation?
Most of The Chinese are gonna die before surrendering
>>76347695
How was Vietnam and Cuba?
>>76350826
>Americans unable to grasp the concept of Destroyers destroying
God these people are full retard I swear, what do they teach them in schools?
China is #1
This is undisputed!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eJ_WNu4AfY
GO CHINA. SWEEP THE OLYMPICS!!
>>76351051
You are FAR over estimating how many Chinese would be willing to die for their communist overlords.
>>76351051
They aren't that loyal. Most of the Chinese can't fight back. The country has 1.5 billion people, 20% of the world's population, and only 4 million are armed. We wouldn't even put a dent in their population.
>>76346917
nice shorts trevor
>>76351054
Vietnam is the meme of the uneducated man.
Cuba was CIA, not armed forces.
b8m8 FUCK YOU LEAFS
>>76349374
ay, based vietnamese
why does china copy literally everything
>>76349901
whatever you say buddy
I'm sure sometime soon niggers will also learn to read
Daily reminder China has a supersoldier program under the guise of their WEIGHTLIFTING olympic program in an attempt to create an army of super humans
>>76351051
wont have to when hundreds of millions of them start facing starvation, their kids don't have shit to eat, their parents start dying etc.
You don't have to physically kill every person in the country to win a war you absolute dipshit
>>76351292
America is producing destroyers that will have fucking rail guns and lasers to explode missiles and planes....
>HURR DURR SUBMWAINES FTW
>>76345877
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfVyrK5k0d8
>>76351721
He's right on the money, stop being an idiot
>>76351721
not an argument chink
>>76351054
>How was vietnam
good, until liberals came around
>how was cuba
we literally stopped them from getting nukes
>>76351810
China is producing an army of super soldiers m8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Dw_oypcFLU
![image065[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/8Vd2z4o.jpg "image065[1].jpg")
>>76351054
>How was Vietnam
Paris Peace Accords, 1973. We have the official victory.
>>76350976
our and their land to sea missiles are within mutual destruction range. to blockade important areas they need to put themselves within range of china's land to sea platforms.
we literally can't hurt them without throwing our entire military into the grinder. then we're both left withot navies, and whereas the US loses ALL of its influence, because we ONLY have military influence, china loses nothing. its strategy is trade.
>>76352159
Why do you continue acting like you know anything when you actually know nothing?
>>76351845
Don't forget that India and China have been getting angry at each other again. If India wanted to team up with the US, we'd have that whole Indian Ocean thing sorted out by the end of the year.
What about internal conflict in China? The place is corrupt as hell, I'm sure some faction would use the crisis as a cover to seed to power. On top of that, Tienanmen Square 2.0 when?
>>76352159
China would literally lose 3/4s of population at minimum and at least half thei country.
US would just rebuild their ships.
>>76352582
We would lose a VERY minimal amount of ships. Hardly an entire fleet. This guy has NO clue what he's talking about.
>>76352491
CCP wont last another 30 years.
They will collapse by 2040 in a Civil War
>>76347358
you cant shoot down an unpowered kinetic space projectile
>>76352033
you realise that all olympic weightlifters use performance enhancing drugs right
>>76352772
>south Sea instillation become pirate bases
>Kevin Costner water world scenario
Oh god the humanity
>>76349746
>share
remember that they are the jews of east Asia
>>76352491
China has a kind of small jingoist cult like those that killed that Japanese ambassador, but outside of that and the Party, Chinese people have no concept of loyalty, least of all to the nation. They might be kept back from an economically costly war by the people simply refusing to tolerate it, or they might see massive sabotage and flight.
Literally everyone hates china. All of their asian neighbors except retard korea, Tibet and the western China muzzies. It would basically be a chink prison gang rape.
>>76345860
>infrastructure obliterated
>land irradiated
>producing submarines
>>76353144
Don't forget that they have #3 and #4 most powerful militaries in the world on their border, along with angry Viets, Japs, Gooks, and Thai.
>Poos invade through Tibet
>Russkies invade through Inner Mongolia and Manchuria
>Naval battle against US, Japan, Indonesia, Phillipines, India, and likely Australia and Malaysia
>Thailand hits their food-growing province
>All China has left is their shitty mountainous regions and polluted rural areas
They would be fucked by the first month. They can't defend their huge fucking borders against the massive militaries they pissed off.
>>76353463
>land irradiated
This is completely unnecessary.
We would bitch slap China so hard with conventional warfare that nukes wouldn't even be considered.
>>76352582
we can't even pave roads. we pay murderers to stop murdering.
the dream that us military might wil last longer than another 20 years is wishful thinking
>>76353651
Are you going to pull shit out of your ass all night?
>>76353144
All their neighbors that hate them are weak as fuck and are American vassals. Did you live under a rock when China and Russia were becoming buddy buddy?
>>76353629
The CCP is going to fire every last nuke they have when they're sure they're going to lose. Granted, they don't have too many nukes - India and Pakistan both have about as much if not more, but they still have enough to cause lasting harm.
China is dogshit
Any America or westerner who prepares for the the next "Chinese century" should be shot in the head
Chinese are the worst
These people have no souls
>>76351200
>>76351142
Tell me what you plan to do with over 1billion Chinese after you defeat them imagine how much it would cost to station enough military there to keep them in line?
>>76353823
>Japan
>South Korea
>Vietnam
>Thailand
>India
>The 'stans
Are you crazy? India fucking HATES China, and they're the military right behind China's in power.
>>76353830
I suppose, but at that point us firing nukes would be purely retaliatory and not necessary to defeat the chinks.
Bottom line, if we ever go to war with China, get as far away from any major city that you can.
USA vs. China = USA easy win
USA vs. China/Russia = End of America
>>76350497
The propulsion slaves make a lot of noise pedaling with those rusted chains.
>>76345166
Would be nice to finally nuke China.
>>76353909
What the fuck are they going to do? Shoot us with their non-existent guns?
We'd just let Taiwan take over again, or split up all of China into different territories. Give Inner Mongolia to Mongolia, give Xijiang to Kyrgyzstan, revive Tibet, and then ??? with the other provinces.
>>76353101
Yea I couldnt see the people tolerating it there, massive industrial accident every month. Bad food security, god it would be horrific. Do any of the south East Asian countries help them or get annexed? Middle east area?
>>76350786
This is why the Chinese will lose
Even a 5yr old can see that the Chinks are subhuman assholes
This is exactly what the history textbooks will say about WWIII
China is the aggressor
>9dash line
>build islands
>piss off all of your neighbors
>start an arms race with the americans
and this is why china is a radioactive trash heap today kids
>>76354037
Why does this topic draw the attention of people who have no reason to opine.
>>76354008
They're probably only going to hit the West Coast, so nothing of value lost.
But yeah, war with China means get the fuck away from California, Alaska, Washington, Oregon, and Nevada.
>>76354077
They would just nuke us back you retard
>>76354210
kek chinese nukes would just fall apart in flight. Ones that made it here would probably fail to detonate.
>>76354037
Its simple
Trump ends NATO and lets the Russians cuck the faggot westerners
Buddy up with Putin to slaughter ISIS
In return Russia pledges to back USA vs China
Trump rebuilds American navy, gets the debt under control and restarts the economy
Problem solved and we don't even have to fight the chinks, they will see the writing on the wall
>>76352582
>China would literally lose 3/4s of population at minimum and at least half thei country.
No even necessary. Once their factory drones start losing their job manufacturing fake dog shit they'll riot. China had to bring in troops from outer provinces in order to end the Tiananmen Square protests because the one's in Beijing couldn't be trusted. What do you think one similar sized riots break out all over the country. The CCP will also have to deal with uprisings in Tibet and hong kong along with an emerging middle class that can't get enough of the western lifestyle. The whole country would quickly collapse and America won't have to land a single non sf troop till afterwards when china find hundreds of thousands of American led peace keepers on their soil been welcomed with open arms by most of the population.
>>76353950
Half those countries won't do shit because of Chinese economic influence, and do you really think India will attack China? What do they have, guns that fire poo?
>forgetting to add the Philippines since he's a retard
>>76354154
You talk like a fag and your shits all retarded
>even our Navy shitposts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqFVOL7mLd4
>>76354210
China has less than 1/10th the nukes we do, and they have a way harder time of delivering them. We have the airforce and navy that would be controlling the Pacific. They'd have to fire from China itself.
>>76345860
And then straight to bottom of ohshern two howa latuh becrauze contraktah no purr in rilverts to save munree.
>>76353788
you clearly don't have an actual job
we don't make our own planes anymore. paving roads is twice as expensive in america as any other country per square foot. we pay 3x per pupil and get WORSE scores. we have the highest rate of violence in the developed world, the highest rates of drug abuse.
HALF of our universities and science departments are staffed by chinese. they send the secrets back to china. the DoJ tried to round about a thousand of them up last year, about 500 every year before that, and they had to release them because our math, engineering, and hysics departments were falling apart without them.
tell me friend, what can we actually do, when we depend on foreigners to first, develop our military tech, then manufacture it for us, then run it, then FUND it with bonds?
please educate me. we can't even pave our own roads. china is repairing OUR schools for us and buying out federal and municipal assets.
>>76354085
>this nigger actually believes the US could invade mainland China
>>76354431
You're insane
Fucking retarded armchair general white boys
>country couldn't even defeat bamboo hat Charlies in rice paddies, or durkas in caves
>genuinely thinks they can defeat a fucking nuclear armed great power
top kek
MANDATORY READING FOR THIS THREAD
EDUCATE YOURSELF
>its actually a fast read and very informative
>>76354297
China can shoot down satellites. Never underestimate your enemy. They can have subs off the west coast in hours
>>76354340
Philippines don't necessarily mind China, apart from China buying up valuable land in Manila and the whole South China Sea thing.
And yes, are you crazy? India fucking hates China. Almost more than they hate Pakistan. India spends a ton of money on their military instead of industrializing further. They also benefit for taking out a competing economy that's cutting off trade routes for India. Why the hell wouldn't India attack China, especially since China backs Pakistan in the first place.
>>76354113
many countries are backing out of this. china has been the #1 investor in thai and philippine infrastructure for the last 10 years.
>>76354395
our nuclear launches function off floppy disks
>>76353830
The CCP leadership is ridiculously corrupt and power hungry. Expect and very quick coup from all the non suicidal people that want to keep their piece of the pie.
>>76345699
Photoshop zerg face pls
>>76354457
I don't believe it, I know it. America's military is the most advanced and well equipped in the world. China's has the most population. Every US soldier could take out 500 Chinks.
>>76354395
they have subs too. it's impossible to patrol the entire pacific ocean
>>76354457
>this gringo doesnt even know that all you need to do is bomb the shit out of the wealthy coastal cities.
>>76354563
Which side are you talking about? Vietnam defeated China too. Multiple times. In fact the Phillipines routinely scares the Chinese away.
>>76354615
I don't even know, half the times Indians talk about how badly they want to ally with China to take over the world as superpowers in the near future, the other times they are completely fixated on becoming friends with everyone and branding themselves as the country of peace.
we badly need an excuse to go to war with China anyway
>>76354340
India hates China because of their loss with Jammu and Kashmir. Chinks also supported Pakis so yeah, that adds to their hate
>>76354681
>our nuclear launches function off floppy disks
So? It's far more secure. They'd have to physically go to where our nukes are held to gain access to them. Don't be one of those retards that thinks that them running on floppies is a bad thing.
>>76354802
Yes, but we also have far closer bases (Japan, South Korea, Hawaii, Alaska), and we can detect their subs easily since they're extremely poorly made and loud as fuck.
>>76345166
>those uniforms
Is there nothing they don't copy for this West?
>>76345166
I honestly don't know why the government cares
>>76354085
Riots mass starvation not to mention how people love to make you yanks look like the bad guys. What's the point of taking them over? They have nothing you'd need and it would cost too much even to just exterminate them
What we should really do is stretch out a hand with them and Russia and form a united front against Islam.
>>76351342
Boy you never heard of the Spanish American war did you?
>daily reminder that war isn't going to happen, and we will go on as mutually beneficial trade partners
>>76354315
>on the wall
Those words made me chuckle a little
>>76354841
Those are shitposters, man. The actual Indians hate China for being such huge assholes. China is building roads through Northern India and claiming it as Chinese land, backing India's #1 greatest enemy, blocking Indian trade in the SCS, competing with them in every market imaginable, and draining rivers that run into India to divert the water for their own purposes.
The Indians hate the Chinese far more than we hate the Mexicans.
>>76354765
Tyrone, do you have any conception of how big China really is? It would be literally impossible for you to occupy the interior unless you literally exterminated the Chinese as you went, and even then you'd just mobilize more support against you. And this is setting nuclear war aside, because we all know that nuclear armageddon would be the last resort of any modern great power about to be annihilated.
>>76354806
How well did that work out for Japan in WWII, Pedro?
>>76354615
PI is the only country to have not tried to genocide its overseas community every 20 years or so. I forsee a shift in relations as china gets vietnam, malaysia, and PI to compete for the privilege of being a shipping hub.
>Can the United States defeat China in conventional war
Yes, with our Pacific fleet alone.
>>76355035
Everyone already hates China, man. We could easily blame the invasion on them being too aggressive, war crimes, crimes against humanity, force projection in the South China Sea, trying to corrupt democracy in Taiwan and South Korea, propping up North Korea...
We don't need justification. As long as we don't preemptively nuke them, we'd be keen.
>>76354883
As if we didn't have a problem with them in our country already
If China went to war there would be another "refugee" crisis. Guess where they would be flooding to
Do you really want an excuse for mass Chinese migration to western countries
>>76354995
I just see too many leaks or entry points for a nuke to get into America. which is why both sides will have to agree not to use them in WW3
all the nuke test footage is 40+ years old i can only imagine the destruction a modern nuke could do
>>76355303
they might help you with your muslim problem. just sayin' nigel jr.
>>76350976
>blocade the country
That's why we're building a gas/oil pipelines, iron roads, bridges etc to china right now. Can't let you win fast, hehehe.
>>76355282
>Everyone already hates China
Everybody already hates you, amerinigger. Pic related, it's a map of who is viewed as the greatest threat to world peace, by country.
>>76348799
That's Burt Mancuso's boat.
>>76355561
China kills 40 million in like 70 years, the US kills 3 million since 1776. The US is a greater threat.
棋高一着
中国人民解放军无缘战胜美国海军。美国海军的能力会让他们马到成功。
![provmap[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/A8EJnXI.png "provmap[1].png")
>>76355195
Nigger, are you retarded?
1. The Chinese don't have weapons. It's illegal to own A N Y weapon in China. They are more disarmed than the fucking Swedes.
2. Half of China hates being China anyways. Inner Mongolia wants to be Mongolia again. Manchuria hates China. Tibet wants to be independent. Xinjiang wants to stop being genocided. Qinghai is a fucking desert, Sichuan is a bunch of rural farmers and overpopulated cities, Guangdong isn't very loyal to the CCP, and Taiwan wants to be officially independent.
3. Our military is far stronger than the CCP military
4. Many Chinese are already on the verge of rebelling because of mistreatment, economic downturn, pollution, and lack of support from the Government
It's so clear cut.
>>76355465
there won't be an actual war, contrary to what all these us stronk idiots think.
america can't even keep the murder rates down in metro areas. where I live in california the roads are practically undriveable because 80% of car fatalities are caused by spics and people then have to pay their entire cost, medical and vehicle, out of pocket.
they're setting cars on fire and shooting whites.
america can't last. there will be no war.
in the mexican slums, the water isn't drnkable, and the roads are more filth and filled with rubbish than in fucking thailand.
there will BE NO war
>>76355667
Everyone hates you for two main reasons
>biggest exporter of degeneracy of all time
>constantly meddles in the political affairs of almost every country on earth
>>76355713
you are insane
>>76355561
That map is based off of anecdotal evidence by people who answered a survey. Either way
>Kenya
TOP FUCKING KEK EVERY TIME
>>76355667
Those 40 million deaths are just China doing its part to reduce overpopulation. The US could learn a thing or two from them.
>>76355777
Are you retarded? Very few countries actually hate us. Russia didn't hate us until Nigger in Chief fucked their economy.
That map you posted, which is heavily biased and funded by fucking anti-American liberals, shows which people singled out for survey said was the biggest threat to world peace, not which one they hated.
>>76355713
i hope not that's a great way to disarm the American population
draft everyone to china mainland to fight while the UN comes to patrol America
>>76355713
Holy shit, you're fucking stupid. We aren't solving the problem because it's seen as oppressive to do so. That has nothing to do with war, it's a domestic issue.
Here's your (you) anyways.
>>76352077
>le America didn't lose Vietnam meme
We flat out lost Vietnam anon. We were doomed to lose from the beginning. Just accept it.
>>76347127
>>76355682
我们看书才不可能。无用了
>>76356206
We quite literally won. The "we lost Vietnam XD" meme didn't happen until 1975, 2 years after we officially won.
After that, we pulled out, and we never sent troops back in to defend South Vietnam when the North came calling collect.
>>76356206
>heh we totally lost see I just said so, that makes it a true statement
>>76355561
France, Canada, Italy. Britain, and Poland confirmed for not being faggots.
>>76356168
our military strength is unrelated to our economy and domestic political efficacy? interesting thesis dr. dumbass. I'd love to see an example of a country waging a multi-year war where our citizens were being killed by nigger rioters in the streets
>>76355704
>1. The Chinese don't have weapons. It's illegal to own A N Y weapon in China. They are more disarmed than the fucking Swedes.
So were the Soviet citizens in WWII you fucking moron, are you implying China, with its vast manufacturing capability, wouldn't be able to turn out millions of arms?
>2. Half of China hates being China anyways. Inner Mongolia wants to be Mongolia again. Manchuria hates China. Tibet wants to be independent. Xinjiang wants to stop being genocided. Qinghai is a fucking desert, Sichuan is a bunch of rural farmers and overpopulated cities, Guangdong isn't very loyal to the CCP, and Taiwan wants to be officially independent.
Spoken like someone who truly knows nothing about modern China. Mongolia (the country) is literally half owned by China, and the population of Inner Mongolia is very much assimilated. Manchuria is literally irrelevant. Xinjiang and Qinhai hold very few resources or capability of challenging CCP.
As for
>Guangdong isn't very loyal to the CCP
Just laughable. If you think the citizens of a country won't rally behind it if they're being literally fucking invaded, you're a moron, and you need to read some more history.
>3. Our military is far stronger than the CCP military
Of course, but you still don't have the manpower to occupy a massive landmass composed of more than a billion people. Not even in Hitler's wildest wet dreams was that a possibility, like I said, you would need to exterminate the Chinese (like Hitler planned for the Slavs) or else you would fail, and that's something the American people would never tolerate.
>4. Many Chinese are already on the verge of rebelling because of mistreatment, economic downturn, pollution, and lack of support from the Government
KEK SUPREME. You've been watching too much Fox, the Chinese economy is doing great, it's just having a correction, and the CCP is the most secure it's been in decades.
>It's so clear cut.
To an Amerinigger with a 4th grade education, perhaps
