hey so I just got an idea
since super pacs are technically not supposed to be affiliated with any candidate or coordinate with them
Can't someone make a subversive super pac
like, pretend to be pro-Hillary for example and then make really shitty ads
"Vote for Hillary. Women are just better. It's her turn"
something really non-PC and bound to piss people off
Is this even legal?
>>76255242
Man we could make something great if this is legal
Trump probably did something similar by infiltrating the anti-Trump PACs.
If it isn't illegal why aren't more people doing it? If they do it subtle enough they even have plausible deniability.
The lack of a "I'm ___ _____, and I approve of this message." at the end of the ad would break the illusion rather quickly
>>76256021
That's the thing. Super PACs are required by law to not be officially affiliated or collaborate with campaigns. Do a quick search of different candidates' PAC commercials and none of them end with "I'm X and I support this message"
They all end with "SomePac is responsible for the contents of this message" or something to that effect.
>>76255477
>proud to be a cuck
My fucking sides.
/pol/ PAC when? Can we do this?
>>76257682
bump for this
tv ads are expensive
ESPECIALLY during campaign season
DUDE SOMEBODY SHOULD BUY A NEW FERRARI AND PUT IT UNDER A HYDRAULIC PRESS AND CRUSH IT. IMAGINE THE REACTION. SOMEBODY DO THAT
>>76260520
But there are already pro-Trump super pacs, can't they funnel a portion of their funds into a new pac (PAC donors are anonymous) that masquerades as a pro-Hillary pac?
>>76260935
Or even the RNC's billion dollar war chest for the general should be more than enough for a few subversive ads, no?
>>76255242
the issue is that big donors won't donate to your pac unless you have people with experience and a solid track record; because there is no way a "subversive" super pac can get these kinds of people to commit career suicide, the big donors will stay away.
On OP's note, could someone get nominated for low-level office like state senate for the democrats and then purposely tank the election and try and sully the parties name as much as possible without being fraud or something?
